Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Source?AdamB wrote:Recorded factual historical evidence disagrees with you
Tell me AdamB, why would the Jews call Jesus their Messiah yet crucify Him?AdamB wrote:Well said?? The message of Jesus was repugnant? They crucified their Messiah, not their GOD??
The Apocrypha was written during the intertestamental period (between the Old and New Testament). It never mentioned anything about Jesus. I think you mean the gnostic gospels which came 200-300 years after the life of Christ.rocknrolla wrote:well there's no proof of anything much without being there when it all happened. ill have to re-source the book. i believe it was one of the apocryphal books which spoke of the life of jesus as a child. the large gap in the New Testament which just jumps from jesus as a baby to jesus as an adult with very little mention of his adolescent years.
Habit7 wrote:Source?AdamB wrote:Recorded factual historical evidence disagrees with youTell me AdamB, why would the Jews call Jesus their Messiah yet crucify Him?AdamB wrote:Well said?? The message of Jesus was repugnant? They crucified their Messiah, not their GOD??The Apocrypha was written during the intertestamental period (between the Old and New Testament). It never mentioned anything about Jesus. I think you mean the gnostic gospels which came 200-300 years after the life of Christ.rocknrolla wrote:well there's no proof of anything much without being there when it all happened. ill have to re-source the book. i believe it was one of the apocryphal books which spoke of the life of jesus as a child. the large gap in the New Testament which just jumps from jesus as a baby to jesus as an adult with very little mention of his adolescent years.
Both are consider not to be inspired.
rocknrolla wrote:only reason u cant is because u set that limit in urself.
but really, what u just said, u think it's a jab at me? think about it. if the chakras are the path to God through nirvana, then u just insulted and belittled the path to God.
good luck on ur journeys.
AdamB wrote:rocknrolla wrote:only reason u cant is because u set that limit in urself.
but really, what u just said, u think it's a jab at me? think about it. if the chakras are the path to God through nirvana, then u just insulted and belittled the path to God.
good luck on ur journeys.
Madmen I tell you!! So what distinguishes you from the hindus and mystic "muslim" sufis? Do you believe in the hindu concept that through your nirvana you will become one (re-unite) with GOD?
And the young child was wroth and said unto him: It sufficeth thee (or them) to seek and not to find,
New_SPECIES wrote:A certain few of you want to take literal meanings from some verses of the Quran to insinuate that it teaches terrorism.
Well let me show you many verses from the book that you hypocritically preach from…
Look at the blatant instructions to kill, murder and torture people… according to your book!
Of course, you will have some kinda different meaning for these verses, but it blatantly portrays violence, killing and death to others.
My question is then this:
If you can derive alternate meanings for these verses and you are not using them literally,
then how is it that you are conveniently using literal meanings of Quranic verses to suit your blaspheme of Islam.
Lets now take a look at many of these violent verses of your Bible…
Quoted "word for word" from your own Christian Site:
Joshua 8:24-27
New International Version (NIV)
24. “When Israel had finished killing all the men of Ai in the fields and in the wilderness where they had chased them, and when every one of them had been put to the sword, all the Israelites returned to Ai and killed those who were in it.”
25. “Twelve thousand men and women fell that day—all the people of Ai.”
26. “For Joshua did not draw back the hand that held out his javelin until he had destroyed all who lived in Ai.”
27. “But Israel did carry off for themselves the livestock and plunder of this city, as the Lord had instructed Joshua.”
Joshua 10:28-43
New International Version (NIV)
28. “That day Joshua took Makkedah. He put the city and its king to the sword and totally destroyed everyone in it. He left no survivors. And he did to the king of Makkedah as he had done to the king of Jericho.”
29. “Then Joshua and all Israel with him moved on from Makkedah to Libnah and attacked it.”
30. “The Lord also gave that city and its king into Israel’s hand. The city and everyone in it Joshua put to the sword. He left no survivors there. And he did to its king as he had done to the king of Jericho.”
31. “Then Joshua and all Israel with him moved on from Libnah to Lachish; he took up positions against it and attacked it.”
32. “The Lord gave Lachish into Israel’s hands, and Joshua took it on the second day. The city and everyone in it he put to the sword, just as he had done to Libnah.”
33. “Meanwhile, Horam king of Gezer had come up to help Lachish, but Joshua defeated him and his army—until no survivors were left.”
34. “Then Joshua and all Israel with him moved on from Lachish to Eglon; they took up positions against it and attacked it.”
35. “They captured it that same day and put it to the sword and totally destroyed everyone in it, just as they had done to Lachish.”
36. “Then Joshua and all Israel with him went up from Eglon to Hebron and attacked it.”
37. “They took the city and put it to the sword, together with its king, its villages and everyone in it. They left no survivors. Just as at Eglon, they totally destroyed it and everyone in it.”
38. “Then Joshua and all Israel with him turned around and attacked Debir.”
39. “They took the city, its king and its villages, and put them to the sword. Everyone in it they totally destroyed. They left no survivors. They did to Debir and its king as they had done to Libnah and its king and to Hebron.”
40. “So Joshua subdued the whole region, including the hill country, the Negev, the western foothills and the mountain slopes, together with all their kings. He left no survivors. He totally destroyed all who breathed, just as the Lord, the God of Israel, had commanded.”
41. “Joshua subdued them from Kadesh Barnea to Gaza and from the whole region of Goshen to Gibeon.”
42. “All these kings and their lands Joshua conquered in one campaign, because the Lord, the God of Israel, fought for Israel.”
43. “Then Joshua returned with all Israel to the camp at Gilgal.”
Numbers 31:14-18
New International Version (NIV)
14. “Moses was angry with the officers of the army—the commanders of thousands and commanders of hundreds—who returned from the battle.”
15. “Have you allowed all the women to live?” he asked them.”
16. “They were the ones who followed Balaam’s advice and enticed the Israelites to be unfaithful to the Lord in the Peor incident, so that a plague struck the Lord’s people.”
17. “Now kill all the boys. And kill every woman who has slept with a man, 18 but save for yourselves every girl who has never slept with a man.”
Deuteronomy 7:1-2
New International Version (NIV)
1. “When the Lord your God brings you into the land you are entering to possess and drives out before you many nations—the Hittites, Girgashites, Amorites, Canaanites, Perizzites, Hivites and Jebusites, seven nations larger and stronger than you—“
2. “and when the Lord your God has delivered them over to you and you have defeated them, then you must destroy them totally. Make no treaty with them, and show them no mercy.”
Deuteronomy 20:10-17
King James Version (KJV)
10. “When you approach a city to fight against it, you shall offer it terms of peace.”
11. “If it agrees to make peace with you and opens to you, then all the people who are found in it shall become your forced labor and shall serve you.”
12. “However, if it does not make peace with you, but makes war against you, then you shall besiege it.”
13. “When the LORD your God gives it into your hand, you shall strike all the men in it with the edge of the sword.”
14. “Only the women and the children and the animals and all that is in the city, all its spoil, you shall take as booty for yourself; and you shall use the spoil of your enemies which the LORD your God has given you.”
15 Thus shalt thou do unto all the cities which are very far off from thee, which are not of the cities of these nations.
16. “Only in the cities of these peoples that the LORD your God is giving you as an inheritance, you shall not leave alive anything that breathes”
17. “But thou shalt utterly destroy them; namely, the Hittites, and the Amorites, the Canaanites, and the Perizzites, the Hivites, and the Jebusites; as the Lord thy God hath commanded thee:”
Here..... This "big talker" is trying to use a literal meaning of this statement…Bukhari (11:626) - [Muhammad said:] "I decided to order a man to lead the prayer and then take a flame to burn all those, who had not left their houses for the prayer, burning them alive inside their homes."
The statement just shows how important prayer is but is never and has never been done to anybody for not attending prayer.
But look at these two statements from the Bible.. I wonder if this Muslim Hating "Power Seller" will also take the literal meaning of this statement:
Exodus 31:12-14
New International Version (NIV)
12. “Then the Lord said to Moses, “
13. “Say to the Israelites, ‘You must observe my Sabbaths. This will be a sign between me and you for the generations to come, so you may know that I am the Lord, who makes you holy.”
14. “Observe the Sabbath, because it is holy to you. Anyone who desecrates it is to be put to death; those who do any work on that day must be cut off from their people.”
Deuteronomy 17:2-5
New International Version (NIV)
2. “If a man or woman living among you in one of the towns the Lord gives you is found doing evil in the eyes of the Lord your God in violation of his covenant,”
3. “and contrary to my command has worshiped other gods, bowing down to them or to the sun or the moon or the stars in the sky,”
4. “and this has been brought to your attention, then you must investigate it thoroughly. If it is true and it has been proved that this detestable thing has been done in Israel,”
5. “take the man or woman who has done this evil deed to your city gate and stone that person to death.”
...................................
Here are some more sacred teachings of the Bible…
Luke 19:26-27
New International Version (NIV)
26. “He replied, ‘I tell you that to everyone who has, more will be given, but as for the one who has nothing, even what they have will be taken away.”
27. “But those enemies of mine who did not want me to be king over them—bring them here and kill them in front of me.”
Matthew 10:34-35
English Standard Version (ESV)
34. “Do not think that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I have not come to bring peace, but a sword.”
35. “For I have come to set a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law.”
Like I said before... if you (the Christians) don't take these verses literally and you have alternate meanings for them (of course),
then why are you taking literal meanings from the Quran to feed your desire to spread blaspheme?
Is that what Christianity teaches you to do?
Finally…
A word of advice to ABA:
Using your company's name and your "Power Seller" status to discriminate against others (for example Muslims)… blatantly spread lies and blaspheme about Islam… categorize all Muslims as potential Terrorists and endorse hatred to an entire people will definitely be very bad for business.
.........................................................................
A True Muslim is never and can never be a Terrorist!
..........................................................................
MG Man wrote:epic kicks in here
ranting christians
ranting muslims
and rocknrolla in the middle babbling like a lunatic on acid
metalgear2095 wrote:Y'all Muslims not ready for Habit at all. He is always clear
RASC wrote:ny local Muslim clerics come out in condemnation of the Kenyan attacks? One of our own were brutally murdered
Another forum member has mentioned that in their mosques people were happy for these attacks to take place? His comments have since been deleted.
Rainman wrote:RASC wrote:ny local Muslim clerics come out in condemnation of the Kenyan attacks? One of our own were brutally murdered
Another forum member has mentioned that in their mosques people were happy for these attacks to take place? His comments have since been deleted.
That's the problem RASC, the so called "peaceful" ones never bat an eye when the radicals murder, torture and terrorize hundreds of innocent people. In the truest sense of the cliched term "the only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing". This is a muslim problem that the muslim world needs to fix.
Both Christianity and Judaism has through periods of revolution and change and have moved away from medieval practices; these aren't the middle ages!! These cowardly towel heads run around killing women and children in the name of so called "religiously legitimized violence" and when it happens the "non-violents" say "oh well, I'm not violent but i can certainly understand why that group of nice men slaughtered innocent women and children in a mall" They spew garbage and then take the ostrich approach.
Habit7 wrote:^^^Only thing I would disagree with 'is that Christianity needed to go through a revolution.'
From inception, Christianity never endorsed violence for the propagation of its message nor does it command its followers to commit any violent acts. The errant actions of those who commit violence in the name of Christianity, are done without its blessings.
Your vegan friend eating KFC doesn't compromise all vegetarians, your friend is just not following the rules of his worldview.
Cid wrote:Habit7 wrote:^^^Only thing I would disagree with 'is that Christianity needed to go through a revolution.'
From inception, Christianity never endorsed violence for the propagation of its message nor does it command its followers to commit any violent acts. The errant actions of those who commit violence in the name of Christianity, are done without its blessings.
Your vegan friend eating KFC doesn't compromise all vegetarians, your friend is just not following the rules of his worldview.
Wow well said, and a very good point...
Can the same be said about muslums?
What separates the terrorists from the others?
Does one group encourage violence and the others just tolerate or ignore it?
What is the general point of view of a devoted muslim?
Habit7 wrote:Cid wrote:Habit7 wrote:^^^Only thing I would disagree with 'is that Christianity needed to go through a revolution.'
From inception, Christianity never endorsed violence for the propagation of its message nor does it command its followers to commit any violent acts. The errant actions of those who commit violence in the name of Christianity, are done without its blessings.
Your vegan friend eating KFC doesn't compromise all vegetarians, your friend is just not following the rules of his worldview.
Wow well said, and a very good point...
Can the same be said about muslums?
What separates the terrorists from the others?
Does one group encourage violence and the others just tolerate or ignore it?
What is the general point of view of a devoted muslim?
Well you need to answer those questions yourself. We have been examining the teachings of the Quran to see if those questions can be answered and to my understanding they clearly have.
Habit7 wrote:New_SPECIES the conquest of Canaan has been hammered out several times in the Religion thread, yet when called to account for the violent commands for Muslims today, you appeal to it.
Habit7 wrote:You quoted Luke 19:26-27 which is part of a parable, and not a historical recount of an event.
...... Even in their literal meaning those verses you quote don’t advocate violence so your point is mute.
Habit7 wrote:...... Even in their literal meaning those verses you quote don’t advocate violence so your point is mute.
Habit7 wrote:But we have a lot more to go by than your own testimony of Islam. We have the history of Muhammad and his several conquests in the name of Islam and the slaughter of disbelievers, we have the history of the caliphs and their conquests.
Rainman wrote:RASC wrote:ny local Muslim clerics come out in condemnation of the Kenyan attacks? One of our own were brutally murdered
Another forum member has mentioned that in their mosques people were happy for these attacks to take place? His comments have since been deleted.
That's the problem RASC, the so called "peaceful" ones never bat an eye when the radicals murder, torture and terrorize hundreds of innocent people. In the truest sense of the cliched term "the only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing". This is a muslim problem that the muslim world needs to fix.
Both Christianity and Judaism has through periods of revolution and change and have moved away from medieval practices; these aren't the middle ages!! These cowardly towel heads run around killing women and children in the name of so called "religiously legitimized violence" and when it happens the "non-violents" say "oh well, I'm not violent but i can certainly understand why that group of nice men slaughtered innocent women and children in a mall" They spew garbage and then take the ostrich approach.
Cid wrote:
How could one book confuse so many people...???
What gives
New_SPECIES wrote:Luke 19:26-27
New International Version (NIV)
26. “He replied, ‘I tell you that to everyone who has, more will be given, but as for the one who has nothing, even what they have will be taken away.”
27. “But those enemies of mine who did not want me to be king over them — bring them here and kill them in front of me.”
Further>>>>>>>>>
28. After Jesus had said this, he went on ahead, going up to Jerusalem.
What you said..... “even if this verse is taken literally, it does not advocate violence”?
Your books said that Jesus instructed others to bring the people that basically didn’t agree with his leadership and KILL THEM in front of him!
That does not implicate violence or dictatorship?
You quoted Luke 19:26-27 which is part of a parable, and not a historical recount of an event.
...... Even in their literal meaning those verses you quote don’t advocate violence so your point is moot.
According to the Dictionary of Bible Themes - The sword as the principal weapon of war (it lists all the different contexts, and under Metaphorical use of the sword) To symbolise judgment Ex 5:3; Mt 10:34 See also Jdg 7:20-22; 2Ch 20:9; Ps 7:12; Isa 31:8; Jer 50:35-37; Eze 11:8-10; Eze 21:3; Eze 33:2New_SPECIES wrote:Matthew 10:34
English Standard Version (ESV)
34. “Do not think that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I have not come to bring peace, but a sword.”BUT literally.... a sword is a sword!Habit7 wrote:...... Even in their literal meaning those verses you quote don’t advocate violence so your point is moot.
So your statement (like all the others that you ‘babbled’) makes no sense!
bluefete wrote:If there are so many religions with so many Gods, how come all humans have the same basic features?
Is it that these Gods got together and agreed on a blueprint?
Or is there really only one true God with the blueprint?
every species has adapted in different ways to survive......its evolution....not a blueprint.
Is Satan a creator or destroyer?
god = good
satan = bad
basics of teaching good from bad....imagine a world where people didnt know what is good from bad. lol
Do truly intelligent people really believe that the building blocks of life came hurtling through the atmosphere on an asteroid/comet from outer space? If so, then aliens must really exist!
yes...that is one theory....but there are many other theories as well.
and yes, chances of life forming on another planet or celestial body is very high.....may not be little green men, it can simply be a single cell creature.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 86 guests