Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
De Dragon wrote:Habit7 wrote:De Dragon wrote:Don't be an Arse and show itWHERE did the Nawh CMO get 6 months from? Where did he get that 6 months to on the VERY day JUHN Scarfy was supposed to get the vaccine justify it? CERTAINLY NOT from the WHO at the time.
Ah yes, the expected beat up when you know you are wrong but refuse to admit it. These are the WHO guidelines for AZ and Sinopharm, you reject them not because they are wrong, not because you have newer and better research. You reject them when they started applying to KCR. You are a political hack.Within 6 months after an initial natural infection, available data show that symptomatic reinfection is uncommon. Given limited vaccine supply, persons with PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in the preceding 6 months may therefore choose to delay vaccination until near the end of this period.
https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/han ... .2-eng.pdfBased on current data, symptomatic reinfection is uncommon within 6 months after an initial natural infection, and in the context of limited vaccine supply, persons with PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in the preceding 6 months may choose to delay vaccination until near the end of this period. However, emerging data indicate that symptomatic reinfection may occur in settings where variants with evidence of immune escape are circulating, and in these settings, earlier vaccination after infection may be advisable. The length of this time period may be revised when more data on duration of immunity after natural infection become available.
https://www.who.int/docs/default-source ... ner-24.pdf
Tuntso, YOUR own link is May 2021 for SINOPHARM, WHERE did JUHN Scarfy and the Nawh CMO get 6 months for ASTRA ZENECA from in APRIL? The WHO site RIGHT NOW still has that guidance that I posted.
Are you really using updated guidance to justify a LIE that JUHN Scarfy and the Nawh CEO attempted to pull in April?![]()
![]()
I mean guttersnipe, liar, corrupt, crass, t'iefin, misogynistic are many of the attributes of JUHN Scarfy, but seer man? Nah better than dat!
Pfizer COVID vaccine will go to the children – President Ali
President Dr Irfaan Ali promised to allocate all of the US Covid-19 vaccines to children, if the country receives Pfizer-BioNTech.
While speaking to the media this afternoon after the Sod Turning Ceremony for the new Courtyard Marriott Hotel in Timehri, the Head of State said that he is optimistic that Guyana would benefit from vaccines from the US.
“I can’t say what is coming, I know that we are in discussion at CARICOM with the US. The US has committed to giving vaccines to the region.”
The President said that although he is unsure about the amount, he is hopeful that it will “be substantial for Guyana”.
“What I can say is that once it is Pfizer, I can tell you this policy now, it will go to the children, starting from 18 and below.”
Meanwhile, President Ali told reporters that he was extremely concerned about the news of children being infected with severe cases of the virus.
“Every single person that goes into the hospital to me is alarming, especially children.”
He noted that although children are not as affected as older adults, many still suffer, especially those with underlying issues. He said that it will be a plus if the country receives the Pfizer vaccines to protect them all.
“Let us say that we get Pfizer through the US opportunity and we roll out Pfizer for those 18 and below and we can capture the whole cohort, population, for secondary schools that will be very good for us.”
According to the Ministry of Health, of the 20,000 plus COVID-19 cases in Guyana, almost 1600 have been children under-14.[/size]
elec2020 wrote:vaccinating kids with an experimental vaccine. What could go wrong?
Johnson said he would set out how the country would “learn to live with this virus” — a major shift in tone from a leader who has previously painted COVID-19 as an enemy to be vanquished.
Public health officials say Britain’s vaccination program has weakened the link between infections and deaths. So far, 86% of U.K. adults have received at least one vaccine dose and 63% are fully vaccinated.
Across lethal and non-lethal adverse events there was a relatively high rate of cardiac-related injuries, 26% of which occurred in young people below the age of 40, a high prevalence of massive vaginal bleeding, neurological, skeletal and skin damage, and events directly or indirectly related to coagulopathy (myocardial infarction, stroke, miscarriages, disruption of blood flow to the limbs and pulmonary embolism)
dogg wrote:Boris Johnson says UK must live with virus as he announces easingJohnson said he would set out how the country would “learn to live with this virus” — a major shift in tone from a leader who has previously painted COVID-19 as an enemy to be vanquished.
Habit7 wrote:De Dragon wrote:Habit7 wrote:De Dragon wrote:Don't be an Arse and show itWHERE did the Nawh CMO get 6 months from? Where did he get that 6 months to on the VERY day JUHN Scarfy was supposed to get the vaccine justify it? CERTAINLY NOT from the WHO at the time.
Ah yes, the expected beat up when you know you are wrong but refuse to admit it. These are the WHO guidelines for AZ and Sinopharm, you reject them not because they are wrong, not because you have newer and better research. You reject them when they started applying to KCR. You are a political hack.Within 6 months after an initial natural infection, available data show that symptomatic reinfection is uncommon. Given limited vaccine supply, persons with PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in the preceding 6 months may therefore choose to delay vaccination until near the end of this period.
https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/han ... .2-eng.pdfBased on current data, symptomatic reinfection is uncommon within 6 months after an initial natural infection, and in the context of limited vaccine supply, persons with PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in the preceding 6 months may choose to delay vaccination until near the end of this period. However, emerging data indicate that symptomatic reinfection may occur in settings where variants with evidence of immune escape are circulating, and in these settings, earlier vaccination after infection may be advisable. The length of this time period may be revised when more data on duration of immunity after natural infection become available.
https://www.who.int/docs/default-source ... ner-24.pdf
Tuntso, YOUR own link is May 2021 for SINOPHARM, WHERE did JUHN Scarfy and the Nawh CMO get 6 months for ASTRA ZENECA from in APRIL? The WHO site RIGHT NOW still has that guidance that I posted.
Are you really using updated guidance to justify a LIE that JUHN Scarfy and the Nawh CEO attempted to pull in April?![]()
![]()
I mean guttersnipe, liar, corrupt, crass, t'iefin, misogynistic are many of the attributes of JUHN Scarfy, but seer man? Nah better than dat!
Screenshot 2021-07-04 18.16.39.png
Reading and comprehension and now sight
Public discussion regarding delaying vaccinations dates back to the beginning of 2021. The discussion around delaying vaccinations for those that had recently recovered was presented as a way to accelerate immunity at the time when there were precious few vaccine doses for the most vulnerable.De Dragon wrote:Habit7 wrote:De Dragon wrote:Habit7 wrote:De Dragon wrote:Don't be an Arse and show itWHERE did the Nawh CMO get 6 months from? Where did he get that 6 months to on the VERY day JUHN Scarfy was supposed to get the vaccine justify it? CERTAINLY NOT from the WHO at the time.
Ah yes, the expected beat up when you know you are wrong but refuse to admit it. These are the WHO guidelines for AZ and Sinopharm, you reject them not because they are wrong, not because you have newer and better research. You reject them when they started applying to KCR. You are a political hack.Within 6 months after an initial natural infection, available data show that symptomatic reinfection is uncommon. Given limited vaccine supply, persons with PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in the preceding 6 months may therefore choose to delay vaccination until near the end of this period.
https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/han ... .2-eng.pdfBased on current data, symptomatic reinfection is uncommon within 6 months after an initial natural infection, and in the context of limited vaccine supply, persons with PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in the preceding 6 months may choose to delay vaccination until near the end of this period. However, emerging data indicate that symptomatic reinfection may occur in settings where variants with evidence of immune escape are circulating, and in these settings, earlier vaccination after infection may be advisable. The length of this time period may be revised when more data on duration of immunity after natural infection become available.
https://www.who.int/docs/default-source ... ner-24.pdf
Tuntso, YOUR own link is May 2021 for SINOPHARM, WHERE did JUHN Scarfy and the Nawh CMO get 6 months for ASTRA ZENECA from in APRIL? The WHO site RIGHT NOW still has that guidance that I posted.
Are you really using updated guidance to justify a LIE that JUHN Scarfy and the Nawh CEO attempted to pull in April?![]()
![]()
I mean guttersnipe, liar, corrupt, crass, t'iefin, misogynistic are many of the attributes of JUHN Scarfy, but seer man? Nah better than dat!
Screenshot 2021-07-04 18.16.39.png
Reading and comprehension and now sight
Dumbarse, that WHO guidance wasn't in EXISTENCE when JUHN Scarfy and the Nawh claimed it was why he couldn't be vaccinated! Fack it isn't even in the same link you posted!.The quote that I have put up many times DIRECTLY from the WHO was the guidance at the time
You do know what updated means right? That it eh wey it was, BUT, it did de way it de dey on April 6th 2021 when JUHN Scarfy claimed to have contracted Covid. I don't mind persistence and determination, but when it is rooted in dotishness and obstinacy, that's something else.
Keep trying to make your God look infallible and not the pathological liar that he is. I'll be here all week
De Dragon wrote:Dumbarse, that WHO guidance wasn't in EXISTENCE when JUHN Scarfy and the Nawh claimed it was why he couldn't be vaccinated! Fack it isn't even in the same link you posted!.The quote that I have put up many times DIRECTLY from the WHO was the guidance at the time
You do know what updated means right? That it eh wey it was, BUT, it did de way it de dey on April 6th 2021 when JUHN Scarfy claimed to have contracted Covid. I don't mind persistence and determination, but when it is rooted in dotishness and obstinacy, that's something else.
Keep trying to make your God look infallible and not the pathological liar that he is. I'll be here all week
Currently available data indicate that symptomatic reinfection within 6 months after an initial infection is rare. Thus, persons with PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in the preceding 6 months may delay vaccination until near the end of this period. When more data on duration of immunity after natural infection become available, the length of this time period may be revised.
10 February 2021
https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/han ... .1-eng.pdf
CMO: PM will have to wait six months
Tue Apr 06 2021
https://www.guardian.co.tt/news/cmo-pm- ... 2cd078d5d5
Habit7 wrote:De Dragon wrote:Dumbarse, that WHO guidance wasn't in EXISTENCE when JUHN Scarfy and the Nawh claimed it was why he couldn't be vaccinated! Fack it isn't even in the same link you posted!.The quote that I have put up many times DIRECTLY from the WHO was the guidance at the time
You do know what updated means right? That it eh wey it was, BUT, it did de way it de dey on April 6th 2021 when JUHN Scarfy claimed to have contracted Covid. I don't mind persistence and determination, but when it is rooted in dotishness and obstinacy, that's something else.
Keep trying to make your God look infallible and not the pathological liar that he is. I'll be here all week
You continue to beat up, this is fun.Currently available data indicate that symptomatic reinfection within 6 months after an initial infection is rare. Thus, persons with PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in the preceding 6 months may delay vaccination until near the end of this period. When more data on duration of immunity after natural infection become available, the length of this time period may be revised.
10 February 2021
https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/han ... .1-eng.pdfCMO: PM will have to wait six months
Tue Apr 06 2021
https://www.guardian.co.tt/news/cmo-pm- ... 2cd078d5d5
De Dragon wrote:Habit7 wrote:De Dragon wrote:Dumbarse, that WHO guidance wasn't in EXISTENCE when JUHN Scarfy and the Nawh claimed it was why he couldn't be vaccinated! Fack it isn't even in the same link you posted!.The quote that I have put up many times DIRECTLY from the WHO was the guidance at the time
You do know what updated means right? That it eh wey it was, BUT, it did de way it de dey on April 6th 2021 when JUHN Scarfy claimed to have contracted Covid. I don't mind persistence and determination, but when it is rooted in dotishness and obstinacy, that's something else.
Keep trying to make your God look infallible and not the pathological liar that he is. I'll be here all week
You continue to beat up, this is fun.Currently available data indicate that symptomatic reinfection within 6 months after an initial infection is rare. Thus, persons with PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in the preceding 6 months may delay vaccination until near the end of this period. When more data on duration of immunity after natural infection become available, the length of this time period may be revised.
10 February 2021
https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/han ... .1-eng.pdfCMO: PM will have to wait six months
Tue Apr 06 2021
https://www.guardian.co.tt/news/cmo-pm- ... 2cd078d5d5
Repeat a lie often enough, and people, especially soft headed sheep like Tuntsy will not only believe it, but slavishly defend it to the death, while putting their shame and pride firmly up their cacahole until it is convenient to use, most likely when attacking non LFD RFD PNM parties.
WHO Q/A right this very minute
Even if you have already had COVID-19, you should be vaccinated when it is offered to you. The protection that someone gains from having COVID-19 will vary from person to person, and we also don’t know how long natural immunity might last.
There is absolutely NO risk in getting vaccinated before 6 months NONE. You feel the MILLIONS of people who had Covid, didn't know, and were vaccinated would go undetected if there was a problem?
Habit7 wrote:De Dragon wrote:Habit7 wrote:De Dragon wrote:Dumbarse, that WHO guidance wasn't in EXISTENCE when JUHN Scarfy and the Nawh claimed it was why he couldn't be vaccinated! Fack it isn't even in the same link you posted!.The quote that I have put up many times DIRECTLY from the WHO was the guidance at the time
You do know what updated means right? That it eh wey it was, BUT, it did de way it de dey on April 6th 2021 when JUHN Scarfy claimed to have contracted Covid. I don't mind persistence and determination, but when it is rooted in dotishness and obstinacy, that's something else.
Keep trying to make your God look infallible and not the pathological liar that he is. I'll be here all week
You continue to beat up, this is fun.Currently available data indicate that symptomatic reinfection within 6 months after an initial infection is rare. Thus, persons with PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in the preceding 6 months may delay vaccination until near the end of this period. When more data on duration of immunity after natural infection become available, the length of this time period may be revised.
10 February 2021
https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/han ... .1-eng.pdfCMO: PM will have to wait six months
Tue Apr 06 2021
https://www.guardian.co.tt/news/cmo-pm- ... 2cd078d5d5
Repeat a lie often enough, and people, especially soft headed sheep like Tuntsy will not only believe it, but slavishly defend it to the death, while putting their shame and pride firmly up their cacahole until it is convenient to use, most likely when attacking non LFD RFD PNM parties.
WHO Q/A right this very minute
Even if you have already had COVID-19, you should be vaccinated when it is offered to you. The protection that someone gains from having COVID-19 will vary from person to person, and we also don’t know how long natural immunity might last.
There is absolutely NO risk in getting vaccinated before 6 months NONE. You feel the MILLIONS of people who had Covid, didn't know, and were vaccinated would go undetected if there was a problem?
It is not a lie, you just go apoplectic when it comes to Keith Rowley and the PNM.
The WHO guidance is that infected ppl may delay for 6 months. Our minister of health adopted that then shortened it to three. That is the guidance scholarly document the MoH will follow from the WHO, not a Q&A or FAQ on the WHO website. That is the specific information for the drug.
But because you are a crazy conspiracist you string together some conspiracy that the CMO compromised his professional integrity and change the rules just to fit KCR. Not a shred of evidence. You denied for 2 pages that WHO ever said anything about 6 months delay. Now after the evidence is overwhelming, you are too embarrassed to admit you were wrong, so you claiming it is a repeated lie even with a document dated 2months before the CMO spoke on the issue.
It is one thing to be a political sycophant, that is your liberty to do so. But to impugn ppl's professional integrity because you are not smart enough to read and comprehend that is where I draw the line.
"you should be vaccinated when it is offered to you."
Who is offering it to you? The MoH
What is guiding the MoH on when they should offer it to you? WHO guidelines which initially suggested 6 months after infection.
shake d livin wake d dead wrote:Lil update from my friend who took the AZ. She is currently in hospital as her blood oxygen level dropped to 62 on day 2 after 1st shot. She complained about severe chest pains and has done at least 3 ECGs thus far. I will update accordingly.
shake d livin wake d dead wrote:shake d livin wake d dead wrote:Lil update from my friend who took the AZ. She is currently in hospital as her blood oxygen level dropped to 62 on day 2 after 1st shot. She complained about severe chest pains and has done at least 3 ECGs thus far. I will update accordingly.
She has been discharged, 4 ECGs in total.....lil sceptical about taking 2nd shot
elec2020 wrote:you have time to focus on me when u yet to prove Habit7 wrong?
shake d livin wake d dead wrote:shake d livin wake d dead wrote:Lil update from my friend who took the AZ. She is currently in hospital as her blood oxygen level dropped to 62 on day 2 after 1st shot. She complained about severe chest pains and has done at least 3 ECGs thus far. I will update accordingly.
She has been discharged, 4 ECGs in total.....lil sceptical about taking 2nd shot
redmanjp wrote:shake d livin wake d dead wrote:shake d livin wake d dead wrote:Lil update from my friend who took the AZ. She is currently in hospital as her blood oxygen level dropped to 62 on day 2 after 1st shot. She complained about severe chest pains and has done at least 3 ECGs thus far. I will update accordingly.
She has been discharged, 4 ECGs in total.....lil sceptical about taking 2nd shot
did she by chance get a covid test? low oxygen levels and chest pains are both serious symptoms of the virus itself
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 74 guests