Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
De Dragon wrote:ProtonPowder wrote:Using it to pay for municipal services is what was originally planned for by the ministry, and is what those taxes are used for in every other country that has such a tax.
You can pretend I am a PNM all you want, go and rant on your facebook about it under every newspaper article and status if you want. If you step back and watch for one minute, you go see that this tax will end up just like VAT. Contentious in the beginning but secretly even the opposition knows and wants it to stay. They all just toe the party line and contrarian stance to rope all of you into one of two camps.
I guess that's why they stopped it for so many years, to see it stay
De Dragon wrote:I guess that's why they stopped it for so many years, to see it stay
Proton Head believes .
There is a nice rocky chair waiting for you in St Anns.
ProtonPowder wrote:De Dragon wrote:I guess that's why they stopped it for so many years, to see it stay
Is all a chess game, is all for show.Proton Head believes .
There is a nice rocky chair waiting for you in St Anns.
I not PNM bredda, not UNC, COP, PEP or anything else. Just a fella that proceeding down an academic route relating to this very thing. I not putting my head on a block for no politician because all of them taking their money from the same men at the top.
De Dragon wrote:The "Axe the Tax" was a cornerstone on which the PP won that election in 2010. They'd be foolish to support any reintroduction of it. No show thing there, just common sense.
ProtonPowder wrote:De Dragon wrote:The "Axe the Tax" was a cornerstone on which the PP won that election in 2010. They'd be foolish to support any reintroduction of it. No show thing there, just common sense.
I still have one of the yellow "Do So" stickers lying around somewhere, and they will fight it on those grounds again in 2020, and remember when i say that even by then, is an extremely slim chance that people will be taxed.
The longer Devant fight this the better, since middle of last year I saying he taking it to the Privy Council if he get the chance. Many people dont have a $500 to $1500 to drop on this every year; the tax rates they using are highly dependent on the land/house location. And as much as you feel is 'common sense' for what these people doing, they still knocking glass together in the tea room of Tower D on the waterfront.
RedVEVO wrote:^^^
Proton Head missing the entire concept with this Tax Property issue.
It is not that just because you spending or you have money - you should be taxed.
Where the tax dollars going ? Where have the tax dollars and boom $$ gone ?
History is repeating itself Proton Head. Rehashing your words " Educate yourself "
"Chess Game" my tanty arse on by father's ex wife side once removed !
ProtonPowder wrote:RedVEVO wrote:^^^
Proton Head missing the entire concept with this Tax Property issue.
It is not that just because you spending or you have money - you should be taxed.
Where the tax dollars going ? Where have the tax dollars and boom $$ gone ?
History is repeating itself Proton Head. Rehashing your words " Educate yourself "
"Chess Game" my tanty arse on by father's ex wife side once removed !
You moving the goalposts every time I say something, it gone from calling me a PNM to trying to argue about philosophy of taxation. Settle down yute, I say anything defending the tax? whether or not we should pay it? Not a damn thing
I defend a party or any minster? No. I giving alyuh information that getting withheld from the public and what you doing bredda, is shooting the messenger.
ProtonPowder wrote:Using it to pay for municipal services is what was originally planned for by the ministry, and is what those taxes are used for in every other country that has such a tax.
RedVEVO wrote:Ya getting dazed and confused .. again and again
You supporting PNM property tax with municipal services, podium talk, goal post , chess etc.,
PNM man go to school & educate yourself
ProtonPowder wrote:RedVEVO wrote:Ya getting dazed and confused .. again and again
You supporting PNM property tax with municipal services, podium talk, goal post , chess etc.,
PNM man go to school & educate yourself
lol, stay in your corner unless you have a question to ask
88sins wrote:ProtonPowder wrote:Using it to pay for municipal services is what was originally planned for by the ministry, and is what those taxes are used for in every other country that has such a tax.
if baldilocks & lemonface really wanted the support of the public on this it'd be easy to get, by reforming the law & allowing the regional corps to collect & use the revenue collected for projects in their respective areas, so that taxpayers would directly see their dollars at work. [/b][/u] does something for them.
88sins wrote:ProtonPowder wrote:RedVEVO wrote:Ya getting dazed and confused .. again and again
You supporting PNM property tax with municipal services, podium talk, goal post , chess etc.,
PNM man go to school & educate yourself
lol, stay in your corner unless you have a question to ask
dat kinda like askin Satan to install a/c in he kitchen
Yup this tax was really an injun taxProtonPowder wrote:Tax is based solely upon 3 factors
1) square footage of the house.
2)class of the house (executive, modern, standard, substandard, shack).
3)Band of the house. In each regional corporations there are high income or low income areas. So for example, a house in Palmiste would have a higher multiplier than a house on in Diamond or Esperance a few minutes away.
VexXx Dogg wrote:What papers is that?
zoom rader wrote:Yup this tax was really an injun taxProtonPowder wrote:Tax is based solely upon 3 factors
1) square footage of the house.
2)class of the house (executive, modern, standard, substandard, shack).
3)Band of the house. In each regional corporations there are high income or low income areas. So for example, a house in Palmiste would have a higher multiplier than a house on in Diamond or Esperance a few minutes away.
The_Honourable wrote:After prolonged debate in both houses of the parliament, the Property Tax Amendment Bill 2018 was passed in the Senate.
1% will most likely have their houses linked to their bussiness and pay less when they cook the books as a lossshake d livin wake d dead wrote:zoom rader wrote:Yup this tax was really an injun taxProtonPowder wrote:Tax is based solely upon 3 factors
1) square footage of the house.
2)class of the house (executive, modern, standard, substandard, shack).
3)Band of the house. In each regional corporations there are high income or low income areas. So for example, a house in Palmiste would have a higher multiplier than a house on in Diamond or Esperance a few minutes away.
1% have some to pay as well
The_Honourable wrote:Property Tax is fair
THE idea that the Property Tax unfairly targets East Indians was refuted by surveyor and commentator Afra Raymond speaking to Newsday yesterday. At a recent Maha Sabha function, guest of honour surgeon Dr Dilip Dan alleged that the tax maybe being targeted at East Indians who had tirelessly toiled and saved to build their homes rather than squander their earnings.
Raymond however retorted that such a notion of an unfair taxation was an idea imported from the political right-wing in the United States and was not related to the Africans and East Indians of TT. He argued that as property is a store of wealth it should be taxed the same way as a business such as a travel agency into which a pair of business partners had invested their individual capital and was now generating revenues. Raymond made the point that property tax is not charged on capital value, but on rental value.
Lamenting that property tax has not been paid since 2009, Raymond said, "It is long overdue. The quicker they bring it the better."
Source: http://newsday.co.tt/2018/05/21/afra-pr ... x-is-fair/
hong kong phooey wrote:The_Honourable wrote:Property Tax is fair
THE idea that the Property Tax unfairly targets East Indians was refuted by surveyor and commentator Afra Raymond speaking to Newsday yesterday. At a recent Maha Sabha function, guest of honour surgeon Dr Dilip Dan alleged that the tax maybe being targeted at East Indians who had tirelessly toiled and saved to build their homes rather than squander their earnings.
Raymond however retorted that such a notion of an unfair taxation was an idea imported from the political right-wing in the United States and was not related to the Africans and East Indians of TT. He argued that as property is a store of wealth it should be taxed the same way as a business such as a travel agency into which a pair of business partners had invested their individual capital and was now generating revenues. Raymond made the point that property tax is not charged on capital value, but on rental value.
Lamenting that property tax has not been paid since 2009, Raymond said, "It is long overdue. The quicker they bring it the better."
Source: http://newsday.co.tt/2018/05/21/afra-pr ... x-is-fair/
But who/what determines the rental value . the figures i seeing is crazy
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 69 guests