Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
All ah spann customers and renters are non unc people. He real love demThe_Honourable wrote:rspann wrote:These police wicked. She innocent. She was cleared by the integrity commission and shitkickers.
Allyuh so don’t like to see black people strive. Is only fight down. Can't take down that strong black woman. I PRAY! that she will be protected by the angels.
Redman wrote:Gladiator wrote:Redman wrote:Pretty soon no one will want to serve.
This is where the politics going.
Optics is the substance
So you saying to leave them to their corrupt and nasty behavior...
HYPOTHETICALLY What if Simonettehad a drinking problem at the time ..and has been sober since...would you still disqualify him from the office?
second thatpaid_influencer wrote:DUI is one bad drive away from manslaughter. people that drive drunk are a next level of kakahole.
shake d livin wake d dead wrote:http://www.guardian.co.tt/article-6.2.423687.1befd21de8
Lawyer name looks familiar...allyuh really feel he resign just because of that dui...or it have more thing...
You do know that David Muhammad is a Trini/Brit Afro, right?one eye wrote:David Muhammad is a mind bender. if you listen to him and follow him you will see subtly how his aim is victory for Kamla and UNC. Both Cudjoe and Kambron all the same.
Racial Indo Hindus will always try to bring down Africans in this land!!!
rspann wrote:Simonette is one of the top lawyers in the land. Very decent guy too. It doesn't even have to be a drinking problem, a lot of people drink and it could have been his unlucky time. The problem I would worry about is his judgement. Why drive if you know you above the limit. Growlers has bad judgement too. Look at some of the people he put up and the problems he had with them.
one eye wrote:David Muhammad is a mind bender. if you listen to him and follow him you will see subtly how his aim is victory for Kamla and UNC. Both Cudjoe and Kambron all the same.
Racial Indo Hindus will always try to bring down Africans in this land!!!
Redman wrote:rspann wrote:Simonette is one of the top lawyers in the land. Very decent guy too. It doesn't even have to be a drinking problem, a lot of people drink and it could have been his unlucky time. The problem I would worry about is his judgement. Why drive if you know you above the limit. Growlers has bad judgement too. Look at some of the people he put up and the problems he had with them.
I am not holding a brief for or against the man.
So a singular transgression is enough to prevent anyone serving..regardless of
A- its relevance,
B his qualifications for the job in question.
That's a very high bar.
I would say unrealistically high.
I feel that we lose too much quality talent that we as a country very much need...to secular transient politics.
Is this the case with Simonette?
one eye wrote:This is all a plot by the unc and the cabal to win elections buttttt how can Christian Africans vote for a racial ethnic pagan religious HINDU CULT that has always been as Dr. Eric Williams told us.
She is a woman of high standards and excellent morals stop dragging her name in the mud!
one eye wrote:This is all a plot by the unc and the cabal to win elections buttttt how can Christian Africans vote for a racial ethnic pagan religious HINDU CULT that has always been as Dr. Eric Williams told us.
She is a woman of high standards and excellent morals stop dragging her name in the mud!
pugboy wrote:A foreign dui carry more weight than a local
No. But because this is reportedly "new information", it indicates that he did not (and does not) have the ethics to declare it to his party leadership in advance. That is enough to disqualify him in my books...Redman wrote:Gladiator wrote:Redman wrote:Pretty soon no one will want to serve.
This is where the politics going.
Optics is the substance
So you saying to leave them to their corrupt and nasty behavior...
HYPOTHETICALLY What if Simonettehad a drinking problem at the time ..and has been sober since...would you still disqualify him from the office?
sMASH wrote:but, he get some points for his rage quit. the report say minutes before his swearing in, he got the call that it cancelled. and then he renounce himself as the senator. like, he didnt like how he was being involved in a circus, so he opted to bow out and not be part of anything.
and the next ting, as with big mac's second dismissal, rowlers may have further info that is not available to the public as he is head of security council.
and doh get vex with citizens or opposition, is rowlers that blank him, not us.
hydroep wrote:The Integrity Commission, ODPM, EMA all of these are "legitimizing bodies" to take the responsibility off of those in High Office.
If those bodies make a decision and things turn out good Government will say "We made the right call" and if things turn out badly "Is their (i.e. the IC, ODPM, EMA etc.) fault".
Sh!tkicker cannot blame the IC in this case. There was too much circumstantial evidence surrounding Big Mac's activities for him to just claim that the Integrity Commission cleared her. Now he wants to throw them under the bus?
Foolish man is the most incompetent Prime Minister this country has ever seen...
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 57 guests