Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Quoting a western mainstream media source? Your Zionist colors showing... yellow, representing cowardice and your dear beloved political party.Kickstart wrote:Turkey's Erdogan accuses the West of 'barbarism' and Islamophobia in the war in Gaza
https://uk.yahoo.com/news/turkeys-erdog ... 19933.html
Me quoting an article is not my opinion, nor is it as you described.wing wrote:Quoting a western mainstream media source? Your Zionist colors showing... yellow, representing cowardice and your dear beloved political party.Kickstart wrote:Turkey's Erdogan accuses the West of 'barbarism' and Islamophobia in the war in Gaza
https://uk.yahoo.com/news/turkeys-erdog ... 19933.html
European Jewish war or no war still means that land grabbing will continue.adnj wrote:While Palestinians are raping and kidnapping and trying to get foreign aid and the world's sympathy, Zionists are taking away their stuff.
Half the "new neighbourhood" comprising 1,738 housing units will be in the city's annexed east, the Israeli NGO Peace Now said.
"If it weren't for the war (between Israel and Hamas), there would be a lot of noise. It's a highly problematic project for the continuity of a Palestinian state between the southern West Bank and east Jerusalem," Peace Now's Hagit Ofran told AFP.
In a statement, the NGO said: "Half of the Lower Aqueduct neighbourhood is situated beyond the Green Line in east Jerusalem, and the other half is within the Green Line.
"However, its strategic location between the neighbourhoods of Givat Hamatos and Har Homa makes it particularly problematic from a political standpoint."
The Green Line refers to the 1949 Armistice Line established at the end of the war that accompanied Israel's founding a year earlier. ...
https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/2 ... usalem-ngo
Yeah, u cherry picking whatever suits you. No problem, except you and your other account insults anything contradictory to your set opinion.Kickstart wrote:Me quoting an article is not my opinion, nor is it as you described.wing wrote:Quoting a western mainstream media source? Your Zionist colors showing... yellow, representing cowardice and your dear beloved political party.Kickstart wrote:Turkey's Erdogan accuses the West of 'barbarism' and Islamophobia in the war in Gaza
https://uk.yahoo.com/news/turkeys-erdog ... 19933.html
It is there for all to read and make what they think of it. I have my own judgements, and from time to time, I may make a remake or post another article to refute what is written.
It is up to the reader as to what they think. Either they agree, or they may provide further reading to counteract the article or for the article.
Don't know what you are on about about cherry picking. This thread is about what goes on in the Middle East. At present, it's the ongoing dispute between Palestinians and Western Jews. Some articles need to be questioned if fiction or fact. Other posters have produced misleading articles that have been refuted from multiple news sources. Choosing to believe an article without looking at the other side is pure folly. Certain news sources will have you believe that their reporting is the truth, while others will produce a different side of the report. We were all told that the war on Iraq was about weapons of mass destructions when that turned out to be false, so must one continue to believe those same news sources that are now pro Jewish.wing wrote:Yeah, u cherry picking whatever suits you. No problem, except you and your other account insults anything contradictory to your set opinion.Kickstart wrote:Me quoting an article is not my opinion, nor is it as you described.wing wrote:Quoting a western mainstream media source? Your Zionist colors showing... yellow, representing cowardice and your dear beloved political party.Kickstart wrote:Turkey's Erdogan accuses the West of 'barbarism' and Islamophobia in the war in Gaza
https://uk.yahoo.com/news/turkeys-erdog ... 19933.html
It is there for all to read and make what they think of it. I have my own judgements, and from time to time, I may make a remake or post another article to refute what is written.
It is up to the reader as to what they think. Either they agree, or they may provide further reading to counteract the article or for the article.
Kickstart wrote:Don't know what you are on about about cherry picking. This thread is about what goes on in the Middle East. At present, it's the ongoing dispute between Palestinians and Western Jews. Some articles need to be questioned if fiction or fact. Other posters have produced misleading articles that have been refuted from multiple news sources. Choosing to believe an article without looking at the other side is pure folly. Certain news sources will have you believe that their reporting is the truth, while others will produce a different side of the report. We were all told that the war on Iraq was about weapons of mass destructions when that turned out to be false, so must one continue to believe those same news sources that are now pro Jewish.wing wrote:Yeah, u cherry picking whatever suits you. No problem, except you and your other account insults anything contradictory to your set opinion.Kickstart wrote:Me quoting an article is not my opinion, nor is it as you described.wing wrote:Quoting a western mainstream media source? Your Zionist colors showing... yellow, representing cowardice and your dear beloved political party.Kickstart wrote:Turkey's Erdogan accuses the West of 'barbarism' and Islamophobia in the war in Gaza
https://uk.yahoo.com/news/turkeys-erdog ... 19933.html
It is there for all to read and make what they think of it. I have my own judgements, and from time to time, I may make a remake or post another article to refute what is written.
It is up to the reader as to what they think. Either they agree, or they may provide further reading to counteract the article or for the article.
The world is filled with fake news, and it shows that people will sit back and believe an article without hearing the other side. It's called gaslighting, and articles are cleverly written to misdirect the truth. Simple words put into a report can play on feeble minds.coltspeed wrote:@Kickstart, remember it have people voting for Rowley still eh. Some ah these fellas no different in here.
Fools that need fooling to stay fooled and spread foolishness!
Biased reporting is paid reporting, and it is why the BBC refused to call Hamas terrorist. Most news sources are paid to project an image to gain public support, the public does not gain but the investors that paid for fake news gaincoltspeed wrote:Both gov and opposition play the same cards for the same financiers. But otherwise well said. Media personnel worldwide are coming out and exposing and educating us on the play of words and how to see through a fake story using trigger language because of the increasing ridiculous amount of fake propergander being openly pushed on media even on main platforms that were thought to be trusted sources are now viewed as biased reporting.
Once again I ask, what are the independent news sources we can trust? I pointed out previously that you quoted a mainstream media source to support your narrative.Kickstart wrote:Biased reporting is paid reporting, and it is why the BBC refused to call Hamas terrorist. Most news sources are paid to project an image to gain public support, the public does not gain but the investors that paid for fake news gaincoltspeed wrote:Both gov and opposition play the same cards for the same financiers. But otherwise well said. Media personnel worldwide are coming out and exposing and educating us on the play of words and how to see through a fake story using trigger language because of the increasing ridiculous amount of fake propergander being openly pushed on media even on main platforms that were thought to be trusted sources are now viewed as biased reporting.
That it is something that you would have to seek on your own while carefully reading a variety of reports. It is then up to you to decide what is fact from fiction. Further to this, always look at who are the owners of the news source, what they expect to gain from it. Certain news sources will publish truthful articles from time to time but those are of lesser importance to them as it is only to make them look unbiased.wing wrote:Once again I ask, what are the independent news sources we can trust? I pointed out previously that you quoted a mainstream media source to support your narrative.Kickstart wrote:Biased reporting is paid reporting, and it is why the BBC refused to call Hamas terrorist. Most news sources are paid to project an image to gain public support, the public does not gain but the investors that paid for fake news gaincoltspeed wrote:Both gov and opposition play the same cards for the same financiers. But otherwise well said. Media personnel worldwide are coming out and exposing and educating us on the play of words and how to see through a fake story using trigger language because of the increasing ridiculous amount of fake propergander being openly pushed on media even on main platforms that were thought to be trusted sources are now viewed as biased reporting.
So you are saying then, there are news sources who have an agenda but sometimes publish articles to appear impartial. Can we assume then, that if major news corporations can be bought, so could the smaller or even independent media houses? If this is true, then it explains the neverending circle of news and propaganda on all sides, as observed in this forum.Kickstart wrote:That it is something that you would have to seek on your own while carefully reading a variety of reports. It is then up to you to decide what is fact from fiction. Further to this, always look at who are the owners of the news source, what they expect to gain from it. Certain news sources will publish truthful articles from time to time but those are of lesser importance to them as it is only to make them look unbiased.wing wrote:Once again I ask, what are the independent news sources we can trust? I pointed out previously that you quoted a mainstream media source to support your narrative.Kickstart wrote:Biased reporting is paid reporting, and it is why the BBC refused to call Hamas terrorist. Most news sources are paid to project an image to gain public support, the public does not gain but the investors that paid for fake news gaincoltspeed wrote:Both gov and opposition play the same cards for the same financiers. But otherwise well said. Media personnel worldwide are coming out and exposing and educating us on the play of words and how to see through a fake story using trigger language because of the increasing ridiculous amount of fake propergander being openly pushed on media even on main platforms that were thought to be trusted sources are now viewed as biased reporting.
My opinion on news sources may not agree to you as you may have a different opinion.
Would u prefer to believe the blast or the sunshine newspaper.
Does the Guardian or Express publish mis-truths, or do they hide certain facts to steer the public in a different direction.
In the end, the truth always comes out and the damage is already done. If you are burnt once, then you should by now know how not to get burned again
It is up to the reader to separate what is fact from fiction.wing wrote:So you are saying then, there are news sources who have an agenda but sometimes publish articles to appear impartial. Can we assume then, that if major news corporations can be bought, so could the smaller or even independent media houses? If this is true, then it explains the neverending circle of news and propaganda on all sides, as observed in this forum.Kickstart wrote:That it is something that you would have to seek on your own while carefully reading a variety of reports. It is then up to you to decide what is fact from fiction. Further to this, always look at who are the owners of the news source, what they expect to gain from it. Certain news sources will publish truthful articles from time to time but those are of lesser importance to them as it is only to make them look unbiased.wing wrote:Once again I ask, what are the independent news sources we can trust? I pointed out previously that you quoted a mainstream media source to support your narrative.Kickstart wrote:Biased reporting is paid reporting, and it is why the BBC refused to call Hamas terrorist. Most news sources are paid to project an image to gain public support, the public does not gain but the investors that paid for fake news gaincoltspeed wrote:Both gov and opposition play the same cards for the same financiers. But otherwise well said. Media personnel worldwide are coming out and exposing and educating us on the play of words and how to see through a fake story using trigger language because of the increasing ridiculous amount of fake propergander being openly pushed on media even on main platforms that were thought to be trusted sources are now viewed as biased reporting.
My opinion on news sources may not agree to you as you may have a different opinion.
Would u prefer to believe the blast or the sunshine newspaper.
Does the Guardian or Express publish mis-truths, or do they hide certain facts to steer the public in a different direction.
In the end, the truth always comes out and the damage is already done. If you are burnt once, then you should by now know how not to get burned again
coltspeed wrote:Another fake accusation by the IDF. Staged videos of IDF claiming citizens to be Hamas by doing 2 videos of the same scene.
Link
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MxJwJVp77fU
Kickstart wrote:Yet still none of the posters on tuner for Jews will talk about this.
They will never speak on the apartheid in the west bankcoltspeed wrote:Kickstart wrote:Yet still none of the posters on tuner for Jews will talk about this.
It was said that they were just getting started .....
CNN was one of those news sources that positioned the public to believe that the war on Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan, and Iran were all justified.Dizzy28 wrote:Men will claim mainstream news like CNN are not valid sources of data but proceed to cite Max Blumenthal and Grayzone.
Blumenthal who is bought and paid for by Russia and routinely bats for Russia, China and Syria is more trusted apparently in their eyes.
I love this place oui!!!!
Are you aware that Israel is currently bombing parts of Syria as well? So despite the unjustified slaughter of innocent men women and children in Gaza, West Bank and to the lesser extent Tel Aviv, they have started their "ethnic cleansing" in Syria.Dizzy28 wrote:Men will claim mainstream news like CNN are not valid sources of data but proceed to cite Max Blumenthal and Grayzone.
Blumenthal who is bought and paid for by Russia and routinely bats for Russia, China and Syria is more trusted apparently in their eyes.
I love this place oui!!!!
Moscow Max tell you that?Jerry84 wrote:Are you aware that Israel is currently bombing parts of Syria as well? So despite the unjustified slaughter of innocent men women and children in Gaza, West Bank and to the lesser extent Tel Aviv, they have started their "ethnic cleansing" in Syria.Dizzy28 wrote:Men will claim mainstream news like CNN are not valid sources of data but proceed to cite Max Blumenthal and Grayzone.
Blumenthal who is bought and paid for by Russia and routinely bats for Russia, China and Syria is more trusted apparently in their eyes.
I love this place oui!!!!
Allyuh brutal yes.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 116 guests