Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
San Bernardino shooting: At least 14 dead
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-34987697
RASC wrote:The progressive left wing is scrambling for an angle to project the shooters as VICTIMS of "islamaphobia" if the argument fall out is real.
Wait and see---->
Redman wrote:White American have killed more people in US mass shootings than any one else.
2X the number as Islamic jihadis
Habit7 wrote:Main Stream Media got quiet with the last Agnostic mass shooter in Oregon. Glad to see they are finding back their voices with this possible Islamic shooter.
Slartibartfast wrote:Habit7 wrote:Main Stream Media got quiet with the last Agnostic mass shooter in Oregon. Glad to see they are finding back their voices with this possible Islamic shooter.
Did he do it in the name of agnosticism? Because if not then that seems like an irrelevant detail.
Slartibartfast wrote:Did he belong to a group of people with similar ideals that supported him or did he act alone out of his own volition?
Edit: Also, what teachings of agnosticism did he use to justify his actions?
Slartibartfast wrote:Did he belong to a group of people with similar ideals that supported him or did he act alone out of his own volition?
Edit: Also, what teachings of agnosticism did he use to justify his actions?
EFFECTIC DESIGNS wrote:Can't wait for Mr progressive Liberal Obama and all the liberal lefty to come out and cry about how they need to take away guns from citizens and butcher the second amendment for their progressive minds to be at ease.
Because lets face it, in a country like Trinidad where a law abiding citizen can't even own a toy gun, we are very safe since not a single criminal owns a real gun right? I mean banning all guns from citizens has sure made Trini safe since none of our criminals have real guns right?
EFFECTIC DESIGNS wrote:
Because lets face it, in a country like Trinidad where a law abiding citizen can't even own a toy gun, we are very safe since not a single criminal owns a real gun right? I mean banning all guns from citizens has sure made Trini safe since none of our criminals have real guns right?
Habit7 wrote:Slartibartfast wrote:Did he belong to a group of people with similar ideals that supported him or did he act alone out of his own volition?
Edit: Also, what teachings of agnosticism did he use to justify his actions?
investigations ongoing.
EmilioA wrote:EFFECTIC DESIGNS wrote:
Because lets face it, in a country like Trinidad where a law abiding citizen can't even own a toy gun, we are very safe since not a single criminal owns a real gun right? I mean banning all guns from citizens has sure made Trini safe since none of our criminals have real guns right?
Just imagine if every incident that involved a cutlass or gramaxone , had a gun instead.
That is what restrictive gun laws prevent.
It is very evident that his agnosticism played a significant role in him asking who were Christians and fatally shooting them while wounding non religious persons. To say otherwise would be naïve. It is in the same vain that this week's shooting was obviously terrorism but ppl like Obama wanna call it Workplace Violence. The tag line "investigation ongoing" is a panacea to the obvious truth.Slartibartfast wrote:Habit7 wrote:Slartibartfast wrote:Did he belong to a group of people with similar ideals that supported him or did he act alone out of his own volition?
Edit: Also, what teachings of agnosticism did he use to justify his actions?
investigations ongoing.
Lol. So as it stands right now that is an irrelevant detail and does not reflect on the general thoughts or behaviours of agnostics is anyway.
See the difference?
A terrorist that happens to be agnostic =/= agnostic terrorist by default
Same goes for all other religious affiliations.
Redman wrote:EmilioA wrote:EFFECTIC DESIGNS wrote:
Because lets face it, in a country like Trinidad where a law abiding citizen can't even own a toy gun, we are very safe since not a single criminal owns a real gun right? I mean banning all guns from citizens has sure made Trini safe since none of our criminals have real guns right?
Just imagine if every incident that involved a cutlass or gramaxone , had a gun instead.
That is what restrictive gun laws prevent.
Let's not imagine.
What is the actual incidence of crime committed with a legal fire arm in TNT?
Why not give those who want to own a fire arm responsibly...and want to follow the rules..the ability to own a fire arm???
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests