Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
wtf wrote:14 more dead. Finally the numbers gone up.
Who they thought they were fooling..
redmanjp wrote:sMASH wrote:hover11 wrote:I asked this same question no one responded.....who footing the bill next year for the population to be re vaccinated, if you leave it to ppl they wouldn't do it unless necessary so the government have to spend yet againelec2020 wrote:
as well as who bears the cost as it is unfeasible for governments to be spending US billions on vaccines each year. Last i checked foreign reserves are finite inno.
is the flu shot free at the health centers? i think u can pay for it privately if u wanted to go that route. it would be on the scale fo that. but the covid would also be like the flu: u will get some flare ups, but more of a yearly niusance than a pandemic. some people will die, cause yearly 40 ppl die from teh flu, and nobody takes it on.
what trinidad did with covid was overblown. especially after easter.
u will always have some spread, just minimize ur superspreader events, and apply resources to deal with the cases u get.
we needed about 5k beds to work. this 1k thing was foolish.
imagine if ur normal was 4-5k in state care, what wodl the country's acitivity woudl be? it would be fairly normal.
we opted to crash the country, take on debts like debt, sending people mad lock up home, just because we could only handle 1k and not able to deal with 5k
u realize a bed is not a bed right? we already short on staff and perhaps almost short on other things like oxygen. simply putting ppl in ah bed is not treatment. and even so, we still do not have an effective approved or authorised treatment so without the lockdown as stated by the PM the projection would have been 100 deaths PER DAY without a lockdown. simply increasing beds and letting the virus rip through the population is not a solution.
even from a financial standpoint if half the country in quarantine due to widespread infection how any business going to function? what about the cost of dramatically more tests/testkits, oxygen, and all the other things they will need to buy? even getting extra staff well they have to be paid as well.
Habit7 wrote:wtf wrote:14 more dead. Finally the numbers gone up.
Who they thought they were fooling..
Doom and gloom celebration going on here.
De Dragon wrote:Habit7 wrote:wtf wrote:14 more dead. Finally the numbers gone up.
Who they thought they were fooling..
Doom and gloom celebration going on here.
No, he's merely pointing out the obvious, that 14 > 4.
I also thought the sad face emoji was a dead giveaway as well, yet somehow you're perceiving it as some "celebration?"
Is it because the numbers not remaining low makes the GORTT look bad?
Only a truly evil, demented mind would have a "celebration" of increased deaths from Covid, never mind the person's political leanings.
sMASH wrote:redmanjp wrote:sMASH wrote:hover11 wrote:I asked this same question no one responded.....who footing the bill next year for the population to be re vaccinated, if you leave it to ppl they wouldn't do it unless necessary so the government have to spend yet againelec2020 wrote:
as well as who bears the cost as it is unfeasible for governments to be spending US billions on vaccines each year. Last i checked foreign reserves are finite inno.
is the flu shot free at the health centers? i think u can pay for it privately if u wanted to go that route. it would be on the scale fo that. but the covid would also be like the flu: u will get some flare ups, but more of a yearly niusance than a pandemic. some people will die, cause yearly 40 ppl die from teh flu, and nobody takes it on.
what trinidad did with covid was overblown. especially after easter.
u will always have some spread, just minimize ur superspreader events, and apply resources to deal with the cases u get.
we needed about 5k beds to work. this 1k thing was foolish.
imagine if ur normal was 4-5k in state care, what wodl the country's acitivity woudl be? it would be fairly normal.
we opted to crash the country, take on debts like debt, sending people mad lock up home, just because we could only handle 1k and not able to deal with 5k
u realize a bed is not a bed right? we already short on staff and perhaps almost short on other things like oxygen. simply putting ppl in ah bed is not treatment. and even so, we still do not have an effective approved or authorised treatment so without the lockdown as stated by the PM the projection would have been 100 deaths PER DAY without a lockdown. simply increasing beds and letting the virus rip through the population is not a solution.
even from a financial standpoint if half the country in quarantine due to widespread infection how any business going to function? what about the cost of dramatically more tests/testkits, oxygen, and all the other things they will need to buy? even getting extra staff well they have to be paid as well.
i do understand a bed is not just 'a bed'. there are over 100 countries with higher daily case rates than us, and u dont hear about them in the news. they just put their heads down, and got to handling the cases as they arise. shoulder to the wheel business.
redmanjp wrote:
elec2020 wrote:but vaccinated getting reinfected already. Look at Seychelles, 86% of the Seychelles’ targeted population for vaccination (70,000 people) got the shots but yet still cases and deaths on the rise (5 deaths, 493 new cases yesterday). So what is the point. Is the 14 per cent that causing the people to still get infected? Can't make this sheit up.
redmanjp wrote:sMASH wrote:redmanjp wrote:sMASH wrote:hover11 wrote:I asked this same question no one responded.....who footing the bill next year for the population to be re vaccinated, if you leave it to ppl they wouldn't do it unless necessary so the government have to spend yet againelec2020 wrote:
as well as who bears the cost as it is unfeasible for governments to be spending US billions on vaccines each year. Last i checked foreign reserves are finite inno.
is the flu shot free at the health centers? i think u can pay for it privately if u wanted to go that route. it would be on the scale fo that. but the covid would also be like the flu: u will get some flare ups, but more of a yearly niusance than a pandemic. some people will die, cause yearly 40 ppl die from teh flu, and nobody takes it on.
what trinidad did with covid was overblown. especially after easter.
u will always have some spread, just minimize ur superspreader events, and apply resources to deal with the cases u get.
we needed about 5k beds to work. this 1k thing was foolish.
imagine if ur normal was 4-5k in state care, what wodl the country's acitivity woudl be? it would be fairly normal.
we opted to crash the country, take on debts like debt, sending people mad lock up home, just because we could only handle 1k and not able to deal with 5k
u realize a bed is not a bed right? we already short on staff and perhaps almost short on other things like oxygen. simply putting ppl in ah bed is not treatment. and even so, we still do not have an effective approved or authorised treatment so without the lockdown as stated by the PM the projection would have been 100 deaths PER DAY without a lockdown. simply increasing beds and letting the virus rip through the population is not a solution.
even from a financial standpoint if half the country in quarantine due to widespread infection how any business going to function? what about the cost of dramatically more tests/testkits, oxygen, and all the other things they will need to buy? even getting extra staff well they have to be paid as well.
i do understand a bed is not just 'a bed'. there are over 100 countries with higher daily case rates than us, and u dont hear about them in the news. they just put their heads down, and got to handling the cases as they arise. shoulder to the wheel business.
and what are their death figures like?
sMASH wrote:i do understand a bed is not just 'a bed'. there are over 100 countries with higher daily case rates than us, and u dont hear about them in the news. they just put their heads down, and got to handling the cases as they arise. shoulder to the wheel business.
drchaos wrote:elec2020 wrote:but vaccinated getting reinfected already. Look at Seychelles, 86% of the Seychelles’ targeted population for vaccination (70,000 people) got the shots but yet still cases and deaths on the rise (5 deaths, 493 new cases yesterday). So what is the point. Is the 14 per cent that causing the people to still get infected? Can't make this sheit up.
Silence ... No response to this.
elec2020 wrote:drchaos wrote:elec2020 wrote:but vaccinated getting reinfected already. Look at Seychelles, 86% of the Seychelles’ targeted population for vaccination (70,000 people) got the shots but yet still cases and deaths on the rise (5 deaths, 493 new cases yesterday). So what is the point. Is the 14 per cent that causing the people to still get infected? Can't make this sheit up.
Silence ... No response to this.
They don't have a response. They can use whatever news article that doctor so and so say this and that but I looking at facts. And according to the facts Seychelles highly vaccinated populace back to getting cases. Some other countries too mind you.
elec2020 wrote:drchaos wrote:elec2020 wrote:but vaccinated getting reinfected already. Look at Seychelles, 86% of the Seychelles’ targeted population for vaccination (70,000 people) got the shots but yet still cases and deaths on the rise (5 deaths, 493 new cases yesterday). So what is the point. Is the 14 per cent that causing the people to still get infected? Can't make this sheit up.
Silence ... No response to this.
They don't have a response. They can use whatever news article that doctor so and so say this and that but I looking at facts. And according to the facts Seychelles highly vaccinated populace back to getting cases. Some other countries too mind you.
st7 wrote:can we have a new ched for vaxxers vs anti. vaxxers? i fed up seeing the same ppl repeating themselves about not taking vaccine.
we get it. why you need to keep saying it over and over?
it's counter-productive and i just want to read updates n sheit in this ched. pls.
hover11 wrote:England is back on restrictions and they have quality vaccineselec2020 wrote:drchaos wrote:elec2020 wrote:but vaccinated getting reinfected already. Look at Seychelles, 86% of the Seychelles’ targeted population for vaccination (70,000 people) got the shots but yet still cases and deaths on the rise (5 deaths, 493 new cases yesterday). So what is the point. Is the 14 per cent that causing the people to still get infected? Can't make this sheit up.
Silence ... No response to this.
They don't have a response. They can use whatever news article that doctor so and so say this and that but I looking at facts. And according to the facts Seychelles highly vaccinated populace back to getting cases. Some other countries too mind you.
Habit7 wrote:De Dragon wrote:Habit7 wrote:wtf wrote:14 more dead. Finally the numbers gone up.
Who they thought they were fooling..
Doom and gloom celebration going on here.
No, he's merely pointing out the obvious, that 14 > 4.
I also thought the sad face emoji was a dead giveaway as well, yet somehow you're perceiving it as some "celebration?"
Is it because the numbers not remaining low makes the GORTT look bad?
Only a truly evil, demented mind would have a "celebration" of increased deaths from Covid, never mind the person's political leanings.
"Finally" expresses expectation after delay. "who they thought they were fooling" is the continued unfounded distrust in covid-19 numbers which is most doubtful of lower numbers.
Nevertheless, one day's increase is just part of a 7day assessment period. The recent epidemiological week still shows a reduction in deaths.
So next time you try to white knight for other tuners, try and actually benefit them nah.
drchaos wrote:elec2020 wrote:but vaccinated getting reinfected already. Look at Seychelles, 86% of the Seychelles’ targeted population for vaccination (70,000 people) got the shots but yet still cases and deaths on the rise (5 deaths, 493 new cases yesterday). So what is the point. Is the 14 per cent that causing the people to still get infected? Can't make this sheit up.
Silence ... No response to this.
hover11 wrote:England is back on restrictions and they have quality vaccineselec2020 wrote:drchaos wrote:elec2020 wrote:but vaccinated getting reinfected already. Look at Seychelles, 86% of the Seychelles’ targeted population for vaccination (70,000 people) got the shots but yet still cases and deaths on the rise (5 deaths, 493 new cases yesterday). So what is the point. Is the 14 per cent that causing the people to still get infected? Can't make this sheit up.
Silence ... No response to this.
They don't have a response. They can use whatever news article that doctor so and so say this and that but I looking at facts. And according to the facts Seychelles highly vaccinated populace back to getting cases. Some other countries too mind you.
Dohplaydat wrote:hover11 wrote:England is back on restrictions and they have quality vaccineselec2020 wrote:drchaos wrote:elec2020 wrote:but vaccinated getting reinfected already. Look at Seychelles, 86% of the Seychelles’ targeted population for vaccination (70,000 people) got the shots but yet still cases and deaths on the rise (5 deaths, 493 new cases yesterday). So what is the point. Is the 14 per cent that causing the people to still get infected? Can't make this sheit up.
Silence ... No response to this.
They don't have a response. They can use whatever news article that doctor so and so say this and that but I looking at facts. And according to the facts Seychelles highly vaccinated populace back to getting cases. Some other countries too mind you.
They are not back on, they have very very limited restrictions right now. Basically everything but night clubs are open.
They delayed their full removal of all restrictions by a month due to the presence of the Indian variant.
But expect full freedom in the UK next month.
hover11 wrote:When that variant hits here what do you think will happen?Dohplaydat wrote:hover11 wrote:England is back on restrictions and they have quality vaccineselec2020 wrote:drchaos wrote:elec2020 wrote:but vaccinated getting reinfected already. Look at Seychelles, 86% of the Seychelles’ targeted population for vaccination (70,000 people) got the shots but yet still cases and deaths on the rise (5 deaths, 493 new cases yesterday). So what is the point. Is the 14 per cent that causing the people to still get infected? Can't make this sheit up.
Silence ... No response to this.
They don't have a response. They can use whatever news article that doctor so and so say this and that but I looking at facts. And according to the facts Seychelles highly vaccinated populace back to getting cases. Some other countries too mind you.
They are not back on, they have very very limited restrictions right now. Basically everything but night clubs are open.
They delayed their full removal of all restrictions by a month due to the presence of the Indian variant.
But expect full freedom in the UK next month.
De Dragon wrote:drchaos wrote:elec2020 wrote:but vaccinated getting reinfected already. Look at Seychelles, 86% of the Seychelles’ targeted population for vaccination (70,000 people) got the shots but yet still cases and deaths on the rise (5 deaths, 493 new cases yesterday). So what is the point. Is the 14 per cent that causing the people to still get infected? Can't make this sheit up.
Silence ... No response to this.
Yes, we all know there is no possibility whatsoever of getting infested after you get vaccinated.
Didn't we start more than piecemeal vaccinations recently? What are our numbers? Is that 80% of a population fully vaccinated? Herd immunity is to drive the virus to manageable levels like the flu, not eradicate it completely, thus freeing up your healthcare systems.
You sure talk weird for a doctor.
drchaos wrote:De Dragon wrote:drchaos wrote:elec2020 wrote:but vaccinated getting reinfected already. Look at Seychelles, 86% of the Seychelles’ targeted population for vaccination (70,000 people) got the shots but yet still cases and deaths on the rise (5 deaths, 493 new cases yesterday). So what is the point. Is the 14 per cent that causing the people to still get infected? Can't make this sheit up.
Silence ... No response to this.
Yes, we all know there is no possibility whatsoever of getting infested after you get vaccinated.
Didn't we start more than piecemeal vaccinations recently? What are our numbers? Is that 80% of a population fully vaccinated? Herd immunity is to drive the virus to manageable levels like the flu, not eradicate it completely, thus freeing up your healthcare systems.
You sure talk weird for a doctor.
The point is that the 30 to 40% of the population that refuse to vaccinate are not the reason for variants and the virus enduring. This FLASE claim has been said over and over from people on this forum.
The virus is endemic, which means it will continue to make its rounds and mutate every couple of months.
Vaccine/Natural acquired immunity is the only way to reach a steady state where this becomes just like the seasonal flu.
People who don't want the shot will eventually get natural infection and very highly likely survive. They will then become immune and therefore contribute to Heard Immunity so getting us to where we need to be.
drchaos wrote:
The point is that the 30 to 40% of the population that refuse to vaccinate are not the reason for variants and the virus enduring. This FLASE claim has been said over and over from people on this forum.
Dohplaydat wrote:drchaos wrote:
The point is that the 30 to 40% of the population that refuse to vaccinate are not the reason for variants and the virus enduring. This FLASE claim has been said over and over from people on this forum.
Not entirely true, it's not black and white. Vaccinated people even with Sinopharm will have reduced spread, especially to other vaccinated persons as well.
If we all get vaccinated we all do our part to sideline Covid. And yes it's unlikely Covid will ever disappear, but it needs to become a non issue.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 400 guests