Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
nismoid wrote:obviously the police (and anybody else) would know the difference between people hanging out in front of a place like "earth and other establishments" and gang members congregating somewhere.
It is also obvious that the people who like to dress a certain way and act a certain way (be it whatever race they are) would also know where not to "hang out"
The "good" police officers would use this to help curb the gang related crimes. But in Trinidad theres always an exception to the rule, My view is, If you want to dress a certain way, and act a certain way and "lime" with certain people then take whatever you get. If you want to place yourself in the line of the stereotypical people that the law is looking at well then take what you get.
Rallyfignis wrote:foss wrote:Rallyfignis wrote:I think we need to do like Grenada - if you pants hanging off yuh a$$ wit all yuh ole drawers showing, is instant arrest
then 98% of the male nagger population would have been arrested.
*fixed
Sky wrote:nismoid wrote:obviously the police (and anybody else) would know the difference between people hanging out in front of a place like "earth and other establishments" and gang members congregating somewhere.
It is also obvious that the people who like to dress a certain way and act a certain way (be it whatever race they are) would also know where not to "hang out"
The "good" police officers would use this to help curb the gang related crimes. But in Trinidad theres always an exception to the rule, My view is, If you want to dress a certain way, and act a certain way and "lime" with certain people then take whatever you get. If you want to place yourself in the line of the stereotypical people that the law is looking at well then take what you get.
So you saying to leave it up to the discretion of the police then.
Like tint?
nismoid wrote:Sky wrote:nismoid wrote:obviously the police (and anybody else) would know the difference between people hanging out in front of a place like "earth and other establishments" and gang members congregating somewhere.
It is also obvious that the people who like to dress a certain way and act a certain way (be it whatever race they are) would also know where not to "hang out"
The "good" police officers would use this to help curb the gang related crimes. But in Trinidad theres always an exception to the rule, My view is, If you want to dress a certain way, and act a certain way and "lime" with certain people then take whatever you get. If you want to place yourself in the line of the stereotypical people that the law is looking at well then take what you get.
So you saying to leave it up to the discretion of the police then.
Like tint?
YES i'm saying that.
I dont have any tint on any of my vehicles that may be deemed illegal.
I dont find myself anywhere that the people upholding the law may find sketchy or shady.
I do not "hang out" with people that may be looking shady to the law.
So all of these things do not affect me DIRECTLY so I have no problem with them.
Drastic times calls for drastic measures, actually the people who may find these measures harsh are probably the ones that have "cocoa in the sun"
I still believe there are more good police than there are bad ones and I have nothing to hide thats why I agree with them.
measures like these have to be put in place because Trinidad has become a lawless nation, no one obeys the law anymore, look at drivers on the shoulders, its a daily occurrence that has become the norm, and when the guntas on the shoulders, they pull on you and they are more "vexed" than you if you dont let them in.
thats just one example of blatant lawlessness that happens as the norm.
I say fack away with all ah dem, the harsher the better to deal with them.
RASC wrote:eliteauto wrote:Hmm RASC have a point eh, Trinis really need Gibbs but they want a Borroughs, they want an action man and knowing the Trini psyche that would help galvanize citizens in the anti-crime drive, yeah yeah I see where you coming from with that
EXACTLY...the formula is simple you know.
During NYC's reformation, the tough talking "action man" was Guliani.
Gunta's HATEDDDDD him, the man used to come out and say flat out. WE WILL HUNT YOU DOWN and YOU WILL NOT ESCAPE! If you used to hear them fellas in Brooklyn talking "abuse abuse, fck Guliani".
Guess what? It worked tho...You can't fight ignorance with words, there is only one way to teach those bastards a lessons. You need to kick down their doors, lock down their streets and let the AK's start blazing in their tail. We need an action man. Gibbs is NOT an action man, because he ain't know nothing like that.
When Wyatt Earp went to the OK CORAL...you think he went to TALK to them men? Is blaze, that's the only way criminals learn. They don't understand anything else. T&T is the wild west right now!
RASC wrote:They can enter your place of none dwelling WITHOUT a warrant if they believe it is harboring gang members. So if somehow you own a warehouse or an office, they can raid/break into the space, turn it upside down, and legally have no right to ensure your goods are not damaged, or somehow go "missing".
I'm asking the CoP and national security to be tough, not outright foolish.
pioneer wrote:I for that too....take us back please
trinis have no idea what they doin...
pioneer wrote:actually they will quicker pick up you and yuh creepers crewon that
pioneer wrote:actually they will quicker pick up you and yuh creepers crewon that
pioneer wrote:actually they will quicker pick up you and yuh creepers crewon that
Sky wrote:nismoid wrote:Sky wrote:nismoid wrote:obviously the police (and anybody else) would know the difference between people hanging out in front of a place like "earth and other establishments" and gang members congregating somewhere.
It is also obvious that the people who like to dress a certain way and act a certain way (be it whatever race they are) would also know where not to "hang out"
The "good" police officers would use this to help curb the gang related crimes. But in Trinidad theres always an exception to the rule, My view is, If you want to dress a certain way, and act a certain way and "lime" with certain people then take whatever you get. If you want to place yourself in the line of the stereotypical people that the law is looking at well then take what you get.
So you saying to leave it up to the discretion of the police then.
Like tint?
YES i'm saying that.
I dont have any tint on any of my vehicles that may be deemed illegal.
I dont find myself anywhere that the people upholding the law may find sketchy or shady.
I do not "hang out" with people that may be looking shady to the law.
So all of these things do not affect me DIRECTLY so I have no problem with them.
Drastic times calls for drastic measures, actually the people who may find these measures harsh are probably the ones that have "cocoa in the sun"
I still believe there are more good police than there are bad ones and I have nothing to hide thats why I agree with them.
measures like these have to be put in place because Trinidad has become a lawless nation, no one obeys the law anymore, look at drivers on the shoulders, its a daily occurrence that has become the norm, and when the guntas on the shoulders, they pull on you and they are more "vexed" than you if you dont let them in.
thats just one example of blatant lawlessness that happens as the norm.
I say fack away with all ah dem, the harsher the better to deal with them.
This is retarded. If you piss off an officer and he remember your face in a tint road block, he WILL make you take off your 35% if he bad mind. And that is the point. They got power to do that and it can be abused with the tint. Now they could kick down any door they want? You're really sheltered if you think all police officers are decent people.
Some are genuine, but some are VERY nasty. And you hadda be a damass to go this far just to support the PP.
I just hope Gibbs planning to setup some kind of internal affairs to keep the officers in line while they have all this power. Or else NOBODY is safe. Drug men already rolling with police. How far is bandits rolling with them? Bust in a house normal normal and raid it with the police. Plant what they want, take what they want, rape who they want.
Sky wrote:Y'know what, I not finished.
Allyuh remember a bandit being shot while breaking into Singer in Curepe? He was executed in the Bangladesh area. I saw him by Farm road corner being questioned by police, then assaulted. Then they throw him in the van and gone inside Farm road with him. Next thing I hear a gunshot. Next day, "Bandit shot dead robbing Singer"
But he probably deserved it right? Doesn't matter what wrong he did, he did wrong. He deserved to be executed in the darkness and not put in court and jail. Because that is justice.
Anyone who thinks that walking the straight and narrow makes them safe with these conditions are gravely mistaken.
Scenario: You're driving and a police stops you and accuses you of doing something wrong. like what? You know you're right and you protest. While protesting you 'give him lip'. The officer already has your lic and insurance in hand. Now he has your address in his hands (on your lic) and make a turn later. It's that simple. Now people would dispute giving an officer lip. Define giving lip..... wake up moron there is a procedure for protesting any offence that you believe the police is charging you with
True story: I was working and an employee attacked me. I was working on a car under the dash and installing an alarm. I had a soldering iron plugged in and ready to do good work. He come and take it. Now he have a habit of using it and resting it on the ground next to the car, so I tell him plug it in when he finish, because I'll have to wait until it heats up to use it again who's soldering iron was it? his or yours?. He jump up and ask what that supposed to mean. I say It mean what I say, I wasting time waiting for it to heat up. And that was with no attitude. yeah sure I was hooking up wires and thats where my head was. He ask if I on he and rock a slap on me. Now I take it because:
1. I'm under a dash and he's standing above me between my legs
2. He bigger than me and I ain't dumb yeah sure
When a meeting was called about it and they asked me what I wanted done, I said suspension for the most. They told me they're short on ppl and i say forget it. Later I hear the man was toting feelings because I working on the side and making more money than him.theres always 3 sides to a story, your side his side and the truth
HE IS NOW A POLICE OFFICER!. That ignoramus now has a gun and the right to issue tickets.
Now imagine bouncing that up on the road and trying to rightfully and honestly defend yourself.I have no problem bouncing him up,, i didnt piss him off in the first place, and now if you believe that he is toting for that long, well apparently you have a problem.
Now imagine this officer has your address and can pass by you later and do what they want, plant what they want, beat who they want, rape who they want.
Your best choice is to shutup and let Mr. officer wrongfully make up his ticket quota for the day.
REAL officers hadda drink go home juice before any citizen can feel safe. And I'm saying this while having family on the force, having heard stories from one of them about holding 2 sprangers, making them race up the hill and the loser going down to the station. No contraband found yet eh.
I'm not saying all police are corrupt. A lot are just doing their jobs and doing it well. But here I was thinking with a Canadian top cop they would be more accountable for their actions. Now they're gonna be less.
ABA Trading LTD wrote:Pissing off a police officer can be done simply because you're not the same race as him eh nismoid, eh matter how good you feel you are, and if you think you don't associate with the wrong crowd, officers have Judge Dredd complex,
Sooner or later, you will stumble upon a officer who just find out his wife horning him, and you might take too long to take out your license, then he will give you a setta tickets for diff sheit, yuh guh get vex, tell him "whammm boyyyyyy"
then yuh guh get some gunbutt in yuh head.
7. A person who has in his possession or under his care
or control a bullet-proof vest, firearm or ammunition,
whether lawfully obtained or not, which he intends or
ought to know will be used for the benefit of or at the
direction of a gang, or any gang member, commits an
offence and is liable on conviction on indictment to a fine
of four hundred thousand dollars and to imprisonment
for fifteen years.
8. A person who harbours or conceals a person whom
he knows is a gang member and whom he knows is
wanted by any member of the law enforcement authorities
commits an offence and is liable on summary conviction to
a fine of one hundred and fifty thousand dollars and to
imprisonment for five years.
Humes wrote:I was with yuh until you implied that a businessman could be touched by the law.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 93 guests