Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
rspann wrote:Slartibartfast,something in your answer reminds me of something I always think about. Many Christians only research the bible for their own purposes,I not talking about you ,but how you said you rusty made me reflect. They use it to prove they are right ,not as a means of seeking God's words.Muslims go to classes to learn the Quran from young,do most Christian churches have provision for that?Muslims pray five times a day to remember God, some Christians pray when they need something or when they have problems.I am a Christian but there are some things I admire and follow from them.like bowing in humility while praying(I don't understand how some preachers shout at God and give him instructions). There are also some things I as a Christian don't believe even in Christianity,like the Godhead,and other doctrines that are not in the Bible.Muslims condemn the Bible because of two reasons,one is that they never studied nit and so make wrong claims but the other is that some Christians, by their doctrines,and by their lives give lie to what is really in the Bible.
York wrote:3 persons in 1 being is a lie u invented. It is clear misguidance, polytheism, as stated by God in the Quran. I dont care about your symantics and donkey logic. Heed the warning. You have strayed far. Disbelief in any 1 messenger (Muhammad) is disbelief in all, including Jesus.
Slarti,
I'll try to make the time but i'm very busy. As i have said, read the Quran.
rspann wrote:This is why I can't get a grasp of the three being one. You have to explain it by what the church says and the Athanasian creed. God gave us his spirit to guide us into all truth,why do I go back to letting a sinful human decide what I must believe?
Habit7 wrote:York wrote:so what so christians deem the name of god to be?
why haven't Jews accepted your Lord and saviour, the promised messiah?
For Christians God is the God of the Bible, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. The God who progressively revealed him throughout the Bible as being one in essence, three in person. Elohim (pl) of Genesis 1 who said "let Us create..." The God who promised to send His divine Son (Isaiah 9:6), the Son who David spoke of (Psalm 110:1), the divine Son of Man (Daniel 7:13). Along with the Holy Spirit who is also spoken of as well (Numbers 27:18, 1 Samuel 16:12-13 and 1 Samuel 10:10). In the New Testament this revelation is fully demonstrated in Jesus, who was both man and God, who forgave sin, received worship and claimed His equality with God the Father (John 5:18). Thus He was crucified as a blasphemer, but on the cross as a man He was the fitting substitute for the sins of those who have faith in Him, and as God, only He can bear the wrath of the Father poured out on Him and rise again.
God is one being, three in person: Father, Son and the Holy Spirit.
Slartibartfast wrote:Rspann you are correct in a sense. Lots of people only read the bible to prove a point. But this is true forany religious text. Just like in any religion there are those that actually follow the teachings. Habit and to some extent even bluesclues seem like the type that truly believe in the bible and follow it even outside of tuner arguments.
Now I'm not sure where you are from but I was personally exposed to bible studies in school (prayer 3 times a day and Religious studies 3 times a week in a catholic school). I also had to go to weekly classes for a year tp study my faith before making first communion and this was all before the age of 10.
In my teen years there was bible study groups for older folks and sunday school for younger ones. I ducked out of those to play football. There was also a year and a half of mandatory studies before anyone could be confirmed.
So there are a lot of prayers and study groups available for Christians every day of the week. I left the faith and I. No longer invovled in it so I'll only do a quick google search on the bible to prove a point but don't think that I represent Christians in any way. I would say look to Habit to get a better idea cuz he is clearly more involved in the faith than I am.
I was just quoting the bible to try to relate to York since he seems to be having difficulty formulating his own thoughts. I decided to stick to thoughts and writongs at least 1000 uears old im hopes that he has had ample time to understand them so far.
But yeah, FYI I'm not a catholic or christian so dont take me as an example for either.
Edit: for adults there are also Catholic orgamisations like Opus Dei. I'm actually still in contact with them but that's because they are wonderful human beings and do good charity work.
Habit7 wrote:York wrote:3 persons in 1 being is a lie u invented. It is clear misguidance, polytheism, as stated by God in the Quran. I dont care about your symantics and donkey logic. Heed the warning. You have strayed far. Disbelief in any 1 messenger (Muhammad) is disbelief in all, including Jesus.
Slarti,
I'll try to make the time but i'm very busy. As i have said, read the Quran.
You are asking Slarti to read the Quran but I have and pose inconsistencies in the Quran to you that you are unwilling to address.
First you said the Trinity is the Father, Son and Angel Gabriel, the Quran says it is the Father, Son and Mary and both of you are wrong. I gave the historic confession of the triune nature God the church has confessed and you say that it is lie I invented. That is a clear indication you have no knowledge of what you deny. That formula is from the Athanasian Creed which also predates Muhammad, sadly neither you or the "prophet" was unaware of it.
York wrote:Slartibartfast wrote:Rspann you are correct in a sense. Lots of people only read the bible to prove a point. But this is true forany religious text. Just like in any religion there are those that actually follow the teachings. Habit and to some extent even bluesclues seem like the type that truly believe in the bible and follow it even outside of tuner arguments.
Now I'm not sure where you are from but I was personally exposed to bible studies in school (prayer 3 times a day and Religious studies 3 times a week in a catholic school). I also had to go to weekly classes for a year tp study my faith before making first communion and this was all before the age of 10.
In my teen years there was bible study groups for older folks and sunday school for younger ones. I ducked out of those to play football. There was also a year and a half of mandatory studies before anyone could be confirmed.
So there are a lot of prayers and study groups available for Christians every day of the week. I left the faith and I. No longer invovled in it so I'll only do a quick google search on the bible to prove a point but don't think that I represent Christians in any way. I would say look to Habit to get a better idea cuz he is clearly more involved in the faith than I am.
I was just quoting the bible to try to relate to York since he seems to be having difficulty formulating his own thoughts. I decided to stick to thoughts and writongs at least 1000 uears old im hopes that he has had ample time to understand them so far.
But yeah, FYI I'm not a catholic or christian so dont take me as an example for either.
Edit: for adults there are also Catholic orgamisations like Opus Dei. I'm actually still in contact with them but that's because they are wonderful human beings and do good charity work.
Would anyone expect a 10 yr old child to have been educated to an extent to really understand his religion and to not have been brainwashed, in an era when information was not readily available compared to now?
Now wonder you can't grasp some of the concepts i have been throwing at you. You were brainwashed and I hope not molested by any priests...
Rspann, you on the right track. Circular logic applies to "the bible" as well. Unknown men wrote them, especially JOHN which is the one that introduced the Trinity polytheistic concept. And then continued to be changed by men who corrected the word of God. It is what it is. Jesus was a man.
Slartibartfast wrote:York wrote:3 persons in 1 being is a lie u invented. It is clear misguidance, polytheism, as stated by God in the Quran. I dont care about your symantics and donkey logic. Heed the warning. You have strayed far. Disbelief in any 1 messenger (Muhammad) is disbelief in all, including Jesus.
Slarti,
I'll try to make the time but i'm very busy. As i have said, read the Quran.
And as I have replied, the answer to my questions are personal, specific to you and cannot be found in the Quran. I am sure you are aware of what the "circular reasoning" fallacy is and why you can't say that you know the Quran to be true because it says it is true.
I shall quote it again with emphasis to aid you in avoiding some of the confusion.Slartibartfast wrote:Slartibartfast wrote:Relevant part ofy question quoted below for you to address.Slartibartfast wrote:YOU talk a lot about obeying God and what he want and all that. How do YOU know what God's will is? How do YOU know that the teachings in the Quran is His/Her teaching? How do YOU know that Islam is right?
Also, do you doubt any of the things below that Jesus said? Remember, to doubt Jesus is to doubt Muhammed. Here Jesus likens himself to God. If my interpretation is off I expect Habit can correct me. It's been a while since I studied the bible closely so forgive me if I'm a bit rusty.
I and the Father are one. (John 10:30, NIV)Are they conjoined twins? One in purpose?
Jesus answered: "Don't you know me, Philip, even after I have been among you such a long time? Anyone who has seen me has seen the Father. Are they identical twins?How can you say, 'Show us the Father'? (John 14:9, NIV)
Slartibartfast wrote:YOU talk a lot about obeying God and what he want and all that. How do YOU know what God's will is? How do YOU know that the teachings in the Quran is His/Her teaching? How do YOU know that Islam is right?
York wrote:Unknown men wrote them, especially JOHN which is the one that introduced the Trinity polytheistic concept. And then continued to be changed by men who corrected the word of God. It is what it is.
I don't have the Christian Holy Spirit in me. I went to Christian Sunday School as a youth. I never believed that Jesus was GOD or part of GOD.Slartibartfast wrote:Why dont you start with one of my simpler questions. It's clear the idea of the trinity eludes you.
Let's start at the beginning. Quoted again in case you missed it the first time..... or second time or third time or forth time.Slartibartfast wrote:YOU talk a lot about obeying God and what he want and all that. How do YOU know what God's will is? How do YOU know that the teachings in the Quran is His/Her teaching? How do YOU know that Islam is right?
Fifth time's the charm.
Habit7 wrote:York wrote:Unknown men wrote them, especially JOHN which is the one that introduced the Trinity polytheistic concept. And then continued to be changed by men who corrected the word of God. It is what it is.
Quran 6:114-115 [Say (O Muhammad )] "Shall I seek a judge other than Allah while it is He Who has sent down unto you the Book (The Qur'an), explained in detail." Those unto whom We gave the Scripture [the Taurat (Torah) and the Injeel (Gospel)] know that it is revealed from your Lord in truth. So be not you of those who doubt.And the Word of your Lord has been fulfilled in truth and in justice. None can change His Words. And He is the All-Hearer, the All-Knower.
You are not doing the Quran any help. Either you are right and the Torah and the Gospel was changed and the Quran is wrong? Or the Quran is right the Scripture is unchanged and you are wrong. Either way the Quran is wrong.
York you keep using Muslim sources to inform you about Christianity, you will always get a biased review. To test the truth and consistency of your religion, read the Christian sources and see if they align with what your Islamic sources says they should be.
I have done this with Islamic sources against Christianity and as you can see I have seen some woeful inconsistency with Islam.
Habit7 wrote:The Jews Alter Allah's Words
Allah states that some Jews, may Allah's curses descend on them, distort Allah's Words with their tongues, change them from their appropriate places, and alter their intended meanings. They do this to deceive the ignorant people by making it appear that their words are in the Book of Allah. They attribute their own lies to Allah, even though they know that they have lied and invented falsehood. Therefore, Allah said,
(and they speak a lie against Allah while they know it.)
Mujahid, Ash-Sha`bi, Al-Hasan, Qatadah and Ar-Rabi` bin Anas said that,
(who distort the Book with their tongues,) means, "They alter them (Allah's Words).''
Al-Bukhari reported that Ibn `Abbas said that the Ayah means they alter and add although none among Allah's creation can remove the Words of Allah from His Books, they alter and distort their apparent meanings. Wahb bin Munabbih said, "The Tawrah and the Injil remain as Allah revealed them, and no letter in them was removed. However, the people misguide others by addition and false interpretation, relying on books that they wrote themselves.
http://www.qtafsir.com/index.php?option ... &Itemid=46
That was your source, not mine.
Habit7 wrote:Habit7 wrote:The Jews Alter Allah's Words
Allah states that some Jews, may Allah's curses descend on them, distort Allah's Words with their tongues, change them from their appropriate places, and alter their intended meanings. They do this to deceive the ignorant people by making it appear that their words are in the Book of Allah. They attribute their own lies to Allah, even though they know that they have lied and invented falsehood. Therefore, Allah said,
(and they speak a lie against Allah while they know it.)
Mujahid, Ash-Sha`bi, Al-Hasan, Qatadah and Ar-Rabi` bin Anas said that,
(who distort the Book with their tongues,) means, "They alter them (Allah's Words).''
Al-Bukhari reported that Ibn `Abbas said that the Ayah means they alter and add although none among Allah's creation can remove the Words of Allah from His Books, they alter and distort their apparent meanings. Wahb bin Munabbih said, "The Tawrah and the Injil remain as Allah revealed them, and no letter in them was removed.
The original revelation itself. You don't have these. The Injil is the Gospel given to Jesus. What you have are recollections (or fabrications) written many years after.
However, the people misguide others by addition and false interpretation, relying on books that they wrote themselves.aka THE BIBLE.
http://www.qtafsir.com/index.php?option ... &Itemid=46
That was your source, not mine.
I hear this a lot. What is the significance of Muhammed being uneducated?York wrote:Muhammad was unlettered, could not read or write,
I think you made a mistake here. If he was not taught Christian theology then it seems only natural that what he made up would not follow it.York wrote: was not taught Christian theology. If he made up the Quran / Islam, why did he not conform with Christianity.
Ok so, so far, no indication that Muhammed was correct or that Islam is right and the only reason you believe is because you "choose" to believe. Sounds a lot like brainwashing but moving on.York wrote:Rather he opposed. He was a plain warner whom I choose to believe with sound mind and intellect, no talking in tongues / possessions, etc.
Any comforting text can be "healing" for someone brainwashed enough to believe. That is how all of the other "true" religions work. no indication that Muhammed was correct or that Islam is right.York wrote:
I asked habit to say which prophesy of Muhammad was not fulfilled? The Romans were defeated, etc...Quran Ch 30.
The Quran itself is a healing for those who believe but I make no claim to have experienced, there are narrations to support that claim. Also, to repel demon (jinn) possessed persons.
No real answers put forward so far. Hopefully I can get one good answer before the year is out.York wrote:
Many other reasons Slarti but i didn't have the time recently / this weekend (attending to farm) and will be fully booked with work this week.
Before I take a look at this, what are the references for this book? Does it use the Quran as it's main reference?York wrote:
Islamic Monotheism is the only true monotheism in the world. You have to study Tawheed, Oneness of GOD to understand. Google The Book of Tawheed by Ibn Abdul Wahhaab. It can be downloaded with explanation by Shaykh Uthaimeen in MP3 format.
Fair enough. Seeing that I didn't quote or reference this site then you should have no problem debating with me. Also, which Christians worship Mary? After being brought up in Christianity for two decades I have never met a Christian that worshiped Mary. Why would the Quran state not to worship Mary like Christians do when Christians don't worship Mary. Shouldn't Allah know better? Unless that part was misquoted from the Quran.York wrote:I am not interested in debating or discussing with anyone who is going to keep posting stuff from Anti-Islamic propaganda sites like this http://www.bible.ca/islam/islam-bible-k ... n-mary.htm. I honestly don't have the time. Like habit and his claim that the Quran says Mary is part of the Trinity. It states not to worship Mary as Catholics do, but does not explicitly say she is part of the Trinity. Yet they want to say the Quran / Muhammad claims such and such.
So is fear is why you believe?York wrote:
Just take the admonition meted out by the Quran from Muslims. Then choose to believe or disbelieve. GOD know best and HE will be the Judge.
Ignoring this until you can somehow show that he Quran was not written by man. If you can show it then I shall take it seriously.York wrote:
Allah said in the Quran that HE would protect it, so they can't get their filthy hands on it to corrupt it like they did the books of the Bible.(I don't support that the Bible was meant to be compiled the way it was.)
york. there is documentation that suggest that muhamad went thru periods of possesions,madness,and crazy rants there were times i think he seekthe help of an exorcistYork wrote:Muhammad was unlettered, could not read or write, was not taught Christian theology. If he made up the Quran / Islam, why did he not conform with Christianity. Rather he opposed. He was a plain warner whom I choose to believe with sound mind and intellect, no talking in tongues / possessions, etc.
This why I said two pages back:York wrote:As for Allah's Books, they are still preserved and cannot be changed.'' Ibn Abi Hatim recorded this statement. However, if Wahb meant the books that are currently in the hands of the People of the Book, then we should state that there is no doubt that they altered, distorted, added to and deleted from them. For instance, the Arabic versions of these books contain tremendous error, many additions and deletions and enormous misinterpretation. Those who rendered these translations have incorrect comprehension in most, rather, all of these translations. If Wahb meant the Books of Allah that He has with Him, then indeed, these Books are preserved and were never changed.
Habit7 wrote:We have Torahs that predate Muhammad by hundreds of years, likewise Gospels, all of which are identical to Torah and Gospel today in my bible. So when Muhammad tells me to corroborate what he says in the Torah and Gospels which are supposed to be the words of Allah and they don't corroborate him. And that Allah's words can't be changed. Also that the Quran never says that the Torah, Psalms or Gospels were corrupted. However they all were compiled long before the Quran and widely distributed, so if one were to corrupt them one would have to find all the multiple copies around the world and change these handwritten documents, an impossibility.
Either Muhammad was wrong about the Torah and the Gospel corroborating him.
Or Muhammad was wrong that the God of the Torah, Psalms and Gospel being the Allah of the Quran.
Either ways Muhammad is wrong.
Well post your documentation that YOU THINK? He was known as Al-Amin, the Trusted One, before he claimed prophethood at the age of 40. In the first few years of his prophethood even his enemies entrusted their property and wealth for him to keep safe for them. They didn't have banks and safety deposit boxes back then.megadoc1 wrote:york. there is documentation that suggest that muhamad went thru periods of possesions,madness,and crazy rants there were times i think he seekthe help of an exorcistYork wrote:Muhammad was unlettered, could not read or write, was not taught Christian theology. If he made up the Quran / Islam, why did he not conform with Christianity. Rather he opposed. He was a plain warner whom I choose to believe with sound mind and intellect, no talking in tongues / possessions, etc.
York wrote:Habit7 wrote:York wrote:3 persons in 1 being is a lie u invented. It is clear misguidance, polytheism, as stated by God in the Quran. I dont care about your symantics and donkey logic. Heed the warning. You have strayed far. Disbelief in any 1 messenger (Muhammad) is disbelief in all, including Jesus.
Slarti,
I'll try to make the time but i'm very busy. As i have said, read the Quran.
You are asking Slarti to read the Quran but I have and pose inconsistencies in the Quran to you that you are unwilling to address.
First you said the Trinity is the Father, Son and Angel Gabriel, the Quran says it is the Father, Son and Mary and both of you are wrong. I gave the historic confession of the triune nature God the church has confessed and you say that it is lie I invented. That is a clear indication you have no knowledge of what you deny. That formula is from the Athanasian Creed which also predates Muhammad, sadly neither you or the "prophet" was unaware of it.
GOD in the Quran addresses you concerning the Trinity:
(1) O people of the Scripture (Christians)! Do not exceed the limits in your religion, nor say of Allah (GOD) aught but the truth. The Messiah 'Îsa (Jesus), son of Maryam (Mary), was (no more than) a Messenger of Allah and His Word, ("Be!" - and he was) which He bestowed on Maryam (Mary) and a spirit (Ruh ) created by Him; so believe in Allah and His Messengers. Say not: "Three (trinity)!" Cease! (it is) better for you. For Allah is (the only) One Ilah (God), glory be to Him (Far Exalted is He) above having a son. To Him belongs all that is in the heavens and all that is in the earth. And Allah is All-Sufficient as a Disposer of affairs.
He added this last part to confirm that He is NOT IN NEED of any help or son to help Him dispose of affairs.
(سورة النساء, An-Nisaa, Chapter #4, Verse #171)
(2) Surely, disbelievers are those who said: "Allah is the third of the three (in a trinity)." But there is no Ilah (god) (none who has the right to be worshipped) but One Ilah (God -Allah). And if they cease not from what they say, verily, a painful torment will befall on the disbelievers among them. (سورة المائدة, Al-Maaida, Chapter #5, Verse #73)
Habit7 wrote:This why I said two pages back:York wrote:As for Allah's Books, they are still preserved and cannot be changed.'' Ibn Abi Hatim recorded this statement. However, if Wahb meant the books that are currently in the hands of the People of the Book, then we should state that there is no doubt that they altered, distorted, added to and deleted from them. For instance, the Arabic versions of these books contain tremendous error, many additions and deletions and enormous misinterpretation. Those who rendered these translations have incorrect comprehension in most, rather, all of these translations. If Wahb meant the Books of Allah that He has with Him, then indeed, these Books are preserved and were never changed.Habit7 wrote:We have Torahs that predate Muhammad by hundreds of years, likewise Gospels, all of which are identical to Torah and Gospel today in my bible. So when Muhammad tells me to corroborate what he says in the Torah and Gospels which are supposed to be the words of Allah and they don't corroborate him. And that Allah's words can't be changed. Also that the Quran never says that the Torah, Psalms or Gospels were corrupted. However they all were compiled long before the Quran and widely distributed, so if one were to corrupt them one would have to find all the multiple copies around the world and change these handwritten documents, an impossibility.
Either Muhammad was wrong about the Torah and the Gospel corroborating him.
Or Muhammad was wrong that the God of the Torah, Psalms and Gospel being the Allah of the Quran.
Either ways Muhammad is wrong.
The illiterate Muhammad in the 7th century told his followers that Torah and Gospel corroborates his teachings and that Christians and Jews should check in those books to verify. It was not until the 9th century that Bible was translated into Arabic and Muslims saw for themselves the vast inconsistency in books Islam seeks to justify itself with. Only then did some Muslims claim that Torah and Gospels were corrupted, but the Quran says they were not. wrong, it was there in the Quran and from Muhammad 14 centuries ago.
The tafsir gives you 2 hypothetical options, you are claiming one is true. Both are True. A little reflection will reveal how so.
Either way the tafsir confirms that there is an uncorrupted Torah and Gospel that was in the hands of the Jews and Christians. Subsequent transcribers and translators may have corrupted it, thanks for the confirmation!but so have they done to the Quran. Nevertheless, in its original language it remained pure and undefiled. And we have multiple manuscripts dating way before Muhammad's greatest grandfather was a boy show that the Torah and Gospel of then, is the same of today.well then quote and explain from those, not English translations which were translated from the Latin Vulgate Bible. Oh, post a link to those original manuscripts nah? What language/s were they?
So to say that these books were corrupted and the original no longer exists would make Muhammad a false prophet because he said nobody can change Allah's word.
To say that they not corrupted would make him a false prophet since they dont corroborate his message.
Either way he is false prophet. And if you hold him to the Deuteronomy 18:18 standard, Deuteronomy 18:20-22 identifies him as a false prophet because he recites the Satanic Verses. This is just another example of the Torah not corroborating him.
York wrote:wrong, it was there in the Quran and from Muhammad 14 centuries ago.Abu’l-Rabi‘ b. al-Layth (c. 8th century A.D.), ‘Ali b. Rabban al-Tabari (b. 810 A.D.), Abu Muhammad ‘Abd Allah b. Muslim b. Qutayba (b. 828 A.D.), Ahmad b. Abi Ya‘qub b. Ja‘far b. Wahb b. Wadih al-‘Abbasi (b. first quarter of the 9th century A.D.), Abu Ja‘far Muhammad b. Jarir al-Tabari (b. 839 A.D.), Abu’l-Hasan ‘Ali b. al-Husayn al-Mas‘udi (b. 893 A.D.), Abu Bakr Muhammad b. al-Tayyib b. Ja‘far b. Muhammad b. al-Qasim (ibn) al-Baqillani (b. 950) all believed in the authenticity and non-corruption of the Torah and Gospel.
Both are True. A little reflection will reveal how so.The law of non-contradiction states A cannot be B at the same sense and the same time. They cannot both be true, either books are corrupted or not. Not both.
well then quote and explain from those, not English translations which were translated from the Latin Vulgate Bible. Oh, post a link to those original manuscripts nah? What language/s were they? I have been quoting from the New American Standard Bible (NASB) for our discussion, it is not translated from the Vulgate. The New Testament manuscripts are named p1-p76 ranging in age from A.D. 200 to A.D. 700 http://www.csntm.org/Manuscripts.aspx
Papyri just last long enough for us to have the originals as it is organic. Nevertheless we have so much manuscripts in such wide distribution along with quotations from early church fathers, the New Testament still remains the most verified book of antiquity.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], matr1x, VexXx Dogg and 114 guests