Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
cinco wrote:3+hrs per x 200 x 3
you have no forkin life dan
rollingstock wrote:Eva don't knock it, those books are great.
EVA Unit-01 wrote:rollingstock wrote:Eva don't knock it, those books are great.
i'm not, dude! i LOVE Tolkien! i've bought every book of his i ever got my hands on!
i'm just saying i never expected to find 2nrs who read of and loved Middle Earth as well...
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:^ Howard Shore issa BOSS!!!
I've read the Hobbit and IMO it was better than the three LOTR books put together. I am yet to read The Silmarillion.
Books will always carry more depth than a movie can - but Peter Jackson and WETA did a damn fine job with LOTR IMO.
I expect The Hobbit movie to be EPIC!
Beowulf
Tolkien's 1936 lecture, "Beowulf: The Monsters and the Critics," had a lasting influence on Beowulf research.[58] Lewis E. Nicholson said that the article Tolkien wrote about Beowulf is "widely recognized as a turning point in Beowulfian criticism", noting that Tolkien established the primacy of the poetic nature of the work as opposed to its purely linguistic elements.[59] At the time, the consensus of scholarship deprecated Beowulf for dealing with childish battles with monsters rather than realistic tribal warfare; Tolkien argued that the author of Beowulf was addressing human destiny in general, not as limited by particular tribal politics, and therefore the monsters were essential to the poem.[60] Where Beowulf does deal with specific tribal struggles, as at Finnsburg, Tolkien argued firmly against reading in fantastic elements.[61] In the essay, Tolkien also revealed how highly he regarded Beowulf: "Beowulf is among my most valued sources," and this influence may be seen throughout his Middle-earth legendarium.[62]
tom bombadil pwns chuck norris16 cycles wrote:tom bombadil (sp) was the most intriguing character for me....and they left him out of the movie...
rollingstock wrote:No movie can ever capture the effect of a book.
Peter Jackson reveals the Red Epic secrets behind The Hobbit (video)
By Daniel Cooper posted Nov 5th 2011 4:08AM
Diet and filmmaking legend Peter Jackson's given us another insight into the making of the Hobbit movies, and this time he's talking about his envious collection of tech. Filming with no less than 48 Red Epic cameras at 48fps in full 5k resolution might sound fantastic, but it hasn't all been a bed of cotton candy. Two 3D cameras need to be mounted at the same "interocular" (the inch-or-so distance between your eyes) which is impossible given the size of the Epic and its lenses. The team had to hire specialist firm 3ality to build a rig where one camera shoots the action and the other is pointed vertically at a mirror. Those who would love to shoot with an Epic should also beware that the cameras naturally desaturate the action to such an extent that the makeup, costume and set design teams have to over-color everything to look natural in post production. For more interesting facts, head down past the break to catch the video in full, and try not to imagine how many years bad luck you'd get if you broke one of those mirrors during a key scene.
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:CAN'T WAIT!!!
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:tom bombadil pwns chuck norris16 cycles wrote:tom bombadil (sp) was the most intriguing character for me....and they left him out of the movie...
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:^ nope, Chuck Norris was Tom Bombadil's pedicurist.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 56 guests