Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
UML wrote:why is watson duke promoting the reintroduction of the property tax?,,,,is it that he is of the opinion that the majority of his members would not be affected......or.......would he use it as another reason/excuse to demand higher salaries?
firstchoicett wrote:Well what's d word when u living on gov land and waiting to get it ?
CBharath wrote:firstchoicett wrote:Well what's d word when u living on gov land and waiting to get it ?
freeness
pete wrote:Rent will still go up if they put it back though. What he should be pushing for us for the HDC to start to give out houses so the number of people renting will fall creating a glut in the market to hopefully drive down rent and house prices.
To that end, the country should expect a cut-back on the prolific Government spending on transfers and subsidies—including the $4 billion fuel subsidy.
webb wrote:This so called government don't have a clue this doesnt surprise me the truth offends they lied they knew that only a matter of time that this property tax will be coming but wait gas sub will be gone too hold on......... but hey what do i know this governmet STEUPSSSS
webb wrote:This so called government don't have a clue this doesnt surprise me the truth offends they lied they knew that only a matter of time that this property tax will be coming but wait gas sub will be gone too hold on......... but hey what do i know this governmet STEUPSSSS
pete wrote:WRT fuel subsidy.. what ya feel the new fuel prices would be?
Diesel - $3
Super - $3.50
Premium - $4.50?
UML wrote:why is watson duke promoting the reintroduction of the property tax?,,,,is it that he is of the opinion that the majority of his members would not be affected......or.......would he use it as another reason/excuse to demand higher salaries?
Habit7 wrote:I do believe property tax should be introduce to bring revenue into the teasury and to reduce the derelict properties that aesthetically scar our country.
I believe that the UNC and COP should apologise for taking a political stance rather than a national when they were not in gov't.
I believe maxis, taxis and legitimate transport vehicles to receive the subsidised diesel fuel prices. But personal use cars and pick-up trucks should pay a higher price.
pete wrote:Everything won't double in price though.
I'd say 3-5% increase on goods. Maybe 15-25% transportation.
Dizzy28 wrote:Habit7 wrote:I do believe property tax should be introduce to bring revenue into the teasury and to reduce the derelict properties that aesthetically scar our country.
I believe that the UNC and COP should apologise for taking a political stance rather than a national when they were not in gov't.
I believe maxis, taxis and legitimate transport vehicles to receive the subsidised diesel fuel prices. But personal use cars and pick-up trucks should pay a higher price.
Not a bad idea but how do we police it. It already nigh impossible wrt to diesel bunkering.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 481 guests