Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
bluefete wrote:illumin@ti wrote:round and round we go again ,,,,
Bluefete,,, when will we get off this not-so-merry-go-round?
when asked for proof, you cant answer with faith
faith dont cut it in a court of law, how can it apply here.
Show me proof that the election result as per your thread title (5th iteration) is the will of god.
Answer me with proof, and not scripture quotes or allusions to biblical tales.
Kamla is the Prime Minister, not so? What more proof do you want?
ABA Trading LTD wrote:but didnt Christ already die for your sins? How are you still a sinner?
illumin@ti wrote:bluefete wrote:illumin@ti wrote:round and round we go again ,,,,
Bluefete,,, when will we get off this not-so-merry-go-round?
when asked for proof, you cant answer with faith
faith dont cut it in a court of law, how can it apply here.
Show me proof that the election result as per your thread title (5th iteration) is the will of god.
Answer me with proof, and not scripture quotes or allusions to biblical tales.
Kamla is the Prime Minister, not so? What more proof do you want?
come come now blue, you know a one-liner like that wont satisfy me ..... go on, tell me how and why ,, wheres the proof
bluefete wrote:illumin@ti wrote:bluefete wrote:illumin@ti wrote:round and round we go again ,,,,
Bluefete,,, when will we get off this not-so-merry-go-round?
when asked for proof, you cant answer with faith
faith dont cut it in a court of law, how can it apply here.
Show me proof that the election result as per your thread title (5th iteration) is the will of god.
Answer me with proof, and not scripture quotes or allusions to biblical tales.
Kamla is the Prime Minister, not so? What more proof do you want?
come come now blue, you know a one-liner like that wont satisfy me ..... go on, tell me how and why ,, wheres the proof
How and why? Go as Patrick why he called the election. I bet you he cannot give you a logical answer. Divine intervention!!!
Like I wrote, the proof is in front your face. Kamla is the Prime Minister!! Why is this so difficult for you to accept.?
MG Man wrote:megadoc1 wrote:because MG man is more valuable to him than a dogMG Man wrote:MG Man wrote:MG Man wrote:why does jesus let the stray dogs suffer?
after peolpe like MG man take heed, repent and turn to God then he may consider anything else, jesus loves you first.
unless u think a dog is more valuable than you
so you saying all life is not of equal value???
So jesus has an agenda with a list of priorities?
Why can't the innocent creatures that his loving father created be dealt with at the same time???????
So the innocent animals must suffer because he can't multitask?
Think carefully b4 u answer
illumin@ti wrote:bluefete wrote:illumin@ti wrote:bluefete wrote:illumin@ti wrote:round and round we go again ,,,,
Bluefete,,, when will we get off this not-so-merry-go-round?
when asked for proof, you cant answer with faith
faith dont cut it in a court of law, how can it apply here.
Show me proof that the election result as per your thread title (5th iteration) is the will of god.
Answer me with proof, and not scripture quotes or allusions to biblical tales.
Kamla is the Prime Minister, not so? What more proof do you want?
come come now blue, you know a one-liner like that wont satisfy me ..... go on, tell me how and why ,, wheres the proof
How and why? Go as Patrick why he called the election. I bet you he cannot give you a logical answer. Divine intervention!!!
Like I wrote, the proof is in front your face. Kamla is the Prime Minister!! Why is this so difficult for you to accept.?
Sadly mistaken Blue - your first assumption is incorrect. if yuh want to try your hand at logic.. the same god you and 'Doc toutin and spoutin bout would divinely intervene and then do what, put a Hindu woman in charge?![]()
how logical is that?
Secondly, i have no political interest in the question at hand at all. I am not a 'feelings toter' or a mindless follower of politics or religion. So its not a matter of anything being hard for me to accept...
i just called on you to explain to me your proof that the election result is in fact an edict from god... I cant ask you a simpler question
Sky wrote:Blue said something about someone warning Manning about listening to the people.
That's his testimony on it. But I think that's as physical, logical and Earthly as telling a child don't put their hand in a hot pot, and when they do, they get burnt.
Everyone was fedup of Manning's movements. He'd do what he want and not listen to the people. At the end of the day their voice matter, and when he didn't listen to their voices they spoke with their fingers. Simple as that. A 12 year old coulda tell Manning that.
I dunno why bluefete clinging onto simple logic to defend God. Blue you're being retarded, change the thread name.
illumin@ti wrote:bluefete wrote:
People talk about the Holocaust in WW2 without realizing that it was a generational curse on the Jews going back almost 2,000 years.
"24When Pilate saw that he could prevail nothing, but that rather a tumult was made, he took water, and washed his hands before the multitude, saying, I am innocent of the blood of this just person: see ye to it.
25Then answered all the people, and said, His blood be on us, and on our children." Matthew 27:24-25
Like i been sayin all along, these ppl are off dey fleckin rockers
bluefete wrote:
God is no respecter of persons or religion!!!
"No Respecter of Persons"
The Bible teaches that there is no respecter of persons with God, "For there is no respect of persons with God," Paul declared (Rom. 2: 11). However, such is hard for man to realize, especially since man is often given to respect of persons. Nonetheless, the scriptures are emphatic and replete with teaching that presents God as not judging or treating man, any man, with respect of persons. In other words, God is just and equitable in his dealings with man (Calvinism and other false systems of theology that present God acting with respect of persons to the contrary, notwithstanding). (To read more about Calvinism, click on "What is Calvinism?")
"Then Peter opened his mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons: But in every nation he that feareth him, and worketh righteousness, is accepted with him;" "And, ye masters, do the same things unto them, forbearing threatening: knowing that your Master also is in heaven; neither is there respect of persons with him;" "But he that doeth wrong shall receive for the wrong which he hath done: and there is no respect of persons;" "And if ye call on the Father, who without respect of persons judgeth according to every man's work, pass the time of your sojourning here in fear" (Acts 10: 34, 35; Eph. 6: 9; Col. 3: 25; I Pet. 1: 17).
If God is truly no respecter of persons and treats all men equally (in the sense being addressed), then we would expect to find certain cardinal truths in the Bible to be conducive to and harmonious with the fact of God not being a respecter of persons. Let us see if this is really the case.
All men are under the same law. Men today, regardless of race, education, or location, are under the "perfect law of liberty" (Jas. 1: 25). Let us appreciate the fact that while the Law of Moses (designed for the Jew) has been abrogated, we are under the law of Christ (Gal. 6: 2; I Cor. 9: 21). This law is unique in that it is law and grace combined; hence, the perfect law of liberty (see Jn. 1: 17). The gospel, Jesus' law, was to be preached to the whole world (Matt. 28: 19; Mk. 16: 15, 16). In fact, in about twenty-five years all had heard the gospel (Rom. 10: 18). (To read more about law, click on "A Study of Law").
Beloved, both the Christian and non-Christian are answerable and amenable to God's law. John had Christians primarily in mind when he penned, "Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law" (I Jn. 3: 4, see the context). Romans 8: 7 ("the carnal mind is …not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be") is not saying that the non-Christian is not answerable to God's law. Rather, the thought is the worldly mind is not interested in God's law and will not be in its present state of carnality. Of the Corinthians Paul wrote, "And such were some of you: but ye are washed, but ye are sanctified, but ye are justified…" (I Cor. 6: 11). They had been (before they became Christians) thieves, drunkards, and adulterers (vs. 9, 10). The fact that they had been while non-Christians thieves, drunkards, and adulterers proves they were judged by and answerable to God's law before they became Christians (Eph. 4: 29; Eph. 5: 18; Matt. 19: 9, notice that God considers non-Christians in unscriptural marriages as being in adultery).
Salvation for all men. The Bible says that all men sin (Rom. 3: 23). Therefore, all men (accountable men and women) need salvation. The grace of God that brings salvation "has appeared to all men" (Tit. 2: 11). Jesus is the means of salvation for all men. Jesus, we are told, tasted death for "every man" (Heb. 2: 9). Jesus' blood was shed for the remission of man's sins (Matt. 26: 28). Paul wrote thus of Jesus, "Who gave himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time" (I Tim. 2: 6). Hence, Jude referred to the "common salvation," available to all men (Jude 3).
Salvation is offered to all men on the same conditions. Yes, there are conditions. If there were no conditions, then all men would unconditionally and universally be saved. However, such will not be the case (Matt. 7: 13, 14). Remember Peter said,
"Then Peter opened his mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons: But in every nation he that feareth him, and worketh righteousness, is accepted with him" (Acts 10: 34, 35).
To "work righteouness" means to do what God has required of man to do in order to be saved. The scriptures plainly teach: belief; repentance; confession of Jesus' deity; and water baptism for the remission of sins (Jn. 8: 24; Lk. 13: 3, 5; Rom. 10: 9, 10; Acts 2: 38, 22: 16). All men must accept God's grace in the precise same way. God does not require some to believe, repent, confess, and be baptized and not require the same of others. God only has one plan of salvation for all men (Click on "What Must I do to be Saved?" to see more).
A common church for all men. Jesus promised to build his church (Matt. 16: 18, 19). Jesus said that he would build his church despite death and hades (Ibid.). The establishment of Jesus' church was very important because "in Christ" we have redemption and all spiritual blessings (Eph. 1: 3-7). Jesus' church is for Jew and Gentile alike (Eph. 2: 16). All who are scripturally baptized are placed into Jesus' church or body (Gal. 3: 26, 27, I Cor. 12: 13, see Eph. 1: 22, 23). Hence, there is but one body or church (Eph. 4: 4, Col. 1: 18, if you want to learn more about the church, click on "The Church Jesus Built").
All men will be judged by the same standard. It is appointed unto all once to die and then the judgment (Heb. 9: 27). The Bible says, "…for we shall all stand before the judgment seat of Christ" (Rom. 14: 10, cp. 2 Cor. 5: 10). Consider the great judgment scene to come:
"And I saw a great white throne, and him that sat on it, from whose face the earth and the heaven fled away; and there was found no place for them. And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works. And the sea gave up the dead which were in it; and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them: and they were judged every man according to their works. And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death. And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire" (Rev. 20: 11-15).
Beloved, all men will be judged by the standard of God's word compared to how they lived and accepted or rejected God's grace in this life (Jn. 12: 48).
In conclusion, when we examine in detail the various features and teachings of the gospel, they are all consistent and conducive to the fact that God is no respecter of persons. Let us now revisit the text of Romans 2: 11. Verse eleven that we quoted in the beginning of this article is actually the climax to a passage that begins with verse six. Please consider the passage and the conclusion again: "Who will render to every man according to his deeds: To them who by patient continuance in well doing seek for glory and honour and immortality, eternal life: But unto them that are contentious, and do not obey the truth, but obey unrighteousness, indignation and wrath, Tribulation and anguish, upon every soul of man that doeth evil, of the Jew first, and also of the Gentile; But glory, honour, and peace, to every man that worketh good, to the Jew first, and also to the Gentile: For there is no respect of persons with God."
http://www.bibletruths.net/archives/BTAR152.htm
Yeah I know. You will say that is not "proof."
Go back and read the Book of Daniel and the tale of King Nebuchadnezzar and his son Balshazzar.
ABA Trading LTD wrote:Toyo , both you and megadoc are apparently staunch believers in Jesus, but one point I want to ask about is, megadoc1 says he does not sin at all and you say that everyone sins everyday.
Megadoc1 says that people who believe that everyone sins everyday do not understand the religion.
So from this, is either you or him don't understand your religion, which is it?
Furthermore, you speak of a mother drinking or smoking and it affects her child, of course everyone knows that.
But why does your all powerful God subject the CHILD to such hardships? The child didn't do anything, the mother did.
That aside, what about bluefete who said the holocaust happened due to something thousands of years before, you believe in that also? That the holocaust was God's work?
bluefete wrote:ABA Trading LTD wrote:but didnt Christ already die for your sins? How are you still a sinner?
Christ died to pave the way back to heaven for us and to be the intercessor between God and man.
Remember that when Jesus taught us the Lord's Prayer, he did not say, Our Jewish, Muslim, Hindu, Christian Father, but Our Father, the God of ALL men and women.
The same goes for the night of his birth when the angels said to the shepherds - "Goodwill to ALL men" not the Hindu, Muslim, Jewish, Christian men alone.
We are all sinners until we repent and do our best to refrain from sinning.
toyo682 wrote:ABA Trading LTD wrote:First of all,
My father is a hindu, my mother is a muslim and I went to a catholic school.
I do not follow any specific religion because all of them have stupid extreme traits which makes no sense at all.
well is there a better solution???? Make up our own god, or stop believing in one? How do we rid the world of evil? will a man who thinks there is no consequence for raping, killing stealing, molesting stop? we can say religion is crap and believe nothing and do everything, just my $.02. Or make a religion that makes it possible to practice what we like. Or we could follow one that rubs us the round way and goes against the evil we want to do.
Imagine a world where people actually believed killing was wrong. Were people would wait till they are married, stay faithful to their spouse, treat them with love and respect etc. There will certainly be less aids, less unwanted child, less single parent homes etc. Where men feared God to the point where they will not touch a innocent child, or rape an unsuspecting women. etc, etc. So what do you propose to achieve this? Now with gay rights being passing many people don't know that the next people who will start fighting for rights is the "MAN BOY LOVE ASSOCIATION', can you guess what they are about? Yes you guess it, making it legal to molest little children. You know why, just like homosexuals (once again not seeking to offend anyone, stating it as it is) they are born with that desire. Now when the Church was against, homosexuality we are blasted for being ignorant. So where does it stop. Soon it would be okay to have sex with animals etc etc.
Offer a better solution please and I am sure many will follow.
illumin@ti wrote:
Sadly mistaken Blue - your first assumption is incorrect. if yuh want to try your hand at logic.. the same god you and 'Doc toutin and spoutin bout would divinely intervene and then do what, put a Hindu woman in charge?![]()
how logical is that?
ABA Trading LTD wrote:illumin@ti wrote:
Sadly mistaken Blue - your first assumption is incorrect. if yuh want to try your hand at logic.. the same god you and 'Doc toutin and spoutin bout would divinely intervene and then do what, put a Hindu woman in charge?![]()
how logical is that?
Hindus have 330,000 Gods (or so ive heard)
You feel one man onna cross is a match for that?
Hindu Gods> Whatever blue believes in.
Tar Baby wrote:just in case
ABA Trading LTD wrote:bluefete wrote:ABA Trading LTD wrote:but didnt Christ already die for your sins? How are you still a sinner?
Christ died to pave the way back to heaven for us and to be the intercessor between God and man.
Remember that when Jesus taught us the Lord's Prayer, he did not say, Our Jewish, Muslim, Hindu, Christian Father, but Our Father, the God of ALL men and women.
The same goes for the night of his birth when the angels said to the shepherds - "Goodwill to ALL men" not the Hindu, Muslim, Jewish, Christian men alone.
We are all sinners until we repent and do our best to refrain from sinning.
No I dont remember that, as I was not there, and neither were you or anyone you know.
You read that in a book.
If there was a section of the world, where in the sky at a certain time, you could read God's words or you can hear him talk from the heavens from 8-12pm (but not on fridays, cuz daz when he doz go out wid d hoes), then THAT would be proof I would be willing to accept.
Not what you read in a man made book.
bluefete wrote:Back in the day, Moses went before the court of Pharaoh. Both sides knew the "arts". Long story short, Moses' snake ate up the snakes of the Egyptian Gods.ABA Trading LTD wrote:illumin@ti wrote:Sadly mistaken Blue - your first assumption is incorrect. if yuh want to try your hand at logic.. the same god you and 'Doc toutin and spoutin bout would divinely intervene and then do what, put a Hindu woman in charge?![]()
how logical is that?
Hindus have 330,000 Gods (or so ive heard)
You feel one man onna cross is a match for that?
Hindu Gods> Whatever blue believes in.
You keep missing the point. There is only one God and thus One creator of Men & Women. There are ma ny other pretenders to the throne starting with Lucifer.
bluefete wrote:Sky wrote:Blue said something about someone warning Manning about listening to the people.
That's his testimony on it. But I think that's as physical, logical and Earthly as telling a child don't put their hand in a hot pot, and when they do, they get burnt.
Everyone was fedup of Manning's movements. He'd do what he want and not listen to the people. At the end of the day their voice matter, and when he didn't listen to their voices they spoke with their fingers. Simple as that. A 12 year old coulda tell Manning that.
I dunno why bluefete clinging onto simple logic to defend God. Blue you're being retarded, change the thread name.
If my logic is so simple, why is it so difficult for you to understand?
ABA Trading LTD wrote:illumin@ti wrote:
Sadly mistaken Blue - your first assumption is incorrect. if yuh want to try your hand at logic.. the same god you and 'Doc toutin and spoutin bout would divinely intervene and then do what, put a Hindu woman in charge?![]()
how logical is that?
Hindus have 330,000 Gods (or so ive heard)
You feel one man onna cross is a match for that?
Hindu Gods> Whatever blue believes in.
wagonrunner wrote:bluefete wrote:Back in the day, Moses went before the court of Pharaoh. Both sides knew the "arts". Long story short, Moses' snake ate up the snakes of the Egyptian Gods.ABA Trading LTD wrote:illumin@ti wrote:Sadly mistaken Blue - your first assumption is incorrect. if yuh want to try your hand at logic.. the same god you and 'Doc toutin and spoutin bout would divinely intervene and then do what, put a Hindu woman in charge?![]()
how logical is that?
Hindus have 330,000 Gods (or so ive heard)
You feel one man onna cross is a match for that?
Hindu Gods> Whatever blue believes in.
You keep missing the point. There is only one God and thus One creator of Men & Women. There are ma ny other pretenders to the throne starting with Lucifer.
so you saying then, that your "one & true god", intervened, and put a person, who worships a "pretender to the throne", in charge of the nation?
and that's the basis for your best encounter, and proof of existence?
pato wrote:Aaron 2NR wrote:but when I die in faith through Christ I go straight to heaven
This is not as easy and one thinks.....
I remember hearing a sermon a couple months ago in which because you are saved and baptised, doesnt mean you are automatically going to heaven.
You must live your life in alignment with God's teachings, follow his commandments and seek his forgiveness about your shortcomings and sins......
On judgement day, you would have to answer to Almighty God for all the sins you committed and why you lived your life the way and manner in which you did......
Firstly where exactly in the bible says we are going to heaven when we die ? Eccl 9:5 says " The living are concious that they will die but the dead are concious of nothing at all".
John11:11-14- When Lazarus died and Jesus resurrected him...he did not come back to life and talk about heaven or hell...for him he was in a deep sleep which is y i was curious as where exactly did the bible tells us we are going to heaven when we die.
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:^ knockin on heaven's door?
that is a modern belief, the pearly white gates.
how are we so sure that it's not really a Flower Mountain as the Maya believed?
or as Pato stated, really just blankness, nothing, an eternal dreamless sleep into non-existence. Toyo and Megadoc1 and Bluefete might find that too scary to accept.
pato wrote:Well again in the bible it says:
Gen 3:19 "In the sweat of your face you will eat bread until you return to the ground, for out of it you were taken. For dust you are and to dust you will return". This was after Adam and Eve sinned in the garden of eden and god spoke to them. The verse tells us that we will return to where we were taken from initially -the earth, it doesn't say that your soul will go to heaven or to hell.
So now i'm wondering what exactly does the bible teach about the dead ? where are the dead ? Again the bible clearly states and compares death to a deep sleep just as Lazarus when he died.
illumin@ti wrote:^^^^ blue .... really.. im tryin to get you to speak with me, reason as it were on a human level and not try to beat me with the bible. The bible has no answer to the question that i asked you. Simply put YOU seem to be the pretender here.. Why make a statement like that and allude it to divine intervention? As Sky sed, DEMOCRACY worked and the people voted him out.
What's God got to do with that?
Oh snap,,, wait,,,, you'll ascribe that to him also right? yeah, i can see it now, god spoke to the people and made them vote.. Blue, seriously, yuh need to stop running back to the book to prove your words.
In this thread i have seen you and the mad Doc bawlin bout 'my god is a jealous god, rah rah rah, serve no other before him, rah rah' and then u say that all other 'religions are false, and there is one true god..... OK then you berate all other religions ad nauseum. Now you would have us believe that the PM, having taken oath of office while swearing on the Bhagwad Geeta - last i recall that makes her Hindu... Is the proclaimed device of deliverance from Manning's evil..??
Just how many times must you contradict yourself? Or is your faith really that convenient? and your belief that vacuous? Do you really know how many times you twisted and turned in this thread? I mean ,,, Wagonrunner asked you the same thing im asking ,, WHERE IS THE LOGIC IN THAT STATEMENT?? and more importantly how can u use that as proof ?
bluefete wrote:illumin@ti wrote:^^^^ blue .... really.. im tryin to get you to speak with me, reason as it were on a human level and not try to beat me with the bible. The bible has no answer to the question that i asked you. Simply put YOU seem to be the pretender here.. Why make a statement like that and allude it to divine intervention? As Sky sed, DEMOCRACY worked and the people voted him out.
What's God got to do with that?
Oh snap,,, wait,,,, you'll ascribe that to him also right? yeah, i can see it now, god spoke to the people and made them vote.. Blue, seriously, yuh need to stop running back to the book to prove your words.
In this thread i have seen you and the mad Doc bawlin bout 'my god is a jealous god, rah rah rah, serve no other before him, rah rah' and then u say that all other 'religions are false, and there is one true god..... OK then you berate all other religions ad nauseum. Now you would have us believe that the PM, having taken oath of office while swearing on the Bhagwad Geeta - last i recall that makes her Hindu... Is the proclaimed device of deliverance from Manning's evil..??
Just how many times must you contradict yourself? Or is your faith really that convenient? and your belief that vacuous? Do you really know how many times you twisted and turned in this thread? I mean ,,, Wagonrunner asked you the same thing im asking ,, WHERE IS THE LOGIC IN THAT STATEMENT?? and more importantly how can u use that as proof ?
Go and read about Nebuchadnezzar. That is why I posted the writing somewhere above.
God works through people, as well. So we voted and Manning lost. Logical enough, right? No divine intervention there, right? Riiiight!!!!![]()
Agnostics expect God to thump them on the head and say, "Here I am"!!!
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: The_Honourable and 221 guests