Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
eliteauto wrote:src1983 logically you're correct, however this election campaign just like the last will lean heavily on public opinion, the UNC/PP has and continues to use this tactic, Jack Warner was one of the main tacticians and strategists for the UNC/PP, remember the Manning-Mugabe parallel? Remember the many UNC media plants and UNC plants in the security services who fed information and printed exposés? What would you realistically expect JW to do with his back against the wall? JW knows the electorate as well as he knows politics, he swam with sharks so he knows what's bait, with a Gov't already tainted in the national discourse with allegations of corruption, he can do damage and create doubts with his revelations regardless of how little legal standing those revelations may have
src1983 wrote:RASC wrote:OK sure, you go ahead living your life in Black and White-By the Book and to the letter of the law...
Forget all about HUMAN NATURE ,Socio-Political Warfare and Understanding the areas of Grey/Subtext/Innuendo... I also suggest not to get into Poker-too risky for a person like you. Stick to the facts, the texts and what is written in stone.
So what you telling me it ok for the RBL to get away but good for UNC to sink correct?
This has nothing to do with the UNC, all they could really go on a podium and say is that -
"A ex-minsiter, yes people an ex-minster who has close ties to the PP was held for money laundering by the US government."
They cannot say "That minister, yes ppl that minister finance the PP"
And if they do such without hitting the banks with the same effect, I do not want such a party in power. As just like the PP they miss the real issues
Redman wrote:allyuh getting on like we have all the info.
What somebody needs to do is to tell the PM to shut up and stop going off half cocked.
Everybody knows Jack was a financier-no UNC big wig protested that label until last week.
She might have eeked by with innocent till proven guilty-but he had to come out and paint herself in the corner.
in this century you cant not know where the money is coming from.
RASC is right the connection is cemented by her lie and Jack bringing what is circumstantial evidence.
Ross will have to work double time to reverse spin this.
Jack now start....so there is more to come.
oh src1983....none of the money I contributed to the COP/UNC in 2010 was paid to the party.
All went to service providers etc.
How come the UNC or party for that matter wasn't listed in the indictments?
Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:Src I think it's quite possible to share RASC's opinion AND also question how banks allow large sums of money to be transferred without question.
Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:Src I think it's quite possible to share RASC's opinion AND also question how banks allow large sums of money to be transferred without question.
src1983 wrote:Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:Src I think it's quite possible to share RASC's opinion AND also question how banks allow large sums of money to be transferred without question.
Yea, but RASC and rfari just like many only concerned about UNC and PNM when the main issue walking by
Redman wrote:Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:Src I think it's quite possible to share RASC's opinion AND also question how banks allow large sums of money to be transferred without question.
you all missing the point.
The money is in the system-its outside the banks jurisdiction to arbitrate on how the money is spent.
and frankly the activity might be quite normal for the account-so the bank prolly would be in the clear.
locally
Redman wrote:Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:Src I think it's quite possible to share RASC's opinion AND also question how banks allow large sums of money to be transferred without question.
you all missing the point.
The money is in the system-its outside the banks jurisdiction to arbitrate on how the money is spent.
and frankly the activity might be quite normal for the account-so the bank prolly would be in the clear.
locally
src1983 wrote:Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:Src I think it's quite possible to share RASC's opinion AND also question how banks allow large sums of money to be transferred without question.
Yea, but RASC and rfari just like many only concerned about UNC and PNM when the main issue walking by
rfari wrote:src1983 wrote:Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:Src I think it's quite possible to share RASC's opinion AND also question how banks allow large sums of money to be transferred without question.
Yea, but RASC and rfari just like many only concerned about UNC and PNM when the main issue walking by
What should I also be concerned about?
src1983 wrote:Redman wrote:Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:Src I think it's quite possible to share RASC's opinion AND also question how banks allow large sums of money to be transferred without question.
you all missing the point.
The money is in the system-its outside the banks jurisdiction to arbitrate on how the money is spent.
and frankly the activity might be quite normal for the account-so the bank prolly would be in the clear.
locally
When I have to move funds from my company to myself. I need to fill a source of funds. How did jack move funds from FIFA/COCACAF to his companies accounts?
src1983 wrote:rfari wrote:src1983 wrote:Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:Src I think it's quite possible to share RASC's opinion AND also question how banks allow large sums of money to be transferred without question.
Yea, but RASC and rfari just like many only concerned about UNC and PNM when the main issue walking by
What should I also be concerned about?
How and why dirty money is being washed in our local banks with them not giving a hoot, with no penalty what so ever
PNM and UNC should be later
src1983 wrote:That is of high interest to me
src1983 wrote:frfari wrote:All a sudden pp sheep eat bulb and bright like sheit
I think I have more PNM ties than you though
Redman wrote:src1983 wrote:That is of high interest to me
SRC yuh being deliberately naive
ALL the banks have preferential treatment for certain clients
and I mean all in the world.
The more money you have with the bank/or in some cases OWE the bank -the easier it is to get stuff done.
Ive seen FCB take deposits from Chinese guy who cant speak a word of english coming in the bank with a bag of money in short pants and rubber slippers...and deposit cash that took 20 min to count....no singles
and this was done repeatedly over a period of time.
They pressure you to maintain the facade of compliance by having the minimum % of accounts with all paperwork.
numbers game
trichards80 wrote::shock::shock::shock::shock::shock::shock:
trichards80 wrote:Pnm with a 20,000,000.00 dollar check from duprey and people still waiting for their money!
K74T wrote:TV6: FBI questions Hema Ramkissoon in FIFA probe.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 51 guests