Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
sMASH wrote:Hmmm. So, we couldn't afford to produce feuls.. Yet was able to have regional buyers...
Yes, buying and paying for shipping, wayyyy cheaper than taking it from the ground and making it urself...
teems1 wrote:sMASH wrote:Hmmm. So, we couldn't afford to produce feuls.. Yet was able to have regional buyers...
Yes, buying and paying for shipping, wayyyy cheaper than taking it from the ground and making it urself...
Wasn't the problem that Petrotrin wasn't profitable even without the financial burdens from the WGTL/ULSD etc.
Petrotrin was borrowing money every month from government to meet opex. Imagine if goverment said no more loans.
teems1 wrote:sMASH wrote:Hmmm. So, we couldn't afford to produce feuls.. Yet was able to have regional buyers...
Yes, buying and paying for shipping, wayyyy cheaper than taking it from the ground and making it urself...
Wasn't the problem that Petrotrin wasn't profitable even without the financial burdens from the WGTL/ULSD etc.
Petrotrin was borrowing money every month from government to meet opex. Imagine if goverment said no more loans.
XD ....Joshie23 wrote:teems1 wrote:sMASH wrote:Hmmm. So, we couldn't afford to produce feuls.. Yet was able to have regional buyers...
Yes, buying and paying for shipping, wayyyy cheaper than taking it from the ground and making it urself...
Wasn't the problem that Petrotrin wasn't profitable even without the financial burdens from the WGTL/ULSD etc.
Petrotrin was borrowing money every month from government to meet opex. Imagine if goverment said no more loans.
Lol, look Franklin Khan join 2NR. Or is it Imbert..?? We'll never know, I guess.
DanielCW wrote:teems1 wrote:sMASH wrote:Hmmm. So, we couldn't afford to produce feuls.. Yet was able to have regional buyers...
Yes, buying and paying for shipping, wayyyy cheaper than taking it from the ground and making it urself...
Wasn't the problem that Petrotrin wasn't profitable even without the financial burdens from the WGTL/ULSD etc.
Petrotrin was borrowing money every month from government to meet opex. Imagine if goverment said no more loans.
Petrotrin was borrowing money from the government? Where is the evidence of this, Petrotrin sought government guarantees for short term borrowing which they financed via their own cash flows.
mitch1980 wrote:DanielCW wrote:teems1 wrote:sMASH wrote:Hmmm. So, we couldn't afford to produce feuls.. Yet was able to have regional buyers...
Yes, buying and paying for shipping, wayyyy cheaper than taking it from the ground and making it urself...
Wasn't the problem that Petrotrin wasn't profitable even without the financial burdens from the WGTL/ULSD etc.
Petrotrin was borrowing money every month from government to meet opex. Imagine if goverment said no more loans.
Petrotrin was borrowing money from the government? Where is the evidence of this, Petrotrin sought government guarantees for short term borrowing which they financed via their own cash flows.
yes Petrotrin was constantly borrowing to pay Operational cost
and with the ridiculous action of trying to hold the country ransom WRT gas supply for their 5% increase in January 2017 which was unheard off as the company is making year to year loss but pressuring the government funded by tax payers for salary increase.
the public seem to have a short selective memory
http://portal.guardian.co.tt/news/2017- ... ess-nation
Heard talk the land is leased land.kstt wrote:What about the LAND that the PM promised former workers.
And severance to temporary workers.
The union and court need to address those issues
kstt wrote:What about the LAND that the PM promised former workers.
Redman wrote:These guys should show their documented contributions to a benefits package to the press.
I see where you are getting at.Redman wrote:My thoughts remain 10,15,20 year as a temporary worker is a choice.
Were they contributing to a plan?
Redman wrote:My thoughts remain 10,15,20 year as a temporary worker is a choice.
Were they contributing to a plan?
Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:Redman wrote:My thoughts remain 10,15,20 year as a temporary worker is a choice.
Were they contributing to a plan?
Does the question of contributing to a plan influence whether or not temps get some form of severance package?
Pointman-IA wrote:I see where you are getting at.Redman wrote:My thoughts remain 10,15,20 year as a temporary worker is a choice.
Were they contributing to a plan?
They would not be able to contribute to the pension plan.
Lets hope they have some sort of savings put aside.
Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:Redman wrote:My thoughts remain 10,15,20 year as a temporary worker is a choice.
Were they contributing to a plan?
Does the question of contributing to a plan influence whether or not temps get some form of severance package?
nervewrecker wrote:Manager like rain
What makes people think there are temps that didnt elevate themselves?Joshie23 wrote:Pointman-IA wrote:I see where you are getting at.Redman wrote:My thoughts remain 10,15,20 year as a temporary worker is a choice.
Were they contributing to a plan?
They would not be able to contribute to the pension plan.
Lets hope they have some sort of savings put aside.
I saw what he was getting at as well..Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:Redman wrote:My thoughts remain 10,15,20 year as a temporary worker is a choice.
Were they contributing to a plan?
Does the question of contributing to a plan influence whether or not temps get some form of severance package?
so this is what I was getting at. Being real, any extended period of time in an organisation without attempting to elevate yourself in any form, is on you. I won't dispute that. But to take that 'hard luck' approach, is inhumane. Especially when the PM and other minions said that no one would leave empty-handed. There is no ambiguity there, but then again, shame on me for believing a politician, right?
As Pointman-IA said, I hope they have some savings. And yes, business is business, but to those who support that callous and possibly even spiteful move and rejoice in the face of yet another unemployed member of our society, I genuinely hope that you never have to suffer in any form.nervewrecker wrote:Manager like rain
This is what's best for the country. It's a surefire way to prevent the haemorrhaging that the Company was formerly experiencing. I love my Trinidadian brethren, you know.
$45,000 average total compensation package: 'Wey, wickedness yes!! Greedy tf!! Shut it tf down!! Not my taxpayer's dollars at all!!'
$240,000 basic pay; exclusive of medical, housing, travel, entertainment, etc, for one man: 'Well, you know, we have to pay the best, if we want the best and he is the CEO and he have experience all over the world, you know nah. Rowley and them know what they doing'.
Mind you, his basic salary for a year, is more than the profit Heritage intends to make in said year, according to Allyson West. Trinidadians for ya.
If the business was involved in any work at the deceased Petrotrin, you had to complete the "Conflict of Interest" documentation.Numb3r4 wrote:^^^ Would working for Petrotrin and having a small business be considered a conflict of interest, or is that even legal working for a public entity and having a business?
Asking seriously.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 96 guests