Flow
Flow
Flow
TriniTuner.com  |  Latest Event:  

Forums

***The Official Rapid Rail Thread***

this is how we do it.......

Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods

desifemlove
Trying to catch PATCH AND VEGA
Posts: 6963
Joined: October 19th, 2013, 12:35 am

Re: ***The Official Rapid Rail Thread***

Postby desifemlove » October 13th, 2015, 10:53 am

Curtms wrote:Is either " RAPID PREVAIL"
or
"RAPID FAIL"


so what we should do?

just have roads?

why not develop the economy? the country?

we does say we want to diversify and be "first world economy"....don't UNC or PNM realise that most "first world" countries have advanced infrastructure. Zoom et al may be content wit box drains, but to be a wealthy country, some mass transit is a necessity.... Zoom and co. goh disagree, economic facts arent' opinions..

User avatar
Habit7
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 12156
Joined: April 20th, 2009, 10:20 pm

Re: ***The Official Rapid Rail Thread***

Postby Habit7 » October 13th, 2015, 11:56 am

UWI head backs Rapid Rail
By VERNE BURNETT Friday, October 9 2015

PRO Vice Chancellor and Principal of the St Augustine campus of the University of the West Indies, Professor Clement Sankat yesterday said he can only see benefits from the construction of the Rapid Rail Project. Saying he was speaking as the leader of the St Augustine campus, Sankat said he hoped the economics would support the project.

Professor Sankat was delivering greetings at the start of the Conference on the Economy (COTE) 2015 held at the Learning Resource Centre at St. Augustine.

COTE 2015 is dedicated to Professor Emeritus Karl Theodore, the current director of the Centre for Health Economics.

In honour of his lifetime of work on the issue of the economics of health in the Caribbean, the theme “Managing Development in Caribbean Economies: The Key Role of Health and Social Security,” was chosen for the conference.

Professor Sankat’s comments on the Rapid Rail followed some brief remarks made by Dean of the Faculty of Social Sciences, Professor Ann Marie Bissessar who spoke about the challenges of getting from her home in St.

Helena to the university campus because of the volume of traffic.

Professor Sankat said the problems of traffic gridlock have been with this country for fifteen to twenty years despite building more roads, highways and overpasses.

He said that he sometimes goes to the UWI Campus in Penal, Debe, noting that when he did he was travelling against the traffic but said he was still seeing traffic coming from South still backing up in Chaguanas and extending as far as Couva despite having the overpass.

He said when the Rapid Rail was being planned the university engaged the consultants because one of the biggest ridership is the university population at St. Augustine.

Noting that the population of the university had grown since then. He said there was a captive ridership of about 21,000 which he said was the biggest along the East-West Corridor “coupled with our inability to find parking spaces.” Professor Sankat said he hoped the economics could support the project “because from a very functional perspective and especially as the leader of the St.

Augustine Campus, I can only see benefits.” He said when the project was being conceptualised, the station for the Rapid Rail was going to be located at the southern entrance to the UWI campus on the Churchill Roosevelt Highway. He said this was the reason he was againat plans to locate a sewer plant for the university at the south entrance so that if a station was going to be built it would be built there.

He added that Rapid Rail and rail systems are not only about moving people. While that was important, he said the stations create a level of commerce that is overwhelming sometimes. “You go to a Rapid Rail station or a rail station or a subway station, it is a shopping mall. Could you imagine the benefits to our students and the population.” He said he was hopeful and always had a big vision for the development of the country to make it a truly world class, industrialised country. He said small countries such as Singapore had achieved this — they had invested.

“They don’t have as much resources as us, why can’t we do it?” He said ideally the investments should be made at a time when the country has resources “but even when we don’t have resources, you have to be creative.” He said while delivering an address recently to a group of engineers, he told them of the need to use innovative methods - design, finance, build, operate and eventually transfer. “I said there are countries around us in this region with less resources - challenging times - but still building their infrastructure.” He said for 40-50 years it was a nighmare to cross the Berbice River in Guyana until they built a bridge across the river and users paid a toll to cross. He added that Jamaica is building roads to Montego Bay and now to Ocho Rios. “And guess what? Jamaica in troubles but to use it, pay a toll.

The government didn’t have to put out any money. The designers, the builders and the operators do it and we will have to find a way to pay it back. What it says is the complete freeness if we want to grow this country, we want to develop it with the vision that we all have, modern, efficient, industrialised, we all have to contribute.”

http://www.newsday.co.tt/news/0,218203.html


Kublalsing RR.jpg


One principal of UWI criticised that staff are reluctant to go Debe Campus and he was called asinine. Another principal is for the RR, is he asinine too.

Also we have Kublalsingh seal of approval.

User avatar
Slartibartfast
punchin NOS
Posts: 4650
Joined: May 15th, 2012, 4:24 pm
Location: Magrathea

Re: ***The Official Rapid Rail Thread***

Postby Slartibartfast » October 13th, 2015, 1:08 pm

Habit if you for the RR system then I wouldn't highlight that kubs supporting it. BTW did he start back eating as yet?

User avatar
drchaos
punchin NOS
Posts: 4372
Joined: February 5th, 2013, 3:56 pm

Re: ***The Official Rapid Rail Thread***

Postby drchaos » October 13th, 2015, 1:14 pm

Did he ever stop?

User avatar
EFFECTIC DESIGNS
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 9651
Joined: April 1st, 2010, 3:17 pm

Re: ***The Official Rapid Rail Thread***

Postby EFFECTIC DESIGNS » October 13th, 2015, 1:17 pm

Slartibartfast wrote:Habit if you for the RR system then I wouldn't highlight that kubs supporting it. BTW did he start back eating as yet?


He claimed recently that he has made 300 days without eating or drinking anything.

I am pretty sure once this gets underway he will start back another hunger strike thing. The only difference is this time Rowley go let he dead.

Zedenka
Street 2NR
Posts: 34
Joined: August 27th, 2015, 8:08 am
Location: Sleeping with the fishes

Re: ***The Official Rapid Rail Thread***

Postby Zedenka » October 13th, 2015, 2:31 pm

For those who are interested how the train system was in the past:



The question i want to ask though, is 35mins from South to POS really that fast for a train? I thought it would have been about 15mins or so.

Also why did they discontinue using the train in the first place?

User avatar
zoom rader
TunerGod
Posts: 30521
Joined: April 22nd, 2003, 12:39 pm
Location: Grand Cayman

Re: ***The Official Rapid Rail Thread***

Postby zoom rader » October 13th, 2015, 2:42 pm

I guess a new feasibility study will be on the way and knowing PNM it's going to cost tax payers 1 billion for juss a paper study.

User avatar
Habit7
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 12156
Joined: April 20th, 2009, 10:20 pm

Re: ***The Official Rapid Rail Thread***

Postby Habit7 » October 13th, 2015, 2:44 pm

Zedenka wrote:The question i want to ask though, is 35mins from South to POS really that fast for a train? I thought it would have been about 15mins or so.

35mins if it stops at all the stations. But if there is an express line and there are bypasses for all the stops then at the average speed of 160kph then 15mins for a 40km journey.

User avatar
EFFECTIC DESIGNS
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 9651
Joined: April 1st, 2010, 3:17 pm

Re: ***The Official Rapid Rail Thread***

Postby EFFECTIC DESIGNS » October 13th, 2015, 2:57 pm

Is 160km/h the highest speed this rapid rail can go? I was more thinking on the lines of 200km/h, is it because of the size of Trini and the necessary stops needed that it goes at only 160? or that is its limitation?

User avatar
Slartibartfast
punchin NOS
Posts: 4650
Joined: May 15th, 2012, 4:24 pm
Location: Magrathea

Re: ***The Official Rapid Rail Thread***

Postby Slartibartfast » October 13th, 2015, 2:58 pm

All bobol aside. 35 mins from South to Town sounds amazing!

User avatar
EFFECTIC DESIGNS
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 9651
Joined: April 1st, 2010, 3:17 pm

Re: ***The Official Rapid Rail Thread***

Postby EFFECTIC DESIGNS » October 13th, 2015, 3:00 pm

Slartibartfast wrote:All bobol aside. 35 mins from South to Town sounds amazing!


And that is rush hour in morning and evening eh. With stops at each major point to accommodate as much people as possible. People who traveling Chaguanas to POS go have it nice, go take them 14 minutes.

A car would take 3 hours in that traffic. And just imagine thats only because it has to make stops, this can do South to POS in 15 minutes in peak hours if it didn't make any stops :lol:

Redman
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 10430
Joined: August 19th, 2004, 2:48 pm

Re: ***The Official Rapid Rail Thread***

Postby Redman » October 13th, 2015, 4:19 pm

If the rapid rail is up and the traffic disappears....how long does it take to drive Sando/POS with no traffic??

40 mins?
:shock:

Given the alternatives ....what makes the RR THE solution...???

All the other solutions are cheaper,more flexible and can be implemented now....

we need a Transportation Policy...multi modal and flexible.
Last edited by Redman on October 13th, 2015, 4:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
pete
3NE 2NR Moderator
Posts: 9836
Joined: April 18th, 2003, 1:19 pm
Location: Cruisin around in da GTi
Contact:

Re: ***The Official Rapid Rail Thread***

Postby pete » October 13th, 2015, 4:46 pm

The traffic will never disappear. You will still have trucks etc on the road to slow everything down.

User avatar
zoom rader
TunerGod
Posts: 30521
Joined: April 22nd, 2003, 12:39 pm
Location: Grand Cayman

Re: ***The Official Rapid Rail Thread***

Postby zoom rader » October 13th, 2015, 6:28 pm

$100 a ticket for ride on racket rail.
PNM financiers making big money

User avatar
EFFECTIC DESIGNS
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 9651
Joined: April 1st, 2010, 3:17 pm

Re: ***The Official Rapid Rail Thread***

Postby EFFECTIC DESIGNS » October 13th, 2015, 6:49 pm

zoom rader wrote:$100 a ticket for ride on racket rail.
PNM financiers making big money


Actually its going to be something like $10. Its being subsidized by removing fuel subsidy, the RR isn't meant to be profitable it is meant to alleviate traffic and provide a world class public transport service which IMO should have been done ages ago.

I don't see how you can call it racket rail with PNM financiers making big money when UNC did the exact same thing with roads and box drains paying 400% more and you didn't mention anything about that.

EmilioA
Riding on 16's
Posts: 1158
Joined: August 25th, 2013, 8:54 pm

Re: ***The Official Rapid Rail Thread***

Postby EmilioA » October 13th, 2015, 6:55 pm

pete wrote:The traffic will never disappear. You will still have trucks etc on the road to slow everything down.


Hmm Govt might want to invest in some cargo trains.

EmilioA
Riding on 16's
Posts: 1158
Joined: August 25th, 2013, 8:54 pm

Re: ***The Official Rapid Rail Thread***

Postby EmilioA » October 13th, 2015, 6:57 pm

Zedenka wrote:Also why did they discontinue using the train in the first place?


Car dealers pay off the Govt at the time. No joke.

User avatar
zoom rader
TunerGod
Posts: 30521
Joined: April 22nd, 2003, 12:39 pm
Location: Grand Cayman

Re: ***The Official Rapid Rail Thread***

Postby zoom rader » October 13th, 2015, 7:07 pm

EFFECTIC DESIGNS wrote:
zoom rader wrote:$100 a ticket for ride on racket rail.
PNM financiers making big money


Actually its going to be something like $10. Its being subsidized by removing fuel subsidy, the RR isn't meant to be profitable it is meant to alleviate traffic and provide a world class public transport service which IMO should have been done ages ago.

I don't see how you can call it racket rail with PNM financiers making big money when UNC did the exact same thing with roads and box drains paying 400% more and you didn't mention anything about that.


You have facts you cover your claim that Box drains cost 400% more?

User avatar
EFFECTIC DESIGNS
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 9651
Joined: April 1st, 2010, 3:17 pm

Re: ***The Official Rapid Rail Thread***

Postby EFFECTIC DESIGNS » October 13th, 2015, 7:15 pm

^ this is what Rowley and Rfari said and I have never known them to lie

User avatar
zoom rader
TunerGod
Posts: 30521
Joined: April 22nd, 2003, 12:39 pm
Location: Grand Cayman

Re: ***The Official Rapid Rail Thread***

Postby zoom rader » October 13th, 2015, 7:18 pm

EFFECTIC DESIGNS wrote:^ this is what Rowley and Rfari said and I have never known them to lie


Sorry if you were misled by those two.

EmilioA
Riding on 16's
Posts: 1158
Joined: August 25th, 2013, 8:54 pm

Re: ***The Official Rapid Rail Thread***

Postby EmilioA » October 13th, 2015, 7:24 pm

ZR right. Its not 400% overcharge. Its 200% overcharge. If they thing cost 1000 they paying 3000.

User avatar
Habit7
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 12156
Joined: April 20th, 2009, 10:20 pm

Re: ***The Official Rapid Rail Thread***

Postby Habit7 » October 13th, 2015, 7:25 pm

Redman wrote:If the rapid rail is up and the traffic disappears....how long does it take to drive Sando/POS with no traffic??

40 mins?
:shock:

Given the alternatives ....what makes the RR THE solution...???

All the other solutions are cheaper,more flexible and can be implemented now....

we need a Transportation Policy...multi modal and flexible.
Well if your car gets you 9 litres per 100km and from Sando to POS is 50km currently, with a super gasoline vehicle you will it will cost about $30 per one way trip.

With the fuel subsidy currently removed, price of fuel may double and it cost $60 per one way trip.

With subsidy gone and oil back at +$100 per barrel we are talking again double the price so it is $120 a trip, $1200 a week, $4800 a month. :shock:

A train ticket might be $12, $15 or $20? Runs off of cleaner CNG electricity, safer, more reliable and multi modal. You can't ask for a multi modal transport policy and not have a mass transit system.

Also cheaper solutions are not always the best. Consider the Endeavour flyover, rather than expand the flyover or build another one, many piecemeal attempts to change traffic flow, add roundabouts, add bypasses and whatever else, and it still causes traffic congestion and lost manhours.

Let us get the best, let us get something that works, so that we won't have to add some other solution for the new problem created.

User avatar
Slartibartfast
punchin NOS
Posts: 4650
Joined: May 15th, 2012, 4:24 pm
Location: Magrathea

Re: ***The Official Rapid Rail Thread***

Postby Slartibartfast » October 13th, 2015, 7:31 pm

zoom rader wrote:$100 a ticket for ride on racket rail.
PNM financiers making big money


You have facts you cover your claim that tickets will cost $100? Or you just talking out of the wrong sh!thole again?

User avatar
zoom rader
TunerGod
Posts: 30521
Joined: April 22nd, 2003, 12:39 pm
Location: Grand Cayman

Re: ***The Official Rapid Rail Thread***

Postby zoom rader » October 13th, 2015, 7:32 pm

Just think when laventille bandits stage an attack on a train. It's every man jack getting rob.

User avatar
Slartibartfast
punchin NOS
Posts: 4650
Joined: May 15th, 2012, 4:24 pm
Location: Magrathea

Re: ***The Official Rapid Rail Thread***

Postby Slartibartfast » October 13th, 2015, 7:46 pm

You still didn't answer my question tho. I now extend that previous question to this statement as well.

User avatar
EFFECTIC DESIGNS
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 9651
Joined: April 1st, 2010, 3:17 pm

Re: ***The Official Rapid Rail Thread***

Postby EFFECTIC DESIGNS » October 13th, 2015, 7:56 pm

Habit7 wrote:A train ticket might be $12, $15 or $20? Runs off of cleaner CNG electricity, safer, more reliable and multi modal. You can't ask for a multi modal transport policy and not have a mass transit system.

Let us get the best, let us get something that works, so that we won't have to add some other solution for the new problem created.


At max would cost $20 but most likely would be less, in reality for it to be profitable it needs to be $100 per ticket.

However Rowley did point out they want to subsidize it for the benefit of the people and not for them to make a profit, they just want to serve the people, this is what should have been done long ago. They can't price it too high if they want to serve the people. so long as it cheaper than using a vehicle is all that matters.
Last edited by EFFECTIC DESIGNS on October 13th, 2015, 8:34 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
bluesclues
punchin NOS
Posts: 3600
Joined: December 5th, 2013, 3:35 am

Re: ***The Official Rapid Rail Thread***

Postby bluesclues » October 13th, 2015, 8:04 pm

Zedenka wrote:For those who are interested how the train system was in the past:



The question i want to ask though, is 35mins from South to POS really that fast for a train? I thought it would have been about 15mins or so.

Also why did they discontinue using the train in the first place?


aaahhhh i now coming to remind us about the train line. and ask the same question.

why was it discontinued?

User avatar
bluesclues
punchin NOS
Posts: 3600
Joined: December 5th, 2013, 3:35 am

Re: ***The Official Rapid Rail Thread***

Postby bluesclues » October 13th, 2015, 8:05 pm

Slartibartfast wrote:All bobol aside. 35 mins from South to Town sounds amazing!


but is 35 mins from south to pos on a flowing highway driving the speed limit.

User avatar
VII
punchin NOS
Posts: 4605
Joined: July 29th, 2003, 9:44 pm
Location: maraval
Contact:

Re: ***The Official Rapid Rail Thread***

Postby VII » October 13th, 2015, 8:16 pm

"BRT BRT BRT" How many people here realize that BRT's are mainly feeder systems to other mass transit and countries with BRT also have many different levels of rail transport?

A temporary solution. Many BRTs are temporary
solutions until an LRT system is built. (See case
study below.)


BRT vs LRT ..

"The good and bad BRT"
Last edited by VII on October 13th, 2015, 8:24 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Slartibartfast
punchin NOS
Posts: 4650
Joined: May 15th, 2012, 4:24 pm
Location: Magrathea

Re: ***The Official Rapid Rail Thread***

Postby Slartibartfast » October 13th, 2015, 8:20 pm

bluesclues wrote:
Slartibartfast wrote:All bobol aside. 35 mins from South to Town sounds amazing!


but is 35 mins from south to pos on a flowing highway driving the speed limit.
Yeah you try driving 80kmph during rush hour traffic and tell me how that goes.

Advertisement

Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 98 guests