Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
adnj wrote:Honey, you just don't see the point that was made in the first place.Dizzy28 wrote:Your'e so far down the hole you didn't realize you just made the point anyhows.adnj wrote:Dizzy28 wrote:Add Jamaica to that and any point in trying to link vaccines to deaths goes out the windowadnj wrote:
No.
Jamaica has a lower vaccinated population.
Jamaica has never had a high prevelance of recorded COVID-related deaths.
Jamaica has never been deemed a hot-spot.
Well no sheit.hover11 wrote:A new study suggests immunocompromised people who are fully vaccinated against COVID-19 are more likely to have breakthrough infections than people without weakened immune systems.
https://www.facebook.com/86680728811/po ... 744733812/
timelapse wrote:Well no sheit.hover11 wrote:A new study suggests immunocompromised people who are fully vaccinated against COVID-19 are more likely to have breakthrough infections than people without weakened immune systems.
https://www.facebook.com/86680728811/po ... 744733812/
In other news,water is wet
And first to get vaccine boosters.Kenjo wrote:timelapse wrote:Well no sheit.hover11 wrote:A new study suggests immunocompromised people who are fully vaccinated against COVID-19 are more likely to have breakthrough infections than people without weakened immune systems.
https://www.facebook.com/86680728811/po ... 744733812/
In other news,water is wet
Ent it’s like why were they vaccinated first when supplies were new and limited
Imagine if everyone who experiencing symptoms decided not to test and be under quarantine and simply went about their business because the state tests take too long....redmanjp wrote:hope they at least quarantining. they should still test as contact tracing depends on that. its not just for their own sake or to add to the stats.
DMan7 wrote:Numbers low today but then again only 465 tests done today yet 360 newly positive cases which puts it at 77.4% positivity rate.
redmanjp wrote:DMan7 wrote:Numbers low today but then again only 465 tests done today yet 360 newly positive cases which puts it at 77.4% positivity rate.
the +ve cases are always from multiple days tho
Mmoney607 wrote:People just seem intent on ignoring that vaccinated and unvaccinated can get and spread covid. So then antivaxxers should be allowed to make there points.
redmanjp wrote:Mmoney607 wrote:People just seem intent on ignoring that vaccinated and unvaccinated can get and spread covid. So then antivaxxers should be allowed to make there points.
not at the same rate. watch from 2:00
DMan7 wrote:redmanjp wrote:DMan7 wrote:Numbers low today but then again only 465 tests done today yet 360 newly positive cases which puts it at 77.4% positivity rate.
the +ve cases are always from multiple days tho
Yea I know but there is no way for us to know that information. The best we have is to put the value as daily cases / daily tests. Not even MOH puts that information out as they have "Reported in the last 24hrs" under the number of new positive cases.
Mmoney607 wrote:[soundcloud][/soundcloud]redmanjp wrote:Mmoney607 wrote:People just seem intent on ignoring that vaccinated and unvaccinated can get and spread covid. So then antivaxxers should be allowed to make there points.
not at the same rate. watch from 2:00
This is a veryyy old video.
paid_influencer wrote:DMan7 wrote:redmanjp wrote:DMan7 wrote:Numbers low today but then again only 465 tests done today yet 360 newly positive cases which puts it at 77.4% positivity rate.
the +ve cases are always from multiple days tho
Yea I know but there is no way for us to know that information. The best we have is to put the value as daily cases / daily tests. Not even MOH puts that information out as they have "Reported in the last 24hrs" under the number of new positive cases.
Hinds in his presentation often gives monthly averages of positivity rate. Last graph he put up had us at 80% positivity rate for November.![]()
redmanjp wrote:efficacy may have fallen with variants but its not zero. especially with a booster dose. u are implying that its no different and that it is in fact zero.
paid_influencer wrote:redmanjp wrote:efficacy may have fallen with variants but its not zero. especially with a booster dose. u are implying that its no different and that it is in fact zero.
not to spook anybody, but there's a possibility that vaccine effectiveness can infact fall to below zero. Negative effectiveness.
For delta prevalent nations with omicron spreading:Mmoney607 wrote:[soundcloud][/soundcloud]redmanjp wrote:Mmoney607 wrote:People just seem intent on ignoring that vaccinated and unvaccinated can get and spread covid. So then antivaxxers should be allowed to make there points.
not at the same rate. watch from 2:00
This is a veryyy old video.
Because vaccines provide some protection against passing the virus to others, the tipping point for transmission was higher. Once eight in 10 people were vaccinated, more than half of transmission came from the vaccinated.
https://www.colorado.edu/today/2021/12/ ... ad-omicron
Negative efficacy is typically a result of the study design and/or sample size where the results straddle the negative outcomes.redmanjp wrote:paid_influencer wrote:redmanjp wrote:efficacy may have fallen with variants but its not zero. especially with a booster dose. u are implying that its no different and that it is in fact zero.
not to spook anybody, but there's a possibility that vaccine effectiveness can infact fall to below zero. Negative effectiveness.
perhaps only if vaxxed ppl lower their guard and go out like dpd to a million and one limes and get infected
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 92 guests