Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
sMASH wrote:Crimea or bust!
The crimean resistances forces gearing up to fite back the Russian invaders, any day now....
Is the first use of nuclear weapons ever justified? A top adviser to Vladimir Putin now says yes
Escalation of nuclear threats from Russia coincides with Ukraine's counteroffensive
https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/russia-nuclear-weapons-attack-putin-1.6885338
"The enemy must know that we are ready to deliver a pre-emptive strike ... to prevent a slide into global thermonuclear war," wrote Sergei Karaganov, chair of the Council on Foreign and Defence Policy, a prestigious Russian think-tank, and an adviser to Putin.
Karaganov is believed to be one of the architects of Russia's invasion of Ukraine and has frequently provided an ideological justification for waging war on that country.
maj. tom wrote:This is madness. Scary madness. Is this really happening? This madman!Is the first use of nuclear weapons ever justified? A top adviser to Vladimir Putin now says yes
Escalation of nuclear threats from Russia coincides with Ukraine's counteroffensive
https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/russia-nuclear-weapons-attack-putin-1.6885338
"The enemy must know that we are ready to deliver a pre-emptive strike ... to prevent a slide into global thermonuclear war," wrote Sergei Karaganov, chair of the Council on Foreign and Defence Policy, a prestigious Russian think-tank, and an adviser to Putin.
Karaganov is believed to be one of the architects of Russia's invasion of Ukraine and has frequently provided an ideological justification for waging war on that country.
Assuming that Russia envisages NATO as the enemy that must be destroyed, the de facto military target is then the United States.maj. tom wrote:This is madness. Scary madness. Is this really happening? This madman!Is the first use of nuclear weapons ever justified? A top adviser to Vladimir Putin now says yes
Escalation of nuclear threats from Russia coincides with Ukraine's counteroffensive
https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/russia-nuclear-weapons-attack-putin-1.6885338
"The enemy must know that we are ready to deliver a pre-emptive strike ... to prevent a slide into global thermonuclear war," wrote Sergei Karaganov, chair of the Council on Foreign and Defence Policy, a prestigious Russian think-tank, and an adviser to Putin.
Karaganov is believed to be one of the architects of Russia's invasion of Ukraine and has frequently provided an ideological justification for waging war on that country.
Under current U.S. policy, when can the president order a nuclear strike?
Current U.S. policy does not restrict the president’s ability to order a nuclear strike for any reason at any time. The military may reject an order that is perceived to violate laws of war, and there are legal concerns about the role of Congress authorizing the use of force, but as a matter of broad understanding, the president can launch nuclear weapons when and if s/he chose to.
https://armscontrolcenter.org/issues/no ... questions/
That Russia has not taken military action against a NATO member country, and has been careful not to take escalatory action that might provoke a direct NATO response thus far suggests that NATO’s theatre nuclear posture, based on nuclear sharing and the deployment of B61 gravity bombs delivered by Dual-Capable Aircraft (DCA) in Europe, is sufficient for the moment. However, Russia’s behaviour arguably vindicates the 2020 decision by the US to deploy the W76-2 low-yield nuclear warhead atop the D5 Trident Submarine Launched Ballistic Missiles (SLBM) to complement NATO’s current tactical nuclear weapon mainstay (since they are more survivable than the DCA-delivered B61). In addition, the United Kingdom’s 2021 decision, with its Integrated Review, to expand its nuclear stockpile by 40 percent may also be seen as a reasonable response. While the introduction of US low-yield SLBM adds technical and political flexibility to the strategic calculus, the Alliance’s nuclear posture builds on three decision-making centres – Washington, London and Paris. Other Allies are involved either through the nuclear-sharing agreement underlying the DCAs or through the Nuclear Planning Group, adding a dimension of political unity and an element of strategic decentralisation, which, combined, make it harder for Russia to gauge NATO's possible actions and reactions, thus undermining its possible bets.
https://www.nato.int/docu/review/articl ... index.html
sMASH wrote:Has the spring offensive started yet?
sMASH wrote:Quick elenski, time to strike the iron... Its hot!
Run in!
sMASH wrote:Shouldn't he attempt to recapture the donbas?
Putin calls armed rebellion by Wagner mercenary group a betrayal, vows to defend Russia
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/putin-calls-armed-rebellion-by-wagner-mercenary-group-a-betrayal-and-vows-to-defend-russia/
President Vladimir Putin vowed Saturday to defend Russia against an armed rebellion by mercenary chief Yevgeny Prigozhin, who led his troops out of Ukraine and into a key city south of Moscow.
The uprising, which Putin called "a stab in the back," was the biggest threat to his leadership in over two decades in power.
The private army led by Prigozhin appears to control the military headquarters in Rostov-on-Don, a city 660 miles (over 1,000 kilometers) south of Moscow that runs Russian offensive operations in Ukraine, Britain's Ministry of Defense said in an intelligence briefing.
The jet of the Belarus Dictator Lukashenko family took off from Belarus and is now in the sky over Turkey.
Upon entering Russian airspace, the aircraft turned off the transponders and turned them on only over Kalmykia, when exiting Russia.
https://twitter.com/akaclandestine/status/1672426735265038339
bluefete wrote:^^ No wonder Turkey does not want Ukraine to join NATO.
pugboy wrote:turkey like to play them is nice guy but they somewhat dodgy
look how the saudis murdered the guy therebluefete wrote:^^ No wonder Turkey does not want Ukraine to join NATO.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests