*** The 2025 GENERAL ELECTION thread***

[wing]

PNM never had it so easy.... and it's all because of one person and her sycophants. And no amount of braying, ranting and insulting won't result in anybody from the PNM getting kicked out. Blogging and spin is such easy money.

[st7]

i wonder what's the IQ of people who still back the flip floppea (not a typo) and think he relevant at all

unc and pnm are owned by the same group of people... they protect each other. both sides always saying they cud buss files but nobody ever do it. rinse and repeat with elections

[paid_influencer]

It's ON

the only debate happening for dis elections

kamla too scared

rowley who scared

ONLY WHO NAME MAN WILL DEBATE

[alfa]

They probably debating who coming last this GE

[shake d livin wake d dead]

Kpb like she officially gone mad.... Last year she rating GG, this year she throw him under the bus.

Pnm doh even need to campaign and they winning next year

[mero]

#Knockitondem run outta steam already?

Any plan b?

[VexXx Dogg]

457143785_521676133575132_6962630348461720943_n.jpg

It's ON

the only debate happening for dis elections

kamla too scared

rowley who scared

ONLY WHO NAME MAN WILL DEBATE

That debate gonna turn into a mudslinging comedy fest, because one man like to throw talk and the other can’t take it

[pugboy]

let them cic men fight it out
gg could ask pea about the expo

funny thing is when gg was cop he went on pea show and did a long interview
things was good then went sour

[wing]

Cuckold PEA flip back to Kamla.

[paid_influencer]

demands met, policies in manifesto.

MEDIA RELEASE - PEP RECOMMITS SUPPORT FOR KAMLA

Kamla Persad Bissessar’s announcement last evening that she and any government she leads would be opposed to any notion of a cashless society, the introduction of a property tax as well as a commitment to examine the administration of justice in this country aligns with the conditions we in the Progressive Empowerment Party set out as urgent and important and gives us all the confidence we need to maintain our support to ensure that she is elected Prime Minister of Trinidad & Tobago whenever the next general election is called.

To take such strong positions on those issues takes a mammoth amount of courage, and, coupled with former MP and Minister Fuad Khan’s recent videos publicly decrying government’s decimation of the economy during the COVID fiasco and his willingness to examine the inconsistencies in the remit and role of the WHO perfectly parallels our position that Trinidad & Tobago is a sovereign nation that should not be bound by external treaties that in anyway undermine our ability to govern and administer ourselves under circumstances and conditions we think right for ourselves as a nation.

THESE are the most important issues facing this and every country in the world right now, and we the people of this country have a responsibility to ourselves and future generations to ensure that we vote for the the enshrinement of civil liberties and constitutional rights that uphold our sovereign democracy, and to seek out and support those who take the right position on this side of freedom at great risk to themselves and their fortunes.

We see the hands of those who would benefit from the removal of our rights and liberties behind all the raging distractions and political turmoil suddenly present to all who would stand against these agendas, and we call on all right thinking people to ignore all distractions, put aside their differences and to join forces on these most pressing issues, as the consequences of failure is a future too nightmarish to envision, where external organisations could have legal authority over our very bodies and those of our loved ones, where law enforcement could have the right to line up our children and inject them or administer to them without our permission, where our properties that we worked so hard to acquire could be transferred to state ownership overnight, and where others could control all our belongings at the push of a button.

For those who might be intimidated at the battles before us, we remember Patrick Manning at the height of his power test flying private jets and out fitting his personal Presidential palace before he was decimated at the polls in 2010. We say let that be our reality again, and join together to sweep from office the current band of failures that have destroyed our economy, plundered our resources to enrich their friends and financiers, and left a trail of blood, death and corruption as their legacy.

We in the PEP are clear that the next election is going to be a battle for the very freedom of our people, and based on that, recommit our support announced on March 2nd of this year, and pledge ourselves, our resources and strong voices to ensure that Kamla Persad Bissessar is the next Prime Minister of Trinidad & Tobago, and will work assiduously to ensure that becomes a reality.

Phillip Edward Alexander
Political Leader
Progressive Empowerment Party

[DMan7]

Another reason why PNM going to sweep next general elections. People already fed up with the opposition leader and now all this back and forth with people leaving and coming back and leaving again and those splitting off to form their own parties not to mention all the losses that Kams has taken over the years. People just fed up with them, they gonna vote back PNM with ease.

Also remember one of the reasons they kicked her to the curb in 2015 was because of this very same thing with soo many cabinet reshuffles in her time which showed instability and lack of leadership. WOFT.

[Mmoney607]

Another reason why PNM going to sweep next general elections. People already fed up with the opposition leader and now all this back and forth with people leaving and coming back and leaving again and those splitting off to form their own parties not to mention all the losses that Kams has taken over the years. People just fed up with them, they gonna vote back PNM with ease.

Also remember one of the reasons they kicked her to the curb in 2015 was because of this very same thing with soo many cabinet reshuffles in her time which showed instability and lack of leadership. WOFT.

When has PNM ever swept an election in recent times? Fake news

[pugboy]

only one party ever really had a sweep
it always boils down to the few marginals

[wing]

Another reason why PNM going to sweep next general elections. People already fed up with the opposition leader and now all this back and forth with people leaving and coming back and leaving again and those splitting off to form their own parties not to mention all the losses that Kams has taken over the years. People just fed up with them, they gonna vote back PNM with ease.

Also remember one of the reasons they kicked her to the curb in 2015 was because of this very same thing with soo many cabinet reshuffles in her time which showed instability and lack of leadership. WOFT.

When has PNM ever swept an election in recent times? Fake news

Whether you win by an inch or a mile.... winning's winning.
But a serial loser will study things like if the PNM ever "swept" an election.
So PEA solution to crime is what? What does the UNC manifesto solution? To bring back the justice ministry whose only achievement was section 34? Give police reward for doing what they're already being paid for? Reduce cost of living how? Giving away computers for kids to watch porn? The generation who were recipients are better or worse off?

[Mmoney607]

Another reason why PNM going to sweep next general elections. People already fed up with the opposition leader and now all this back and forth with people leaving and coming back and leaving again and those splitting off to form their own parties not to mention all the losses that Kams has taken over the years. People just fed up with them, they gonna vote back PNM with ease.

Also remember one of the reasons they kicked her to the curb in 2015 was because of this very same thing with soo many cabinet reshuffles in her time which showed instability and lack of leadership. WOFT.

When has PNM ever swept an election in recent times? Fake news

Whether you win by an inch or a mile.... winning's winning.
But a serial loser will study things like if the PNM ever "swept" an election.
So PEA solution to crime is what? What does the UNC manifesto solution? To bring back the justice ministry whose only achievement was section 34? Give police reward for doing what they're already being paid for? Reduce cost of living how? Giving away computers for kids to watch porn? The generation who were recipients are better or worse off?

They can't pass any laws that require a 3/5 majority, they only thing could do is change the quote of arms while crime out of control.
And PNM voted for section 34

[wing]

only one party ever really had a sweep
it always boils down to the few marginals

There was a government that had a 29-12 majority, enough for a constitutional majority. What did they do to ensure the evil PNM never comes back to power? What did they do to effect real reform to ensure the country's future isn't decided by a few thousand voters in the marginals? Instead, they used the majority to enact section 34 and refused to repeal the property tax and revenue authority. They refused to implement term limits, proportional representation, procurement legislation, campaign financing, service commission reform, justice reform, HSF rules, monetary policy...... and so on and on. But section 34 was the best they could do, having swept the election.

[Mmoney607]

only one party ever really had a sweep
it always boils down to the few marginals

There was a government that had a 29-12 majority, enough for a constitutional majority. What did they do to ensure the evil PNM never comes back to power? What did they do to effect real reform to ensure the country's future isn't decided by a few thousand voters in the marginals? Instead, they used the majority to enact section 34 and refused to repeal the property tax and revenue authority. They refused to implement term limits, proportional representation, procurement legislation, campaign financing, service commission reform, justice reform, HSF rules, monetary policy...... and so on and on. But section 34 was the best they could do, having swept the election.

But why Rowley vote yes to section 34?

[zoom rader]

only one party ever really had a sweep
it always boils down to the few marginals

There was a government that had a 29-12 majority, enough for a constitutional majority. What did they do to ensure the evil PNM never comes back to power? What did they do to effect real reform to ensure the country's future isn't decided by a few thousand voters in the marginals? Instead, they used the majority to enact section 34 and refused to repeal the property tax and revenue authority. They refused to implement term limits, proportional representation, procurement legislation, campaign financing, service commission reform, justice reform, HSF rules, monetary policy...... and so on and on. But section 34 was the best they could do, having swept the election.

PNM won all 36 seat in 1971 and under that term they also envoked section 34.

PNM had all 36 seats and they did fvck all

[The_Honourable]

So whenever Kamla and Gary fall out, Phillip re-commits. When Kamla and Gary start back knocking glass, Phillip pulls back his support.

What a fool

[mero]

[wing]

So whenever Kamla and Gary fall out, Phillip re-commits. When Kamla and Gary start back knocking glass, Phillip pulls back his support.

What a fool

The real fools are those who support and promote his idiocy.

[wing]

only one party ever really had a sweep
it always boils down to the few marginals

There was a government that had a 29-12 majority, enough for a constitutional majority. What did they do to ensure the evil PNM never comes back to power? What did they do to effect real reform to ensure the country's future isn't decided by a few thousand voters in the marginals? Instead, they used the majority to enact section 34 and refused to repeal the property tax and revenue authority. They refused to implement term limits, proportional representation, procurement legislation, campaign financing, service commission reform, justice reform, HSF rules, monetary policy...... and so on and on. But section 34 was the best they could do, having swept the election.

But why Rowley vote yes to section 34?

What Rowley have to do with this? Study that your beloved UNC is the exact same as the PNM.

[Mmoney607]

only one party ever really had a sweep
it always boils down to the few marginals

There was a government that had a 29-12 majority, enough for a constitutional majority. What did they do to ensure the evil PNM never comes back to power? What did they do to effect real reform to ensure the country's future isn't decided by a few thousand voters in the marginals? Instead, they used the majority to enact section 34 and refused to repeal the property tax and revenue authority. They refused to implement term limits, proportional representation, procurement legislation, campaign financing, service commission reform, justice reform, HSF rules, monetary policy...... and so on and on. But section 34 was the best they could do, having swept the election.

But why Rowley vote yes to section 34?

What Rowley have to do with this? Study that your beloved UNC is the exact same as the PNM.

Yes, all is the same, Rowley and Ravi Ratiram is the same

[Mmoney607]

About five different threads right now with people using the classic propaganda "PNM going to win anyway so don't vote"

[zoom rader]

About five different threads right now with people using the classic propaganda "PNM going to win anyway so don't vote"

Its the reason why Trinidad is a failed state.

Freedom is too cheap in Trinidad.

[The_Honourable]

What pea bringing to the table for those demands? Facebook likes? Because it can’t be votes or seats.

Can't be money or power either so still waiting for paid to answer this question

[wing]

only one party ever really had a sweep
it always boils down to the few marginals

There was a government that had a 29-12 majority, enough for a constitutional majority. What did they do to ensure the evil PNM never comes back to power? What did they do to effect real reform to ensure the country's future isn't decided by a few thousand voters in the marginals? Instead, they used the majority to enact section 34 and refused to repeal the property tax and revenue authority. They refused to implement term limits, proportional representation, procurement legislation, campaign financing, service commission reform, justice reform, HSF rules, monetary policy...... and so on and on. But section 34 was the best they could do, having swept the election.

But why Rowley vote yes to section 34?

What Rowley have to do with this? Study that your beloved UNC is the exact same as the PNM.

Yes, all is the same, Rowley and Ravi Ratiram is the same

You disrespect Rowley by comparing with ratiram. But you didn't answer why with a constitutional majority, the UNC refused to repeal the property tax and implement proportional representation, since they claim to get the most votes. All they did was ensure section 34 got passed.

[wing]

https://www.guardian.co.tt/news/senate- ... afb494217a


Young people of substance, intelligence and achievement. Also no alternative lifestyle proponents. Let's see what lagahoo the UNC putting up.

[timelapse]

Wake up.Its 2024
The real choice to make is not who is going to rule you,but whether you want to be ruled.
Different "choices" same results.
It is much easier to bump keyboard gums than to actually do something meaningful for the benefit of the country.
Be the change that you want to see

[st7]

Wake up.Its 2024
The real choice to make is not who is going to rule you,but whether you want to be ruled.
Different "choices" same results.
It is much easier to bump keyboard gums than to actually do something meaningful for the benefit of the country.
Be the change that you want to see

^this.

too much froth, not enough go forth and conquer