Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
randolphinshan wrote:Gem_in_i wrote:Hmmm well
Goodbye and good riddance. Was a rude and pompous man.
zoom rader wrote:randolphinshan wrote:Gem_in_i wrote:Hmmm well
Goodbye and good riddance. Was a rude and pompous man.
He saw the light and escaped the PNM matrix long before anyone else saw it.
Every thing he wrote about trinidad is true, a bunch of mimic men .
RedVEVO wrote:shogun wrote:Deeply flawed man with a literary gift. Such is the human condition.
How was he deeply flawed ? You are a Judge and a Priest ?
Lil youth man did you ever win a Noble Prize for Literature ?
V.S. Naipaul was a genius .
He was human and a man .
shogun wrote:RedVEVO wrote:shogun wrote:Deeply flawed man with a literary gift. Such is the human condition.
How was he deeply flawed ? You are a Judge and a Priest ?
Lil youth man did you ever win a Noble Prize for Literature ?
V.S. Naipaul was a genius .
He was human and a man .
Priest????![]()
You seem to be under the impression that a man-made/awarded prize is any equal to basic humanity towards others?
There was no need to judge, just go read what the people closest to him, have said about him? And PLEASE stop being so defensive, to the point of desperate insecurity about everything under the sun? I already stated that he was gifted literarily. What more did you need?
It's funny you landed on my comment, when the one above mine was even more critical/descriptive? Iz almost as if you can sense that I'm trying my best to avoid you at all cost and thought it best to drag me into one of your attention grabbing tantrums?
Redman wrote:He was a great author.
And and arsehole.
Neither takes away from the other.
airuma wrote:Redman wrote:He was a great author.
And and arsehole.
Neither takes away from the other.
Correct but unfortunately one may have added to the other.
I agree he made offensive statements but I'm not sure if he was ever a diplomat, one might argue that being knighted made him a diplomat though. Either way, did he negatively affect the lives of people other than those closest to him, like ALL of our politicians and ALL of those who exercise control over our governments?
hassanvoyeau wrote:All the bad things being said about Naipaul and being amplified, I don't see it. We want to have our cake and eat it too is what I am getting from this. I have full confidence in his ability to describe (be critical) of himself like he did for other things. Show me where he describes himself and that is what I will accept. What I am seeing is second hand rhetoric and opines.
screwbash wrote:waste ah forkin time cudnt make it here so at 18 years gone in the white man place and still wah say he is trini. trinis shud be shame to know he.
hydroep wrote:I remember the time he "rough up" a SAGHS student for asking what was in his opinion a stupid question...
Eccentricity is not an excuse for being an arsehole.
R.I.P.
RedVEVO wrote:" .. Among his widely quoted comments: He called India a "slave society," quipped that Africa has no future, and explained that Indian women wear a colored dot on their foreheads to say "my head is empty." He laughed off the 1989 fatwa against Salman Rushdie as "an extreme form of literary criticism ... "
https://www.msn.com/en-xl/europe/europe ... li=BBKxOg5
He was 100 % correct .
Sundar wrote:RedVEVO wrote:" .. Among his widely quoted comments: He called India a "slave society," quipped that Africa has no future, and explained that Indian women wear a colored dot on their foreheads to say "my head is empty." He laughed off the 1989 fatwa against Salman Rushdie as "an extreme form of literary criticism ... "
https://www.msn.com/en-xl/europe/europe ... li=BBKxOg5
He was 100 % correct .
Because you're Knighted by the queen doesn't mean you damn the bridge you crossed. Such an ungrateful filth. where is he now? same grave as any normal person.
sotf wrote:hydroep wrote:I remember the time he "rough up" a SAGHS student for asking what was in his opinion a stupid question...
Eccentricity is not an excuse for being an arsehole.
R.I.P.
I remember this, he said that he expected better questions from the students or something to that effect. Total douche move. Regardless of his accomplishments in literature and the fact that he was our only Nobel laureate, that did not give him the right to act like that. The students looked forward to meeting him and asking questions. Instead they had to hear that crap. Then the next clown, Sat Maharaj, stood up and said that the students would work on better questions for the next time. He did not defend the students.
Additionally, I always got the impression that V.S. had a certain disdain for the country.
zoom rader wrote:randolphinshan wrote:Gem_in_i wrote:Hmmm well
Goodbye and good riddance. Was a rude and pompous man.
He saw the light and escaped the PNM matrix long before anyone else saw it.
Every thing he wrote about trinidad is true, a bunch of mimic men .
screwbash wrote:waste ah forkin time cudnt make it here so at 18 years gone in the white man place and still wah say he is trini. trinis shud be shame to know he.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests