Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
hydroep wrote:Check the Office of the Financial Services Ombudsman. Even if you don't get your money back they'll have your complaint on record in case this happens to others.
https://www.ofso.org.tt/
sMASH wrote:now seeing a looptt post where rbc reached out to the customer....
Calor wrote:sMASH wrote:now seeing a looptt post where rbc reached out to the customer....
I was contacted a short while ago by the branch manager..got an apology...they will also be doing a refund today...
Thanks everyone!
nick639v2 wrote:Jus 100 u going back with??? It was gas and lawyer fee, not to mention the trauma they caused me... You supposed to be set for life g, u missed d opportunity
Calor wrote:I get the part where i left the bank but shouldnt the bank be checking the $ they receive? I contacted a lawyer and will go to the fraud squad...will update you folks later
skylinechild wrote:Calor wrote:I get the part where i left the bank but shouldnt the bank be checking the $ they receive? I contacted a lawyer and will go to the fraud squad...will update you folks later
correct tellers should have the UV light under the counter to check for counterfeit bills as well as a money counting machine to verify what is being received is accurate.
behind every teller theres a camera pointed at their workstation / workstation drawer.
the bank can verify if they received cash without the teller checking the authenticity of the notes being handed over.
if that is the case the teller can be disciplined...
i remember once i went to the teller to do a transaction and all i wanted was $200. the teller put the $200 thru the money counting machine yes...![]()
dunno what happening in the banks these days.
Infamouz wrote:nick639v2 wrote:Jus 100 u going back with??? It was gas and lawyer fee, not to mention the trauma they caused me... You supposed to be set for life g, u missed d opportunity
200%
paid_influencer wrote:the international standard is for the receiving bank (not named in the OP) to confiscate the note, take ID details of the person presenting the fraudulent note (the OP), and forward the note and ID details to the relevant authorities (the federal agency or similar).
the note would be examined by the authorities to determine how it was made, including type of paper/textile used, type of printer, type of ink, etc. Basically build a case against the counterfeiter. The person presenting the note would be contacted by the authorities and interviewed for further details.
In a bank dealing with large amounts of cash currency, counterfeit operations would be spotted quickly, authorities given evidence and the counterfeit operation is busted. That is how it works in developed countries.
under no circumstances would the fraudulent note be allowed to leave to possibly re-enter circulation. That is the part of the OP that I am most concerned about.
Calor wrote:Infamouz wrote:nick639v2 wrote:Jus 100 u going back with??? It was gas and lawyer fee, not to mention the trauma they caused me... You supposed to be set for life g, u missed d opportunity
200%
One person out of the 1000s on social media suggested I was trying to eat a food.....i would hate to live up to that...i agree the bank should have offered some sort of compensation but at the same time they could have chosen not to settle things...
@skylinechild..i hope you kidding with counting (2) hundred dollar notes
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 105 guests