LOL!
Same fellas AGAIN. Conveniently quiet for ages, now they're suddenly talkative. So desperate to file ANYTHING in that "win" folder. Things dire, yes. Hey
le Honourable, how that North Korean nuclear deal, that you were Trump-cheerleading about, working out? I see Trump get blanked by Iran trying to restart talks now that he realises he effed up? LOL!
Kavanaugh literally became unhinged, flew into a full on angry rant about the opposition party and naming the Clintons THEMSELVES in conspiring against him, (without evidence) while claiming he would be "impartial" with future decisions?
Alrighty then. That ALONE would have disqualified a nominee in a reasonably sane world. Not for the Trumpist though.... Banana Republic is in their genes.
Oddly/conveniently enough, the investigation of the sexual assault allegations was limited in terms of time, which witnesses the bureau could talk to, and what other kinds of evidence the FBI could obtain. Since when is the FBI ordered to carry out supplemental investigations? The FBI does expansive investigations (in keeping with ALL past investigations into Supreme Court nominees.) So what gives? That "investigation" was nothing but cover for the lemmings and sheep. Mission accomplished.
Also, it's amusing to watch just how little information the Trumpy synapse-lapse operatives, require to engage full braying mode. Men talking about "Anti-Trump" without realizing that Kavanaugh wasn't even on Trump's initial list? Kavanaugh was a name submitted by uber-corporatist, establishment Republican think-tank The Federalist Society. Go look them up. Funny enough Kavanaughs name magically appeared on the list a DAY AFTER Trump and the Republican leadership met with the far-right think-tank. Also the Federalist Society is exactly the kind of anti-populist institution Trumpist tuners and Trump himself was claiming to rail against during the campaign? Funny how things change, eh? Most people on the ACTUAL left couldn't give two shits about Trump at this point, but his policies and appointments do put him in the line of fire. Learn to differentiate nuh? I counter-argue that it's the Trumpists themselves who seem to be obsessed and identify with everything Trump and Trump-ism itself. At this point I'd qualify Trump-ism as a legitimate mental illness (see EFFECTIC DESIGN, et al.)
Here's a list of decisions/votes from the guy the dummy-crew seem to have been championing and is now on the Supreme Court for decades.
Kavanaugh's recordUnleashing special interest money into elections
1. Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. Federal Election Commission (2018)
Shielded the FEC’s considerations not to investigate dark money groups, making it easier
for a partisan FEC to decline to investigate campaign violations.
2. Independence Institute v. FEC (2016)
Enabled dark money groups to evade donor disclosure requirements. Kavanaugh’s
opinion was later reversed by a three judge panel and the reversal was summarily upheld
by the Supreme Court.
3. Bluman v. FEC (2011)
Suggested foreign nationals can run political “issue” advertisements.
4. Emily’s list v. FEC (2009)
Allowed nonprofit front groups to raise and spend unlimited amounts of money in
elections.
Protecting corporations from liability
1. PHH v. CFPB (2018, en banc, dissenting)
Declared the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, charged with protecting consumers
from fraud and abuse, unconstitutional.
2. Bais Yaakov of Spring Valley v. Federal Communications Commission (2017)
Struck down law that would have required businesses to include opt-out notices with
solicited fax advertisements.
3. NLRB v. CNN America, Inc. (2017, dissenting).
Argued that an employer should be absolved of liability for firing union workers and
discriminating against them when rehiring.
4. Ortiz-Diaz v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development (2016,
concurring).
Made it harder for federal employees to bring discrimination claims.
5. Sea World of Florida, LLC v. Thomas Perez (2014, dissenting)
Argued that employers in dangerous industries should not be subjected to workplace safety
regulations.
6. Saleh v. Titan Corp. (2009)
Extended sovereign immunity to tort claims brought by international plaintiffs.
7. Jackson v. Gonzales (2007)
Denied employment discrimination claim by employee who alleged race discrimination.
Helping polluters pollute
1. Mexichem Fluor, Inc. v. Environmental Protection Agency (2017)
Undermined agency deference, stripping the EPA of its authority to properly implement
the Clean Air Act and opening the door to unregulated corporate pollution.
2. Communities for a Better Environment v. EPA (2014)
Concluded that environmental groups did not have standing to challenge an EPA
decision not to tighten carbon monoxide standards.
3. In re Aiken County (2013)
Granted permission to process a license application for permanent nuclear waste station,
limiting agency discretion.
4. Friends of Blackwater v. Salazar (2012)
Upheld the Fish and Wildlife Service’s delisting of the West Virginia Northern Flying
Squirrel as an endangered species.
5. EME Homer City Generation, L.P. v. E.P.A. (2012)
Struck down EPA rule aimed at reducing air pollution, expanding judicial review over final
rules promulgated by the EPA and undercutting the ability of the EPA to rely on the Clean
Air Act to craft new rules.
6. Howmet Corp. v. E.P.A. (2010, dissenting)
Refused to approve an EPA fine against company that had improperly shipped corrosive
chemicals.
7. American Bird Conservancy, Inc. v. FCC (2008, dissenting)
Dissented from a decision requiring the FCC to more completely review possible harm to
migratory birds.
8. Sierra Club v. EPA (2008, dissenting)
Supported a rule that prevented authorities from supplementing inadequate federal
monitoring requirements of sources of air pollution.
9. Association of Irritated Residents v. E.P.A. (2007)
Gave polluters a free pass by refusing to review agreements between EPA and animal
feeding operations.
Striking down commonsense gun regulations
1. Heller v. District of Colombia (2011, dissenting)
Argued against Washington, D.C.’s common-sense gun laws banning semi-automatic
weapons and registration requirements.
Keeping injured plaintiffs out of court
1. National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) v. Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge 189
Labor Committee (2017)
Aggressively using judicial review to vacate an arbitration award that would have reinstated
a terminated union member, undercutting workers’ rights.
2. Meshal v. Higgenbotham (2015, concurring)
Limited access to civil remedies for victims of torture and abuse.
3. Odhiambo v. Republic of Kenya (2014)
Limited the ability to combat fraud by shrinking the types of claims that can be brought under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act.
More here:
https://www.whitehouse.senate.gov/imo/m ... Cases1.pdfHe seems to vote pro-corporation/anti average workers/citizen EVERY chance he gets? Quite a feat. But do tell me about Hillary and people on the left "beating up" merely to be Anti-Trump again, plebs?
