Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Altec55 wrote:ok, so from a non-religious perspective, is morality subjective and changes on what people feel to believe?
Altec55 wrote:ok, so from a non-religious perspective, is morality subjective and changes on what people feel to believe?
Habit7 wrote:Altec55 wrote:ok, so from a non-religious perspective, is morality subjective and changes on what people feel to believe?
Yes and no matter much one questions, rationalizes and compares, they can only do so within their society context and time. Eg. Subjective morality of murder could flex whether you are in a passive nation/time or warring nation/time.
meccalli wrote:Bluefete, have you seen the entire series with with Michael Rood on that couple who explored the true sinai and the exodus, it's a real blessing.
And while I'm here, might as well throw up the new trend of posting images with witty words about religion, this one isn't from backyard atheists, rather the father of quantum theory.
Slartibartfast wrote:Habit7 wrote:Altec55 wrote:ok, so from a non-religious perspective, is morality subjective and changes on what people feel to believe?
But funniest thing is when they adopt societal norms and claim that it was their teaching all along. But not everyone gets the memo of the changes. Hence the amount of variations in something that claims to be absolute.
Victory lap done
how do you follow God without the book?aks wrote:Slartibartfast wrote:Habit7 wrote:Altec55 wrote:ok, so from a non-religious perspective, is morality subjective and changes on what people feel to believe?
But funniest thing is when they adopt societal norms and claim that it was their teaching all along. But not everyone gets the memo of the changes. Hence the amount of variations in something that claims to be absolute.
Victory lap done
tru dat
When will ppl see that when u decide to follow a religion u really decide to follow a man why not follow God directly I think that is the real test ......books about God are for fools, you are the proof God is a reality what else do u need ......have you ever wondered why does the bible and our legal documentation eg affidavit and so on carry the same type of english eg therewith ,hereto ,thou est ,thou ponder on that
aks wrote:Does one not recognize a higher power exists without a book to tell him so ..?just because a book can tell u about biology or history does that lend to a reason why men are so adapted to learning from books, that no one can see a book written by men about God could only be speculation....
aks wrote:Instructions u say ,do you really need a book to know wrong from right? is it not based within you ,well ok this is wrong and that feels right ,most of the religions preach enmity towards each other especially christianity ,islam the same i'm sure the founders of each and every religion intended good faith among their own ppl and pal God didn jus create us and leave us here to go on God never left, but any how lets take what you said into context u really believe that such a high power the almighty God had the need to come to us to tell us things that God embedded in our dna does somebody have to tell a dog its mating season ....ponder.....religion has led us away from the path of true Godliness, true unity .All religions are not linked anyhow and to think in terms of one global power i would say u watch too many episodes of pinky and the brain my friend and speaking of brains thats why God issued you one so you could do your own thinking not follow someone else's and how do you know that God never contacted you through inspiration......in that thing God gave you the wonderful brain.....
Greedbluesclues wrote:...what one source could hold so much power to overtake the Globe?
Slartibartfast wrote:Habit7 wrote:Altec55 wrote:ok, so from a non-religious perspective, is morality subjective and changes on what people feel to believe?
Yes and no matter much one questions, rationalizes and compares, they can only do so within their society context and time. Eg. Subjective morality of murder could flex whether you are in a passive nation/time or warring nation/time.
Not that the presence of the bible makes things any better. In fact the Bible was used as justification to hold back progress in a lot of cases. Also, man decides on the interpretation of the bible (for which there are hundreds). So you should also ask yourself where does man get the wisdom to interpret the bible and why have there been so many changes over the years in something that claims to be absolute.
But funniest thing is when they adopt societal norms and claim that it was their teaching all along. But not everyone gets the memo of the changes. Hence the amount of variations in something that claims to be absolute.
Victory lap done
Altec55 wrote:Man gets the wisdom to interpret the Bible from God. I can attest to this fact. Anyone will be able to attest to it also if they want to find out for themselves. The meanings/teachings of the Bible doesn't change.
Slartibartfast wrote:Altec55 wrote:Man gets the wisdom to interpret the Bible from God. I can attest to this fact. Anyone will be able to attest to it also if they want to find out for themselves. The meanings/teachings of the Bible doesn't change.![]()
I literally cannot argue with that. Just want to know, which version of the bible is correct and why does God tell everyone something different?
Altec55 wrote:Slartibartfast wrote:Altec55 wrote:Man gets the wisdom to interpret the Bible from God. I can attest to this fact. Anyone will be able to attest to it also if they want to find out for themselves. The meanings/teachings of the Bible doesn't change.![]()
I literally cannot argue with that. Just want to know, which version of the bible is correct and why does God tell everyone something different?
Any translation of the Bible translated from the original scripts are correct. God doesn't tell people something different. Anything that someone says God said, must line up with the Bible. If it doesn't, it wasn't God that said it.
Slartibartfast wrote:Is AdamB real name Sterling Archer?
Slartibartfast wrote:Well what about this.
About 10 years ago when I was an aspiring theologian, it was taught that only through faith can someone get into heaven, no through deeds, lest any man shall boast (don't remember the exact wording). I was taught that atheists, regardless of how good they were would eventually go to hell, especially those that knew the word of God and turned away from it.
Now, few month ago, Pope Francis (awesome guy IMO btw) went ahead and said that atheists that do good will go to heaven. I linked both religious and secular sites.
http://www.catholic.org/news/hf/faith/story.php?id=51077
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/pope-francis-assures-atheists-you-dont-have-to-believe-in-god-to-go-to-heaven-8810062.html
So is Pope Francis correct, and everyone to ever teach the opposite wrong, or is everyone else wrong and the Pope correct. Or are they both somehow correct even though they say the opposite thing?
Altec55 wrote:The meanings/teachings of the Bible doesn't change.
Habit7 wrote:...The Catholic Church differs severely with Christianity...
Slartibartfast wrote:Altec55 wrote:The meanings/teachings of the Bible doesn't change.
Why does this confuse you? It really doesn't change.Habit7 wrote:...The Catholic Church differs severely with Christianity...
This confuses me.
Slartibartfast wrote:Altec55 wrote:The meanings/teachings of the Bible doesn't change.Habit7 wrote:...The Catholic Church differs severely with Christianity...
This confuses me.
Habit7 wrote:Catholic Church differs severely with Christianity because unlike Christians who solely rely on the closed canon of Scripture for all life and doctrine, the Catholic Church believes that the Pope and church tradition are just as authoritative.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 59 guests