TriniTuner.com | Latest Event:
Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
zoom rader wrote:With kants like you , no other party has a chance.SuperiorMan wrote:zoom rader wrote:U a lil back pedal mudda ConTSuperiorMan wrote:Mmoney607 wrote:SuperiorMan wrote:Please Kamla just retire.
And who will be leader?
Somebody that actually have a chance of winning the next elections.
Zoom rader, UNC has no chance of winning an election until Kamla leaves. No amount of beating up gonna change that.
That's why Trinidad is a shitthole with idiots that think like you.
Trinis arse too happy, red government should buss more taxes and higher gas prices
Blaze d Chalice wrote:Kamala is a undercover PNM, put there by the PNM to ensure PNM will keep winning.
UNC people won't even begin to comprehend.
Them 1% really smart because they know that Kamal supporters would never even entertain the thought of Kamal being a PNM.
dogg wrote:Barath, Kevin Ramnarine, Jearlean, Sadam, Gavin Nicholas, Ameen...zoom rader wrote:What new leadership will you like?dogg wrote:PNM is the lesser of two evils.
The UNC can't even function properly as opposition, no one pays attention to them save for the yellow till they dead crew.
The 10% of the electorate who sways elections one way or the next will NEVER vote for the UNC with Kamla as leader. And that includes me. Bring in new leadership, and I'll climb on board.zoom rader wrote:All dis and dey voting the red government.timelapse wrote:You were right the first time.MaxPower wrote:^ Ok friends,
How about the majority of Trinis asses are too blasted happy?
Will that work?
Prices going up but we feting still.
Prices going up but we running down whores still.
Prices going up but carnivalling still.
Prices going up but we tuning car to race people on pothole ridden roads still.
Prices going up but we encouraging illegals to leech out the money.(Thats you)
Prices going up but we still have a 2 can a day Redbull addiction.(Thats me)
Yea, we ass too happy
Trinis are ingornant and very stupid ppl.
Spend ,spend, fete , fete, drink , drink.
Then when they catch dey arse blame Kamala.
Back water rats arse shitthole of a country.
Red government ppl vomit the same statements as you with no intentions of ever swaying from the red government. This is a plot used time and time again .
It's always change the leadership of the UNC or bring in fresh faces, but they never stray from the red government
zoom rader wrote:With kants like you , no other party has a chance.SuperiorMan wrote:zoom rader wrote:U a lil back pedal mudda ConTSuperiorMan wrote:Mmoney607 wrote:SuperiorMan wrote:Please Kamla just retire.
And who will be leader?
Somebody that actually have a chance of winning the next elections.
Zoom rader, UNC has no chance of winning an election until Kamla leaves. No amount of beating up gonna change that.
That's why Trinidad is a shitthole with idiots that think like you.
Trinis arse too happy, red government should buss more taxes and higher gas prices
dogg wrote:Barath, Kevin Ramnarine, Jearlean, Sadam, Gavin Nicholas, Ameen...
You do know that this is Redman right?wing wrote:COMMENTARY
The Opposition has a problem
PAOLO KERNAHAN 8 HRS AGO[https://newsday]Paolo Kernahan
PAOLO KERNAHAN
IS THE Opposition accountable for the stewardship of its role in governance? Many UNC loyalists seem to think the party does not have to uphold any performance standards. The hierarchy only needs to do something, anything – just show up (or walk out).
Last week I made a facetious Facebook post questioning the strategy behind the Opposition's protest against gas price increases on the day the increases went into effect.
Why mobilise after gas station pumps had already been recalibrated? The impending adjustment was announced at the beginning of April. Wouldn't it have been more logical to protest every day after the notice went out?
My relatively innocuous post attracted a strike force of opposition drones.
“At least we doing something, what are you doing?”
Apparently, columnists and ordinary citizens must supply receipts of activism to qualify for the right of criticism. Perhaps some circular went out itemising requirements for eligibility to condemn corruption, injustice and imbecility in TT? I must have missed it.
Among the baying mob strafing my Facebook post with intemperate remarks were upper-tier members of the UNC's inner circle. We're not just talking about your average, street-level political bottle-pelter.
Now in my life as a reporter, news producer, talk-show host and columnist I faced constant public critiques of my work. The same is true of my afterlife as an online entrepreneur. Can you imagine if I responded to both constructive and patently malicious criticism with vituperative, emotionally-driven clapbacks?
“You feel you could do the video better, well, you do it, nah!”
Like it or not, certain jobs come with stinging public evaluation and criticism. It's just one of those clauses in the contract most people gloss over.
Oddly enough, I tend to be harder on the government of the day in my commentary. Governments are the ones with access to resources, the authority to set policy and drive (or derail) socio-economic development. They've got their hands both on the till and the tiller.
Yet one post questioning the Opposition's questionable protest strategy had the yellow band seeing red.
There are many problems with the “at least we did something” sentiment. It incorrectly assumes doing something, even if the action is devoid of strategy and produces no result, is somehow different from doing nothing.
Moreover, this underlying attitude exposes a misunderstanding of the Opposition's responsibility to those who elected them. People need intelligent advocacy, not half-baked tactics engineered for optics. This myopic approach also disregards citizens who voted for the Government but strongly disagree with its decisions. But “is dem vote fuh dat!” – or whatever.
Make no mistake, the fuel price hike will punish low- and middle-income families. Thousands are already reeling from a terminally-ill economy further sickened by the pandemic. That's why the Opposition needed a solid strategy, one that gauged the severe pains being endured by the population.
Protests against the fuel-price hike were entirely appropriate, but why push for a rollback of such a major decision rather than try to prevent its implementation? Even if the Government proceeded, pressure could have been applied to lobby for improvement of the notoriously hobbled and unreliable PTSC.
In this way, citizens would benefit from a more dependable and efficient public transportation system, in theory anyway. Ultimately, the Opposition's protest came off as watered-down political theatre.
Not surprisingly, the UNC couldn't stoke support outside its core fandom. Even for an issue touching so many citizens of different political allegiances, the Opposition was unable to attract crossover support.
That's because the UNC clearly doesn't know how to rally a diverse, divided and beleaguered nation. Additionally, it doesn't seem interested in learning. Party insiders are keener on attacking critics, the same people it’s trying to get on board for votes.
The UNC will probably win the next general election anyway. That victory won't be owed to earned appeal, but overwhelming disgust with the PNM and its inability to lead the country out of challenging circumstances. Without broader support, though, the UNC will have one helluva a ride governing a country that, by then, will be in complete tatters.
UNC leaders haven't demonstrated they've learned from their mistakes. Practising the same antagonistic politics that are the speciality of the PNM does nothing for their image and saleability.
The party needs to hit "Pause" and absorb widespread public scrutiny of its performance.
It should examine why it continuously fails to galvanise the populace to causes like the gas-price hikes which are innately flammable.
That would certainly be more useful than chasing after parked cars on social media.
The UNC are not important at this stage. Yet u have the most posts in the UNC forum. Once again I did not address you personally, so keep me out of your thoughts and posts.zoom rader wrote:You do know that this is Redman right?wing wrote:COMMENTARY
The Opposition has a problem
PAOLO KERNAHAN 8 HRS AGO[https://newsday]Paolo Kernahan
PAOLO KERNAHAN
IS THE Opposition accountable for the stewardship of its role in governance? Many UNC loyalists seem to think the party does not have to uphold any performance standards. The hierarchy only needs to do something, anything – just show up (or walk out).
Last week I made a facetious Facebook post questioning the strategy behind the Opposition's protest against gas price increases on the day the increases went into effect.
Why mobilise after gas station pumps had already been recalibrated? The impending adjustment was announced at the beginning of April. Wouldn't it have been more logical to protest every day after the notice went out?
My relatively innocuous post attracted a strike force of opposition drones.
“At least we doing something, what are you doing?”
Apparently, columnists and ordinary citizens must supply receipts of activism to qualify for the right of criticism. Perhaps some circular went out itemising requirements for eligibility to condemn corruption, injustice and imbecility in TT? I must have missed it.
Among the baying mob strafing my Facebook post with intemperate remarks were upper-tier members of the UNC's inner circle. We're not just talking about your average, street-level political bottle-pelter.
Now in my life as a reporter, news producer, talk-show host and columnist I faced constant public critiques of my work. The same is true of my afterlife as an online entrepreneur. Can you imagine if I responded to both constructive and patently malicious criticism with vituperative, emotionally-driven clapbacks?
“You feel you could do the video better, well, you do it, nah!”
Like it or not, certain jobs come with stinging public evaluation and criticism. It's just one of those clauses in the contract most people gloss over.
Oddly enough, I tend to be harder on the government of the day in my commentary. Governments are the ones with access to resources, the authority to set policy and drive (or derail) socio-economic development. They've got their hands both on the till and the tiller.
Yet one post questioning the Opposition's questionable protest strategy had the yellow band seeing red.
There are many problems with the “at least we did something” sentiment. It incorrectly assumes doing something, even if the action is devoid of strategy and produces no result, is somehow different from doing nothing.
Moreover, this underlying attitude exposes a misunderstanding of the Opposition's responsibility to those who elected them. People need intelligent advocacy, not half-baked tactics engineered for optics. This myopic approach also disregards citizens who voted for the Government but strongly disagree with its decisions. But “is dem vote fuh dat!” – or whatever.
Make no mistake, the fuel price hike will punish low- and middle-income families. Thousands are already reeling from a terminally-ill economy further sickened by the pandemic. That's why the Opposition needed a solid strategy, one that gauged the severe pains being endured by the population.
Protests against the fuel-price hike were entirely appropriate, but why push for a rollback of such a major decision rather than try to prevent its implementation? Even if the Government proceeded, pressure could have been applied to lobby for improvement of the notoriously hobbled and unreliable PTSC.
In this way, citizens would benefit from a more dependable and efficient public transportation system, in theory anyway. Ultimately, the Opposition's protest came off as watered-down political theatre.
Not surprisingly, the UNC couldn't stoke support outside its core fandom. Even for an issue touching so many citizens of different political allegiances, the Opposition was unable to attract crossover support.
That's because the UNC clearly doesn't know how to rally a diverse, divided and beleaguered nation. Additionally, it doesn't seem interested in learning. Party insiders are keener on attacking critics, the same people it’s trying to get on board for votes.
The UNC will probably win the next general election anyway. That victory won't be owed to earned appeal, but overwhelming disgust with the PNM and its inability to lead the country out of challenging circumstances. Without broader support, though, the UNC will have one helluva a ride governing a country that, by then, will be in complete tatters.
UNC leaders haven't demonstrated they've learned from their mistakes. Practising the same antagonistic politics that are the speciality of the PNM does nothing for their image and saleability.
The party needs to hit "Pause" and absorb widespread public scrutiny of its performance.
It should examine why it continuously fails to galvanise the populace to causes like the gas-price hikes which are innately flammable.
That would certainly be more useful than chasing after parked cars on social media.
The same red government blogger from bailiser whore House.
Come on Wing stop being the red government Cont that you are by posting this trash. You looking like a big whore.
He is , it's the same person.Dizzy28 wrote:Waitt...................................ZR is saying Paolo is Redman???
BWDMC I does read here sometimes!!
People don't take the opposition seriously because the people themselves are not serious about country first.The_Honourable wrote:Good commentary by Paolo. Most persons including some within the UNC knows that the party needs to revitalize itself but it is not going to happen until there is a leadership change. Opposition is not being taken seriously right now except by the party faithful.
Let's see how the PDP goes, I can easily vote for them.
Big Kants like you are vagrants when non red governments are in power.eliteauto wrote:What Paolo wrote is evident every day on tuner
Listen Kant,wing wrote:The UNC are not important at this stage. Yet u have the most posts in the UNC forum. Once again I did not address you personally, so keep me out of your thoughts and posts.zoom rader wrote:You do know that this is Redman right?wing wrote:COMMENTARY
The Opposition has a problem
PAOLO KERNAHAN 8 HRS AGO[https://newsday]Paolo Kernahan
PAOLO KERNAHAN
IS THE Opposition accountable for the stewardship of its role in governance? Many UNC loyalists seem to think the party does not have to uphold any performance standards. The hierarchy only needs to do something, anything – just show up (or walk out).
Last week I made a facetious Facebook post questioning the strategy behind the Opposition's protest against gas price increases on the day the increases went into effect.
Why mobilise after gas station pumps had already been recalibrated? The impending adjustment was announced at the beginning of April. Wouldn't it have been more logical to protest every day after the notice went out?
My relatively innocuous post attracted a strike force of opposition drones.
“At least we doing something, what are you doing?”
Apparently, columnists and ordinary citizens must supply receipts of activism to qualify for the right of criticism. Perhaps some circular went out itemising requirements for eligibility to condemn corruption, injustice and imbecility in TT? I must have missed it.
Among the baying mob strafing my Facebook post with intemperate remarks were upper-tier members of the UNC's inner circle. We're not just talking about your average, street-level political bottle-pelter.
Now in my life as a reporter, news producer, talk-show host and columnist I faced constant public critiques of my work. The same is true of my afterlife as an online entrepreneur. Can you imagine if I responded to both constructive and patently malicious criticism with vituperative, emotionally-driven clapbacks?
“You feel you could do the video better, well, you do it, nah!”
Like it or not, certain jobs come with stinging public evaluation and criticism. It's just one of those clauses in the contract most people gloss over.
Oddly enough, I tend to be harder on the government of the day in my commentary. Governments are the ones with access to resources, the authority to set policy and drive (or derail) socio-economic development. They've got their hands both on the till and the tiller.
Yet one post questioning the Opposition's questionable protest strategy had the yellow band seeing red.
There are many problems with the “at least we did something” sentiment. It incorrectly assumes doing something, even if the action is devoid of strategy and produces no result, is somehow different from doing nothing.
Moreover, this underlying attitude exposes a misunderstanding of the Opposition's responsibility to those who elected them. People need intelligent advocacy, not half-baked tactics engineered for optics. This myopic approach also disregards citizens who voted for the Government but strongly disagree with its decisions. But “is dem vote fuh dat!” – or whatever.
Make no mistake, the fuel price hike will punish low- and middle-income families. Thousands are already reeling from a terminally-ill economy further sickened by the pandemic. That's why the Opposition needed a solid strategy, one that gauged the severe pains being endured by the population.
Protests against the fuel-price hike were entirely appropriate, but why push for a rollback of such a major decision rather than try to prevent its implementation? Even if the Government proceeded, pressure could have been applied to lobby for improvement of the notoriously hobbled and unreliable PTSC.
In this way, citizens would benefit from a more dependable and efficient public transportation system, in theory anyway. Ultimately, the Opposition's protest came off as watered-down political theatre.
Not surprisingly, the UNC couldn't stoke support outside its core fandom. Even for an issue touching so many citizens of different political allegiances, the Opposition was unable to attract crossover support.
That's because the UNC clearly doesn't know how to rally a diverse, divided and beleaguered nation. Additionally, it doesn't seem interested in learning. Party insiders are keener on attacking critics, the same people it’s trying to get on board for votes.
The UNC will probably win the next general election anyway. That victory won't be owed to earned appeal, but overwhelming disgust with the PNM and its inability to lead the country out of challenging circumstances. Without broader support, though, the UNC will have one helluva a ride governing a country that, by then, will be in complete tatters.
UNC leaders haven't demonstrated they've learned from their mistakes. Practising the same antagonistic politics that are the speciality of the PNM does nothing for their image and saleability.
The party needs to hit "Pause" and absorb widespread public scrutiny of its performance.
It should examine why it continuously fails to galvanise the populace to causes like the gas-price hikes which are innately flammable.
That would certainly be more useful than chasing after parked cars on social media.
The same red government blogger from bailiser whore House.
Come on Wing stop being the red government Cont that you are by posting this trash. You looking like a big whore.
RedmanRovin wrote:a whole lot of nutten from paolo imo ... jes a yapper like many others
UNC not important at this stage. Yet you have the most to say. You are fooling nobody with your yellow DNA. If kernahan is Redman, then you must be padarath.zoom rader wrote:Listen Kant,wing wrote:The UNC are not important at this stage. Yet u have the most posts in the UNC forum. Once again I did not address you personally, so keep me out of your thoughts and posts.zoom rader wrote:You do know that this is Redman right?wing wrote:COMMENTARY
The Opposition has a problem
PAOLO KERNAHAN 8 HRS AGO[https://newsday]Paolo Kernahan
PAOLO KERNAHAN
IS THE Opposition accountable for the stewardship of its role in governance? Many UNC loyalists seem to think the party does not have to uphold any performance standards. The hierarchy only needs to do something, anything – just show up (or walk out).
Last week I made a facetious Facebook post questioning the strategy behind the Opposition's protest against gas price increases on the day the increases went into effect.
Why mobilise after gas station pumps had already been recalibrated? The impending adjustment was announced at the beginning of April. Wouldn't it have been more logical to protest every day after the notice went out?
My relatively innocuous post attracted a strike force of opposition drones.
“At least we doing something, what are you doing?”
Apparently, columnists and ordinary citizens must supply receipts of activism to qualify for the right of criticism. Perhaps some circular went out itemising requirements for eligibility to condemn corruption, injustice and imbecility in TT? I must have missed it.
Among the baying mob strafing my Facebook post with intemperate remarks were upper-tier members of the UNC's inner circle. We're not just talking about your average, street-level political bottle-pelter.
Now in my life as a reporter, news producer, talk-show host and columnist I faced constant public critiques of my work. The same is true of my afterlife as an online entrepreneur. Can you imagine if I responded to both constructive and patently malicious criticism with vituperative, emotionally-driven clapbacks?
“You feel you could do the video better, well, you do it, nah!”
Like it or not, certain jobs come with stinging public evaluation and criticism. It's just one of those clauses in the contract most people gloss over.
Oddly enough, I tend to be harder on the government of the day in my commentary. Governments are the ones with access to resources, the authority to set policy and drive (or derail) socio-economic development. They've got their hands both on the till and the tiller.
Yet one post questioning the Opposition's questionable protest strategy had the yellow band seeing red.
There are many problems with the “at least we did something” sentiment. It incorrectly assumes doing something, even if the action is devoid of strategy and produces no result, is somehow different from doing nothing.
Moreover, this underlying attitude exposes a misunderstanding of the Opposition's responsibility to those who elected them. People need intelligent advocacy, not half-baked tactics engineered for optics. This myopic approach also disregards citizens who voted for the Government but strongly disagree with its decisions. But “is dem vote fuh dat!” – or whatever.
Make no mistake, the fuel price hike will punish low- and middle-income families. Thousands are already reeling from a terminally-ill economy further sickened by the pandemic. That's why the Opposition needed a solid strategy, one that gauged the severe pains being endured by the population.
Protests against the fuel-price hike were entirely appropriate, but why push for a rollback of such a major decision rather than try to prevent its implementation? Even if the Government proceeded, pressure could have been applied to lobby for improvement of the notoriously hobbled and unreliable PTSC.
In this way, citizens would benefit from a more dependable and efficient public transportation system, in theory anyway. Ultimately, the Opposition's protest came off as watered-down political theatre.
Not surprisingly, the UNC couldn't stoke support outside its core fandom. Even for an issue touching so many citizens of different political allegiances, the Opposition was unable to attract crossover support.
That's because the UNC clearly doesn't know how to rally a diverse, divided and beleaguered nation. Additionally, it doesn't seem interested in learning. Party insiders are keener on attacking critics, the same people it’s trying to get on board for votes.
The UNC will probably win the next general election anyway. That victory won't be owed to earned appeal, but overwhelming disgust with the PNM and its inability to lead the country out of challenging circumstances. Without broader support, though, the UNC will have one helluva a ride governing a country that, by then, will be in complete tatters.
UNC leaders haven't demonstrated they've learned from their mistakes. Practising the same antagonistic politics that are the speciality of the PNM does nothing for their image and saleability.
The party needs to hit "Pause" and absorb widespread public scrutiny of its performance.
It should examine why it continuously fails to galvanise the populace to causes like the gas-price hikes which are innately flammable.
That would certainly be more useful than chasing after parked cars on social media.
The same red government blogger from bailiser whore House.
Come on Wing stop being the red government Cont that you are by posting this trash. You looking like a big whore.
We know you an agent from bailiser whore House posting this shitt from Redman.
If unc want to die and erase themselves, then let them. It will be better for red government like yourself and eliteauto-tuntun
Why post this BS ?
Unc is important at this stage yet.wing wrote:UNC not important at this stage. Yet you have the most to say. You are fooling nobody with your yellow DNA. If kernahan is Redman, then you must be padarath.zoom rader wrote:Listen Kant,wing wrote:The UNC are not important at this stage. Yet u have the most posts in the UNC forum. Once again I did not address you personally, so keep me out of your thoughts and posts.zoom rader wrote:You do know that this is Redman right?wing wrote:COMMENTARY
The Opposition has a problem
PAOLO KERNAHAN 8 HRS AGO[https://newsday]Paolo Kernahan
PAOLO KERNAHAN
IS THE Opposition accountable for the stewardship of its role in governance? Many UNC loyalists seem to think the party does not have to uphold any performance standards. The hierarchy only needs to do something, anything – just show up (or walk out).
Last week I made a facetious Facebook post questioning the strategy behind the Opposition's protest against gas price increases on the day the increases went into effect.
Why mobilise after gas station pumps had already been recalibrated? The impending adjustment was announced at the beginning of April. Wouldn't it have been more logical to protest every day after the notice went out?
My relatively innocuous post attracted a strike force of opposition drones.
“At least we doing something, what are you doing?”
Apparently, columnists and ordinary citizens must supply receipts of activism to qualify for the right of criticism. Perhaps some circular went out itemising requirements for eligibility to condemn corruption, injustice and imbecility in TT? I must have missed it.
Among the baying mob strafing my Facebook post with intemperate remarks were upper-tier members of the UNC's inner circle. We're not just talking about your average, street-level political bottle-pelter.
Now in my life as a reporter, news producer, talk-show host and columnist I faced constant public critiques of my work. The same is true of my afterlife as an online entrepreneur. Can you imagine if I responded to both constructive and patently malicious criticism with vituperative, emotionally-driven clapbacks?
“You feel you could do the video better, well, you do it, nah!”
Like it or not, certain jobs come with stinging public evaluation and criticism. It's just one of those clauses in the contract most people gloss over.
Oddly enough, I tend to be harder on the government of the day in my commentary. Governments are the ones with access to resources, the authority to set policy and drive (or derail) socio-economic development. They've got their hands both on the till and the tiller.
Yet one post questioning the Opposition's questionable protest strategy had the yellow band seeing red.
There are many problems with the “at least we did something” sentiment. It incorrectly assumes doing something, even if the action is devoid of strategy and produces no result, is somehow different from doing nothing.
Moreover, this underlying attitude exposes a misunderstanding of the Opposition's responsibility to those who elected them. People need intelligent advocacy, not half-baked tactics engineered for optics. This myopic approach also disregards citizens who voted for the Government but strongly disagree with its decisions. But “is dem vote fuh dat!” – or whatever.
Make no mistake, the fuel price hike will punish low- and middle-income families. Thousands are already reeling from a terminally-ill economy further sickened by the pandemic. That's why the Opposition needed a solid strategy, one that gauged the severe pains being endured by the population.
Protests against the fuel-price hike were entirely appropriate, but why push for a rollback of such a major decision rather than try to prevent its implementation? Even if the Government proceeded, pressure could have been applied to lobby for improvement of the notoriously hobbled and unreliable PTSC.
In this way, citizens would benefit from a more dependable and efficient public transportation system, in theory anyway. Ultimately, the Opposition's protest came off as watered-down political theatre.
Not surprisingly, the UNC couldn't stoke support outside its core fandom. Even for an issue touching so many citizens of different political allegiances, the Opposition was unable to attract crossover support.
That's because the UNC clearly doesn't know how to rally a diverse, divided and beleaguered nation. Additionally, it doesn't seem interested in learning. Party insiders are keener on attacking critics, the same people it’s trying to get on board for votes.
The UNC will probably win the next general election anyway. That victory won't be owed to earned appeal, but overwhelming disgust with the PNM and its inability to lead the country out of challenging circumstances. Without broader support, though, the UNC will have one helluva a ride governing a country that, by then, will be in complete tatters.
UNC leaders haven't demonstrated they've learned from their mistakes. Practising the same antagonistic politics that are the speciality of the PNM does nothing for their image and saleability.
The party needs to hit "Pause" and absorb widespread public scrutiny of its performance.
It should examine why it continuously fails to galvanise the populace to causes like the gas-price hikes which are innately flammable.
That would certainly be more useful than chasing after parked cars on social media.
The same red government blogger from bailiser whore House.
Come on Wing stop being the red government Cont that you are by posting this trash. You looking like a big whore.
We know you an agent from bailiser whore House posting this shitt from Redman.
If unc want to die and erase themselves, then let them. It will be better for red government like yourself and eliteauto-tuntun
Why post this BS ?
Nope wrong.Blaze d Chalice wrote:How Pablo is redman?
8 out of 10 post from Pablo is 'foque PNM'
eliteauto wrote:What Paolo wrote is evident every day on tuner
mero wrote:eliteauto wrote:What Paolo wrote is evident every day on tuner
zoom rader wrote:Big Kants like you are vagrants when non red governments are in power.eliteauto wrote:What Paolo wrote is evident every day on tuner
All you do is suck up tax payers monies for government contracts.
Come on now elite, why lie?eliteauto wrote:zoom rader wrote:Big Kants like you are vagrants when non red governments are in power.eliteauto wrote:What Paolo wrote is evident every day on tuner
All you do is suck up tax payers monies for government contracts.
Elite is either a contractor or a UNC MP, ( I'm neither I'm a taxi driver), better yet your initial statement is probably the best reason given for me to vote PNM, I couldn't even come up with that, thanks ZR for your endorsement of the PNM
Ask eliteauto-tuntun how his kin messed up and bankrupted Trinidad football. Yes they ran footballK74T wrote:Buss files nah zr.
Ah mean if yuh claiming so show we something nah baiyya.
He's Redman.De Dragon wrote:I love Paolo, but his article is seriously misguided here. Not a word about why the LFD RFD PNM raised gas prices when Barbados, Japan and several other countries took measures to shield people from the high oil/gas prices? Like many, many people, he also seems to fail to realize that the Opposition has severely limited powers under our Westminster system. What was he expecting, that they storm the gas stations and turn the prices back? NO amount of nothing will sway this humongous kant duo of JUHN Scarfy and Impsy once they set their stink, anti-people mind to something. NOTHING!
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 53 guests
