Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
ProtonPowder wrote:I would be against it because of the indirect effects.
[u]No property tax= no incentive for a central property database or database of real property or register of deeds. ]Both these things being worked on at present to tie into the same purpose. Next time you buying land and wondering why the title search taking so long, give this a thought.[/u
When you realise that TnT's global rank in land registry's robustness is 151st in the world, out of 187, you might realise that this was an attempt in the right direction.
http://www.instituteofsurveyors.com/ow/blogs/2
88sins wrote:ProtonPowder wrote:I would be against it because of the indirect effects.
[u]No property tax= no incentive for a central property database or database of real property or register of deeds. ]Both these things being worked on at present to tie into the same purpose. Next time you buying land and wondering why the title search taking so long, give this a thought.[/u
When you realise that TnT's global rank in land registry's robustness is 151st in the world, out of 187, you might realise that this was an attempt in the right direction.
http://www.instituteofsurveyors.com/ow/blogs/2
you saying that the tens and hundreds of thousand of dollars in stamp duty ppl does be paying to transfer properties, ISN'T an incentive to keep a central property database? This, as opposed to the proposed minimum $480/year they might board ppl for in property tax? Where you get that idea? So when a man buying a property & he gets hit with a stamp duty fee of $250K, what exactly he paying that for? just for paying it sake? Property tax here is just a way for crooked politicians to bleed more out of ppl pockets in the long run, for doing basically nothing. Simple as that. Because come hell or high water, if they were to implement it and collect it in full for the next decade, we'd still be going through the exact same kaka we going through today. It will be diverted elsewhere,and not gonna benefit the property or it's community in any way.
When they first proposed this, the talk was that collected taxes would go to the go to fund the regional corporations for the areas where they were paid & other local gov't bodies in those areas, so that those organizations need not lean so hard on the central govt for funding to operate. You remember that? That was one of the main selling points to justify this property tax, claiming it would then free up monies that could be better used elsewhere, & it was the primary reasons for all the yappage about 'local govt reform' some years back. Notice not a soul h even whispering anything about 'local gov't reform' lately?
The low ranking of our local land registry has less to do with property taxes & more to do with ppl failing to transfer properties in a timely manner, errors wrt dimensions as well as on documentation such as deeds & cadastral sheets hat occurred over time, among several other factors.
As regards title searches, long is a subjective term eh. Some take months, others take weeks, & others take days. & theres multiple reasons for this that have absolutely nothing to do with property tax. One of which is so many deeds that were hand written and are now so old that they in a condition where the writings on them are barely discernible, some pages torn, & yet even others missing. Another reason being lazy search clerks, (btw, there's times when a lil motivation goes a long way). Another reason being so many racket deeds being registered, so one property would appear to have multiple individual owners at the same time, creating chaos, so each has to be back tracked & the original source documents found & followed from there. & there still more, but I've already made my point.
But all that aside, if it were up to me. I personally would dispose of property tax altogether. yes, they go come up with some other hare brained idea to fleece the populace. but at the very least, when a person spends hundreds of thousands or millions of dollars to buy or build a property, they won't be a tenant of the state and at the mercy of a merciless wrinkle faced albino minion
88sins wrote:well, an increase in some other type of tax to "recover" what "revenue" they not getting from it would still be acceptable to a large degree.
ppl with limited income wouldn't be at risk of losing their homes, and nobody would be a tenant of the state even after spending hundreds of thousands or even millions of dollars to buy or build their own homes and not depending on the state for housing.
88sins wrote:stamp duty is not based solely on the value of the land, but the definition you used is technically correct.
in any regard, allyuh remember when this property tax catastrophe was initially being discussed? do you recall during that time how every 6 seconds some politician kept yapping about "local government reform", and about how this new tax regime would be used to fund the regional corporations so they would be less dependant on central government funding? Notice, it's been years since any of them even whispered anything similar to what they were so passionate about when they were pushing this new tax regime.
this is not an accident, nor is it a coincidence.
88sins wrote:no matter what clown inbutt or chief toolum head say, let us all as grown adults be honest
nobody wants to risk losing what they worked hard to acquire for an opportunity to pay for getting nothing positive in return. & nobody anywhere ever actually wants to pay more taxes. & this is particularly true when they live on modest incomes and are fully well aware that for their additional tax dollars they will continue to see it being piddled away and not used to benefit them in any way, or that their tax dollars will be used to reduce taxation of corporations & the uber rich.
they hoping ppl forget, & they think not talking about it will allow them & their bs to slide under the radar. That eh go wuk tho.
You forgot eleit, the silent oneDe Dragon wrote:88sins wrote:no matter what clown inbutt or chief toolum head say, let us all as grown adults be honest
nobody wants to risk losing what they worked hard to acquire for an opportunity to pay for getting nothing positive in return. & nobody anywhere ever actually wants to pay more taxes. & this is particularly true when they live on modest incomes and are fully well aware that for their additional tax dollars they will continue to see it being piddled away and not used to benefit them in any way, or that their tax dollars will be used to reduce taxation of corporations & the uber rich.
they hoping ppl forget, & they think not talking about it will allow them & their bs to slide under the radar. That eh go wuk tho.
Careful, the self appointed 2NR Racist Police Squad, led by CoP shogun, and ACP Redman will not be pleased.
shake d livin wake d dead wrote:so I witnessed a site visit from the property tax people this morning (visited meh neighbor, so ah macko)
initially they measured every corner of her house, car porch separate, gazebo separate, outdoor toilet and storage room separate, they pass she lil temple straight...questions asked ;
how many bedrooms
bathrooms
ac
water pump
hot/cold
type of roof/ceiling
type of floor
type of windows
and well according to the peeps, this property tax thing is expected to be implemented next year
shake d livin wake d dead wrote:I aint go lie, the water pump question throw meh down
MG Man wrote:shake d livin wake d dead wrote:I aint go lie, the water pump question throw meh down
can't get fking water / water pressure to reach a shower head, but they want to include pump as a value-enhancing asset?
If they checking that and water heater, they gonna start counting ac, lighting fixtures, door knobs and security cameras too?
88sins wrote:MG Man wrote:shake d livin wake d dead wrote:I aint go lie, the water pump question throw meh down
can't get fking water / water pressure to reach a shower head, but they want to include pump as a value-enhancing asset?
If they checking that and water heater, they gonna start counting ac, lighting fixtures, door knobs and security cameras too?
exactly
basically, ANYTHING you have in your house they assigning it as an item that adds value to the property.From A/C to a light fixture that looks like a chandelier, to security systems. Basically, it's an "ah go tax yuh on everything yuh have forever" tax, never mind that the older these things get their value depreciates.
but allyuh vote fuh dat
hydroep wrote:Somebody really need to stuff a calabash in he mouth yes...
The_Honourable wrote:Prime Minister, Dr. Keith Rowley, says the United National Congress (UNC) has sabotaged the government's efforts to move towards Local Government Reform due to the legal challenge on the property tax.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 92 guests