TriniTuner.com | Latest Event:
Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
bluefete wrote:Razkal wrote:bluefete wrote:Jonathan wrote:bluefete wrote:The Creator always was. He had to be, to be the Creator.
Come better dan that nah...
So you 'just exist". Like the universe. There is no purpose to your existence. Like your appendix. If you believe the doctors. Do you know what happens to you if your appendix which "just exists" and serves no purpose, ruptures?
Carry on then.
so all doctors are liars, concerning the necessity of the appendix for individual survival?
..the same doctors are liars when they treat your kid for dengue fever?
..save your grandmother from her severe stroke?
...what about save you from bleeding to death after some imps broadside yuh after sunday service?
why don't these retarded bible thumpers have some sense of consistency??
i mean, if doctors on shite and your 'book' knows better....then why use the facility?
wait, lemme help yuh, "god helps those who helps themselves" ent?
Listen here Doctor:
Psalm 139:14
14 I will praise thee; for I am fearfully and wonderfully made: marvellous are thy works; and that my soul knoweth right well.
Jeremiah 1:5
5 Before I formed thee in the belly I knew thee; and before thou camest forth out of the womb I sanctified thee, and I ordained thee a prophet unto the nations.
Doctors are only now beginning to get the slightest understanding of the workings of the human body. Those who say the appendix has no purpose have no clue about what they are saying. Every piece of the human body derves a purpose ordained by God. If a doctor does not know, s/he should say so!!
(Some) Doctors are really on shrite. Maybe you know some of them... Being a doctor and all...![]()
and that was during the time when church/mosque/temple/ and state was one.Razkal wrote: a couple centuries ago, it was perfectly acceptable to diagnose someone with "madness" and have a practitioner drill, literally, a hole in the side of the head to alleviate said madness...
Jonathan wrote:Sceptics, however, point out that many yeast strains naturally form colonies, and that their ancestors were multicellular tens or hundreds of millions of years ago. As a result, they may have retained some evolved mechanisms for cell adhesion and programmed cell death, effectively stacking the deck in favour of Ratcliff's experiment.
"I bet that yeast, having once been multicellular, never lost it completely," says Neil Blackstone, an evolutionary biologist at Northern Illinois University in DeKalb. "I don't think if you took something that had never been multicellular you would get it so quickly."...
...Ratcliff and his colleagues are planning to address that objection head-on, by doing similar experiments with Chlamydomonas, a single-celled alga that has no multicellular ancestors. They are also continuing their yeast experiments to see whether further division of labour will evolve within the snowflakes. Both approaches offer an unprecedented opportunity to bring experimental rigour to the study of one of the most important leaps in our distant evolutionary past.
Jonathan wrote:Where is your god now?I keed, I keed!!
Razkal wrote:save me the bible quotes, a reference text is not open to interpretations, which your comfort-book thrives on. i am a firm believer that the publication is completely and utterly useless and the biggest collection of contradictions on paper.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 84 guests