Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
All unions and PNM have a common goal.Redman wrote:Well if PNM signs- the union will not worry about if UNC win.
this way the PNM and the UNION have a common goal.
zoom rader wrote:All unions and PNM have a common goal.Redman wrote:Well if PNM signs- the union will not worry about if UNC win.
this way the PNM and the UNION have a common goal.
PNM = Unions
PSA tried hard to get rid of Dukedeath365 wrote:zoom rader wrote:All unions and PNM have a common goal.Redman wrote:Well if PNM signs- the union will not worry about if UNC win.
this way the PNM and the UNION have a common goal.
PNM = Unions
na duke is ah equal opportunity offender but he 90 % politics now-
so i discounting he and saying yeah now CARRY ON !
*sigh* Not with a 3 year test run option. 3 years with no SPT, means there are BILLIONS to thieve.
AGAIN, with no skin in the game, where is the accountability and sound , hardnosed business management going to come from?
The OWTU lucked out, pure and simple. They get to keep an unsustainable workforce quiet for years, reap BILLIONS, with ZERO risk. Don't even bother with funding, because any unethical financier/backer is also going to love a deal of this type.
till don't know the source mind you, so any potential money launderer, narco-terrorist, or Russian prop up entity could be in the mix.
rebound wrote:What was said in the press conference? I am not on FB.
Used abused and dumped.Gladiator wrote:rebound wrote:What was said in the press conference? I am not on FB.
They basically gone against the PNM now saying that their promises was an election gimmick, Rowley is a failure...etc etc
Redman wrote:*sigh* Not with a 3 year test run option. 3 years with no SPT, means there are BILLIONS to thieve.
Expand on that please.AGAIN, with no skin in the game, where is the accountability and sound , hardnosed business management going to come from?
Same place it came from in the past....elsewhere.
In order to get a financier to commit, owtu would have had to convince them and their advisors that Patriotic had the ability to run the biz.
To the extent that the financing is real....I not worried about that yet, they would have to source Human capital, suitably qualified.The OWTU lucked out, pure and simple. They get to keep an unsustainable workforce quiet for years, reap BILLIONS, with ZERO risk. Don't even bother with funding, because any unethical financier/backer is also going to love a deal of this type.
These deal don’t happen without the borrower being able to come up with some % ....
But yes they lucked out big time.
We still don't know the source mind you, so any potential money launderer, narco-terrorist, or Russian prop up entity could be in the mix.
What like HSBC....point taken....but that applies to every single deal of this nature
*sigh* Not with a 3 year test run option. 3 years with no SPT, means there are BILLIONS to thieve. AGAIN,
Can't see what you're still not sure about
Redman wrote:*sigh* Not with a 3 year test run option. 3 years with no SPT, means there are BILLIONS to thieve. AGAIN,
Can't see what you're still not sure about
Well what was confusing is that [b]I do not believe SPT is charged to refining operations-but to those that are in the business of PRODUCING oil..and is based on the oil prices.
Its calculated on the sale of a bbl.
So I asked you to clarify what you were referring to since Patriotic is a refiner and therefore SPT would not apply.
[/b]
They not paying for the refinery.
But they supposed to be fixing it up and getting it refining.
So we would have a 3rd party upgrading and running the refinery....
Taxes, business, employment supposedly should be flowing from the getgo- with the culmination of full operations.
So if everything is as it is supposed to be..then GORTT should have it hand.
If it gets up and running and they buss-the refinery was upgraded- and we go next.
Redman wrote:SPT is not charged to refining operations -we talking about Patriotic.
Patriotic doesnt produce oil.
You should look up the Petroleum Act.
De Dragon wrote:Redman wrote:SPT is not charged to refining operations -we talking about Patriotic.
Patriotic doesnt produce oil.
You should look up the Petroleum Act.
PT as a company was artificially made to show a profit by exemption from SPT.
Redman wrote:De Dragon wrote:Redman wrote:SPT is not charged to refining operations -we talking about Patriotic.
Patriotic doesnt produce oil.
You should look up the Petroleum Act.
PT as a company was artificially made to show a profit by exemption from SPT.
ZR....is that you?
If you gonna make up crap, we wasting time.
Redman wrote:PT never had an exemption, they just did not pay it based on the fact that GORTT always paid subventions for the fuel subsidy very very long after they were due.
But the net result is the same....as you say Petrotrin was not viable the way it was.
De Dragon wrote:Redman wrote:PT never had an exemption, they just did not pay it based on the fact that GORTT always paid subventions for the fuel subsidy very very long after they were due.
But the net result is the same....as you say Petrotrin was not viable the way it was.
Smoke and mirrors as usual.
Redman wrote:De Dragon wrote:Redman wrote:PT never had an exemption, they just did not pay it based on the fact that GORTT always paid subventions for the fuel subsidy very very long after they were due.
But the net result is the same....as you say Petrotrin was not viable the way it was.
Smoke and mirrors as usual.
No just the facts....but how is this Germaine to Patriotic and them running the refinery?
Redman wrote:No you are conflating several things-
Petrotrin Never had an exemption.-declared some operating profits/EBITDA-
Heritage has a 2 year exemption-
We were discussing Patriotic....and the proposed sale.
Im not sure what you are referring to...thats all
my mispelling of Germane-isnt germane-
Redman wrote:Im not as bright as you so you have to explain...
what does this have to do with the Patriotic energies and the refinery?
And I explained-there WAS NO EXEMPTION meaning it was an unpaid liability wherever it existed....
Petrotrin not paying taxes has been happening for decades- it was a structural problem between a state owned enterprise and the GORTT where BOTH parties have unpaid liabilities to each other.-SPT/PPT/Income Taxes on one hand and the Subvention for the subsidy-that headline number that GORTTs like to pelt out.
That is fact
What you are saying is that if the SPT was applied Petrotrin was losing money....so the PNM fudged the books to declare a profit as justification to "shutter"?
Redman wrote:So you saying that they used the profit to justify the restructuring.
You have a link to where they say we shutting cuz it making money?
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Ralphie and 66 guests