Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
De Dragon wrote:shogun wrote:De Dragon wrote:But she didn't did she?
No, she instead opted for sitting quietly in parliament as a member of HER cabinet hid under parliamentary privilege to claim that Rowley's conception was as a result of rape and that he was guilty of kidnapping, pedophilia and gang rape and never once raised a finger to object... so spare me the indignant defense of Kamla's characterDe Dragon wrote:I wish some of you would grow a pair and just state your position on his comments. This facking gooblygook and hemming and hawing, you either agree or disagree. Make no mistake if KPB, or anyone makes dotish crass statements that would have trouble gaining acceptance even in a fish market/rumshop, then I will have no hesitation in condemning those remarks. Rowley, not for the first time, spoke in a manner not befitting the office of PM, and I fear it will not be the last time.
MY position has already been stated clearly. As far as I can see, most supporters of the administration expressed disappointment at Dr. Rowleys comments. How much more definitively/succinctly can it be made? Who on your side has managed to show the same equitable judgment, when the situation called for it? The "hemming and hawing" is obviously coming from inside your building, with those that chronically oppose the current administration, where convenient amnesia, hypocrisy, overreaction and closeted racism resides. Where every political thread is a platform to showcase their bias, ignorance and racist comments. Grow a pair?... lol... buddy most on your side of the isle couldn't even identify a pair.
Yadda yadda yadda. Where did you say that you had issue with the comments? Supporters expressed disappointment? Where did shogun express disappointment? At least when Kamla felt heat from the Vernella fiasco, she apologised, although somewhat belatedly. The PM is a crass, ill mannered clown, who in spite of all the image culturing will revert to his base and stink nature. The frightening thing is that a relatively minor enquiry elicited this dotish and wholly inappropriate response.
Habit7 wrote:De Dragon wrote:shogun wrote:De Dragon wrote:But she didn't did she?
No, she instead opted for sitting quietly in parliament as a member of HER cabinet hid under parliamentary privilege to claim that Rowley's conception was as a result of rape and that he was guilty of kidnapping, pedophilia and gang rape and never once raised a finger to object... so spare me the indignant defense of Kamla's characterDe Dragon wrote:I wish some of you would grow a pair and just state your position on his comments. This facking gooblygook and hemming and hawing, you either agree or disagree. Make no mistake if KPB, or anyone makes dotish crass statements that would have trouble gaining acceptance even in a fish market/rumshop, then I will have no hesitation in condemning those remarks. Rowley, not for the first time, spoke in a manner not befitting the office of PM, and I fear it will not be the last time.
MY position has already been stated clearly. As far as I can see, most supporters of the administration expressed disappointment at Dr. Rowleys comments. How much more definitively/succinctly can it be made? Who on your side has managed to show the same equitable judgment, when the situation called for it? The "hemming and hawing" is obviously coming from inside your building, with those that chronically oppose the current administration, where convenient amnesia, hypocrisy, overreaction and closeted racism resides. Where every political thread is a platform to showcase their bias, ignorance and racist comments. Grow a pair?... lol... buddy most on your side of the isle couldn't even identify a pair.
Yadda yadda yadda. Where did you say that you had issue with the comments? Supporters expressed disappointment? Where did shogun express disappointment? At least when Kamla felt heat from the Vernella fiasco, she apologised, although somewhat belatedly. The PM is a crass, ill mannered clown, who in spite of all the image culturing will revert to his base and stink nature. The frightening thing is that a relatively minor enquiry elicited this dotish and wholly inappropriate response.
When Kamla apologise for the Vernella nastiness?
Habit7 wrote:No, Kamla accepted Vernella's apology for some of her statements. Kamla never apologised, even in your link she never makes a mea culpa.
See the live interview here http://www.tv6tnt.com/sevenpm-news/-PM- ... 05141.html
eliteauto wrote:De Dragon you does read your own posts?
eliteauto wrote:I believe you
eliteauto wrote:De Dragon you does read your own posts?
Habit7 wrote:The man does post something unfactual, post a source that doesn't substantiate it, and then gets vex with you why his facts not lining up. Either that or say it's all semantics.
De Dragon wrote:Habit7 wrote:The man does post something unfactual, post a source that doesn't substantiate it, and then gets vex with you why his facts not lining up. Either that or say it's all semantics.
Oh Gorm, coffee fly out meh nose and mouth!The man who does talk the most unsubstantiated sheit to justify every PNM action/misdeed
![]()
De Dragon wrote: Where did you say that you had issue with the comments?
shogun wrote:
OohGooud!
He didn't have to go there.
Habit7 wrote:De Dragon wrote:Habit7 wrote:The man does post something unfactual, post a source that doesn't substantiate it, and then gets vex with you why his facts not lining up. Either that or say it's all semantics.
Oh Gorm, coffee fly out meh nose and mouth!The man who does talk the most unsubstantiated sheit to justify every PNM action/misdeed
![]()
You really should go have a doctor check that out. That is a strange reaction to truth. :shocking:
shogun wrote:De Dragon wrote: Where did you say that you had issue with the comments?shogun wrote:
OohGooud!
He didn't have to go there.
I dunno, but to me that sounds like disapproval of his comments?
De Dragon wrote:Yes in a mild, non-committal way.
De Dragon wrote:Oooh, hair splitter at 2 o'clock
shogun wrote:De Dragon wrote:Yes in a mild, non-committal way.De Dragon wrote:Oooh, hair splitter at 2 o'clock
The semantics czar strikes again....
Dude, I was in on page one saying he shouldn't have gone there..... seriously, what are you typing?
shogun wrote:De Dragon wrote:Yes in a mild, non-committal way.De Dragon wrote:Oooh, hair splitter at 2 o'clock
The semantics czar strikes again....
Dude, I was in on page one saying he shouldn't have gone there..... seriously, what are you typing?
De Dragon wrote:Habit7 wrote:First page spot for sale
viewtopic.php?p=9125608#p9125608
viewtopic.php?p=9126081#p9126081
My apologies, I missed your post. Very good to see that you condemn the gutter talk.
Habit7 wrote:shogun wrote:De Dragon wrote:Yes in a mild, non-committal way.De Dragon wrote:Oooh, hair splitter at 2 o'clock
The semantics czar strikes again....
Dude, I was in on page one saying he shouldn't have gone there..... seriously, what are you typing?
He made the same accusation against me and had to eat his words, you would think that the second time he would be most humble but...no surprise.De Dragon wrote:Habit7 wrote:First page spot for sale
http://www.trinituner.com/v3/forums/vie ... 8#p9125608
http://www.trinituner.com/v3/forums/vie ... 1#p9126081
My apologies, I missed your post. Very good to see that you condemn the gutter talk.
Habit7 wrote:shogun wrote:De Dragon wrote:Yes in a mild, non-committal way.De Dragon wrote:Oooh, hair splitter at 2 o'clock
The semantics czar strikes again....
Dude, I was in on page one saying he shouldn't have gone there..... seriously, what are you typing?
He made the same accusation against me and had to eat his words, you would think that the second time he would be most humble but...no surprise.De Dragon wrote:Habit7 wrote:First page spot for sale
http://www.trinituner.com/v3/forums/vie ... 8#p9125608
http://www.trinituner.com/v3/forums/vie ... 1#p9126081
My apologies, I missed your post. Very good to see that you condemn the gutter talk.
Numb3r4 wrote:On the bright side his back won't hurt anymore.
Numb3r4 wrote:I guess he is entitled to it. From what I gather from what was put out to the media the changing of the car is a routine function, and given the tax breaks that the office gets it makes it a viable financial choice. If the acquisition is within specification and above board amd does not brech existing policy that no problem from that stand point.
The issue has more to do with the office and the government stating time and time again that we are in financial crisis that we are in dire straits, or giving the impression that we are in such a state and at the same time asking for austerity when it is clearly not prepared to be austere themselves.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 394 guests