Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Cause he was just another black guy and they could not care less .88sins wrote:for all the for's & against's, was on drugs & superhuman strength talk, he was pest statements & if this & if that. hypothetical scenarios aside, I notice nobody not taking into account one little detail & asking a particular question
When they realized he wasn't breathing & he was lying motionless on the ground, to the best of my understanding from what footage & statements are available, not one of those officers decided to render aid to the suspect when they saw he wasn't breathing or moving. No cpr, no checking his airway, nada.
So my question is this.
Why not?
Now, apparently at least one of them knew how to perform cpr. Because according to his attorney he did in fact according to his statement perform cpr on Mr. Floyd in the ambulance. The question is what was the reasoning behind waiting for the paramedics to arrive before attempting to render potentially life saving aid? Legal ramifications? Ethical entanglements? Don't want to appear disloyal or weak to the bros in blue present? Shock made him freeze when he realized the guy died & he only remembered he knew cpr when the emt's got there? There must be a reason, I just curious what it was.
An unarmed man was killed for a crime he did not commit.maj. tom wrote:If some people want to ignore the systemic racism in police authority throughout US history, ok let's ignore it for just a little. Let's ignore institutionalized racism given to authority by States through Jim Crow type laws and passed on culturally through communities since 1865 just for a moment. Let's also pretend for a moment that Sundown Towns, places like Harrison, Arkansas just don't exist for a moment.
The police were responding to a fake $20 bill call. Not an armed robbery. And the response was to murder a man. A man who was not resisting, despite claims that he was high on whatever drugs. Floyd was saying he can't breathe and doesn't want to go in the car. He was gasping for breath already. He wanted to lay on the ground. He was recovering from Covid-19. The autopsy showed this.
The response at that point should have been to call the EMTs to assess Floyd before moving him. Chauvin arrived and murdered him. The actual response was his murder. He was not resisting. This was the police response to a fake $20 bill.
Unchecked police brutality in US society is one of the key points of the BLM movement.
maj. tom wrote:If some people want to ignore the systemic racism in police authority throughout US history, ok let's ignore it for just a little. Let's ignore institutionalized racism given to authority by States through Jim Crow type laws and passed on culturally through communities since 1865 just for a moment. Let's also pretend for a moment that Sundown Towns, places like Harrison, Arkansas just don't exist for a moment.
The police were responding to a fake $20 bill call. Not an armed robbery. And the response was to murder a man. A man who was not resisting, despite claims that he was high on whatever drugs. Floyd was saying he can't breathe and doesn't want to go in the car. He was gasping for breath already. He wanted to lay on the ground. There was blood in his mouth. He was recovering from Covid-19. The autopsy showed this.
The response at that point should have been to call the EMTs to assess Floyd before moving him. Chauvin arrived and murdered him. The actual response was his murder. He was not resisting. This was the police response to a fake $20 bill.
Unchecked police brutality in US society is one of the key points of the BLM movement.
MaxPower wrote:Not every criminal that crying oh they cant breath really cannot breath.
Floyd was a known criminal, pest and an addict and the officers did not render aid because he could be lying.
Relaxing restraint on someone is not a good idea and they can get an opportunity to strike.
MaxPower wrote:^ Reek,
Your comments are noted.
However, i have noticed in your “brief open letter” which turned into a rant was separated from the last portion of the letter that contained the profanity.
For you to actually make this division between civilized conversing and profanity clearly shows that you are having better control over your emotions. We did this in what a few sessions? I didnt think you would adjust so quickly but i must say, i admire this quality.
Now you probably feeling this is all a joke eh Reek, but i am carefully analyzing every single thing you say and how you say it.
Chat again soon.
killercow wrote:De Dragon wrote:So, "criminals" deserve to have their necks knelt on until they die?
Same thing I wondering. Why then do countries have legal systems if the police
resorting to judge and jury now?
88sins wrote:MaxPower wrote:^ Reek,
Your comments are noted.
However, i have noticed in your “brief open letter” which turned into a rant was separated from the last portion of the letter that contained the profanity.
For you to actually make this division between civilized conversing and profanity clearly shows that you are having better control over your emotions. We did this in what a few sessions? I didnt think you would adjust so quickly but i must say, i admire this quality.
Now you probably feeling this is all a joke eh Reek, but i am carefully analyzing every single thing you say and how you say it.
Chat again soon.
I and many others are fully well aware that you're a big fan of anal-izing quite some time now.
But we all also know, that with your limited intellectual ability you're neither qualified nor capable of analyzing anything more complicated than a
fresh stool sample.
Sorry to be the one that bursts that little bubble of yours.
Not
Blaze d Chalice wrote:Yeah ^ was posted 2 pages back. @Vex Dog
Man lived like a pest and died like a pest.
Yes he should have died, but it should have been over one of the more serious incident (out of the numerous cases he had) like the assault of the pregnant lady.killercow wrote:De Dragon wrote:So, "criminals" deserve to have their necks knelt on until they die?
Same thing I wondering. Why then do countries have legal systems if the police
resorting to judge and jury now?
Police didn't resort to judge and jury.
Those crimes were in the past. He was already proven multiple times to be a pest, by the same legal systems.
MaxPower wrote:
Don’t forget, the PM me option is also available if you would like to discuss anything, on topic ofcourse.
88sins wrote:MaxPower wrote:
Don’t forget, the PM me option is also available if you would like to discuss anything, on topic ofcourse.
yuh eh fedup beg me to pm you? yuh starting to sound lil desperate now. yuh lacking friends or sumn? do I appear to be interested in sending you private messages? why do you have this need for private communications with me? I find our convos going good right here in the open. you make an ass of yourself thinking yuh bright, I highlight how you made an ass of yourself, you piss & moan, & then I laugh, then you make an ass of yourself again. it going good, why fix what ain't broke?
told you before, & I'll repeat it openly again. that eh gonna happen.
But since yuh desperate for me to pm you, I'll make you a limited one time offer
Deposit TTD $1000.00 to the account of a charity of my choosing within the next 6 hours, & I go send you a pm. Tt's 10.06 now on my clock, you have till 4.06 pm today.
yea or nay? a man with mini-marts and bars & a rumshop that desperate for a pm for me would have no problem dropping a grand (that's small change) for a good cause.
De Dragon wrote:88sins wrote:MaxPower wrote:
Don’t forget, the PM me option is also available if you would like to discuss anything, on topic ofcourse.
yuh eh fedup beg me to pm you? yuh starting to sound lil desperate now. yuh lacking friends or sumn? do I appear to be interested in sending you private messages? why do you have this need for private communications with me? I find our convos going good right here in the open. you make an ass of yourself thinking yuh bright, I highlight how you made an ass of yourself, you piss & moan, & then I laugh, then you make an ass of yourself again. it going good, why fix what ain't broke?
told you before, & I'll repeat it openly again. that eh gonna happen.
But since yuh desperate for me to pm you, I'll make you a limited one time offer
Deposit TTD $1000.00 to the account of a charity of my choosing within the next 6 hours, & I go send you a pm. Tt's 10.06 now on my clock, you have till 4.06 pm today.
yea or nay? a man with mini-marts and bars & a rumshop that desperate for a pm for me would have no problem dropping a grand (that's small change) for a good cause.
It's a trap sins, he looking for a backup tolee in case he new fobs stretcher Erectile eh work out.
88sins wrote:MaxPower wrote:
Don’t forget, the PM me option is also available if you would like to discuss anything, on topic ofcourse.
yuh eh fedup beg me to pm you? yuh starting to sound lil desperate now. yuh lacking friends or sumn? do I appear to be interested in sending you private messages? why do you have this need for private communications with me? I find our convos going good right here in the open. you make an ass of yourself thinking yuh bright, I highlight how you made an ass of yourself, you piss & moan, & then I laugh, then you make an ass of yourself again. it going good, why fix what ain't broke?
told you before, & I'll repeat it openly again. that eh gonna happen.
But since yuh desperate for me to pm you, I'll make you a limited one time offer
Deposit TTD $1000.00 to the account of a charity of my choosing within the next 6 hours, & I go send you a pm. Tt's 10.06 now on my clock, you have till 4.06 pm today.
yea or nay? a man with mini-marts and bars & a rumshop that desperate for a pm for me would have no problem dropping a grand (that's small change) for a good cause.
88sins wrote:piss of, you friendless broke gay wetback.
and for the last time
STOP BEGGING ME TO PM YOU.
Redman wrote:This stopped being about Floyd/Chauvin the day after it happened.
88sins wrote:Redman wrote:This stopped being about Floyd/Chauvin the day after it happened.
George wasn't the first to die in police custody, & he won't be the last either.
Truth be told, it was never really about George or Chauvin. They were just the match that was used to light the torch, the torch that would be used to shine a very bright light on something America prefers be kept in total darkness & not be mentioned.
Redman wrote:This stopped being about Floyd/Chauvin the day after it happened.
Redman wrote:88sins wrote:Redman wrote:This stopped being about Floyd/Chauvin the day after it happened.
George wasn't the first to die in police custody, & he won't be the last either.
Truth be told, it was never really about George or Chauvin. They were just the match that was used to light the torch, the torch that would be used to shine a very bright light on something America prefers be kept in total darkness & not be mentioned.
The plot thickens.
https://spectator.org/george-floyd-deat ... gy-report/
.So, who killed George Floyd? He did.
The only crime here has been the prosecution’s shockingly incompetent investigation of Floyd’s death. In charging and continuing to prosecute these defendants, Minnesota’s attorney general has failed to take into account the most important and material evidence in the case, i.e., the fact that Floyd’s inability to breathe started while he was still upright and mobile and the scientific proof that his death was the direct and inescapable result of a massively fatal overdose of a powerful and dangerous drug known to cause, in the words of the toxicology report, “severe respiratory depression, seizures, hypotension, coma and death.”
The proof of the defendants’ innocence is undeniable. But given the violence and rioting that has followed in the wake of Floyd’s death, will it be possible for these defendants to receive justice? In other words, will there be a judge or jury with enough integrity and courage to defy the mob and, in recognition of the clear and overwhelming exculpatory evidence, set these wrongfully accused men free
88sins wrote:Redman, that article is nothing other than a BS attempt at blame shifting to try & save their arse.
Drugs or no drugs in his system, whether he had breathing problems while uptight or not, fact remains that when you hear someone say "I can't breathe" while lying prone on the ground with their hands cuffed behind them, keeping a knee on their neck is NOT going to help them breathe better. They could have had him sit up on the ground or rolled him on his side, but they didn't. They chose to do what they did, & the result is a man died & they are now implicated. If they had sat him up on the ground & got off his neck, I believe none of them would be in the position they are in now.
The prosecutors are NOT gong to want to proceed, but in the interest of truth & justice they have to. Its a case where they damned if you do and damned if they don't. & the defense attorneys involved will go to any lengths to get people to see their clients as innocent, that's their job, and winning such a case will open a lot of doors for them. In the American justice system an accused is considered innocent until proven guilty. their attorneys claims of innocence is all they could do, considering that based on video footage of the event it wouldn't be difficult for them to be proven guilty.
88sins wrote:Redman, that article is nothing other than a BS attempt at blame shifting to try & save their arse.
Drugs or no drugs in his system, whether he had breathing problems while uptight or not, fact remains that when you hear someone say "I can't breathe" while lying prone on the ground with their hands cuffed behind them, keeping a knee on their neck is NOT going to help them breathe better. They could have had him sit up on the ground or rolled him on his side, but they didn't. They chose to do what they did, & the result is a man died & they are now implicated. If they had sat him up on the ground & got off his neck, I believe none of them would be in the position they are in now.
The prosecutors are NOT gong to want to proceed, but in the interest of truth & justice they have to. Its a case where they damned if you do and damned if they don't. & the defense attorneys involved will go to any lengths to get people to see their clients as innocent, that's their job, and winning such a case will open a lot of doors for them. In the American justice system an accused is considered innocent until proven guilty. their attorneys claims of innocence is all they could do, considering that based on video footage of the event it wouldn't be difficult for them to be proven guilty.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 133 guests