Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:Remember the rules Marvel uses (even in the comics) for time travel are different to what you think it should be based on other movies. Ignore back to the future, Star Trek etc. endgame explains a lot. Might have to watch it over to understand certain things.
How will Dr. Strange get back the time stone?
Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:Remember the rules Marvel uses (even in the comics) for time travel are different to what you think it should be based on other movies. Ignore back to the future, Star Trek etc. endgame explains a lot. Might have to watch it over to understand certain things.
How will Dr. Strange get back the time stone?
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:Remember the rules Marvel uses (even in the comics) for time travel are different to what you think it should be based on other movies. Ignore back to the future, Star Trek etc. endgame explains a lot. Might have to watch it over to understand certain things.
How will Dr. Strange get back the time stone?
Or how did he return the Soul stone?
maj. tom wrote:Anytime a film has time travel, you have to prepare for massive discrepancies to be dusted under the rug. And expect the audience to plausibly deny the time paradoxes right in front their faces, explained away by some weird fan fiction written two years later.
Endgame should have never touched time travel. It's also saying that Thanos was evil and has an evil nature and didn't explore him anymore beyond a simple but powerful villain who murdered people. Thanos' idea for survival of life in the universe is so much deeper, like Leto God-Emperor's idea behind the Scattering in Dune. Both were seen as tyrants to the very small minds of the people around them.
I don't know what, but Marvel Studios are very creative and could have written another Earth universe (1610?) into that episode with the same existing characters but on another Earth... and thus kicking off the next phase which is coming in the new Spiderman film, and finding closure for the characters on this Earth (616?). I think such a story would have also helped people find closure and deal with loss in their own lives. It's not like we can go back before 9/11 in real life right?
It was a good film anyway.
ismithx wrote:maj. tom wrote:Anytime a film has time travel, you have to prepare for massive discrepancies to be dusted under the rug. And expect the audience to plausibly deny the time paradoxes right in front their faces, explained away by some weird fan fiction written two years later.
Endgame should have never touched time travel. It's also saying that Thanos was evil and has an evil nature and didn't explore him anymore beyond a simple but powerful villain who murdered people. Thanos' idea for survival of life in the universe is so much deeper, like Leto God-Emperor's idea behind the Scattering in Dune. Both were seen as tyrants to the very small minds of the people around them.
I don't know what, but Marvel Studios are very creative and could have written another Earth universe (1610?) into that episode with the same existing characters but on another Earth... and thus kicking off the next phase which is coming in the new Spiderman film, and finding closure for the characters on this Earth (616?). I think such a story would have also helped people find closure and deal with loss in their own lives. It's not like we can go back before 9/11 in real life right?
It was a good film anyway.
time travel can be done right. the recent 12 monkeys tv show was all about that and they wrapped it up with not a loose end. Marvel has the capability to do that, I think if they left holes it leaves something to fill in later
MG Man wrote:A rat saved the universe
Boy, that wrap up on 12 monkeys was clean, proper time traveling clean upismithx wrote:maj. tom wrote:Anytime a film has time travel, you have to prepare for massive discrepancies to be dusted under the rug. And expect the audience to plausibly deny the time paradoxes right in front their faces, explained away by some weird fan fiction written two years later.
Endgame should have never touched time travel. It's also saying that Thanos was evil and has an evil nature and didn't explore him anymore beyond a simple but powerful villain who murdered people. Thanos' idea for survival of life in the universe is so much deeper, like Leto God-Emperor's idea behind the Scattering in Dune. Both were seen as tyrants to the very small minds of the people around them.
I don't know what, but Marvel Studios are very creative and could have written another Earth universe (1610?) into that episode with the same existing characters but on another Earth... and thus kicking off the next phase which is coming in the new Spiderman film, and finding closure for the characters on this Earth (616?). I think such a story would have also helped people find closure and deal with loss in their own lives. It's not like we can go back before 9/11 in real life right?
It was a good film anyway.
time travel can be done right. the recent 12 monkeys tv show was all about that and they wrapped it up with not a loose end. Marvel has the capability to do that, I think if they left holes it leaves something to fill in later
Kronik wrote:Boy, that wrap up on 12 monkeys was clean, proper time traveling clean up
Ben_spanna wrote:When you really analyze the movies Captain America with his over sensitive self really was the cause for so much wars....the avengers and Iron man could have ended the war , killed a few thousand and finished if CA had just hushed his noble a55.
Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:Ben_spanna wrote:When you really analyze the movies Captain America with his over sensitive self really was the cause for so much wars....the avengers and Iron man could have ended the war , killed a few thousand and finished if CA had just hushed his noble a55.
OR things could have been a lot worse without CA. You don’t get to change things and just say it would have worked out better.
fred1266 wrote:
yea it true apparently 7 extra minutes
maj. tom wrote:Then just put it on the Blu-Ray release as official
maj. tom wrote:Quite an openly unfair money grab display move by the studio to break Avatar's record. They could have just released it through their channel on YouTube and everyone would be happy and feel great. Then just put it on the Blu-Ray release as official. This just breaks the box office rules!
hydroep wrote:^^James Cameron must be having a hissy fit...
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], shake d livin wake d dead and 47 guests