Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:One bystander was also shot by the Police, though not fatally.
Monkey Man wrote:extreme times like this needs extreme measures, nothing complicated, nothing smart.
Chump was on to something....
Redman wrote:Monkey Man wrote:extreme times like this needs extreme measures, nothing complicated, nothing smart.
Chump was on to something....
How do you improve on an eight minute response to a random roving attack in a public space?
Outside of allowing private citizens to carry firearms,so that you have a possibility of them intercepting the attackers...IF they can, I would say the UK is excellent in their response to these attacks.
Prevention through intelligence is a hard numbers game.
Monkey Man wrote:Redman wrote:Monkey Man wrote:extreme times like this needs extreme measures, nothing complicated, nothing smart.
Chump was on to something....
How do you improve on an eight minute response to a random roving attack in a public space?
Outside of allowing private citizens to carry firearms,so that you have a possibility of them intercepting the attackers...IF they can, I would say the UK is excellent in their response to these attacks.
Prevention through intelligence is a hard numbers game.
lock d boarders up
Redman wrote:Monkey Man wrote:extreme times like this needs extreme measures, nothing complicated, nothing smart.
Chump was on to something....
How do you improve on an eight minute response to a random roving attack in a public space?
Outside of allowing private citizens to carry firearms,so that you have a possibility of them intercepting the attackers...IF they can, I would say the UK is excellent in their response to these attacks.
Prevention through intelligence is a hard numbers game.
bluesclues wrote:Redman wrote:Monkey Man wrote:extreme times like this needs extreme measures, nothing complicated, nothing smart.
Chump was on to something....
How do you improve on an eight minute response to a random roving attack in a public space?
Outside of allowing private citizens to carry firearms,so that you have a possibility of them intercepting the attackers...IF they can, I would say the UK is excellent in their response to these attacks.
Prevention through intelligence is a hard numbers game.
You just need proper immersion in your environment. Numbers only if you have to hack networks to track terrorist or other criminal activity. But immersion is what gets you to the position of everyone telling you everything what going on everywhere and trusting you with secrets.
#casinoroyale
Daran wrote:bluesclues wrote:Redman wrote:Monkey Man wrote:extreme times like this needs extreme measures, nothing complicated, nothing smart.
Chump was on to something....
How do you improve on an eight minute response to a random roving attack in a public space?
Outside of allowing private citizens to carry firearms,so that you have a possibility of them intercepting the attackers...IF they can, I would say the UK is excellent in their response to these attacks.
Prevention through intelligence is a hard numbers game.
You just need proper immersion in your environment. Numbers only if you have to hack networks to track terrorist or other criminal activity. But immersion is what gets you to the position of everyone telling you everything what going on everywhere and trusting you with secrets.
#casinoroyale
Killing all 3 attackers within 8 mins of receiving the first report is a MASSIVE success. 3 guys on a killing rampage were only able to kill 2.66 persons before getting shut down.
In the US, where conceal and carry (most states) is allowed, mass shooters almost always kill way more than 2.66 if their intention is to kill as much as they can.
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:but the attackers lived in the U.K. for most of their lives. These are not ppl flying in overnight to carry out these attacks. They weren't even on a watch list. Are they supposed to evict all immigrants?
I see the US secretary of homeland security said they could have flown into the US. He's proposing to stop for flights from the U.K.?
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:but the attackers lived in the U.K. for most of their lives. These are not ppl flying in overnight to carry out these attacks. They weren't even on a watch list. Are they supposed to evict all immigrants?
I see the US secretary of homeland security said they could have flown into the US. He's proposing to stop for flights from the U.K.?
desifemlove wrote:damn...and i was planning on going to London soon....;/
it's all Blair's fault. string him up.
desifemlove wrote:Blair only resigned since he had a deal with Brown. He resigned four years after the war, and UK isn't an American colony. He chose to join Bush.
desifemlove wrote:You also act smart, but don't know how the British constitution works. PMs and sovereigns haven't got on, Thatcher and the Queen is an example. but then it's not their spouses who deal with them, is it? if the UK does everything the USA says, how come there were few if any British troops in Vietnam or Grenada? Blair is an evil sheit, that's all. his opinion on anything is thus irrelevant.
But then you'll tell me not to judge you...lol. are you a man or not? i presume this is how you get on in your big wuk you does boast continually about lol. Men accept being judged, nay all people do, especially when they give it out.
desifemlove wrote:yes there is a British constitution. it may not be codified, but there are clearly rules and patterns as to how the government operates. So much for a smart/learned man.
Thatcher's legacy is moot. Again, smart man thinks his opinion is a fact.
Blair was/IS evil. He attacked Iraq for no good cause, that's evil.
Brown did have support, but he lost an election due to the Great recession and people being tired of Labour.
I only "respond" to you since you conflate some moral judgments you learnt in some church with reality. I don't believe you have such big wuk you like to boast about, since you won't be able to manage such resources with such blind thinking.
RedVEVO wrote:desifemlove wrote:yes there is a British constitution. it may not be codified, but there are clearly rules and patterns as to how the government operates. So much for a smart/learned man.
Thatcher's legacy is moot. Again, smart man thinks his opinion is a fact.
Blair was/IS evil. He attacked Iraq for no good cause, that's evil.
Brown did have support, but he lost an election due to the Great recession and people being tired of Labour.
I only "respond" to you since you conflate some moral judgments you learnt in some church with reality. I don't believe you have such big wuk you like to boast about, since you won't be able to manage such resources with such blind thinking.
You do not listen - Your weave tight ? Or elsewhere tight. Let me stretch and liberate you .
There is no written British constitution like we have in USA or Trinidad & Tobago.
What is a 'moot' legacy ? Do some reading - She was known as the 'iron woman"
I have no 'big wuk'. I do not boast .
You cannot just type 'work' not 'wuk' ? - you that lazy ? It is only 1 letter more.
Blair was not evil . Show me one article or one book which say " Blair was/IS evil" ?
He is one of the greatest minds ( Prime Minister ) to exist in the UK. Brown ? Hmm.
Church ? Where Church talk come in now ? I do not go to Church . They are a business.
Have you ever lived in London ?
Have you worked there ?
Have you ever been to London ?
Do you still have a Grenadian ID card ?
Let your hair down Desi (slowly) - Let me liberate you .
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Duane 3NE 2NR and 202 guests