Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
TriniVdub wrote:^^^lol borther man managers an ting daz bank managers salary yuh talkin der....d small man in trinidad does make about $2500-3500TT if he lucky
TK! wrote:~˜VëgŲ˜~ wrote:$210 to full premium gorne up to $280.
iz a cessna yuh have or wha?
my civic does take 110 and give me at least 350km.
Strauss wrote:The NEW car companies are talking bullcrap as far as I'm concerned, when they support the government (I wonder why?).
Firstly, I don't really believe we are getting the proper octane fuel.
Secondly, even though vehicles might FUNCTION on this minimum octane gas, it doesn't mean it's best for your vehicle.
eitech wrote:let's say i was to full my tank with super jus to try it..what's d worse case scenario in terms of engine damage or what have u i could experience..i jus speculatin here
Nissan QG15DE wrote:Strauss wrote:And why can't we get REAL Super "95 RON" and REAL Premium "98/100RON" ?
E-X-A-C-T-L-Y
djcarbon wrote:Interesting. So the dude behind me whose car was shaking like a can of beans wasn't because of his gas?.. I too cynical. He working NP... If super was sooo much better how come it doh cost $4.00 and premium with the chemical $2.70? Sounding like PR to me... I mean I've heard that talk from an NP dude by my mechanic but I just dunno... Really though at the end of the day from the 5th Gear vidz a Golf GTi recommends 98/95 RON (NOT OCTANE). Diamond Motors ppl told my friends use Premium 95 RON (NOT OCTANE) for Lancers... So who to believe? The PR guy or the car manufacturers?
Nissan QG15DE wrote:The guy from the interview in Early Edition said Super and Premium from NP are the same. Only difference is that NP used a chemical called MTE or MVE (Either one) which increase octane by 3 in Premium making it RON95.
The guy also said Super Unleaded is the more environmentally gas because it doesn't contain the chemical MTE or MVE![]()
.