Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Sweet Torque wrote:VexXx Dogg wrote:pay your ticket.
If you contest it, the magistrate will rape you with a 3-4K fine.
This.
A law has been broken regardless of your correct name and type of vehicle... brah.
rollingstock wrote:GReddy23 wrote:once your name or dp # is incorrect on a ticket, then its considered void
you don't have to pay anything, you can verify this with an police officer
fyi 50% tint is legal even if its whole front
the officer must be ignorant or may not like you and your ride
Stop giving wrong advice. Everything on a fixed penalty notice can be amended, even the offence.
Dismissal over a name hahahahahaha, the police can write 'de black short k00lee driving a van', once he can identify the person named as such in court.
btw the ticket doesn't have provisions for make and colour of vehicle just registration number, officers write that to refresh their memory later if the matter is contested.
Any grade of tint on the entire front windscreen is unlawful.
My advice contest it then come tell us how that worked out for you.
tr1ad wrote:to all those laughing at the officer...keep laughing.... he ain't the one paying the fine
as rs said... context it and tell us
nemisis wrote:tr1ad wrote:to all those laughing at the officer...keep laughing.... he ain't the one paying the fine
as rs said... context it and tell us
scriggly line wont appear for right spelling of word in wrong contest
nemisis wrote:Running a red light $1000 fine
Running a red light and dangerous driving $1500 fine
Dark tint $2000.....
Randolph Inshan wrote:Goodnight,
I need some advise on a ticket i got today at Rivulet Road Roundabout. At about 4 p.m there was a roadblock and I was stopped for having 50% tint on my front windshield of my Ford Ranger. I told the police officer I was willing to remove the tint but he instead gave me a $ 2000 ticket. However, my last name was spelt incorrectly, Maharajh instead of Maharaj and in the vehicle description the officer wrote silver ford hilux. Should i challenge this ticket in court based on these mistakes or just pay the fixed penalty ?
Thanks for the advice.
V2NR 3.0 wrote:Randolph Inshan wrote:Goodnight,
I need some advise on a ticket i got today at Rivulet Road Roundabout. At about 4 p.m there was a roadblock and I was stopped for having 50% tint on my front windshield of my Ford Ranger. I told the police officer I was willing to remove the tint but he instead gave me a $ 2000 ticket. However, my last name was spelt incorrectly, Maharajh instead of Maharaj and in the vehicle description the officer wrote silver ford hilux. Should i challenge this ticket in court based on these mistakes or just pay the fixed penalty ?
Thanks for the advice.
I passed through this same roadblock. Was the popo a chupidee skinny looking police officer with real attitude ?.
BTW - Do not pay the ticket, challenge it in court and then counter-suit. Dottish MC police officers...
GReddy23 wrote:once your name or dp # is incorrect on a ticket, then its considered void
you don't have to pay anything, you can verify this with an police officer
fyi 50% tint is legal even if its whole front
the officer must be ignorant or may not like you and your ride
rollingstock wrote:V2NR 3.0 wrote:Randolph Inshan wrote:Goodnight,
I need some advise on a ticket i got today at Rivulet Road Roundabout. At about 4 p.m there was a roadblock and I was stopped for having 50% tint on my front windshield of my Ford Ranger. I told the police officer I was willing to remove the tint but he instead gave me a $ 2000 ticket. However, my last name was spelt incorrectly, Maharajh instead of Maharaj and in the vehicle description the officer wrote silver ford hilux. Should i challenge this ticket in court based on these mistakes or just pay the fixed penalty ?
Thanks for the advice.
I passed through this same roadblock. Was the popo a chupidee skinny looking police officer with real attitude ?.
BTW - Do not pay the ticket, challenge it in court and then counter-suit. Dottish MC police officers...
Counter suit a fixed penalty notice???????????????
Doesn't matter if the police chuppiddy or not, the ass not supposed to have tint on his entire front windscreen so why the beat up?
Is it because he wasn't afforded the opportunity to remove it and forego the ticket? Not the police responsibility, his job is to issue the ticket not see that his vehicle adhere to the road traffic rules.
rollingstock wrote:GReddy23 wrote:Any grade of tint on the entire front windscreen is unlawful.
ZeroOne wrote:rollingstock wrote:GReddy23 wrote:Any grade of tint on the entire front windscreen is unlawful.
Then all state vehicles are illegal.
AFAIK the law does not exempt them.
Question is who authorized them to install tint on the windscreen.
rollingstock wrote:ZeroOne wrote:rollingstock wrote:GReddy23 wrote:Any grade of tint on the entire front windscreen is unlawful.
Then all state vehicles are illegal.
AFAIK the law does not exempt them.
Question is who authorized them to install tint on the windscreen.
Is that sufficient excuse for you or anyone else doing the same?
Can just imagine the reply from a magistrate, "what a defence force vehicle with tint on the entire windscreen? Well doh fork me up, awright dan you fix up eh."
Randolph Inshan wrote:Thanks for the advise gentlemen, it is appreciated. RolloingStock i honestly do not see the need for behaving like a kant.I just came to ask people's opinion, isn't that what this forum was created for ?If you feel you knw it all why the phoq you don't be the Commisioner of Police ? You already commented on this thread, now pork off and let other people have a chance..
ZeroOne wrote:rollingstock wrote:ZeroOne wrote:rollingstock wrote:GReddy23 wrote:Any grade of tint on the entire front windscreen is unlawful.
Then all state vehicles are illegal.
AFAIK the law does not exempt them.
Question is who authorized them to install tint on the windscreen.
Is that sufficient excuse for you or anyone else doing the same?
Can just imagine the reply from a magistrate, "what a defence force vehicle with tint on the entire windscreen? Well doh fork me up, awright dan you fix up eh."
I didn't say it was an excuse.
On the contrary, im saying that no one has an excuse.
AFAIK only the president is above the law.
ZeroOne wrote:*puts PBR pass on G5 tint windscreen*
[Russian accent] and as usual have a great day[/Russian accent]
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], pugboy, VexXx Dogg and 107 guests