Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
York wrote:Habit,
You sir are a mushrikoon kaafir, polytheist disbeliever. Why MUST you worship a man? Disbelief in any one messenger, is disbelief in all.
Noted.York wrote:Sorry race yes, Islam does not identify superiority of the Arab over the non-Arab. God looks at our hearts and deeds.
Why? Why doesn't the man also have to cover everything except his hands and face? Also, how do you know that the Shariah is the law of God and where can I get a copy to read?York wrote:Muslims live by the law of God, the Shariah. This would take preference over any manmade law. A Muslim woman HAS to cover everything except her hands and face.
Freedom of dress is not special treatment and lots of women in Trinidad dress in this manner without any negative effects. Covering of the face would have been a different matter though as it would allow criminals to walk around in plain site disguised as women.York wrote:She would need a special treatment in this regard if living in a non-Muslim state.
Right. Now here is where you lost me. So Muslims should be allowed to form a society to do as they please regardless of state laws but if the roles were reversed non-muslims should not be allowed such freedoms?[/quote]York wrote:In a Muslim state non- Muslim women will not be allowed to dress any less. The same concept applies to alcohol and gambling, etc because of the effect, negative, that it would have on the society. The laws of the state is what matters here.
York wrote:With respect to creed, non-Muslims in a Muslim state would have to pay Jizya, a tax for security.
Wow! Preferred to live like this under Muslim rule when compared to what alternative exactly?York wrote:Non-Muslims in the past preferred to live under Muslim rule like this. Google it!
York wrote:You keep quoting from an obsolete text and therein lies the problem.
Do not dispute with the People of the Book except in a manner which is best, barring such of them as are wrongdoers, and say, ‘We believe in that which has been sent down to us and has been sent down to you; our God and your God is one [and the same], and to Him do we submit.’(29:46)
He has sent down to you the Book with the truth confirming what was [revealed] before it, and He had sent down the Torah and the Evangel. (3:3)
those who follow the Apostle, the uninstructed prophet, whose mention they find written with them in the Torah and the Evangel, who bids them to do what is right and forbids them from what is wrong, makes lawful to them all the good things and forbids them from all vicious things, and relieves them of their burdens and the shackles that were upon them —those who believe in him, honour him, and help him and follow the light that has been sent down with him,1 they are the felicitous.’ (7:157)
York wrote:Slarti,
France, once known for liberty, fraternity and equality, has turned 180° against Muslims. Nuns could wear head covering but not Muslim women! Right here in Trini Muslim girls could not have gone to a catholic school wearing hijab. Was that every creed finding an equal place?
Habit7 wrote:York wrote:You keep quoting from an obsolete text and therein lies the problem.
The Quran says:Do not dispute with the People of the Book except in a manner which is best, barring such of them as are wrongdoers, and say, ‘We believe in that which has been sent down to us and has been sent down to you; our God and your God is one [and the same], and to Him do we submit.’(29:46)
He has sent down to you the Book with the truth confirming what was [revealed] before it, and He had sent down the Torah and the Evangel. (3:3)
those who follow the Apostle, the uninstructed prophet, whose mention they find written with them in the Torah and the Evangel, who bids them to do what is right and forbids them from what is wrong, makes lawful to them all the good things and forbids them from all vicious things, and relieves them of their burdens and the shackles that were upon them —those who believe in him, honour him, and help him and follow the light that has been sent down with him,1 they are the felicitous.’ (7:157)
So the Quran tells you not to dispute with me except in ways that are best, that the Torah and Gospel are the word of Allah and that the Torah and the Gospel should corroborate Islam.what you have in your bible is not the Torah and the Gospel
Yet you call me a polytheistif u continue what you are upon, the words of Allah has become "obsolete" there u go again, the meaning of Allah is THE ONE TRUE GOD WHO IS WORSHIPPED OUT OF LOVE, MAGNIFICATION AND LONGING (not longing to worship a man)and Muhammad fails to fit in to the Old Testament prophecies. in your view because just like the Jews 2000 yrs ago you can't fathom that GOD can send a book and a prophet/Messenger that would supercede your book and your prophet!
Are you new to Islam?
York wrote:The hijab was banned in schools since 2004.
http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle ... slim-women
In Trinidad, it happened 20+ yrs ago with a muslim girl having to go to court in order to attend the Catholic school (she passed for in Common Entrance).
Slartibartfast wrote:York wrote:The hijab was banned in schools since 2004.
http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle ... slim-women
In Trinidad, it happened 20+ yrs ago with a muslim girl having to go to court in order to attend the Catholic school (she passed for in Common Entrance).
French schools. I agree that is unfair if non Muslim girls are allowed to not wear hijabs in Muslim schools. Are they?
As for schools in Trinidad... you really had to go back to the previous millennium to make your point?! Any cases of those issues in this decade.... or this century even?
I don't think you understand how this point system works. The fact that it happened once and the girl won means that it is no longer an issue.York wrote:the point is that it happened and they got their arse sued and lost, so the presidence is set. They may try it again but the case is there to be referred to. The girl was wearing head covering (kimaar) not niqab (full face covering).
We have Torahs that predate Muhammad by hundreds of years, likewise Gospels, all of which are identical to Torah and Gospel today in my bible. So when Muhammad tells me to corroborate what he says in the Torah and Gospels which are supposed to be the words of Allah and they don't corroborate him. And that Allah's words can't be changed. Also that the Quran never says that the Torah, Psalms or Gospels were corrupted. However they all were compiled long before the Quran and widely distributed, so if one were to corrupt them one would have to find all the multiple copies around the world and change these handwritten documents, an impossibility.York wrote:Habit7 wrote:York wrote:You keep quoting from an obsolete text and therein lies the problem.
The Quran says:Do not dispute with the People of the Book except in a manner which is best, barring such of them as are wrongdoers, and say, ‘We believe in that which has been sent down to us and has been sent down to you; our God and your God is one [and the same], and to Him do we submit.’(29:46)
He has sent down to you the Book with the truth confirming what was [revealed] before it, and He had sent down the Torah and the Evangel. (3:3)
those who follow the Apostle, the uninstructed prophet, whose mention they find written with them in the Torah and the Evangel, who bids them to do what is right and forbids them from what is wrong, makes lawful to them all the good things and forbids them from all vicious things, and relieves them of their burdens and the shackles that were upon them —those who believe in him, honour him, and help him and follow the light that has been sent down with him,1 they are the felicitous.’ (7:157)
So the Quran tells you not to dispute with me except in ways that are best, that the Torah and Gospel are the word of Allah and that the Torah and the Gospel should corroborate Islam.what you have in your bible is not the Torah and the Gospel
Yet you call me a polytheistif u continue what you are upon, the words of Allah has become "obsolete" there u go again, the meaning of Allah is THE ONE TRUE GOD WHO IS WORSHIPPED OUT OF LOVE, MAGNIFICATION AND LONGING (not longing to worship a man)and Muhammad fails to fit in to the Old Testament prophecies. in your view because just like the Jews 2000 yrs ago you can't fathom that GOD can send a book and a prophet/Messenger that would supercede your book and your prophet!
Are you new to Islam?
Habit7 wrote:We have Torahs that predate Muhammad by hundreds of years, likewise Gospels, all of which are identical to Torah and Gospel today in my bible. So when Muhammad tells me to corroborate what he says in the Torah and Gospels which are supposed to be the words of Allah and they don't corroborate him. And that Allah's words can't be changed. Also that the Quran never says that the Torah, Psalms or Gospels were corrupted. However they all were compiled long before the Quran and widely distributed, so if one were to corrupt them one would have to find all the multiple copies around the world and change these handwritten documents, an impossibility.
Either Muhammad was wrong about the Torah and the Gospel corroborating him.
Or Muhammad was wrong that the God of the Torah, Psalms and Gospel being the Allah of the Quran.
Either ways Muhammad is wrong.
And while in some convoluted way you see Muhammad fulfilling Deuteronomy 18:18 -19(which he doesn't) since he wrong, he totally fulfills Deuteronomy 18:20-22.
20 But the prophet who presumes to speak a word in my name that I have not commanded him to speak, or who speaks in the name of other gods, that same prophet shall die.'
21 And if you say in your heart, 'How may we know the word that the LORD has not spoken?'-
22 when a prophet speaks in the name of the LORD, if the word does not come to pass or come true, that is a word that the LORD has not spoken; the prophet has spoken it presumptuously. You need not be afraid of him.
well you say you don't believe but you seem to be sympathetic to christianity, a people who have gone astray.Slartibartfast wrote:So York you ever got chance to answer my questions? I know Habit was keeping you busy whike he was educating you.
Habit7 wrote:Habit7 wrote:We have Torahs that predate Muhammad by hundreds of years, likewise Gospels, all of which are identical to Torah and Gospel today in my bible. So when Muhammad tells me to corroborate what he says in the Torah and Gospels which are supposed to be the words of Allah and they don't corroborate him. And that Allah's words can't be changed. Also that the Quran never says that the Torah, Psalms or Gospels were corrupted. However they all were compiled long before the Quran and widely distributed, so if one were to corrupt them one would have to find all the multiple copies around the world and change these handwritten documents, an impossibility.
Either Muhammad was wrong about the Torah and the Gospel corroborating him.
Or Muhammad was wrong that the God of the Torah, Psalms and Gospel being the Allah of the Quran.
Either ways Muhammad is wrong.
And while in some convoluted way you see Muhammad fulfilling Deuteronomy 18:18 -19(which he doesn't) since he wrong, he totally fulfills Deuteronomy 18:20-22.
20 But the prophet who presumes to speak a word in my name that I have not commanded him to speak, or who speaks in the name of other gods, that same prophet shall die.'
21 And if you say in your heart, 'How may we know the word that the LORD has not spoken?'-
22 when a prophet speaks in the name of the LORD, if the word does not come to pass or come true, that is a word that the LORD has not spoken; the prophet has spoken it presumptuously. You need not be afraid of him.
Still no answer for this.
My consistent Christianity is consistent.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 42 guests