Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
shogun wrote:Not true. In fact the media helped him get as far as he did. If you go look at the Republican primaries, the media was covering Trump even more than candidates doing better in the polls, at the time. However, because Trumps statements and actions got more traction they abdicated their duty and disproportionately covered him over the other candidates.
Romney and Palin had equally loyal followers. Trump's more polarizing nature just makes it seem that way. Couple that with the fact that the ALT-Right nuts and White supremacist groups swarm internet polls, forums and rabidly inundate them with comments and attack anyone that disagrees has just made his followers reputation worse. These are basically the SAME people that supported Romney and Palin.
Do you know there were 13 similar attacks on consulates and embassies which resulted in even more American deaths under Bush? For some strange reason though Republicans have NEVER conducted a SINGLE investigation into ANY of those. Only the ONE that occured under Hillary. How convenient. The Benghazi investigation has the notoriety of being the longest investigation of it's kind in history and cost tax payers $2M. Yet, they found nothing. So it's strange to hear Trump supporters routinely ask for her to be jailed when the Republican led investigation turned up nothing indictable. Again, strange.
Lastly, it's interesting that you're blaming Hillary for the Russian situation when Putin is clearly being the aggressor. What is the US to do? Trumps strategy of blushing every time Putin compliments him, will only put the US in more danger. Putin is Ex-KGB, while Trump is well... Trump
De Dragon wrote:^^ But what about the other media that carry the unflattering Trump stories? Are so many of them biased as well?
De Dragon wrote:The thing is Trump seems to have arrived at a perfect moment in history where many Americans are jaded by the status quo. Rather than build intelligently on that we get misogyny, xenophobia, which contestant was too unattractive to molest etc. Hilary is widely disliked, but her team is more adept at managing her so that she says the right things. Trump, well............
De Dragon wrote:The thing is Trump seems to have arrived at a perfect moment in history where many Americans are jaded by the status quo. Rather than build intelligently on that we get misogyny, xenophobia, which contestant was too unattractive to molest etc. Hilary is widely disliked, but her team is more adept at managing her so that she says the right things. Trump, well............
Daran wrote:De Dragon wrote:The thing is Trump seems to have arrived at a perfect moment in history where many Americans are jaded by the status quo. Rather than build intelligently on that we get misogyny, xenophobia, which contestant was too unattractive to molest etc. Hilary is widely disliked, but her team is more adept at managing her so that she says the right things. Trump, well............
Whether he is intentially doing this or not, Trump represents a big portion of American views. You can argue that a more intelligent anti-establishment candidate would never garner such support.
EFFECTIC DESIGNS wrote:
But to my surprise the Wikileaks from Hillary has actually shown that some of these conspiracies are actually true, color me surprised here. Now I see why Trump is so popular, he is winning this Election.
Julian Assange says he has a lot more bomb shell to drop on Hillary, lets see if he will really destroy Hillary.
Daran wrote:ED you might enjoy this, Google docs summary of some of Hillary's worst emails.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/u/ ... b&sle=true
Miktay wrote:EFFECTIC DESIGNS wrote:
But to my surprise the Wikileaks from Hillary has actually shown that some of these conspiracies are actually true, color me surprised here. Now I see why Trump is so popular, he is winning this Election.
Julian Assange says he has a lot more bomb shell to drop on Hillary, lets see if he will really destroy Hillary.
Mass Media not giving Assange coverage.
EFFECTIC DESIGNS wrote: Julian Assange says he has a lot more bomb shell to drop on Hillary, lets see if he will really destroy Hillary.
Miktay wrote:Thiz aint over by a long shot.
Hiliary needs more women 2 come forward and say theyve gotten felt up by Da Donald.
Or Donald called them names and their feelings was hurt and they self esteem went down.
EFFECTIC DESIGNS wrote:I used to pass off all these conspiracies as just nonsense for the uneducated. Rubbish like illuminati which it still is btw,
Alex Jones is still an idiot who dwell in deep dark crazy conspiracies that goes as far as satan and all this rubbish.
But to my surprise the Wikileaks from Hillary has actually shown that some of these conspiracies are actually true, color me surprised here. Now I see why Trump is so popular, he is winning this Election.
Julian Assange says he has a lot more bomb shell to drop on Hillary, lets see if he will really destroy Hillary.
COVER UP?
Ex-British Prime Minister Named in Alleged Government Pedophile Docs
Ted Heath was named in a secret government dossier about alleged pedophiles operating in parliament 30 years before he died—but the claims were never tested in court.
NICO HINES
DON HALE
08.03.15 9:14 AM ET
LONDON — Former British Prime Minister Sir Edward Heath is being investigated over child sex abuse allegations.
Ted Heath, who died in 2005, has been the subject of unsubstantiated speculation linking him to the sexual abuse of boys for years. The Daily Beast can reveal that he was named in a secret government dossier obtained by a senior Labour Party politician in 1984—but the allegations never made it to the courtroom.
Heath is now the most high-profile person named by investigators working on inquiries into an alleged VIP network of pedophiles who operated at the highest echelons of British public life.
Barbara Castle, a Member of the European Parliament at the time, said she had been given copies of classified documents from the Home Office, which oversees British law enforcement, proving there was a clandestine investigation underway into sex abusers in Parliament. The results of that investigation by government officials never wound up being published or reaching a court of law, but Castle claimed that Heath was one of those implicated.
sMASH wrote:But u would say it wasn't her, but her husband. Then u would have forgotten that she referenced his conduct, discredited his accusers, even bullying them.
She also represented a child rapist, allegedly removed evidence, and was astonished to know he had passed a polygraph test, and nested she lost faith in polygraphs.
Donald is small ting in front Hillary.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: VexXx Dogg and 65 guests