Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:What the hell. These are clearly two different vehicles!
Redrasta wrote:How d rass the vehicle in the video is a Pathfinder?
Redrasta wrote:How d rass the vehicle in the video is a Pathfinder?
gastly369 wrote:Redrasta wrote:How d rass the vehicle in the video is a Pathfinder?
pugboy wrote:Like he didn't see the kinda spoiler and daylight underneath it showing the length of vehicle
pugboy wrote:both ian and alexander using the same vid
so the evidence is as good as gold, lol
there are popular kids puzzles "spot the differences" where they put two same pics with hidden differences
maybe you should check them out to sharpen up
Ted_v2 wrote:Lemme post a cool story. My uncle get in a accident in San Francisque. I gone fyzabad police station with him to make a report. Hit and run na.
They sent me Siparia, told me I need to go penal now. They took the report and say go penal to collect the receipt the following day bc it was almost midnight.
When I reach penal the other day, they eh get the report
bluesclues wrote:The ting is, i dont know how they arrive at the conclusion that the xtrail in ian video is without a doubt the same vehicle used in the kidnapping.
Next, they went and get an xtrail by a policeman.. they say that is the xtrail.. so im guessing they identified it by license plate. But the xtrail look different from the one in the video. With chrome handles and stuff. Next ting the policeman was released. so that wasnt the xtrail? Someone used his license plate on their xtrail? Or was he released because of lawyer/rock solid alibi?
There are some blanks need filling in. But first of all, how was it determined that the vehicle used was an xtrail. I am assuming that it came from eyewitness reports. But xtrail and pathfinder look so similar, someone who dont know too much bout car.. like me... will be quick to call a pathfinder an xtrail. As i did with a pathfinder i saw on the road a few days ago until i saw 'pathfinder' written small on the side glass.
Is there any video or snapshots of the vehicle at the scene? Because to me, without those details. Ian alleyne video just looks like that of a suspicious xtrail that may or may not have any connection. And 'suspicious' has to be taken with a grain of salt here because the video doesnt really show the xtrail doing anything illegal. Driving stopping and reversing cant really be considered suspicious. Could be someone stop to talk on their fone or something.
crash dummy wrote:http://www.guardian.co.tt/news/2016-10-03/cops-seize-guns-ammo-morvant
'"A bullet proof vest bearing the writing “POLICE,” which is similar but not exact to those issued to local police, was also seized. Investigators believe that the vest was smuggled here from South America and was being used together with other imitation police clothing by gang members to commit crimes".
rollingstock wrote:screwbash wrote:rollingstock wrote:screwbash wrote:
According to the Motor Vehicle and Road Traffic act (MVRT) a driver has to obey the instructions of a police officer in UNIFORM only. According to the police standing orders 2016 a police uniform is GREY SHIRT AND NAVY BLUE/BLACK PANTS. This full blue kit that the inspector on TV wears in NOT a police uniform and you do not have to obey his instructions. Do not stop if and unmarked car tries to pull you over and they not in uniform. Chaguanas area has a while small lancer kind of old looking with 2 plain clothes office on patrol at times. They will buss fix penalty ticket on you for traffic violations but you have to refuse to take the ticket. Everyone should get a copy of the police standing orders and see where they stand.
Like you standing on your friggin brains.
Police operational wear had been Gazetted many years now so stop uttering complete garbage.
you is a kinda front ah wah. Bring the gazett post. Cause it not in the MVRT or the police standing orders. if the navy blue kit is a uniform why is the word police on it made with Velcro that it can be removed easily. Tactical gear includes body kits and not just piece ah uniform, similar as the high vision vest is not part of the uniform. If an office not wearing his hat and try to stop you it is not an office in uniform.
C.unt there is more than one police uniform Gazetted, ALL can perform stops under the mv&rt act.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 233 guests