Flow
Flow
Flow
TriniTuner.com  |  Latest Event:  

Forums

As Ish dead... $31m fight for Royal Castle

this is how we do it.......

Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods

User avatar
hover11
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 11978
Joined: July 10th, 2016, 4:15 pm

Re: As Ish dead... $31m fight for Royal Castle

Postby hover11 » May 20th, 2025, 10:56 am

The_Honourable wrote:
pugboy wrote:from the papers story it’s not clear what exactly went on
who could summarize what the article saying?


Ish and Dagwood was in a 50/50 partnership, both had 100,000 shares each in ICHL, Royal Castle’s parent company.

Before Ish died, he split his 100,000 shares among his four children equally - 25,000 shares each.

The claim is that according to ICHL by laws, before Ish transfer any shares it must be offered to ICHL and Dagwood first. ICHL claims that Ish did not do this and broke the by-laws making the transfer illegal.

Bacchanal ensues.
I could see this reaching privy council or some siblings might just go missing

pugboy
TunerGod
Posts: 29380
Joined: September 6th, 2003, 6:18 pm

Re: As Ish dead... $31m fight for Royal Castle

Postby pugboy » May 20th, 2025, 1:18 pm

i got that but the writer implies stuff about his son doing things plus sisters seemingly separate from son.

the article writer didn’t write the story in a straight line

The_Honourable wrote:
pugboy wrote:from the papers story it’s not clear what exactly went on
who could summarize what the article saying?


Ish and Dagwood was in a 50/50 partnership, both had 100,000 shares each in ICHL, Royal Castle’s parent company.

Before Ish died, he split his 100,000 shares among his four children equally - 25,000 shares each.

The claim is that according to ICHL by laws, before Ish transfer any shares it must be offered to ICHL and Dagwood first. ICHL claims that Ish did not do this and broke the by-laws making the transfer illegal.

Bacchanal ensues.

Advertisement

Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 229 guests