Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
K74T wrote:
Dizzy28 wrote:Never see people so happy to pay more money to somebody else than in the Facebook comments to that story.
Sheep will sheeple
De Dragon wrote:Dizzy28 wrote:Never see people so happy to pay more money to somebody else than in the Facebook comments to that story.
Sheep will sheeple
Wait, the red and ready crew eh reach to extoll their sudden affirmation of the courts and their ruling. All dem imps who was crying it down recently go jump out 'jes now.
Dizzy28 wrote:RedVEVO wrote:88sins wrote:hydroep wrote:What stood out in the Newsday article was the "explain yourself to a court of law" bizness, meaning you'd be forced to retain legal counsel unless you're capable of defending yourself.
They're setting the stage fuh lawyers tuh dig out people eye.
Thats one possibility. not likely, but possible. seems there's more to it than that. but lawyers hadda eat ah food too
so if a female works nowhere, but has a dozen bf's that finance her lifestyle, how they want her to prove she get all she have from takin beat out from all dem different piggy? they want she to call all dem man to show up in court on d same day? is trouble fuh she after. the court accepting used condoms as evidence? that proposed piece of legislation is a joke. It's an outright disregard for people's right to privacy.
buh wait, i now remember, it wasn't too long ago some one of them politicians say that we as citizens have no right to privacy? who say dat again?
.. Faris
And he also say he is a direct descendant from Moses.
Not Moses but Mohammed. Faris say he is a descendant of Mohammed.
toyolink wrote:The recent appeal court allows for voluntary submission of VRF, however no sanctions nor penalties can be attached for non submission (this is therefor a kind of off- the- record thing).
I am still unsure of how Govt plans to proceed with timely implementation since the formal notices of assessment have to determined and properly posted/presented to property/home owners.
This exercise looks like at least 2019.
Are we going to have to pay maybe 4 years property tax in one shot (since retro to 2016).
I would really like to see the Minister's in-house plans to operationalize this thing including deadlines.
De Dragon wrote:Enough dotishee PNM sheep go fill out enough forms to keep dem busy until then![]()
I'm not sure that you can retroactively apply a tax that was not on the statute books and was being challenged in the courts.
88sins wrote:De Dragon wrote:Enough dotishee PNM sheep go fill out enough forms to keep dem busy until then![]()
I'm not sure that you can retroactively apply a tax that was not on the statute books and was being challenged in the courts.
well, sinister clong inbutt did state recently that they'd collected 90k vrf's at one point, and later said they collected an additional 60k forms. He was using these figures to say that ppl want to pay property tax. I seriously doubt they collected even 20k vrf's tho. Politicians around the globe have been known to lie to manipulate people, I seriously doubt those we have here are averse to such tactics.
88sins wrote:De Dragon wrote:Enough dotishee PNM sheep go fill out enough forms to keep dem busy until then![]()
I'm not sure that you can retroactively apply a tax that was not on the statute books and was being challenged in the courts.
well, sinister clong inbutt did state recently that they'd collected 90k vrf's at one point, and later said they collected an additional 60k forms. He was using these figures to say that ppl want to pay property tax. I seriously doubt they collected even 20k vrf's tho. Politicians around the globe have been known to lie to manipulate people, I seriously doubt those we have here are averse to such tactics.
toyolink wrote:I am still unsure of how Govt plans to proceed with timely implementation since the formal notices of assessment have to determined and properly posted/presented to property/home owners.
adnj wrote:toyolink wrote:I am still unsure of how Govt plans to proceed with timely implementation since the formal notices of assessment have to determined and properly posted/presented to property/home owners.
I doubt that there will be a delay. An inferred estimate of the value of a particular home's value based on the square footage and on neighborhood homes is how an evaluation is made in general.
I would expect that a value will be assigned, a tax assessed and the owner mailed a notice.
eliteauto wrote:Surprised at how much the government " can't" do according to some posters. I wonder how much door to door occurred under the land and building taxes?
88sins wrote:eliteauto wrote:Surprised at how much the government " can't" do according to some posters. I wonder how much door to door occurred under the land and building taxes?
Iirc, the old system was based on an assessment that was gathered by using data collected by WASA. Info such as property location, land/building square footage, number of bathrooms, etc. So they had that then.
I got no idea what data they gonna use if nobody gives them any info, since it's all voluntary & no penalty. But I can think of at least 2 places they can get info on properties, but plenty of that data may well be outdated & inaccurate.
The most we can do is wait & watch to see what they try next
RedVEVO wrote:
Where are the 2 places ?
adnj wrote:toyolink wrote:I am still unsure of how Govt plans to proceed with timely implementation since the formal notices of assessment have to determined and properly posted/presented to property/home owners.
I doubt that there will be a delay. An inferred estimate of the value of a particular home's value based on the square footage and on neighborhood homes is how an evaluation is made in general.
I would expect that a value will be assigned, a tax assessed and the owner mailed a notice.
RedVEVO wrote:88sins wrote:De Dragon wrote:Enough dotishee PNM sheep go fill out enough forms to keep dem busy until then![]()
I'm not sure that you can retroactively apply a tax that was not on the statute books and was being challenged in the courts.
well, sinister clong inbutt did state recently that they'd collected 90k vrf's at one point, and later said they collected an additional 60k forms. He was using these figures to say that ppl want to pay property tax. I seriously doubt they collected even 20k vrf's tho. Politicians around the globe have been known to lie to manipulate people, I seriously doubt those we have here are averse to such tactics.
Of course he lie - under Parliament Privilege .
The Bill will go back to Parliament and will need a 2/3 majority vote to pass.
But meanwhile, he will try to raise his $500M in taxes some other way.
Sell Petrotrin . Sell back Clico . Sell Land to squatters . Sell Couva Hospital .
Allow private enterprise to flourish - " the invisible hand "
Again,
Axe the Tax .
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 55 guests