Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Habit7 wrote:The_Honourable wrote:PNM is a "christian" party... on one hand they will quote scripture and talk about the blood of Jesus...The_Honourable wrote:There is nothing christian about the PNM... it's just assumed.
Do you willing contradict yourself or do I always have to point it out to you?
The_Honourable wrote:PNM is a "christian" party... on one hand they will quote scripture and talk about the blood of Jesus... but on the other hand they will proceed to cuss yuh if you have a different opinion from theirs. What makes it interesting is that these PNM "christians" ketchin dey ass and blaming others for their predicament.
If you are putting inverted commas it would mean that there is something about them that is Christian but really they are not. But you subsequently said there is nothing about them that its Christian. You are contradicting yourself.The_Honourable wrote:Notice the quotation marks aka inverted commas on the word christian. Maybe this pic will put it into context for you to understand... which i doubt.
EFFECTIC DESIGNS wrote:One of the big reasons I would never vote for PNM is because of the very same fact that they like to claim to be a Christian party.
To me that says you have no interest in doing anything for people of different religion or even non believers. Infact some of the biggest wackos in this world or should I say bible belt America are these very same Christians who think anyone who celebrates Halloween should be burnt alive.
As if mixing religion and politics wasn't already such a mess.
EFFECTIC DESIGNS wrote:Not even sure if things like Express papers was online back in those days.
You may not get a link but its well known and they have proclaimed to be a Christian party in the past.
They have never denounced being Christian since and therefore the general public can only assume they are still a said Christian party. The_Honourable did explain it quite well though.
EFFECTIC DESIGNS wrote:Not even sure if things like Express papers was online back in those days.
You may not get a link but its well known and they have proclaimed to be a Christian party in the past.
They have never denounced being Christian since and therefore the general public can only assume they are still a said Christian party. The_Honourable did explain it quite well though.
EFFECTIC DESIGNS wrote:I can see now that there is no reasoning with die hard PNM supporters
Habit7 wrote:If you are putting inverted commas it would mean that there is something about them that is Christian but really they are not. But you subsequently said there is nothing about them that its Christian. You are contradicting yourself.The_Honourable wrote:Notice the quotation marks aka inverted commas on the word christian. Maybe this pic will put it into context for you to understand... which i doubt.
But let me get off that topic because it is a straw man. The PNM has never claimed to be Christian, however you deemed it to be Christian, showed how non-Christian it truly is, then conclude how wrong your initial perception of Christian the PNM really was.
Some of you all have a shallow history. In 1956 the PNM was the party out of many that formed the colonial govt and possessed those across the spectrum. The main opposition the DLP was able to garner support from the indo/Hindu population promoting the fear that the PNM independence thrust would suppress the Hindus in T&T. DLP supporters was predominantly Hindu, while the PNM received support from all other religions and ethnicities. After independence, when the DLP realised that their support base was not adequate, they tried to add other opposition parties to their front, they failed even more. The DLP eventually diffused into the SDMS and other opposition parties.
When others went down the road of religion, the PNM for 50+ years was secular. Just because you claim something in your contradictory mind, doesn't mean it exists in reality.
EFFECTIC DESIGNS wrote:I can see now that there is no reasoning with die hard PNM supporters
Therefore I will leave the forums to you guys.
I see why ZR says Carnival is Trini problem, I have never been able to reason with a single PNM supporter / carnival supporter somehow they go hand in hand.
So enjoy your topic at hand.
UML wrote:Maybe the mere fact of Manning's involvement in buildingva church with State funds and having a personal priestess who was directly involved in government decisions and benefitted from government funding and Manning's dream to become a priest it could be assumed that the leader of the party and the party by extension was Christian?
No bai.zoom rader wrote:^^^ any arrest for this alleged government minster as yet?
j.o.e wrote:Both sides have die hards that don't follow logic.. that's why there are safe seats.
Habit7 wrote:No bai.zoom rader wrote:^^^ any arrest for this alleged government minster as yet?
But PNM is a Christian party, Manning used state funds to build a church and Calder Hart stole millions/billions.
Habit7 wrote:Well the UNC promoted the idea in 2010 and many UNC supporters here seem to believe so. But the Uff commission and informed and unbiased sources say otherwise. I agree with the informed and unbiased sources.
Habit7 wrote:That what you explained there doesn't equate to he stole millions/billions, a narrative of the UNC and their supporters.
If you want to equate to that then one can say Anil stole millions in LifeSport.
Habit7 wrote:UML wrote:Maybe the mere fact of Manning's involvement in buildingva church with State funds and having a personal priestess who was directly involved in government decisions and benefitted from government funding and Manning's dream to become a priest it could be assumed that the leader of the party and the party by extension was Christian?
Please prove where "buildingva church with State funds" occurred under Manning.
You all are making wild propaganda claims from PNM being a Christian party to state funds being used to build a church.
But serious allegation that govt ministers have been calling hits on citizens of our country, from legal luminaries to irrelevant DJs, but you choose to stick your finger in your ears and beg that we give them 5 more years.
UML wrote:Maybe the mere fact of Manning's involvement in buildingva church with State funds and having a personal priestess who was directly involved in government decisions and benefitted from government funding and Manning's dream to become a priest it could be assumed that the leader of the party and the party by extension was Christian?
Habit7 wrote:If Rowley is at fault because he was apart of a government that approved granting of lands to a religious body (something done by govts past and present), how much more guilty is Kamla for presiding over LifeSport which not only ended up with 34 million in one person's pocket, but the loss of lives of several ppl
UML wrote:Habit7 wrote:If Rowley is at fault because he was apart of a government that approved granting of lands to a religious body (something done by govts past and present), how much more guilty is Kamla for presiding over LifeSport which not only ended up with 34 million in one person's pocket, but the loss of lives of several ppl
What official religious body or oganisation does Pena belong to again? How much did the church cost the state? What other state privileges were provided to her by the state and at what cost?
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Duane 3NE 2NR, VexXx Dogg and 72 guests