Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
grad wrote:- Rovin's car audio - wrote:janfar wrote:Bear Kublalsingh does absorb water thru his skin when he swimming . He is a red bean.
good 1 .......![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
bear grylls all dem survival shows ppl doing it wrong - dem cyar last 3 days good , they need to come down to trinidad & learn how kubs do it ...
UML wrote:pp making a big deal about if he die.
If he die, so what?
How many people before died while waiting to be transported to San Fernando General Hospital because of traffic?
Redman wrote:UML wrote:pp making a big deal about if he die.
If he die, so what?
How many people before died while waiting to be transported to San Fernando General Hospital because of traffic?
Probably not as many as those who have died because the hospital is yet to be built.
Redman wrote:Allyuh really serious??
When government runs roughshod over the process and details in the pursuit of expedience and special interest you will remain so supportive.
civicman wrote:Redman wrote:UML wrote:pp making a big deal about if he die.
If he die, so what?
How many people before died while waiting to be transported to San Fernando General Hospital because of traffic?
Probably not as many as those who have died because the hospital is yet to be built.
Which hospital g
The one in couva in the heart of our enery sector
Or the oncology hospital that get in the budget about 5 years in a row under former admin that is now being built
Or wait is the big new one in sando
That supposed to be a carpark if patrick was still here
De Dragon wrote:Redman wrote:Allyuh really serious??
When government runs roughshod over the process and details in the pursuit of expedience and special interest you will remain so supportive.
Explain.
There will never be a satisfactory outcome for every single person affected by the highway. The majority, as in an election, must hold sway at the end of the day and Kubs and a handful of supporters do not look anything like a majority. Nigel Henry should poll the area and let us see some numbers.
Redman wrote:civicman wrote:Redman wrote:UML wrote:pp making a big deal about if he die.
If he die, so what?
How many people before died while waiting to be transported to San Fernando General Hospital because of traffic?
Probably not as many as those who have died because the hospital is yet to be built.
Which hospital g
The one in couva in the heart of our enery sector
Or the oncology hospital that get in the budget about 5 years in a row under former admin that is now being built
Or wait is the big new one in sando
That supposed to be a carpark if patrick was still here
the one in Point Fortin Einstein
Redman wrote:De Dragon wrote:Redman wrote:Allyuh really serious??
When government runs roughshod over the process and details in the pursuit of expedience and special interest you will remain so supportive.
Explain.
There will never be a satisfactory outcome for every single person affected by the highway. The majority, as in an election, must hold sway at the end of the day and Kubs and a handful of supporters do not look anything like a majority. Nigel Henry should poll the area and let us see some numbers.
No its not about whether who wants x or y
But you prove my point.
A Hway or a Smelter or a Rapid Rail is a POLICY decision-not a POLITICAL one.
Any Project of these types would be something that is needed -as I think the Hway is.
BUT that decision must be based on something like a proper analysis or a feasibility study etc-that is NOT subject to your political POV.
So really as administrators the GORTT should be able to say that ABC Inc are professionals in Public Transport Analysis and their analysis says TnT needs this...and frankly implement-as elected leaders they have that right.
What we get however is Patrick says Smelter and RR. Take dat....and feels empowered enough to hold that position
We spent 500M on those projects and have nothingto show.
So we now see where the GORTT is implementing a massive projects and there are serious shortcomings with the processes and in some cases legal requirements.
Im all for the hway-EXECUTED PROPERLY.TRANSPARENTLY and in the best manner -it should be something to be proud of-not mired in controversy.
The GORTT should clear the air
Redman wrote:De Dragon wrote:Redman wrote:Allyuh really serious??
When government runs roughshod over the process and details in the pursuit of expedience and special interest you will remain so supportive.
Explain.
There will never be a satisfactory outcome for every single person affected by the highway. The majority, as in an election, must hold sway at the end of the day and Kubs and a handful of supporters do not look anything like a majority. Nigel Henry should poll the area and let us see some numbers.
No its not about whether who wants x or y
But you prove my point.
A Hway or a Smelter or a Rapid Rail is a POLICY decision-not a POLITICAL one.
Any Project of these types would be something that is needed -as I think the Hway is.
BUT that decision must be based on something like a proper analysis or a feasibility study etc-that is NOT subject to your political POV.
So really as administrators the GORTT should be able to say that ABC Inc are professionals in Public Transport Analysis and their analysis says TnT needs this...and frankly implement-as elected leaders they have that right.
What we get however is Patrick says Smelter and RR. Take dat....and feels empowered enough to hold that position
We spent 500M on those projects and have nothingto show.
So we now see where the GORTT is implementing a massive projects and there are serious shortcomings with the processes and in some cases legal requirements.
Im all for the hway-EXECUTED PROPERLY.TRANSPARENTLY and in the best manner -it should be something to be proud of-not mired in controversy.
The GORTT should clear the air
De Dragon wrote:Do you really think a project of this size and scope did not have a feasibility study precede it? One does not simply wake up one morning and decide to build a highway without considering the social/environmental/financial impacts before even turning a clump of dirt over.
What we have here is a group of people who disagree with the route and demanding that it change. The Government is simply not willing to set a precedent and bend to the HRM. Look at what happened the last time they conceded to Kublalsingh and HRM.
De Dragon wrote:Redman wrote:De Dragon wrote:Redman wrote:Allyuh really serious??
When government runs roughshod over the process and details in the pursuit of expedience and special interest you will remain so supportive.
Explain.
There will never be a satisfactory outcome for every single person affected by the highway. The majority, as in an election, must hold sway at the end of the day and Kubs and a handful of supporters do not look anything like a majority. Nigel Henry should poll the area and let us see some numbers.
No its not about whether who wants x or y
But you prove my point.
A Hway or a Smelter or a Rapid Rail is a POLICY decision-not a POLITICAL one.
Any Project of these types would be something that is needed -as I think the Hway is.
BUT that decision must be based on something like a proper analysis or a feasibility study etc-that is NOT subject to your political POV.
So really as administrators the GORTT should be able to say that ABC Inc are professionals in Public Transport Analysis and their analysis says TnT needs this...and frankly implement-as elected leaders they have that right.
What we get however is Patrick says Smelter and RR. Take dat....and feels empowered enough to hold that position
We spent 500M on those projects and have nothingto show.
So we now see where the GORTT is implementing a massive projects and there are serious shortcomings with the processes and in some cases legal requirements.
Im all for the hway-EXECUTED PROPERLY.TRANSPARENTLY and in the best manner -it should be something to be proud of-not mired in controversy.
The GORTT should clear the air
Do you really think a project of this size and scope did not have a feasibility study precede it? One does not simply wake up one morning and decide to build a highway without considering the social/environmental/financial impacts before even turning a clump of dirt over.
What we have here is a group of people who disagree with the route and demanding that it change. The Government is simply not willing to set a precedent and bend to the HRM. Look at what happened the last time they conceded to Kublalsingh and HRM.
Redman wrote:UML wrote:pp making a big deal about if he die.
If he die, so what?
How many people before died while waiting to be transported to San Fernando General Hospital because of traffic?
Probably not as many as those who have died because the hospital is yet to be built.
UML wrote:Redman wrote:UML wrote:pp making a big deal about if he die.
If he die, so what?
How many people before died while waiting to be transported to San Fernando General Hospital because of traffic?
Probably not as many as those who have died because the hospital is yet to be built.
Thank God for the PPG because they building the hospital in Pt Fortin, in addition to the highway, which the pnm never did for their own voters!!
kaylex wrote:UML wrote:Redman wrote:UML wrote:pp making a big deal about if he die.
If he die, so what?
How many people before died while waiting to be transported to San Fernando General Hospital because of traffic?
Probably not as many as those who have died because the hospital is yet to be built.
Thank God for the PPG because they building the hospital in Pt Fortin, in addition to the highway, which the pnm never did for their own voters!!
dude put the politiking to rest for a moment..... honestly they should just make the Highway feasibility study open to some public forum. furnish kubs and posse with the study and call that fred..
If you have nothing to hide you'd come out in the open..
as per what i studying is the ramifications if kubs take it to the wire>>> what could be the possible outcomes..
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 38 guests