Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
crock101 wrote:Wow ....you just repeated what I just said right back at me...again......you're a clever one aren't you.
bluesclues wrote:Eitech boy is just to stay home and develop yuh powers and then when yuh come out and they teasin yuh and asking yuh to prove it.. drop a lightning bolt from the sky and disintegrate them. They will believe then and all the argument will done.
Lol
maj. tom wrote:That would be cool? To physically harm someone over thoughts different from your small brain box?
Oh yes, the Bible does in fact teach that.
drchaos wrote:Early in the morning, as Jesus was on his way back to the city, he was hungry. Seeing a fig tree by the road, he went up to it but found nothing on it except leaves. Then he said to it, “May you never bear fruit again!” Immediately the tree withered. Matthew 21:18-22 NIV
I did some reading and this guy has major issues ...
eitech wrote:drchaos wrote:Early in the morning, as Jesus was on his way back to the city, he was hungry. Seeing a fig tree by the road, he went up to it but found nothing on it except leaves. Then he said to it, “May you never bear fruit again!” Immediately the tree withered. Matthew 21:18-22 NIV
I did some reading and this guy has major issues ...
Yup that's how ppl read the bible.
drchaos wrote:eitech wrote:drchaos wrote:Early in the morning, as Jesus was on his way back to the city, he was hungry. Seeing a fig tree by the road, he went up to it but found nothing on it except leaves. Then he said to it, “May you never bear fruit again!” Immediately the tree withered. Matthew 21:18-22 NIV
I did some reading and this guy has major issues ...
Yup that's how ppl read the bible.
Lol when Christians quote lines from the bible its AAAA OOOO KKK but when other people do it its not?
crock101 wrote:Eitech....I am sure you can see the Hindus are crazy for believing in a flying,talking monkey....yet you seem to think that your belief in talking a snake and a talking donkey is somehow sophisticated and perfectly logical..... the hypocrisy is truly a wonder to gaze upon.
sMASH wrote:these versions of the bible u have today, are truths mixed with lies. you will be lead astray.
eitech wrote:ok. you know what? u r correct. i was a fool to ever think that someone who is not saved could understand the scriptures jus by reading it so. My apologies and i do mean it.
eitech wrote:sMASH wrote:these versions of the bible u have today, are truths mixed with lies. you will be lead astray.
Very true. there are many translations that have deviated from the original text and are teaching something totally different. One such translation is that used by the jehovah witnesses. And, when people come along and start to compare they say well the bible has mistakes and clump everything into a group. I can see where ppl get their accusations from.
sMASH wrote:these versions of the bible u have today, are truths mixed with lies. you will be lead astray.
drchaos wrote:eitech wrote:sMASH wrote:these versions of the bible u have today, are truths mixed with lies. you will be lead astray.
Very true. there are many translations that have deviated from the original text and are teaching something totally different. One such translation is that used by the jehovah witnesses. And, when people come along and start to compare they say well the bible has mistakes and clump everything into a group. I can see where ppl get their accusations from.
What about the other 20 or so gospels that they conveniently left out?
meccalli wrote:sMASH wrote:these versions of the bible u have today, are truths mixed with lies. you will be lead astray.
Like the kjv, at least they italicised the spurious text they added in to push the concept of a trinity.
Textural criticism is a wonderful thing, Isaiah's scroll was found among the dead sea scrolls making it 1100 years older than the previously dated copy, what's even more astonishing is that the integrity of the text was preserved, the only changes noted were grammatical, continuing the great track record of its prophecies one of which when Daniel handed Cyrus the scroll of Isaiah when he walked into Babylon; He read the prophecy of his name, occupation and method of babylon's invasion which was written 150 years before he was born and was moved to send the Israelites back to their cities and charged with a royal decree to rebuild the temple to their God.
Many of the gospels are filled with anachronisms and other historical disproofs of it's authenticity and are classed as pseudepigrapha attributed to well known figures in the biblical narrative. Which is why they weren't included in the canon.
drchaos wrote:eitech wrote:ok. you know what? u r correct. i was a fool to ever think that someone who is not saved could understand the scriptures jus by reading it so. My apologies and i do mean it.
Apology accepted ... I ketch what you saying about being "Saved" from common sense and rational thinking.
drchaos wrote:Boss you pull phrases out of context again ....
epic fail ....
rspann wrote:I don't know what it is about religion and God that makes people who don't believe in it, spend so much time and effort arguing over it, or trying to prove it does not exist.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: ProtonPowder and 218 guests