Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
src1983 wrote:De Dragon wrote:src1983 wrote:I totally understand what you are saying, but you are taking the view as if the doctor intentionally wanted to cut the child
The human body ain't no car engine, some viruses and ailments affects ppl in different ways.
Look at it this way, I didn't see the full report, but I read somewhere here that the senior doctor wasn't present (need clarification)
Now you on call, you a baby delivery doctor (I not a medical man) the senior missing, the baby coming. Seeing it's a C-Section most likely she have complications. He maybe had no choice to start the procedure.
Let's say he waited and the woman and baby died due to the complications.
Headline "DOCTOR ON CALL, FAILS TO SAVE MOTHER AND CHILD"
The risk they face is that they stand to lose everything when something goes wrong.
It's not like my job when I could just reverse an entry.
That being said I know personally of doctors that did crap, and have evidence to prove such.
Intent would have made it murder. The fact is, a child died because someone was negligent. Do you suggest that we just shrug our shoulders and ask what's for lunch?
Where did I say he should get off? I didn't read the report so I can't say he was negligent
src1983 wrote:De Dragon wrote:src1983 wrote:I totally understand what you are saying, but you are taking the view as if the doctor intentionally wanted to cut the child
The human body ain't no car engine, some viruses and ailments affects ppl in different ways.
Look at it this way, I didn't see the full report, but I read somewhere here that the senior doctor wasn't present (need clarification)
Now you on call, you a baby delivery doctor (I not a medical man) the senior missing, the baby coming. Seeing it's a C-Section most likely she have complications. He maybe had no choice to start the procedure.
Let's say he waited and the woman and baby died due to the complications.
Headline "DOCTOR ON CALL, FAILS TO SAVE MOTHER AND CHILD"
The risk they face is that they stand to lose everything when something goes wrong.
It's not like my job when I could just reverse an entry.
That being said I know personally of doctors that did crap, and have evidence to prove such.
Intent would have made it murder. The fact is, a child died because someone was negligent. Do you suggest that we just shrug our shoulders and ask what's for lunch?
Where did I say he should get off? I didn't read the report so I can't say he was negligent
desifemlove wrote:src1983 wrote:De Dragon wrote:src1983 wrote:I totally understand what you are saying, but you are taking the view as if the doctor intentionally wanted to cut the child
The human body ain't no car engine, some viruses and ailments affects ppl in different ways.
Look at it this way, I didn't see the full report, but I read somewhere here that the senior doctor wasn't present (need clarification)
Now you on call, you a baby delivery doctor (I not a medical man) the senior missing, the baby coming. Seeing it's a C-Section most likely she have complications. He maybe had no choice to start the procedure.
Let's say he waited and the woman and baby died due to the complications.
Headline "DOCTOR ON CALL, FAILS TO SAVE MOTHER AND CHILD"
The risk they face is that they stand to lose everything when something goes wrong.
It's not like my job when I could just reverse an entry.
That being said I know personally of doctors that did crap, and have evidence to prove such.
Intent would have made it murder. The fact is, a child died because someone was negligent. Do you suggest that we just shrug our shoulders and ask what's for lunch?
Where did I say he should get off? I didn't read the report so I can't say he was negligent
look dude, jus admit you tink he shouldn't be charged at all...and med. neglience is small scene..
seems you and pugbean or whoever mus be doctors...![]()
src1983 wrote:desifemlove wrote:src1983 wrote:De Dragon wrote:src1983 wrote:I totally understand what you are saying, but you are taking the view as if the doctor intentionally wanted to cut the child
The human body ain't no car engine, some viruses and ailments affects ppl in different ways.
Look at it this way, I didn't see the full report, but I read somewhere here that the senior doctor wasn't present (need clarification)
Now you on call, you a baby delivery doctor (I not a medical man) the senior missing, the baby coming. Seeing it's a C-Section most likely she have complications. He maybe had no choice to start the procedure.
Let's say he waited and the woman and baby died due to the complications.
Headline "DOCTOR ON CALL, FAILS TO SAVE MOTHER AND CHILD"
The risk they face is that they stand to lose everything when something goes wrong.
It's not like my job when I could just reverse an entry.
That being said I know personally of doctors that did crap, and have evidence to prove such.
Intent would have made it murder. The fact is, a child died because someone was negligent. Do you suggest that we just shrug our shoulders and ask what's for lunch?
Where did I say he should get off? I didn't read the report so I can't say he was negligent
look dude, jus admit you tink he shouldn't be charged at all...and med. neglience is small scene..
seems you and pugbean or whoever mus be doctors...![]()
I actually believe in evidence, unless you see the report of what happened then come and post it so we could say "yea the doc slice her", but until then I not casting aspersions
Rainman wrote:src1983 wrote:desifemlove wrote:src1983 wrote:De Dragon wrote:src1983 wrote:I totally understand what you are saying, but you are taking the view as if the doctor intentionally wanted to cut the child
The human body ain't no car engine, some viruses and ailments affects ppl in different ways.
Look at it this way, I didn't see the full report, but I read somewhere here that the senior doctor wasn't present (need clarification)
Now you on call, you a baby delivery doctor (I not a medical man) the senior missing, the baby coming. Seeing it's a C-Section most likely she have complications. He maybe had no choice to start the procedure.
Let's say he waited and the woman and baby died due to the complications.
Headline "DOCTOR ON CALL, FAILS TO SAVE MOTHER AND CHILD"
The risk they face is that they stand to lose everything when something goes wrong.
It's not like my job when I could just reverse an entry.
That being said I know personally of doctors that did crap, and have evidence to prove such.
Intent would have made it murder. The fact is, a child died because someone was negligent. Do you suggest that we just shrug our shoulders and ask what's for lunch?
Where did I say he should get off? I didn't read the report so I can't say he was negligent
look dude, jus admit you tink he shouldn't be charged at all...and med. neglience is small scene..
seems you and pugbean or whoever mus be doctors...![]()
I actually believe in evidence, unless you see the report of what happened then come and post it so we could say "yea the doc slice her", but until then I not casting aspersions
ummm that's what the report stated.
RIPEBREDFRUIT wrote:So the Special team that was appointed to probe this case in the babys death were paid as follows:
Mustapha Ibrahim - $ 500,000.00
Dr Petronella Manning - $ 190,000.00
Clare Davies - $ 114,000.00
RIPEBREDFRUIT wrote:How many of you in here would Carry their wife to this SAME doctor and have him deliver YOUR child after all has been said and done?
src1983 wrote:desifemlove wrote:src1983 wrote:De Dragon wrote:src1983 wrote:I totally understand what you are saying, but you are taking the view as if the doctor intentionally wanted to cut the child
The human body ain't no car engine, some viruses and ailments affects ppl in different ways.
Look at it this way, I didn't see the full report, but I read somewhere here that the senior doctor wasn't present (need clarification)
Now you on call, you a baby delivery doctor (I not a medical man) the senior missing, the baby coming. Seeing it's a C-Section most likely she have complications. He maybe had no choice to start the procedure.
Let's say he waited and the woman and baby died due to the complications.
Headline "DOCTOR ON CALL, FAILS TO SAVE MOTHER AND CHILD"
The risk they face is that they stand to lose everything when something goes wrong.
It's not like my job when I could just reverse an entry.
That being said I know personally of doctors that did crap, and have evidence to prove such.
Intent would have made it murder. The fact is, a child died because someone was negligent. Do you suggest that we just shrug our shoulders and ask what's for lunch?
Where did I say he should get off? I didn't read the report so I can't say he was negligent
look dude, jus admit you tink he shouldn't be charged at all...and med. neglience is small scene..
seems you and pugbean or whoever mus be doctors...![]()
I actually believe in evidence, unless you see the report of what happened then come and post it so we could say "yea the doc slice her", but until then I not casting aspersions
src1983 wrote:Rainman wrote:src1983 wrote:I actually believe in evidence, unless you see the report of what happened then come and post it so we could say "yea the doc slice her", but until then I not casting aspersions
ummm that's what the report stated.
Then lock up he batty
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Duane 3NE 2NR, Ralphie and 31 guests