Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:Maduro issues new map of Venezuela including the Essequibo region in it
IMG_5687.png
*sets up temporary Govt. for Essequibo
*gives mining and oil companies in Essequibo 3 months to leave
*instructs his state company to immediately start granting concessions for oil, gas, and minerals
https://www.kaieteurnewsonline.com/2023 ... venezuela/
Dohplaydat wrote:It's painfully obvious this is being stirred up by Russia/China, those who think otherwise are blind fools.
Coldwar part 2, but this time in think the west is gonna lose.
timothymcdavid wrote:Dohplaydat wrote:It's painfully obvious this is being stirred up by Russia/China, those who think otherwise are blind fools.
Coldwar part 2, but this time in think the west is gonna lose.
No you are reading this wrong.
It is Uncle Sam that stirred this up.
By opening talks with Venezuela and lifting sanctions just ahead of an election year to try to get more oil pumping into the world markets it is this that has emboldened Venezuela.
So much so they want Exxon to leave Guyana in 30 days Russia and China can do nothing in this part of the world.
Maduro is stirring up nationalism in a bid to win/do less rigging in the coming elections in Venezuela in 2024. Which were part of their agreement with said Uncle Sam to ease sanctions.
Uncle Sam is in a difficult place since to act or even use harsh words can panic the oil markets.
maj. tom wrote:So when Biden sending down the US Navy Fourth Fleet?
Redress10 wrote:Which one you all prefer?
Prolonged coflict that destabilising the entire region's security or guyana losing 2/3s of the land?
Guyana population really need all that land? Are they going to starve if they lose essequibo? If you own that much land shouldn't you be capable of defending it yourself? Howcome Venezuela know not to contest some of Brazil land?
Dizzy28 wrote:Redress10 wrote:Which one you all prefer?
Prolonged coflict that destabilising the entire region's security or guyana losing 2/3s of the land?
Guyana population really need all that land? Are they going to starve if they lose essequibo? If you own that much land shouldn't you be capable of defending it yourself? Howcome Venezuela know not to contest some of Brazil land?
Venezuela has 30m ppl living in a country the size of Nigeria who has 223m ppl. Does Venezuela's population really need all that extra land? Would Venezuela starve without annexing Essequibo?
Redress10 wrote:Dizzy28 wrote:Redress10 wrote:Which one you all prefer?
Prolonged coflict that destabilising the entire region's security or guyana losing 2/3s of the land?
Guyana population really need all that land? Are they going to starve if they lose essequibo? If you own that much land shouldn't you be capable of defending it yourself? Howcome Venezuela know not to contest some of Brazil land?
Venezuela has 30m ppl living in a country the size of Nigeria who has 223m ppl. Does Venezuela's population really need all that extra land? Would Venezuela starve without annexing Essequibo?
You understand the history of indegenious population control in latin america involving colonial powers?
You do realise that those borders in Africa are of colonial design as well right? That's why there is soo much ethnic and tribal conflict for access to resources etc.
You continue to prove my point without even explaining how Guyana in its current form has ownership of the Essequibo region if that belonged to the British who packed up and left Guyana without caring about it
Redress10 wrote:You on this forum fighting for the historical legitimacy of a south american country governed by a man of indian descent who is a muslim in a cabinet mainly made up of indo and afro ppl. But i guess "humans have always migrated" according to you.
You are probably one of those who find it wrong that Mugabe kick out all the white ppl from Zimbabwe or Idi Ameen was wrong to expel the Indians from Uganda because they had legitimate reasons to be there.
There's history before colonisation bro.
Dizzy28 wrote:Redress10 wrote:You on this forum fighting for the historical legitimacy of a south american country governed by a man of indian descent who is a muslim in a cabinet mainly made up of indo and afro ppl. But i guess "humans have always migrated" according to you.
You are probably one of those who find it wrong that Mugabe kick out all the white ppl from Zimbabwe or Idi Ameen was wrong to expel the Indians from Uganda because they had legitimate reasons to be there.
There's history before colonisation bro.
Venezuela is a post colonial entity with a population that has less indigenous persons as a percentage of the population than Guyana. For some reason you refuse to acknowledge Venezuela like Guyana are both post colonial entities and also for some reason near 200 years is not enough time for people to have native rights apparently.
Just say you like dictators bruv because your two examples cited plus Maduro were all dictators.
Redress10 wrote:Dizzy28 wrote:Redress10 wrote:You on this forum fighting for the historical legitimacy of a south american country governed by a man of indian descent who is a muslim in a cabinet mainly made up of indo and afro ppl. But i guess "humans have always migrated" according to you.
You are probably one of those who find it wrong that Mugabe kick out all the white ppl from Zimbabwe or Idi Ameen was wrong to expel the Indians from Uganda because they had legitimate reasons to be there.
There's history before colonisation bro.
Venezuela is a post colonial entity with a population that has less indigenous persons as a percentage of the population than Guyana. For some reason you refuse to acknowledge Venezuela like Guyana are both post colonial entities and also for some reason near 200 years is not enough time for people to have native rights apparently.
Just say you like dictators bruv because your two examples cited plus Maduro were all dictators.
Ofc you would consider them dictators bro. You didn't address that both of those ppl who were expelled from those countries had no rights to be there in the first place. Once again brought by the british/europeans in a contentious environment who pack up and leave.
Do you think Venezuela and venezuelans by extension are studying all that colonial stuff u rambling about. Or do you think they are saying to themselves that Guyana is former british, part of caricom, doesn't speak spanish, has a majority population that is non latin, a polical system that is non socialist/ left leaning and seems to be ok with being raped by American oil companies that those same countries have been fighting for decades. Seems like Guyana is looking like a trojan horse in the region at this point.
Read the room. Guyana could have handled this situation much better with much more mature diplomacy.
Dizzy28 wrote:Redress10 wrote:Dizzy28 wrote:Redress10 wrote:You on this forum fighting for the historical legitimacy of a south american country governed by a man of indian descent who is a muslim in a cabinet mainly made up of indo and afro ppl. But i guess "humans have always migrated" according to you.
You are probably one of those who find it wrong that Mugabe kick out all the white ppl from Zimbabwe or Idi Ameen was wrong to expel the Indians from Uganda because they had legitimate reasons to be there.
There's history before colonisation bro.
Venezuela is a post colonial entity with a population that has less indigenous persons as a percentage of the population than Guyana. For some reason you refuse to acknowledge Venezuela like Guyana are both post colonial entities and also for some reason near 200 years is not enough time for people to have native rights apparently.
Just say you like dictators bruv because your two examples cited plus Maduro were all dictators.
Ofc you would consider them dictators bro. You didn't address that both of those ppl who were expelled from those countries had no rights to be there in the first place. Once again brought by the british/europeans in a contentious environment who pack up and leave.
Do you think Venezuela and venezuelans by extension are studying all that colonial stuff u rambling about. Or do you think they are saying to themselves that Guyana is former british, part of caricom, doesn't speak spanish, has a majority population that is non latin, a polical system that is non socialist/ left leaning and seems to be ok with being raped by American oil companies that those same countries have been fighting for decades. Seems like Guyana is looking like a trojan horse in the region at this point.
Read the room. Guyana could have handled this situation much better with much more mature diplomacy.
Guyanese land has been stolen and you blaming them.
Man fcuk off with your bullsheit.
MaxPower wrote:If it is Guyanese land, which Guyanese would name it Essequibo?
Just curious.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: juswil868, The_Honourable and 50 guests