Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
toyolink wrote:Why doesn't the state exercise some common-sense and implement a property tax which shows a bit of consideration for the average citizen who want to pay but don't want to be faced with levels of payment that they just cant afford at this time.
Retroactive from Sept. 2016 is just another punch in the gut...........3yrs property tax one time?
Pensioners have to go and essentially beg for some consideration.........What about the dignity of these folks who for decades worked and contributed to get us to where we are and surviving on $3000-$5000 per month?
Sometimes people in authority just lose touch with reality and start to believe their own foolishness.
88sins wrote:What's the simplest most cost effective way to rid a small boat, with multiple small compartments, of a severe rat infestation?
paid_influencer wrote:pnm supporters are masochists. the more pain and suffering you inflict on them, the more they will support their party
88sins wrote:What's the simplest most cost effective way to rid a small boat, with multiple small compartments, of a severe rat infestation?
ProtonPowder wrote:Tax not coming for at least 2 more years at the rate that the ministry going, 2020 election is going to be interesting for sure.
RedVEVO wrote:ProtonPowder wrote:Tax not coming for at least 2 more years at the rate that the ministry going, 2020 election is going to be interesting for sure.
Yes, Tax Man playing smart.
He is trying to assess the public reaction " to riot or not to roti "
Anybody who challenges him seriously, he will back down.
Remember when Roget gave him an ultimatum .
And Casino people issue went silent .
ProtonPowder wrote:
Nah jed, is not cause they playing smart, is because they need finished data on half of all taxable units in the country before they start taxing. And they now start collecting that data.
By that i mean field visits, not the forms that everybody fight in court over
ProtonPowder wrote:RedVEVO wrote:ProtonPowder wrote:Tax not coming for at least 2 more years at the rate that the ministry going, 2020 election is going to be interesting for sure.
Yes, Tax Man playing smart.
He is trying to assess the public reaction " to riot or not to roti "
Anybody who challenges him seriously, he will back down.
Remember when Roget gave him an ultimatum .
And Casino people issue went silent .
Nah jed, is not cause they playing smart, is because they need finished data on half of all taxable units in the country before they start taxing. And they now start collecting that data.
By that i mean field visits, not the forms that everybody fight in court over
RedVEVO wrote:ProtonPowder wrote:RedVEVO wrote:ProtonPowder wrote:Tax not coming for at least 2 more years at the rate that the ministry going, 2020 election is going to be interesting for sure.
Yes, Tax Man playing smart.
He is trying to assess the public reaction " to riot or not to roti "
Anybody who challenges him seriously, he will back down.
Remember when Roget gave him an ultimatum .
And Casino people issue went silent .
Nah jed, is not cause they playing smart, is because they need finished data on half of all taxable units in the country before they start taxing. And they now start collecting that data.
By that i mean field visits, not the forms that everybody fight in court over
Nah jed - PNM is Maco Central .
Is tax then thief![]()
You do not need that Data .
They fool you . It is a trick .
ProtonPowder wrote:RedVEVO wrote:ProtonPowder wrote:RedVEVO wrote:ProtonPowder wrote:Tax not coming for at least 2 more years at the rate that the ministry going, 2020 election is going to be interesting for sure.
Yes, Tax Man playing smart.
He is trying to assess the public reaction " to riot or not to roti "
Anybody who challenges him seriously, he will back down.
Remember when Roget gave him an ultimatum .
And Casino people issue went silent .
Nah jed, is not cause they playing smart, is because they need finished data on half of all taxable units in the country before they start taxing. And they now start collecting that data.
By that i mean field visits, not the forms that everybody fight in court over
Nah jed - PNM is Maco Central .
Is tax then thief![]()
You do not need that Data .
They fool you . It is a trick .
Stop chatting nonsense man, you sounding like a UNC politician on a podium. It have high ranks in ministry of finance that dont want this tax to start with and not ready to go to court for Impsbert to defend anybody. They doing every damn thing by the books.
Anybody ever deal with government valuers for stamp duty? Is the exact same process they using for this.
RedVEVO wrote:
There was a system in place that was good.
Why base tax payment on a rental value ?
They do not need ANY data .
PNM is Maco Central .
ProtonPowder wrote:RedVEVO wrote:
There was a system in place that was good.
Why base tax payment on a rental value ?
They do not need ANY data .
PNM is Maco Central .
They can use a capital value system instead of rental system, but rental values move more fluidly with market conditions, while capital values have a lag time.
The_Honourable wrote:Squatters buy cable, pay taxes
SQUATTERS can afford to buy cable TV and pay property taxes too. This was the opinion of Independent Senator David Small during debate on the Property Tax Amendment Bill 2018 in the Senate on Tuesday night. He revealed an instance where a cable provider told him that squatters living not far from his home, purchased a $1,500 per month cable TV package.
While some squatters are revenue challenged, Small said this instance shows other squatters are, "able to comfortably afford to pay their tax." The senator said the challenge here is to, "find the balance." Retirees "are in the same boat" as squatters and are not short of funding, Small added. Property tax, Small added, will not have people running and "screaming in the streets."
Minister in the Ministry of Finance Allyson West said people accept that that property tax, "is not a fearsome thing." Given the country's current economic circumstances, she said, "It is a tax that is required. A tax that is prudent." West will conclude debate on the bill when the Senate sits on May 11 at Tower D of the Port of Spain International Waterfront Centre at 1.30 pm.
Source: http://newsday.co.tt/2018/05/02/squatte ... pay-taxes/
De Dragon wrote:The_Honourable wrote:Squatters buy cable, pay taxes
SQUATTERS can afford to buy cable TV and pay property taxes too. This was the opinion of Independent Senator David Small during debate on the Property Tax Amendment Bill 2018 in the Senate on Tuesday night. He revealed an instance where a cable provider told him that squatters living not far from his home, purchased a $1,500 per month cable TV package.
While some squatters are revenue challenged, Small said this instance shows other squatters are, "able to comfortably afford to pay their tax." The senator said the challenge here is to, "find the balance." Retirees "are in the same boat" as squatters and are not short of funding, Small added. Property tax, Small added, will not have people running and "screaming in the streets."
Minister in the Ministry of Finance Allyson West said people accept that that property tax, "is not a fearsome thing." Given the country's current economic circumstances, she said, "It is a tax that is required. A tax that is prudent." West will conclude debate on the bill when the Senate sits on May 11 at Tower D of the Port of Spain International Waterfront Centre at 1.30 pm.
Source: http://newsday.co.tt/2018/05/02/squatte ... pay-taxes/
David Small, like Allyson West are kants. Their kantish justification only holds water if every single squatter had a $1500.00 cable package. By their logic, we should not implement property tax because one squatter/retiree cannot afford the tax.
RedVEVO wrote:ProtonPowder wrote:RedVEVO wrote:
There was a system in place that was good.
Why base tax payment on a rental value ?
They do not need ANY data .
PNM is Maco Central .
They can use a capital value system instead of rental system, but rental values move more fluidly with market conditions, while capital values have a lag time.
So PNM tuner what is your point ?
Suffer and torture the small people today and tomorrow or always under PNM ?
ProtonPowder wrote:RedVEVO wrote:ProtonPowder wrote:RedVEVO wrote:
There was a system in place that was good.
Why base tax payment on a rental value ?
They do not need ANY data .
PNM is Maco Central .
They can use a capital value system instead of rental system, but rental values move more fluidly with market conditions, while capital values have a lag time.
So PNM tuner what is your point ?
Suffer and torture the small people today and tomorrow or always under PNM ?
so when you get your questions answer you calling me a PNM. I have zero political affiliations. I trying to answer questions anybody have jed, stop acting like i is your rumshop padna and tackle the point i making.
The tax supposed to pay for municipal services. There are exceptions in the bill for people to appeal to the BIR under section 23 in cases of hardship. Educate yourself
ProtonPowder wrote:RedVEVO wrote:ProtonPowder wrote:RedVEVO wrote:
There was a system in place that was good.
Why base tax payment on a rental value ?
They do not need ANY data .
PNM is Maco Central .
They can use a capital value system instead of rental system, but rental values move more fluidly with market conditions, while capital values have a lag time.
So PNM tuner what is your point ?
Suffer and torture the small people today and tomorrow or always under PNM ?
so when you get your questions answer you calling me a PNM. I have zero political affiliations. I trying to answer questions anybody have jed, stop acting like i is your rumshop padna and tackle the point i making.
The tax supposed to pay for municipal services. There are exceptions in the bill for people to appeal to the BIR under section 23 in cases of hardship. Educate yourself
ProtonPowder wrote:Using it to pay for municipal services is what was originally planned for by the ministry, and is what those taxes are used for in every other country that has such a tax.
You can pretend I am a PNM all you want, go and rant on your facebook about it under every newspaper article and status if you want. If you step back and watch for one minute, you go see that this tax will end up just like VAT. Contentious in the beginning but secretly even the opposition knows and wants it to stay. They all just toe the party line and contrarian stance to rope all of you into one of two camps.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 75 guests