Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Jah blessshake d livin wake d dead wrote::agrue:
Email gate was fabricated by PNM.So is the legality of this tax reform16 cycles wrote:Has that bit of legal advice been verified? i.e. a follow up from a news agency?
Very cautious about info since emailgate...
Question, I probably young on this forum but concerning referendum I know it is in our constitution but has this option ever been used in Trinidad's history, letting the people decide what is best for them?RBphoto wrote:VexXx Dogg wrote:88sins wrote:ProtonPowder wrote:personal allowance was raised twice in the last few years
From 60k to 72k, then to 84k
The bulk of the working population takes home less than 5k/month. Many weekly and fortnightly paid persons, and several government workers included, take home about 1k/week. So that tax allowance does nothing for those people.
Yuh kno, I asked this before, and nobody answered, so imma ask again.
Would it be so terrible a thing to simply abolish property taxes entirely? Considering that the people showing that they DON'T want it, and the state can't really show how the taxpayer benefits from it.
And don't say it can't be done, it's been done in several other countries.
wishful thinking.
referendum, maybe?
I guess the inability to get the required number of forms is the best referendum.
16 cycles wrote:Has that bit of legal advice been verified? i.e. a follow up from a news agency?
Very cautious about info since emailgate...
The red government doesn't want thathover11 wrote:Question, I probably young on this forum but concerning referendum I know it is in our constitution but has this option ever been used in Trinidad's history, letting the people decide what is best for them?RBphoto wrote:VexXx Dogg wrote:88sins wrote:ProtonPowder wrote:personal allowance was raised twice in the last few years
From 60k to 72k, then to 84k
The bulk of the working population takes home less than 5k/month. Many weekly and fortnightly paid persons, and several government workers included, take home about 1k/week. So that tax allowance does nothing for those people.
Yuh kno, I asked this before, and nobody answered, so imma ask again.
Would it be so terrible a thing to simply abolish property taxes entirely? Considering that the people showing that they DON'T want it, and the state can't really show how the taxpayer benefits from it.
And don't say it can't be done, it's been done in several other countries.
wishful thinking.
referendum, maybe?
I guess the inability to get the required number of forms is the best referendum.
hover11 wrote:Question, I probably young on this forum but concerning referendum I know it is in our constitution but has this option ever been used in Trinidad's history, letting the people decide what is best for them?
hover11 wrote:Question, I probably young on this forum but concerning referendum I know it is in our constitution but has this option ever been used in Trinidad's history, letting the people decide what is best for them?
zoom rader wrote:Proton is quickly proving himself a red government idiot.88sins wrote:ProtonPowder wrote:old men roleplay as revolutionaries on the internet
i feel like is 2010 tumblr all over again
old men don't role play son, they seriously defiant, because is they who have the most to lose/taking the hardest hit, know they don't want this and saying it out loud and showing it.
As opposed to the youngsters of the day, who stand for nothing, and own nothing, thus bear no cost or responsibilty, and many of whom probably gonna reach retirement age and dead still owning nothing.
People decisively choosing to not submit. Clown Inbutt is known for being a pnm liar, so it's safe to assume the numbers he's spewing are lies. I suspect they have less than half of what's required for them to start.
Doh worry, when it collapse on itself, yuh go gt with a new job prospect eventually.
16 cycles wrote:Has that bit of legal advice been verified? i.e. a follow up from a news agency?
Very cautious about info since emailgate...
Why must citizens fill out a form that you supposed tobe doing. Some people don't even have tape measure to measure their square feet. Forcing people to do your wuk and you will just guess an unjust tax figure if you carry an injun surname.ProtonPowder wrote:^^
Insufferable PNM fool
Is Rowley in Rowley MC dont submit no form
Of course if the new form is mandatad to the public using a different section of the law and Devant and Anand havent said a word, it can go straight to the JCPC using a previous judicial review case
Is Rowley MC we dont play here we all about justice for citizens
pugboy wrote:first stop to banana is silk fig
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
Property tax – thinking things through
THE EDITOR: With today being the deadline for registering one’s property for tax, I cannot help but be bemused by this ridiculous attempt to raise additional funding for the Government. If there is any doubt that the advisers of the Government are bereft of ideas, this property tax endeavour should confirm one’s suspicion.
It is clear to any sensible thinking person that five years have past since this government came into service without a cent coming in from property tax, as I predicted. Another five years will pass without a proper structure in place to assess and implement a proper property tax system. Why? one may ask. It just is not possible under this convoluted system.
Let’s think this through. There are more than 500,000 properties in TT. But for argument’s sake let’s say there were 400,000. Each form submitted must be read by someone, evaluated for errors, perhaps have someone visit the site for confirmation and then finally arrive at a value for that property. If one public servant was to complete two forms a day that would be plenty.
If 100 public servants were to be dedicated to only working on processing property tax it would take them 2,000 workdays or seven and a half years to complete the processing exercise. No time is added for site visits, days when site visits are attempted, and no one is present, or travelling to far-off areas. In the meantime, not a cent would be collected and property tax would be the burden of another administration.
Why is it so difficult for the Government to take one’s last property tax that was paid “x” years ago and add to it a percentage “y” that represents the percentage of economic growth? Thus, one’s new property tax will be the old tax plus a percentage increase in tandem with economic growth? Perhaps that would be too easy, it would not allow for the employment of temporary assessors and wastage of taxpayers’ money.
The citizens ought not to be concerned about new property taxes soon. Under the proposed system such a tax cannot happen for years. Citizens should however be concerned about registering their properties as the fines that can emanate from non-registration could make proposed property tax revenue look like pocket change.
STEVE ALVAREZ
via e-mail
My problem is not the collection if house taxes. I will gladly pay the tax.ProtonPowder wrote:http://newsday.co.tt/2021/11/30/property-tax-thinking-things-through/
An actually insightful opinion. Boomboom raider take note, this is what you should do instead of roleplay.LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
Property tax – thinking things through
THE EDITOR: With today being the deadline for registering one’s property for tax, I cannot help but be bemused by this ridiculous attempt to raise additional funding for the Government. If there is any doubt that the advisers of the Government are bereft of ideas, this property tax endeavour should confirm one’s suspicion.
It is clear to any sensible thinking person that five years have past since this government came into service without a cent coming in from property tax, as I predicted. Another five years will pass without a proper structure in place to assess and implement a proper property tax system. Why? one may ask. It just is not possible under this convoluted system.
Let’s think this through. There are more than 500,000 properties in TT. But for argument’s sake let’s say there were 400,000. Each form submitted must be read by someone, evaluated for errors, perhaps have someone visit the site for confirmation and then finally arrive at a value for that property. If one public servant was to complete two forms a day that would be plenty.
If 100 public servants were to be dedicated to only working on processing property tax it would take them 2,000 workdays or seven and a half years to complete the processing exercise. No time is added for site visits, days when site visits are attempted, and no one is present, or travelling to far-off areas. In the meantime, not a cent would be collected and property tax would be the burden of another administration.
Why is it so difficult for the Government to take one’s last property tax that was paid “x” years ago and add to it a percentage “y” that represents the percentage of economic growth? Thus, one’s new property tax will be the old tax plus a percentage increase in tandem with economic growth? Perhaps that would be too easy, it would not allow for the employment of temporary assessors and wastage of taxpayers’ money.
The citizens ought not to be concerned about new property taxes soon. Under the proposed system such a tax cannot happen for years. Citizens should however be concerned about registering their properties as the fines that can emanate from non-registration could make proposed property tax revenue look like pocket change.
STEVE ALVAREZ
via e-mail
Yup,Dizzy28 wrote:So that's another L for Faris seeing as AG Office was 2nd Defendant!!
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 159 guests