Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
alifiaad wrote:To know whether GOD exist or not you must first ask yourself "where did i come from and where i am i going" if the answer is "yuh mudda belly" and "in a hole" you maybe correct to an extent but who's belly the world came from. Every creation has a creator. Nissan created the s chassis so Nissan maybe termed the creator and b4 you buy it is tested. Everyone of us similarly has a creator and so to we are tested. My experience of and with GOD is just the mere fact that there are those who believe and those who don't. If everyone believed then what message would it have to share.
Habit7 wrote:A better question to ask is who created time so that we have an idea of beginning and ending?
.
But please don't let me distract from the atheist cliché of "who created God?"
time is a constant succession of moments, time couldn't preceded itself to create itself.nareshseep wrote:Time created Time
Slartibartfast wrote:Gonna try to stay out of this argument but I think the point naresheep was trying to make is this.
You argue that everything had to come from somewhere, but you also say God was a always here. So it looks like you are arguing with opposites.
I believe naresheep was trying to say, what is wrong with the idea that the conditions for a universe to be created were eternal (I.e. No creator needed)?
Habit7 wrote:Your statement is a nonsensetime is a constant succession of moments, time couldn't preceded itself to create itself.nareshseep wrote:Time created Time
Whoever created time is eternal.
this is just as much a nonsense as time and eternity are opposing concepts.Slartibartfast wrote:Or time could be eternal
why not? In your worldview life can naturally arise from non-life, why not time from your Casio?nareshseep wrote:On this trend of thought, then my watch creates time...
alifiaad wrote:True. Because time is like wealth. It has its rations and has to budgeted and its is spent. It is also a favor. If time did not exist then what would life mean
Wikipedia wrote:Since 1967, the second has been defined to be: the duration of 9192631770 periods of the radiation corresponding to the transition between the two hyperfine levels of the ground state of the caesium 133 atom.
rspann wrote:Hoss you for real? You trying to prove you are so intelligent by posting things from Google and wikipedia, in your quest to impress and not realizing you are only showing you don't understand anything . You are constantly contradicting yourself and changing positions, and now trying to define time by using a definition of a second and saying it is the standardized definition of time ? That is the standardized definition of a SECOND not time.
Why don't you Google and cut and paste an explanation of the Space time continuum and Newtons relativity and Quantum theories while you are at it so we could really understand the concept of time.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: foss, VexXx Dogg and 105 guests