TriniTuner.com | Latest Event:
Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
zoom rader wrote:shogun wrote:Habit7 wrote:On this basis, I beg to motion that the alias named zoom rader not be responded to by those who dwell outside of this circle.
I enacted this since last night, no lie.
You are Colm Imbert, Just saw you on Channel 11 with the very same speech.
shogun wrote:zoom rader wrote:shogun wrote:Habit7 wrote:On this basis, I beg to motion that the alias named zoom rader not be responded to by those who dwell outside of this circle.
I enacted this since last night, no lie.
You are Colm Imbert, Just saw you on Channel 11 with the very same speech.
Sounds like someone's a little
zoom rader wrote:Amazing I always knew tuner is a PNM site, Shogun is the short man Colm Imbert. Is Rowley in the house? Eliteauto where are you dude
pioneer wrote:From the posts in this thread I can be sure not many people know how international relations work, and what it means when the US tells you they are "concerned" about a matter...
Guess what happens next????
For ppl asking "who" is the US govt, they are a world super power that we happen to signed treaties with and that we highly depend upon for economic growth, security and aid. Keep living in your ignorant bubbles.
shogun wrote:Agree with some, but....
You also think the state (U.S.), doesn't "give ah fack" about the years/millions spent pursuing the case as well?
bluefete wrote:
All this law does is allow people who have money to stymie the justice systems by filing constitutional motions, appeals and so on for 10 years and then have their cases dismissed.webb wrote:Look at the names this law would of helped out ISH/STEVE not alone
Those who had filed petitions in the High Court were former Airports Authority executive Amrith Maharaj, Ferguson, Galbaransingh, Maritime Life General Insurance Company Ltd executives John Henry Smith and Barbara Gomes as well as the company itself and Maritime Finance, Galbaransingh’s Northern Construction Ltd, Fidelity Finance Leasing Company Ltd, former finance minister Brian Keui Tung, former works minister Carlos John, former national security minister Russell Huggins and businessman Ameer Edoo,Sadiq Baksh,Carlos John who is Volney campaign manager huh
webb wrote:Look at the names this law would of helped out ISH/STEVE not alone
Those who had filed petitions in the High Court were former Airports Authority executive Amrith Maharaj, Ferguson, Galbaransingh, Maritime Life General Insurance Company Ltd executives John Henry Smith and Barbara Gomes as well as the company itself and Maritime Finance, Galbaransingh’s Northern Construction Ltd, Fidelity Finance Leasing Company Ltd, former finance minister Brian Keui Tung, former works minister Carlos John, former national security minister Russell Huggins and businessman Ameer Edoo,Sadiq Baksh,Carlos John who is Volney campange manager huh
“New politics is more than just a catchphrase,” states the manifesto of the Congress of the People. Among other objectives, the party took responsibility for implementing “the concept of transparency and accountability in government.” It was to be the conscience of the People’s Partnership; the voice that would safeguard the public interest. But what is this “new politics” that the COP preached so loftily about if it amounts to no more than polite acquiescence on principle?
The COP, a junior partner in the ruling coalition, is now begging Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar to take note of the fact that it believes that Jack Warner, a man it says with many questions to answer, should not be in the Cabinet. Having sold itself to the electorate on that basis and now copping out of taking bold and decisive action to bring about that new politics, the party’s credibility has been seriously compromised in the eyes of the supporters who genuinely felt it could offer a new, third way in local politics.
It was clear from the start that the motion of COP executive member Vernon De Lima—to have the party leave the Government if its call for Mr Warner to be removed were ignored—had little chance of being accepted. Party leader Prakash Ramadhar had, in the gentlest manner possible, asked Mr Warner please to leave office.
If not, said Mr Ramadhar, “the question of whether he should be removed as Minister is in the hands of the political leader and Prime Minister and not the COP”—thus quietly absolving himself and party of any responsibility in the matter. But if the COP, as part of the Government, is not prepared to take a stand that could force fundamental change to the quality of governance being given to the nation, and is prepared only to engage in useless entreaties, then its principles are like straws in the wind and its espousal of new politics has little or no validity.
Moreover, this is not the first time that the COP has failed those who expected it to take the moral high ground in politics. The last time was when it subsided quietly over the San Fernando Mayor position. On that matter it waited quietly until the Prime Minister made a Cabinet reshuffle and utilised that opportunity to accommodate the party.
The lasting impression the COP leaves with the national community is that of a group of people who are willing to stay in office notwithstanding the damage to their party’s credibility. In this regard, the COP is showing itself no different from the two major hegemonic parties and their politics that the COP has so roundly condemned.
Interestingly, before the Parliament was convened yesterday to repeal Section 34 of the Indictable Proceedings Act—which appeared to have no other intention of clearing the way for the release of UNC friends and financiers—chairman of the COP Joseph Toney seemed to have regained his voice.
He charged that the proclamation of Section 34 amounted to a breach of the undertaking given by the Government to Parliament that no part of the overall act would be made effective until and unless the infrastructure to support the legislation had been implemented.
This was “the most grievous contempt of the Parliament itself,” states the release of the COP chairman. It “compromises the entire purpose of the act, which was to ensure swift justice as part of measures to improve the justice system and contribute to the fight against the horrendous crime situation affecting our society.”
What will the COP do now about continuing to be in a government that has committed what its chairman has called a serious breach of parliamentary principle and practice? Will this increasingly enfeebled junior partner do anything at all?
Carlos and AG: Former UNC minister Carlos John, one of the accused in the Piarco fraud cases, chats with Attorney General Anand Ramlogan during the Independence Day gala dinner at the Diplomatic Centre, St Ann's on September 1.(the day after the proclamation)
http://newsday.co.tt/day/1,60466.html#foto
De Dragon wrote:shogun wrote:Agree with some, but....
You also think the state (U.S.), doesn't "give ah fack" about the years/millions spent pursuing the case as well?
Dais like ah facking two dollars for them, their concern is that dese two lil Indian from back ah dey T&T don't come out victorious vs the mighty USA.
16 cycles wrote:this was a plan for everybody with skeletons in the court to wipe them clean....
Epic Backfire......
nobody to blame etc etc......
awaits next scandal....
sMASH wrote:years ago, before the COP, when i preferred to deface my ballot instead of voting for either pnm or unc, and did not want any one to utilize my blank ballot, people thought me mad. but what i am to do when i saw that each had the same problems which rendered them both unsuitable to take office.
the only reason i put my 'x' by the unc this rounds was because i thought that the extra unc persons would be able to watchdog the unc so they would not get away with too much sneaky things
pyung99 wrote:who exactly are the "they" that are tryin to cover up, and on behalf on who? i think ramlogan has wiped his hands clean of it, especially by suggesting removing the section 34 completely.
so far even the dpp is being questioned wrt motive. voloney also. there must be more
rfari wrote:16 cycles wrote:this was a plan for everybody with skeletons in the court to wipe them clean....
Epic Backfire......
nobody to blame etc etc......
awaits next scandal....
U's a cont orwha? Nobody to blame? I drink that kool-aid that the ag mix last night? Dotish person u are.
16 cycles wrote:this was a plan for everybody with skeletons in the court to wipe them clean....
16 cycles wrote:Epic Backfire......
16 cycles wrote:nobody to blame etc etc......
rfari wrote:U's a cont orwha? Nobody to blame? I drink that kool-aid that the ag mix last night? Dotish person u are.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], st7 and 109 guests
.jpg)
