Flow
Flow
Flow
TriniTuner.com  |  Latest Event:  

Forums

State vs Contractors - Bid rigging at EMBD, EFCL & HDC

this is how we do it.......

Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods

User avatar
zoom rader
TunerGod
Posts: 30521
Joined: April 22nd, 2003, 12:39 pm
Location: Grand Cayman

Re: State vs Contractors - Bid rigging at EMBD, EFCL & HDC

Postby zoom rader » April 28th, 2022, 1:45 pm

Dizzy28 wrote:^ Bai I glad I got out of contracting. During UWI and for the first few years out of it I worked for several contractors (including man like Hafeez Karamath). I also worked in a state agency involved in large construction projects.

I'm certain I saw lots of white collar crime take place which at the time I never bothered.
Steve

User avatar
De Dragon
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 17912
Joined: January 27th, 2004, 3:49 am
Location: Enjoying my little miracles............

Re: State vs Contractors - Bid rigging at EMBD, EFCL & HDC

Postby De Dragon » April 28th, 2022, 8:25 pm

Yet JUHN Scarfy and his dotish crew re-hired Namalco, and all the other contractors.

User avatar
sMASH
TunerGod
Posts: 25636
Joined: January 11th, 2005, 4:30 am

Re: State vs Contractors - Bid rigging at EMBD, EFCL & HDC

Postby sMASH » April 29th, 2022, 9:00 am

Ent Elias get the contract for MoH building, and they was getting sued in some previous matter?

pugboy
TunerGod
Posts: 29394
Joined: September 6th, 2003, 6:18 pm

Re: State vs Contractors - Bid rigging at EMBD, EFCL & HDC

Postby pugboy » April 29th, 2022, 9:20 am

normal ting with govt and contractors
money talks and everybody sleeps well at night

User avatar
The_Honourable
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 10519
Joined: June 14th, 2009, 3:45 pm
Location: Together We Conspire, Together We Deceive

Re: State vs Contractors - Bid rigging at EMBD, EFCL & HDC

Postby The_Honourable » May 27th, 2023, 9:01 pm

Appeal Court to rule on EMBD $m case on June 30

THE future of the Estate Management Business Development (EMBD)’s multi-million-dollar cartel claim trial against five contractors for alleged bid-rigging, bribery and collusion just before the 2015 general election will be known on June 30.

On May 26, Justices of Appeal Nolan Bereaux, Mark Mohammed and Maria Wilson reserved their decision on an appeal by four of the contractors against a judge’s preliminary ruling in August 2020, which gave the EMBD the green light to pursue its claim.

In August 2020, Justice James Aboud dismissed preliminary applications of the five contractors – TN Ramnauth, Namalco, Kallco, Motilal Ramhit and Co and Fides Ltd – which sought to have the EMBD detail the allegations against them so that they could fairly mount their defence, or strike out the claims.

Justice Aboud also had before him EMBD’s lawsuit against Oropouche East MP Dr Roodal Moonilal, as well as a consolidated case in which three companies sued EMBD over unpaid contracts for upgrading and rehabilitating access roads on Caroni lands and two contracts for rehabilitation works, totalling over $300 million.

The EMBD claims the work done was defective and overpriced. In a counter-suit, the state entity is seeking to recoup money paid to the contractors.

The EMBD’s claim against Moonilal also includes former EMBD chief executive Gary Parmassar; former divisional manager at EMBD Madhoo Balroop; Andrew Walker; and companies Fides Ltd, Namalco Construction and LCB Contractors.

However, in its appeal, lead attorney for the contractors who appealed Aboud’s ruling, Ramesh Lawrence Maharaj, SC, argued that the judge was wrong to dismiss his clients’ application to strike out the EMBD’s claim on the two contracts since the pleaded case lacked particulars of the allegations.

The contractors had also asked for more details to enable them to properly defend themselves.

In his ruling, Aboud found the allegations against the contractors were “sufficiently pleaded,” and also held that there was compelling evidence of collusion in what the EMBD advanced in its 1,556-plus-page statement of case. He said the contractors “ought to fully understand” the allegations to allow them to plead their defences.

In June 2021, the procedural appeal was heard by two Appeal Court judges, however, they were unable to arrive at a unanimous decision so the matter was referred to the full three-member panel of judges.

Maharaj argued that Aboud erred in law by not striking out the claim of alleged unlawful means conspiracy and by not finding that the EMBD’s case did not provide adequate information about the allegations and evidence to support them. He also said the EMBD should not be allowed to rely on hearsay evidence.

Maharaj said a claim that did not disclose a cause of action should be struck out as an abuse of process. Maharaj further contended that Aboud did find there was a deficiency in the pleaded case but disregarded it, instead giving the EMBD an opportunity to cure any deficiency at the case-management stage.

However, he said since the allegations related to actions in 2014/2015, nine years have elapsed which is outside the four-year limitation period for bringing any action.

“The appellants are forced to defend a claim that is not actionable and one which is outside the statutory limits.”

In his response to the appeal, EMBD’s King’s Counsel David Phillips admitted the EMBD’s case was not “straightforward."

He said Aboud correctly exercised his discretion and it was not for the Court of Appeal to reconsider the issue on its own. He also said further information could be provided during disclosure when witness statements are filed in preparation for trial.

"If we were three weeks away from the trial, I would have understood his concerns," he said.

"We are not at the conclusion of pleadings. We are at the start," he added.

Phillips admitted that his client was allowed a degree of latitude by the judge as the claim involved a complex case with allegations of fraud.

“When you are dealing with a case of fraud you are given more latitude," he said, admitting that the statement of case was mainly primary facts since the nature of the alleged acts was concealed and the judge could draw inferences when comparing what allegedly transpired to normal commercial practises.

As he delved into some of the evidence in the EMBD’s claim, Phillips claimed the contractors claimed $400 million for work that should have cost half the amount.

Also during the hearing, Phillips informed the judges that those parties which did not appeal Aboud’s ruling – everyone other than Ramhit, Fides and Kallco – had agreed to file their defences 45 days after the court rules based on its findings.

Aboud has since been made an Appeal Court judge and the case has been reassigned to Justice Frank Seepersad who has to await the outcome of the appeal to determine if the claim proceeds.

https://newsday.co.tt/2023/05/27/appeal ... n-june-30/

User avatar
The_Honourable
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 10519
Joined: June 14th, 2009, 3:45 pm
Location: Together We Conspire, Together We Deceive

Re: State vs Contractors - Bid rigging at EMBD, EFCL & HDC

Postby The_Honourable » October 23rd, 2024, 10:54 am

EMBD wins appeal in multi-million cartel case

A multi-million dollar cartel case brought by the Estate Management and Business Development Company Ltd (EMBD) against a group of contractors, former officials and former housing minister Dr Roodal Moonilal is one step closer to going on trial.

Delivering a judgement yesterday morning, Appellate judges Charmaine Pemberton, Peter Rajkumar, and Vasheist Kokaram dismissed an appeal from the contractors over the refusal of former High Court judge and current Appellate Judge James Aboud to strike out the case against them at a preliminary stage.

If the contractors do not mount a successful final appeal to the United Kingdom-based Privy Council, the Appeal Court’s ruling means that the case can now go on trial before Justice Frank Seepersad.

Justice Rajkumar, who delivered the panel’s decision, ruled that EMBD had properly pleaded that it suffered actual pecuniary loss as a result of the alleged unlawful means conspiracy between the contractors and state officials.

He noted that although EMBD did not quantify the losses it incurred when it filed the case, it could do so when it goes to trial.

“If or when the report referred to in the respondent’s pleading becomes available the respondent may choose to fine-tune its case by amendment,” he said.

“This is not the same thing as amending it to complete the cause of action which is now already complete,” he added.

Justice Rajkumar also rejected claims that EMBD’s pleadings did not properly give particulars linking the contractors to the purported conspiracy so they could mount their defences.

“Identification of persons named as the directing mind and will of each of the companies is not required in the circumstances in order for the appellants to plead to the allegation of conspiracy, given that the allegedly rigged bids could not have submitted themselves, and the inference of authorisation of the above acts is consistent with an inference of knowledge, approval and intention identified with the corporate appellants themselves rather than any individual rogue employees,” he said.

Justice Rajkumar also stated that the pleaded case did not need to show the subjective knowledge of the parties.

“That is because the pleaded actions of the appellants, regardless of the names of any individuals therein, are arguably only consistent with their being the product of conscious, deliberate, and intentional action by a controlling mind or will within each appellant company, designed to dishonestly extract payments from EMBD to which they were not entitled,” he said.

The substantive lawsuit centres around 12 contracts for the rehabilitation of roads and infrastructure granted to five contractors before the September 2015 general election.

Contractors TN Ramnauth, Mootilal Ramhit and Sons Contracting Ltd (Ramhit), and Kall Company Ltd (Kallco) initiated the proceedings against the state-owned special purpose company for the almost $200 million balance owed on their respective contracts.

The EMBD countersued the contractors claiming that they, as well as contractors Fides and Namalco, conspired together with Moonilal, former EMBD CEO Gary Parmassar, former divisional manager Madhoo Balroop, and engineer Andrew Walker to corruptly obtain the contracts.

It also claimed that the parties agreed to facilitate the contractors receiving preliminary payments for the work which was allegedly overpriced and substandard and utilised a loan, meant to pay for other legitimate contracts, to make interim payments to the contractors.

Through the lawsuit, the EMBD is seeking a series of declarations against the parties including one on the illegality of the contracts.

The contractors’ application to strike out the case was rejected by Justice Aboud in August 2020.

Aboud ruled that EMBD had presented sufficient preliminary facts to be determined by the court at an eventual trial.

“Someone has to explain at the appropriate time in a way that is sensible how it is that these unusual patterns, oddities, and inconsistencies can exist other than by collusion by contractors,” Aboud said.

The appeal over Justice Aboud’s decision was considered by the Appeal Court twice before yesterday’s ruling.

In 2021, Appellate judges Mira Dean-Armorer and Ronnie Boodoosingh failed to arrive at an agreed decision after considering their evidence and submissions.

In June, last year, Appellate Judge Maria Wilson recused herself from the case a day before she and her colleagues justices Nolan Bereaux and Mark Mohammed were expected to rule on the appeal.

Her decision, which led to the case being considered by a third appellate panel, was based on her brother attorney Fulton Wilson serving on the EMBD board between 2015 and 2021.

In a press release issued yesterday, Attorney General Reginald Armour, SC, praised the judgement as he highlighted portions.

“I commend the long, hard battle that has been fought by the management of the EMBD under the chairmanship of Mr Ronnie Mohammed and the work of the company’s legal Team,” he said.

“These efforts reflect on the Government’s continuing commitment to insist that wrongdoers are brought before our courts to account and that corruption will not pay,” he added.

The contractors were represented by Ramesh Lawrence Maharaj, SC, Jagdeo Singh, Kiel Taklalsingh, Jamie Amanda, and Karina Singh.

EMBD was represented by David Phillips, KC, Jason Mootoo, SC, Savitri Sookraj-Beharry and Tamara Toolsie.

https://www.guardian.co.tt/news/embd-wi ... 0128a5ef52

User avatar
The_Honourable
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 10519
Joined: June 14th, 2009, 3:45 pm
Location: Together We Conspire, Together We Deceive

Re: State vs Contractors - Bid rigging at EMBD, EFCL & HDC

Postby The_Honourable » October 23rd, 2024, 10:55 am

Appeal dismissed: EMBD’s $275m ‘cartel claim’ heads to trial

THE multi-million-dollar “cartel claim” brought by the Estate Management and Business Development Company Limited (EMBD) against several contracting companies and individuals, including Opposition MP Dr Roodal Moonilal, will proceed to trial before High Court Justice Frank Seepersad.

The case was stalled after attorneys representing the contractors took a Court of Appeal decision to the Privy Council.

The appeal revolved around a previous decision by then-High Court Justice James Aboud (now an Appeal Court justice) not to strike out the claim.

When the matter came up in February, Justice Seepersad was informed that the losing parties at the appeal had since filed an application for conditional leave to take their fight to the Privy Council in London.

The Privy Council refused to strike out the EMBD’s case.

Instead, the final appellate court denied TN Ramnauth and Company Ltd, its principal Taradauth Ramnauth, Kall Co Ltd, Mootilal Ramhit and Sons Contracting Ltd, and Fides Ltd permission to appeal against a decision of the Court of Appeal.

Attorney General Reginald Armour, in a media release yesterday, noted that the Privy Council, in its October 8 order, stated that the appellants’ application for permission did not raise an arguable point of law or a point of general public importance.

“EMBD’s case is based on allegations of unlawful means conspiracy, bribery, knowing receipt, dishonest assistance, and breach of fiduciary duty in relation to 12 civil works contracts, which were awarded about three months prior to the 2015 general election,” stated the release.

The AG noted that in 2017, EMBD filed its claim against Fides Ltd, Namalco Construction Services Ltd, Gary Parmassar, Madho Balroop, Andrew Walker, and former government minister and current Member of Parliament for Oropouche East Dr Roodal Moonilal. He said counterclaims were also filed in response to three High Court claims commenced by TN Ramnauth and Company Ltd, Kall Co Ltd, and Mootilal Ramhit and Sons Contracting Ltd against EMBD for money allegedly owed to them under seven of the 12 contracts.

“As a result of the decision of the Privy Council, EMBD’s case, by which it seeks, among other things, to recover the approximate aggregate sum of $275 million, together with interest and declarations that the 12 contracts are void and/or unenforceable for illegality, must now proceed to trial before Justice Seepersad,” stated the AG.

He noted that the appellants and Dr Moonilal, “who have avoided filing their respective defences for approximately seven years,” are now required, by court order, to file them on or before November 6, 2024. The decision of the Privy Council is consistent with those of the lower courts, stated the AG.

Previous attempts by the appellants to prevent the case from proceeding to trial were dismissed firstly by Justice James Aboud (as he then was) on August 6, 2020, and again by the Court of Appeal on January 30, 2024, Armour stated.

The Express contacted Moonilal for comment yesterday. He responded: “I have noted the ruling on the application and as before, remain anxious to defend myself in this matter at the appropriate time.

“This was not my application so the order doesn’t affect my defence. It was an application by the contractor for further and better particulars of the allegations made against their company. The ruling clears the way for the matter to progress and in due course justice will be allowed to take its course.”

https://trinidadexpress.com/newsextra/a ... 3a094.html

User avatar
zoom rader
TunerGod
Posts: 30521
Joined: April 22nd, 2003, 12:39 pm
Location: Grand Cayman

Re: State vs Contractors - Bid rigging at EMBD, EFCL & HDC

Postby zoom rader » October 23rd, 2024, 2:41 pm

Bai PNM tuners not so bright to understand what was posted, best to break it down in ghetto language

User avatar
wing
punchin NOS
Posts: 2777
Joined: December 17th, 2008, 6:57 pm

Re: State vs Contractors - Bid rigging at EMBD, EFCL & HDC

Postby wing » October 23rd, 2024, 2:42 pm

zoom rader wrote:Bai PNM tuners not so bright to understand what was posted, best to break it down in ghetto language
Jail for Moonilal.

User avatar
zoom rader
TunerGod
Posts: 30521
Joined: April 22nd, 2003, 12:39 pm
Location: Grand Cayman

Re: State vs Contractors - Bid rigging at EMBD, EFCL & HDC

Postby zoom rader » October 29th, 2024, 2:39 pm

Take licks all PNM Mudda Cont





EMBDC HAS CRASHED!!
ACCOUNT FOR MILLIONS IN LEGAL FEES NOW !!!
ROWLEY AND YOUNG MUST PAY FROM THEIR POCKETS !
EMBDC loses historic case against local contractor

STATEMENT BY DR. ROODAL MOONILAL, Former Minister of Housing and Urban Development,
MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT FOR OROPOUCHE EAST
October 29, 2024.



It was only seven days ago that the Miami Vice Attorney General Reginald Armour issued a press release and appeared on the disgraced TTT to beat his chest and pronounce with sound and fury a “victory” by the Estate Management Business Development Company (EMBDC) on a striking out claim. Today I ask; will the Attorney General storm the TTT studios to explain this multi million dollar defeat to a rogue state company that has abandoned its stated objectives and is now a weak political puppet of the PNM ?

TODAY THE EMBDC WAS CHASED OUT OF LONDON

The Privy Council ruled today, in its Michaelmas term, in favor of local contractor Junior Sammy Contractors Limited in a matter where the latter sued the company for outstanding monies on a contract awarded and executed fully during my term as Minister of Housing by the EMBDC in 2015.

The PNM EMBDC based their case on “reason to believe” and the contractor “may” not have carried out the work. The taxpayer paid millions of dollars for this rum shop argument devoid of evidence. When we were in office we ensured that decisions were properly and legally taken, institutions were robust and oversight was compulsory. Decisions were taken on the basis of independent assessments and recommendations.

It must be noted that the contractor obtained summary judgment in the High Court since 2020. This means that the defence of the EMBDC was so weak that the Court ruled that it “did not have a realistic prospect of success”. Today, five law lords of the Privy Counsel ruled, with NO dissenting judgment, that the EMBDC claim of fraud was “fanciful and speculative”. We have said that this was politically motivated and the most expensive witch hunt in history. And they did not catch a witch.

This raises the burning question of the quantum of legal fees paid by this government to friends and family. The millions in legal fees could have provided food cards for the hungry, medicines to the poor at run down hospitals, jobs for our desperate youth and help for small businesses.

Equally alarming is that all legal and professional fees are paid in foreign currency. We have a forex crisis today, in part, because all the forex have been used to pay lawyers in Miami and London!! A business man cannot get $200 US but millions of US dollars and British pounds spent on King Counsel in London.

This feeding frenzy must stop. This is tantamount to misbehavior in public office when the Prime Minister, Minister Young, Chairman Ronnie Mohammed and others use up millions of foreign currency to pay friends and family of PNM officials legal and professional fees for hopeless cases. A future government can well consider suing Rowley, Young and Mohammed for those monies and taking it out of their gratuity and pensions. Even if this means bringing legislation to hold them to account for this massive raid on the treasury for political witch hunts.

So today the taxpayer has to pay the contractor for all works properly done to the tune of $ 231 m plus interest on outstanding payments carrying over for seven years at 5% per year. Another $50 m. While they doing this, the Caroni Savannah Eatate is overrun with bush and a dumping ground for gabage. The former Caroni workers cannot receive a square foot of land in nine years because of the vindictiveness of the PNM.

This case against a local contractor dealt with the awarding and execution of a contract under the People’s Partnership administration. The PNM and the EMBDC UNDER chairman Ronnie Mohammed claimed civil fraud, non performance, inferior work and over certification of works. These are exactly the claims made against other contractors in a similar civil action in which the PNM included me as a defendant. The same Board, the same Chairman Ronnie Mohammed, the same lawyers are behind the fake “cartel” case involving several contractors.

Interestingly, the very same contractors that are accused by the PNM of civil fraud are the same ones who receive billions of dollars in state contracts by the Rowley regime.

Today with the ruling of the Privy Council, it means that not one but Ten judges from the High Court, the Court of Appeal to the Privy Council have ruled that the EMBDC HAD NO CASE!! They could not prove any wrong doing on the part of the then Government, EMBDC Board and management and the local contractor. I remind citizens that this very EMBDC UNDER the PNM regime for seven years has failed to provide audited financial records to the Auditor General.

I ask how much money did the EMBDC, the Ministry of Finance and the taxpayers spend to feed King’s Counsel, Senior Counsels, a legion of lawyers including the brother of the President, professional firms and consultancy groups? Today the EMBDC will pay not only their own lawyers but they pay millions in cost to the contractor for his lawyers. And of course they must pay almost $200 million in total on the outstanding works.

The 100 mile an hour talking Senator must explain this in those august Chambers, rather than covering it up

User avatar
sMASH
TunerGod
Posts: 25636
Joined: January 11th, 2005, 4:30 am

Re: State vs Contractors - Bid rigging at EMBD, EFCL & HDC

Postby sMASH » October 29th, 2024, 3:09 pm

I seemed to have missed when armour went to ttt..

User avatar
zoom rader
TunerGod
Posts: 30521
Joined: April 22nd, 2003, 12:39 pm
Location: Grand Cayman

Re: State vs Contractors - Bid rigging at EMBD, EFCL & HDC

Postby zoom rader » October 29th, 2024, 7:33 pm

^^^ Armour is fully dunce

pugboy
TunerGod
Posts: 29394
Joined: September 6th, 2003, 6:18 pm

Re: State vs Contractors - Bid rigging at EMBD, EFCL & HDC

Postby pugboy » October 30th, 2024, 6:10 am

and we thought ferris was duncey

User avatar
zoom rader
TunerGod
Posts: 30521
Joined: April 22nd, 2003, 12:39 pm
Location: Grand Cayman

Re: State vs Contractors - Bid rigging at EMBD, EFCL & HDC

Postby zoom rader » October 30th, 2024, 7:04 am

Fully Dunce PNM
Screenshot_20241030_060246_Instagram.jpg

User avatar
The_Honourable
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 10519
Joined: June 14th, 2009, 3:45 pm
Location: Together We Conspire, Together We Deceive

Re: State vs Contractors - Bid rigging at EMBD, EFCL & HDC

Postby The_Honourable » October 30th, 2024, 8:53 am

Privy Council rules EMBD must pay Junior Sammy $83M

The Estate Management and Business Development Company Limited (EMBD) will have to pay over $83 million in outstanding fees to Junior Sammy Contractors Limited.

Delivering a judgment yesterday morning, five Law Lords of the United Kingdom-based Privy Council dismissed EMBD’s final appeal against Junior Sammy Contractors over the debt.

Lord Ben Stephens, who wrote the judgment, ruled that former High Court Judge and current Appeal Court Judge Mira Dean-Armorer and the Court of Appeal could not be faulted for granting Junior Sammy a default judgment and ordering the compensation.

According to the evidence in the case, the legal dispute concerns a contract for the Caroni Savannah Residential Development undertaken by EMBD, which manages lands formerly held by Caroni (1975) Limited.

EMBD awarded the contract to another company in 2010 but it (the contract) was eventually terminated, as the company failed to perform or complete the work.

Junior Sammy Contractors submitted a $231 million tender for the project and was awarded the contract to complete the development.

It sued EMBD after it only paid seven of the 13 interim payment certificates (IPCs), which were approved by the independent engineering company appointed by EMBD to act as its agent.

In its defence, EMBD requested the disclosure of supporting documentation, as it alleged that there was fraud in the certification of the work.

EMBD also claimed that Junior Sammy could not pursue legal action, as it had assigned the outstanding payments, which are the subject of the lawsuit, to Ansa Merchant Bank when it borrowed $40 million to offset the delay in payments.

In resolving the appeal, Lord Stephens and his colleagues agreed with the local courts that the debt was not absolutely assigned to the bank, although it appeared so in the documents related to the financing arrangement.

“Thus far, there is a powerful case, on the true construction of the documents, that the Contractor and the Merchant Bank intended to pass all the rights of the Contractor in the debt to the Merchant Bank,” Lord Stephens said.

“However, a detailed analysis of the documents reveals that in reality, the transaction was a loan with an equitable assignment of the debt in order to secure repayment of the loan,” he added.

He pointed out the contractor was left with the sole discretion to commence proceedings to recoup the debt.

“The Contractor does not have to obtain the Merchant Bank’s permission to commence proceedings,” he said.

Dealing with EMBD’s request for additional information, the board ruled that its claims of fraud were fanciful and speculative.

“None of the reasons was supported by an expert witness. The board concludes that there is no substance in any of them,” Lord Stephens said.

“The application for specific disclosure is a fishing expedition which amounts to no more than a hope that something might turn up,” he added.

In a media conference to announce the outcome, Junior Sammy’s lawyer, Ramesh Lawrence Maharaj, SC, said he was pleased, as it (the case) set an important legal precedent.

“This judgment is important not only because it vindicates the reputation of my client. It is important because Government and State-owned companies use this kind of contract to, in effect, get contractors to do construction and infrastructure,” Maharaj said.

He noted that the Government and State companies could save significant legal costs if they follow the guidance provided.

“I am sure you would agree with me that those expenses could be saved to benefit the people of T&T,” Maharaj said.

Maharaj revealed that his client would be funding a conference next year, in which he and a team of British lawyers who worked on the case will lecture on standard form contracts and the unique type of contract that was the subject of the case.

The conference is expected to be held in December or January with contractors, and government and State company officials will be invited to attend.

“The purpose of that conference would be for contractors and employers to know their rights under the contracts they operate under, for contractors to enforce their rights and for government and State-owned companies to know their obligations,” Maharaj said.

Oropouche East MP Dr Roodal Moonilal also weighed in on the case in a media release yesterday evening.

Moonilal, who is facing a multimillion civil lawsuit brought against him, several other contractors, and former EMBD officials over alleged bid rigging in another project, criticised EMBD for challenging Junior Sammy’s case.

“The taxpayer paid millions of dollars for this rum shop argument devoid of evidence,” he said.

Earlier this month, the Privy Council refused some of the contractors in Moonilal’s case permission to appeal the dismissal of their preliminary and procedural challenge to it. It ruled that the appeal did not raise an arguable point of law or a point of general public importance.

That case will now go on trial before Justice Frank Seepersad.

In yesterday’s matter, EMBD was represented by Jonathan Acton Davis, KC, Colin Kangaloo, SC, and Jennifer Jones, KC.

David Thomas, KC, and Robert Strang appeared alongside Maharaj for Junior Sammy.

https://guardian.co.tt/news/privy-counc ... f12f673773

User avatar
zoom rader
TunerGod
Posts: 30521
Joined: April 22nd, 2003, 12:39 pm
Location: Grand Cayman

Re: State vs Contractors - Bid rigging at EMBD, EFCL & HDC

Postby zoom rader » October 31st, 2024, 9:25 am

Watch this Cont
Screenshot_20241031_082459_Instagram.jpg

Mmoney607
punchin NOS
Posts: 3375
Joined: April 1st, 2021, 9:21 am

Re: State vs Contractors - Bid rigging at EMBD, EFCL & HDC

Postby Mmoney607 » October 31st, 2024, 2:33 pm

zoom rader wrote:Watch this Cont Screenshot_20241031_082459_Instagram.jpg

Man call a press conference to say that he lose a case lol

User avatar
hover11
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 11987
Joined: July 10th, 2016, 4:15 pm

Re: State vs Contractors - Bid rigging at EMBD, EFCL & HDC

Postby hover11 » October 31st, 2024, 2:38 pm

Mmoney607 wrote:
zoom rader wrote:Watch this Cont Screenshot_20241031_082459_Instagram.jpg

Man call a press conference to say that he lose a case lol
Just when you thought you couldn't get worse than arse wari

User avatar
The_Honourable
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 10519
Joined: June 14th, 2009, 3:45 pm
Location: Together We Conspire, Together We Deceive

Re: State vs Contractors - Bid rigging at EMBD, EFCL & HDC

Postby The_Honourable » February 9th, 2025, 10:27 am

Despite $1B spent, investigations into EMBD and LifeSport shelved

Guardian Media Investigations Desk

The police investigations into the Estate Management and Business Development Company (EMBD) and LifeSport, which were being led by British investigator Kate McMahon (a Special Reserve Police), have been shelved.

Guardian Media was told that despite the work by McMahon’s team being close to completion, it has been put on pause.

McMahon’s team was contracted and funded by the Government and worked alongside the Trinidad and Tobago Police Service, through the Anti-Corruption Investigations Bureau (ACIB), on several police investigations. McMahon’s team also used Ed Jenkins, KC, for legal guidance in the build-out of the cases.

The work fell largely under the ambit of former commissioner of police Gary Griffith. Guardian Media was told that during and after Griffith’s departure, McMahon’s work was being stymied and stalled by the TTPS as requests for warrants to be executed were not completed. “There seems to be a lack of responsibility toward completing it,” the source said.

An informed source explained that the evidence gathered can still be used, provided it meets the required threshold, and the work can be completed if there is a commitment to doing so.

Thus far, it has been reported that McMahon’s team has collected $50 million in fees.

In 2015, the People’s National Movement (PNM) campaigned against the People’s Partnership government over two high-profile corruption issues: EMBD and LifeSport.

The total amount spent on these two matters has already exceeded $1 billion in taxpayers’ dollars.

The TTPS could not immediately provide an update on the matter.

EMBD

The EMBD matter involved two elements—a civil and a criminal matter. The 2020 status report on the EMBD matter alleged a top former government official “orchestrated a scheme that resulted in significant funds being secured and spent by EMBD in the six weeks before the general election on 7th September 2015, approximately $549 million.”

According to that report, the official was able to implement the fraudulent scheme with the assistance of EMBD’s companies owned by his apparently close acquaintances, who were invited to tender for a road contract.

“By the time the tender had come around, the EMBD’s estimates for the cost of the roads had been arbitrarily inflated to $416,340,445 by (name called). This meant the bidders could bid higher,” the report said.

In 2020, a Guardian Media exclusive reported an email from McMahon to the TTPS in which she raised concern about the EMBD matter. At the time, she said that her team had intensified their communication with the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions in “relation to the cases we are seeking to charge.”

She indicated that there were three cases now being actively investigated (EMBD, LifeSport, and EFCL) and “two which are currently being assessed for charge by the DPP and the third which is at an advanced stage and has warrants to be executed, which will, we believe, reveal money laundering and funding for the 2015 election via government contract fees.”

She added that “there are reasonable grounds to suspect criminal behaviour.”

McMahon also pointed out a third matter has also been considered. “We wish to execute a search soon on (name called), who is central to our investigation with the Anti-Corruption Investigations Bureau (ACIB). This is an important matter of public policy, and we urge that, on the evidence as it stands, there are reasonable grounds to suspect criminal behaviour and warrant a search,” McMahon said.

McMahon noted that with a search warrant under section 5 (1) of the Indictable Offences (Preliminary Enquiry Act 1917), “there is a general authority granted to a police officer to search specified premises in accordance with a validly issued search warrant under this section.” She said once the magistrate was satisfied that the place in question to search may have evidence “as to the commission of any such offence,” the DPP’s permission is not needed.

She said she was optimistic that “the DPP may see fit to advance the cases we have put before him.”

The UK firm partner advised that “unless the warrant was particularly tricky or difficult, the officers should be encouraged to (a) not go to the DPP for assistance with routine policing and (b) if they do have concerns or need help, they use the TTPS legal department.”

With the criminal aspect on hold pending the police investigation, the EMBD has sought to retrieve taxpayers’ dollars through civil cases called the cartel claim. Last year, the Privy Council refused permission to some of the contractors to appeal the refusal of the Court of Appeal not to throw out the multimillion-dollar claim against them or provide better particulars of the allegations.

The substantive lawsuit centres around 12 contracts for the rehabilitation of roads and infrastructure granted to five contractors before the September 2015 general election. The contractors—TN Ramnauth and Company Ltd, its CEO Taradauth Ramnauth, Kall Co and Mootilal Ramhit and Sons Contracting Ltd had initiated proceedings against the state-owned special purpose company for the almost $200 million balance owed on their respective contracts.

The EMBD countersued the contractors, claiming they conspired with Moonilal, former EMBD CEO Gary Parmassar, ex-divisional manager Madhoo Balroop, and engineer Andrew Walker to corruptly obtain the contracts.

Also sued by EMBD are Fides Ltd, Namalco Construction Services Ltd, and LCB Contractors Ltd.

LifeSport

It has been ten years since the controversial LifeSport programme ended, and no one has yet been held accountable. In a 2020 Police Status Report on the matter, the TTPS said it had obtained in excess of 25 production orders against individuals and banking organisations and interviewed many witnesses, “which has generated valuable new evidence in support of the allegations.”

“The new evidence has uncovered clear bribes paid to public officials in return for favours and large kickbacks to high-level public officials who were alleged to be at the forefront of the corruption,” the document stated.

“It is alleged that a number of persons from the Ministry of Sport, the Sports Company of Trinidad and Tobago and contractor companies associated with the delivery of the LifeSport programme were involved in various conspiracies to misappropriate funds allocated to the programme for their own use and benefit.

“A total sum of $349,500,000 was allocated to LifeSport between 2012 and 2014, funded through a combination of budgetary allocations made by the Ministry of Sport and bank loans, done in consultation with the Ministry of Finance and the Economy.

“A significant portion of those funds are alleged to have been misappropriated by many individuals at all levels of the programme. This includes a number of high-ranking public officials allegedly tunnelling millions of dollars out of the programme to purchase real estate, boats, vehicles and to fund weddings, amongst other things,” the document said.

It noted that the police investigation began in 2015 and that one suspect “has been assisting the TTPS with the investigation, providing key information about how the programme was manipulated to enable so many individuals to obtain personal benefits to the detriment of the people of Trinidad and Tobago.”

A 2014 audit done by the Ministry of Finance’s Central Audit Committee revealed that the programme has been riddled with financial irregularities; had coordinators with criminal backgrounds; massive fraud; millions misspent; ghost centres; ghost participants; improper procurement; and there were major thefts of state funds.

While millions were lost in padded invoices to contractors, the $34 million payment to educator Adolphus Daniell to teach numeracy and technology to people in the programme was the single biggest payment of the programme for no work.

In August, last year, High Court Judge Eleanor Donaldson-Honeywell upheld the Sports Company of T&T (SporTT) lawsuit with Daniel’s company eBeam Interact Limited and ordered it to repay almost $30 million.

SporTT also pursued a case against its former chief executive officer John Mollenthiel and thirteen former board members for their role in approving the contract with eBeam.

The case went on trial late last year after the outcome of the eBeam case with the former board members all denying any wrongdoing.

The judgment in that case is still pending.

When she laid the report in Parliament, then-former prime minister Persad-Bissessar said she had forwarded a copy of it to the Director of Public Prosecutions, Commissioner of Police, Integrity Commission, and head of the Public Service.

Then-sports minister Anil Roberts subsequently resigned from the Cabinet and as D’Abadie/O’Meara MP on July 31, 2014. At the time, former LifeSport programme director Cornelius Price had described the audit as “sloppy”.

But former finance minister Larry Howai, under whose remit the audit was undertaken, had responded, “I am not aware of the context in which the allegation that the audit was sloppy is being made, but all of the supporting documentation is available to support the various statements that were made in the audit. I expect that a lot of allegations will be made by various persons associated with the programme in a direct or indirect attempt to try to prove their innocence or even to drag as many persons through the mud with them as possible, but the Ministry of Finance and the Economy stands by the results of the audit and the professionalism of the senior officers of the ministry and its overall position in this matter.”

In 2016, Justice Mira Dean-Armorer ruled that the report should be sent back to the audit team. She did not support the argument that the audit team acted irrationally or in bad faith. Guardian Media did not get a response on whether the CAC had redone the audit.

https://www.guardian.co.tt/news/despite ... ffdd6a2508

Mmoney607
punchin NOS
Posts: 3375
Joined: April 1st, 2021, 9:21 am

Re: State vs Contractors - Bid rigging at EMBD, EFCL & HDC

Postby Mmoney607 » February 9th, 2025, 12:42 pm

Like Asha Javeed and Stuart Young break up or what?

alfa
punchin NOS
Posts: 3618
Joined: January 19th, 2015, 4:15 pm

Re: State vs Contractors - Bid rigging at EMBD, EFCL & HDC

Postby alfa » February 9th, 2025, 12:58 pm

Mmoney607 wrote:Like Asha Javeed and Stuart Young break up or what?

Long time.
Her cousin works with me

User avatar
paid_influencer
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 9057
Joined: November 18th, 2017, 4:15 pm

Re: State vs Contractors - Bid rigging at EMBD, EFCL & HDC

Postby paid_influencer » February 9th, 2025, 1:27 pm

imagine spending 10 years and $50 million dollars to find where kamla tief

and you can't even do that right

Mmoney607
punchin NOS
Posts: 3375
Joined: April 1st, 2021, 9:21 am

Re: State vs Contractors - Bid rigging at EMBD, EFCL & HDC

Postby Mmoney607 » February 9th, 2025, 1:44 pm

alfa wrote:
Mmoney607 wrote:Like Asha Javeed and Stuart Young break up or what?

Long time.
Her cousin works with me

I sure closer to election she will find another pnm man and start back writing articles against kamla

bluefete
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 14685
Joined: November 12th, 2008, 10:56 pm
Location: POS

Re: State vs Contractors - Bid rigging at EMBD, EFCL & HDC

Postby bluefete » February 9th, 2025, 11:38 pm

That article in today's guardian made my blood boil.

$1 billion gone and nothing to show for it.

Great is the PNM and UNC.

pugboy
TunerGod
Posts: 29394
Joined: September 6th, 2003, 6:18 pm

Re: State vs Contractors - Bid rigging at EMBD, EFCL & HDC

Postby pugboy » February 10th, 2025, 6:04 am

them lawyers would disagree with you

bluefete wrote:That article in today's guardian made my blood boil.

$1 billion gone and nothing to show for it.

Great is the PNM and UNC.

User avatar
hover11
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 11987
Joined: July 10th, 2016, 4:15 pm

Re: State vs Contractors - Bid rigging at EMBD, EFCL & HDC

Postby hover11 » February 10th, 2025, 7:04 am

Politicians and lawyers always win, taxpayers always lose....classic ending. Like Abu Bakr said everybody is involved, they are all friends, who going and make sure their friend make a jail?
pugboy wrote:them lawyers would disagree with you

bluefete wrote:That article in today's guardian made my blood boil.

$1 billion gone and nothing to show for it.

Great is the PNM and UNC.


Sent from my SM-N986U1 using TriniTuner mobile app

User avatar
zoom rader
TunerGod
Posts: 30521
Joined: April 22nd, 2003, 12:39 pm
Location: Grand Cayman

Re: State vs Contractors - Bid rigging at EMBD, EFCL & HDC

Postby zoom rader » February 10th, 2025, 7:35 am

Mmoney607 wrote:Like Asha Javeed and Stuart Young break up or what?
BBC expanded dat

pugboy
TunerGod
Posts: 29394
Joined: September 6th, 2003, 6:18 pm

Re: State vs Contractors - Bid rigging at EMBD, EFCL & HDC

Postby pugboy » February 10th, 2025, 7:42 am

lol

them media chicks on fishing pause presently
they waiting until after elections to start trolling for fresh govt benefits


zoom rader wrote:
Mmoney607 wrote:Like Asha Javeed and Stuart Young break up or what?
BBC expanded dat

Chimera
TunerGod
Posts: 20054
Joined: October 11th, 2009, 4:06 pm

Re: State vs Contractors - Bid rigging at EMBD, EFCL & HDC

Postby Chimera » February 10th, 2025, 9:31 am

hover11 wrote:Politicians and lawyers always win, taxpayers always lose....classic ending. Like Abu Bakr said everybody is involved, they are all friends, who going and make sure their friend make a jail?
pugboy wrote:them lawyers would disagree with you

bluefete wrote:That article in today's guardian made my blood boil.

$1 billion gone and nothing to show for it.

Great is the PNM and UNC.


Sent from my SM-N986U1 using TriniTuner mobile app
Why you always calling up abu Bakr name and talking about the coup? You pick up a Muslim girl and she have u feeling u is part of the jamaat?

Advertisement

Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 92 guests