Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
adnj wrote:The withdrawal of Russian warships from Crimea is the latest indication that against all odds, Ukraine is actually winning the war at sea. When Russia first began the blockade of Ukraine’s ports on the eve of the full-scale invasion in February 2022, few believed the ramshackle Ukrainian Navy could seriously challenge the dominance of the mighty Russian Black Sea Fleet. Once hostilities were underway, however, it soon became apparent that Ukraine had no intention of ceding control of the Black Sea to Putin without a fight.
Beginning with the April 2022 sinking of the Russian Black Sea Fleet flagship, the Moskva, Ukraine has used a combination of domestically produced drones and missiles together with Western-supplied long-range weapons to strike a series of devastating blows against Putin’s fleet. Cruise missiles delivered by Kyiv’s British and French partners have played an important role in this campaign, but the most potent weapons of all have been Ukraine’s own rapidly evolving fleet of innovative marine drones.
https://www.facebook.com/Taclbery/posts ... hyueECvasl
Dohplaydat wrote:
Literally makes no difference in the actual landwar though.
sMASH wrote:Ukraine is on trouble .
They neeed to end , but one want to negotiate via a powerful world leader and the other is a comedian IMG_20240725_160851.jpg
sMASH wrote:I totally forgot , the bloggers said Russia kinsal'd up to 50 British and French trainers in Ukraine .
Yes, Russia get beat navy wise , but this war wasn't dependent on sea battles .
The 1 km per day territory acquisition rate will start to increase as the Ukraine forces wanes.
Is like doing a titration; u keep adding and adding slowly with no change until u start to see glimmers of results , until bam.... Mission accomplished .
sMASH wrote:Peole getting tie up with how long this taking.
They say if Russia has more troops why they don't flood the place and win fast.
If they send plenty more troops it would mostly mean more deaths and losses per Ukraine strike.
So they will send enough troops to deal with the Ukraine forces ...
So, u send enough to win, but not so much that it's easy to rack up easy kills.
When u watch western propaganda videos about d day , storming the beaches of Normandy , we get to think that that is how wars are fought: plenty men, all at once , hard and fast .
But no. Is really just small clumps of engagements but very many , spread out over vast areas .
Each needing specific attention to address.
Now that the Ukraine forces have been depleted , the engagements are easier and faster coming now. Advancement is speeding up.
Additionally , the fortified places have been breached and the places now don't have fortifications.... They are supposed to tho, but so much corruption , the resources didn't reach ..
That had occurred when reps was holding up funds for Ukraine , when they wanted more border spendingadnj wrote:
I dint know what to say... Its a war economy .adnj wrote:sMASH wrote:Peole getting tie up with how long this taking.
They say if Russia has more troops why they don't flood the place and win fast.
If they send plenty more troops it would mostly mean more deaths and losses per Ukraine strike.
So they will send enough troops to deal with the Ukraine forces ...
So, u send enough to win, but not so much that it's easy to rack up easy kills.
When u watch western propaganda videos about d day , storming the beaches of Normandy , we get to think that that is how wars are fought: plenty men, all at once , hard and fast .
But no. Is really just small clumps of engagements but very many , spread out over vast areas .
Each needing specific attention to address.
Now that the Ukraine forces have been depleted , the engagements are easier and faster coming now. Advancement is speeding up.
Additionally , the fortified places have been breached and the places now don't have fortifications.... They are supposed to tho, but so much corruption , the resources didn't reach ..
Hmmpf. Really?
Russia's GDP grew 5.5% year-over-year over the third quarter of 2023, according to data from the Russian government. But most of that growth is being fueled by the nation's monster military spending, Foucart said, with plans for the Kremlin to spend a record 36.6 trillion rubles, or $386 billion on defense this year.
"Military pay, ammunition, tanks, planes, and compensation for dead and wounded soldiers, all contribute to the GDP figures. Put simply, the war against Ukraine is now the main driver of Russia's economic growth" Foucart said in an op-ed for The Conversation this week.
Other areas of Russia's economy are hurting as the war drags on. Moscow is slammed with a severe labor shortage, thanks to young professionals fleeing the country or being pulled into the conflict. The nation is now short around 5 million workers, according to one estimate, which is causing wages to soar.
Inflation is high at 7.4% — nearly double the 4% target of its central bank. Meanwhile, direct investment in the country has collapsed, falling around $8.7 billion in the first three quarters of 2023, per data from Russia's central bank.
That all puts the Kremlin in a tough position, no matter the outcome of the war in Ukraine. Even if Russia wins, the nation can't afford to rebuild and secure Ukraine, due to the financial costs as well as the impact of remaining isolated from the rest of the global market.
Western nations have shunned trade with Russia since it invaded Ukraine in 2022, which economists have said could severely crimp Russia's long-term economic growth.
As long as it remains isolated, Russia's "best hope" is to become "entirely dependent" on China, one of its few remaining strategic allies, Foucart said.
Meanwhile, the costs of rebuilding its own nation are already "massive," he added, pointing to problems like broken infrastructure and social unrest in Russia.
"A protracted stalemate might be the only solution for Russia to avoid total economic collapse," Foucart wrote. "The Russian regime has no incentive to end the war and deal with that kind of economic reality. So it cannot afford to win the war, nor can it afford to lose it. Its economy is now entirely geared towards continuing a long and ever deadlier conflict."
Other economists have warned of trouble coming for Russia amid the toll of its war in Ukraine. Russia's economy will see significantly more degradation ahead, one London-based think tank recently warned, despite talk of Russia's resilience in the face of Western sanctions.
Dizzy28 wrote:Condolences to the Putin fanboys. Wagner lost 80 men in an ambush by Tuaregs in Mali.
Grey zone a notorious Russian miliblogger with lots of ukro Russo content among the dead
For context France lost 40 soldiers in their entire time in Mali20240728_111012.jpg
Prolly just America trying to bait a response .Dohplaydat wrote:Dizzy28 wrote:Condolences to the Putin fanboys. Wagner lost 80 men in an ambush by Tuaregs in Mali.
Grey zone a notorious Russian miliblogger with lots of ukro Russo content among the dead
For context France lost 40 soldiers in their entire time in Mali20240728_111012.jpg
Man if you know anything about Russia is just like uncle Sam, they will come back with full force and firetruck up a lot of innocent people.
sMASH wrote:Prolly just America trying to bait a response .Dohplaydat wrote:Dizzy28 wrote:Condolences to the Putin fanboys. Wagner lost 80 men in an ambush by Tuaregs in Mali.
Grey zone a notorious Russian miliblogger with lots of ukro Russo content among the dead
For context France lost 40 soldiers in their entire time in Mali20240728_111012.jpg
Man if you know anything about Russia is just like uncle Sam, they will come back with full force and firetruck up a lot of innocent people.
War in Ukraine remains on course as per .
Most of what we know about wars come from American movies , where they go on a vengeance mission to annihilate the group that slapped them.
Since ww2 , usa never won any wars. The best they got was winning battles and devastating regions . And then had to spend decades and billions to occupy to show some sort of competence .
As soon as they pull out, it goes back to the the peole they were fighting .
Tit for tat , with a very big tat is how America fights wars and they don't win.
What America is good at is destabilizing a region and regime change ... And that what they hoping to do...
Ukraine remains on course.
Any other engagement will be according to objectives in the area and in concordance with the regional authority .
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: ADONI, foss, Google Adsense [Bot], VexXx Dogg and 59 guests