Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
pioneer wrote:Any injun driving a vehicle better watchout
Is always Harrikumar and Rajpaul getting charge for DUI, never Alfred and Cooper.
S_2NR wrote:Bribe will just go up now too
nervewrecker wrote:S_2NR wrote:Bribe will just go up now too
I wish my dick was a bribe
pioneer wrote:Any injun driving a vehicle better watchout
Is always Harrikumar and Rajpaul getting charge for DUI, never Alfred and Cooper.
Spitfir3 wrote:nervewrecker wrote:S_2NR wrote:Bribe will just go up now too
I wish my dick was a bribe
it probably would be if rs catch yuh
zoom rader wrote:pioneer wrote:Any injun driving a vehicle better watchout
Is always Harrikumar and Rajpaul getting charge for DUI, never Alfred and Cooper.
Which easier to change a drunk injun or an armed beetham gunta?
88sins wrote:Spitfir3 wrote:nervewrecker wrote:S_2NR wrote:Bribe will just go up now too
I wish my dick was a bribe
it probably would be if rs catch yuh
WAAAAAAAAYYY
allyuh doh stick at all boi
jessojesso allyuh jump on d man
pete wrote:Whenever the radar guns are implemented they should also reduce the basic fine and then incrementally increase it that 1-10 over is one fine, 11-20 over another, 21-30 over is higher and anything over 31 over and you have to face a judge with possible community service / jail time.
Cause really doing 85kph and being made to pay a full $6k is insane. That should really be no more than $1k.
Spitfir3 wrote:nervewrecker wrote:S_2NR wrote:Bribe will just go up now too
I wish my dick was a bribe
it probably would be if rs catch yuh
daxt0r wrote:this morning I coming home from a party passing tru debe...
alex jj wrote:zoom rader wrote:pioneer wrote:Any injun driving a vehicle better watchout
Is always Harrikumar and Rajpaul getting charge for DUI, never Alfred and Cooper.
Which easier to change a drunk injun or an armed beetham gunta?
the police profile ppl in order to carry out their job, if harry coomar and rajpaul happen to fall into the targeted group then so be it, they would have nothing to worry about if they were sober....on the other hand i don't hear zr complaining about police stereotyping the vest and 3/4 pants and jordan/clarks wearing segment of society and subjecting them to unfair stop and search procedures
zoom rader wrote:alex jj wrote:zoom rader wrote:pioneer wrote:Any injun driving a vehicle better watchout
Is always Harrikumar and Rajpaul getting charge for DUI, never Alfred and Cooper.
Which easier to change a drunk injun or an armed beetham gunta?
the police profile ppl in order to carry out their job, if harry coomar and rajpaul happen to fall into the targeted group then so be it, they would have nothing to worry about if they were sober....on the other hand i don't hear zr complaining about police stereotyping the vest and 3/4 pants and jordan/clarks wearing segment of society and subjecting them to unfair stop and search procedures
Nothing is unfair when guntas are stopped and search. They should be jailed for just wearing 3/4 pants.
As for drunk injuns, go back read my posts on certain cheads that Alcohol should be banned together with Carnival.
Injuns are just easy prey and will quicker pass a bribe whereas creole does only have $20 in dey pocket at any one time.
zoom rader wrote:alex jj wrote:zoom rader wrote:pioneer wrote:Any injun driving a vehicle better watchout
Is always Harrikumar and Rajpaul getting charge for DUI, never Alfred and Cooper.
Which easier to change a drunk injun or an armed beetham gunta?
the police profile ppl in order to carry out their job, if harry coomar and rajpaul happen to fall into the targeted group then so be it, they would have nothing to worry about if they were sober....on the other hand i don't hear zr complaining about police stereotyping the vest and 3/4 pants and jordan/clarks wearing segment of society and subjecting them to unfair stop and search procedures
Nothing is unfair when guntas are stopped and search. They should be jailed for just wearing 3/4 pants.
As for drunk injuns, go back read my posts on certain cheads that Alcohol should be banned together with Carnival.
Injuns are just easy prey and will quicker pass a bribe whereas creole does only have $20 in dey pocket at any one time.
alex jj wrote:ever read this rule
We WILL NOT tolerate libel, slander, racist or racial remarks, name calling, ranting or any material which is knowingly false and/or defamatory, inaccurate, speculative, derogatory, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person’s privacy, or otherwise violates any law of Trinidad & Tobago.We WILL NOT tolerate blatant campaigning.
Such content will be deleted and the poster’s account will be suspended without notification.
ModMania wrote:zoom rader wrote:alex jj wrote:zoom rader wrote:pioneer wrote:Any injun driving a vehicle better watchout
Is always Harrikumar and Rajpaul getting charge for DUI, never Alfred and Cooper.
Which easier to change a drunk injun or an armed beetham gunta?
the police profile ppl in order to carry out their job, if harry coomar and rajpaul happen to fall into the targeted group then so be it, they would have nothing to worry about if they were sober....on the other hand i don't hear zr complaining about police stereotyping the vest and 3/4 pants and jordan/clarks wearing segment of society and subjecting them to unfair stop and search procedures
Nothing is unfair when guntas are stopped and search. They should be jailed for just wearing 3/4 pants.
As for drunk injuns, go back read my posts on certain cheads that Alcohol should be banned together with Carnival.
Injuns are just easy prey and will quicker pass a bribe whereas creole does only have $20 in dey pocket at any one time.
Wat part ah hell u from hoss??
alex jj wrote:zoom rader wrote:alex jj wrote:zoom rader wrote:pioneer wrote:Any injun driving a vehicle better watchout
Is always Harrikumar and Rajpaul getting charge for DUI, never Alfred and Cooper.
Which easier to change a drunk injun or an armed beetham gunta?
the police profile ppl in order to carry out their job, if harry coomar and rajpaul happen to fall into the targeted group then so be it, they would have nothing to worry about if they were sober....on the other hand i don't hear zr complaining about police stereotyping the vest and 3/4 pants and jordan/clarks wearing segment of society and subjecting them to unfair stop and search procedures
Nothing is unfair when guntas are stopped and search. They should be jailed for just wearing 3/4 pants.
As for drunk injuns, go back read my posts on certain cheads that Alcohol should be banned together with Carnival.
Injuns are just easy prey and will quicker pass a bribe whereas creole does only have $20 in dey pocket at any one time.
wow..wow..wow....not every african male wearing 3/4 pants is a gunta mr ZR and that twenty dollar statement iz horribly racist
src1983 wrote:They need a revised speed limit.....
Seriously 80km is too slow.
chit8238 wrote:src1983 wrote:They need a revised speed limit.....
Seriously 80km is too slow.
I totally agree. I'm sure most of us average drivers cruise around 100 - 115 kph. I don't mean they should raise it to 140 kph or any such high figure. However it should be more reasonable and practical than 80 kph - perhaps 100 kph.
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:I agree with all except driving without a permit. I can understand if the fine applies if you cannot produce a valid permit within 24hrs. But to have that fine applied at the exact time is extreme IMO.
SMc wrote:sharkman121 wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:I agree with all except driving without a permit. I can understand if the fine applies if you cannot produce a valid permit within 24hrs. But to have that fine applied at the exact time is extreme IMO.
same thing i saying yesterday... a bit harsh imo.
I think they meaning driving without having a driving permit to be you dont have one period, ie its not at home, by yuh mother house, yuh partner have yoh wallet; it means you not recorded in any 'book' as having passed your test and be competent to drive...you will still be given the opportunity to produce it within a certain timeframe otherwise the fine wont stand...to be honest that is an inconvenience enough to make me drive around with my DP
Remember without a licence, you cannot be insured do drive a car and will hold personal responsibility if something were to go wrong (potentially) whether or not it was your fault. Anyway, a simple start would be to have a proper record of what car is owned by who, which ones of those are insured and a readily accessible database of who is licensed to drive in TT... only problem in doing so is it harder to take bribe.
anyway hope it goes through!
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], Strugglerzinc and 82 guests