Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
that's my point, videos like these can be easily biased.Habit7 wrote:^^^ Wow that video biased.
3 evolutionary Phds against 1 creationist scientist. Even the Islamic creationist admits he knows nothing of science. The topic of the programme was biased to evolution, the evolutionists got more speaking time, the moderator was overtly biased to evolution (99.9% of scientists are not evolutionists) and the one example of evolution the paleontologist gave at the end doesn't show new genetic information being created (but the moderator shut down the pastor from pointing that out).
abiogenesis and evolution are two completely different things. The theory of evolution says absolutely nothing about the origin of life. Similarly evolution says nothing of Big Bang.Habit7 wrote:Point is, in the scores of pages that have gone on, I have given you evidence for creation and shown how evolution is inconsistent with the model it claims to present. However you have failed to show naturalistic abiogenesis which underpins evolution theory and would out-rightly win the argument anyways.
oh THIS is fact now?Habit7 wrote:Fact is, before God, you and I and moral law violators whom He must judge. Christ is the moral law keeper who died in our place who can take our punishment. His resurrected life will give us His righteousness and eternal life with God. At the end of the day my message is Christ work can only be realised in us when we repent of our sins and believe in Christ as who He said He is. Jesus Christ is the only way to know God.
you said the earth is 6000-12000 years old. that is far from the scientific evidence that the earth is billions of years old. That is why you and other like you who believe that the Bible states the age of the earth are called Young Earth Creationists.Habit7 wrote:My video wasnt biased, it was one creationist asking several evolutionists simple questions like "name one example?"
I am fully aware of what abiogenesis is (I brought it up) but there is no scientific evidence for life coming from none life, none. Without that, the concept of improvement on simple life to more complex life is a faith premise. Proof of a naturalistic abiogenesis would be the biggest proof for evolution, certainly not the fossil record, even Darwin knew the fossil record didnt fully prove his theory.
I never said the earth is ~6000 years old.
Fact:
-you and I and moral law violators
-Christ is the moral law keeper who died
-He resurrected
Faith:
-Repent of your sins
-Trust in Christ as who He said He is
-Jesus Christ is the only way to know God
HOPE4ALL wrote:
oh c'mon, even if you said 20,000 you would be very far off. The tilde is used as "approximately".Habit7 wrote:Unless we have different interpretations of mathematical symbols ~6,000 does not connote a range of 6,000 to 12,000
We have historical evidence that Christ was a moral law keeper and was resurrected, as I have said before, scientific evidence is not the only way to know if something is true.
I never said all of mankind's morality comes from Christianity.
One would think that if what you are saying is correct, then you wouldnt have to manipulate my views to prove show that I am wrong, however it seems you have to.
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:So then the atheists have the same morality as theists?
Do you think some religions have better morals than others?
Habit7 wrote:No
Yes
Habit7 wrote:nareshseep I believe we have been down this road before viewtopic.php?f=4&t=267363&start=12870#p6879135
nareshseep wrote:At the end of it all we are both biased. And no side can be proven.
livewire wrote:I wasn't going to post here but curiosity got the better of me.
Any of you guys in the petroleum industry?
How do you explain fossil fuels?
We know its not from dinosaurs, it is from organic matter even before that time, so how do you explain its existence.
RBphoto wrote:
Evolution.... a mitsucrew person should be able to respect that answer.
livewire wrote:I wasn't going to post here but curiosity got the better of me.
Any of you guys in the petroleum industry?
How do you explain fossil fuels?
We know its not from dinosaurs, it is from organic matter even before that time, so how do you explain its existence.
rocknrolla wrote:livewire wrote:I wasn't going to post here but curiosity got the better of me.
Any of you guys in the petroleum industry?
How do you explain fossil fuels?
We know its not from dinosaurs, it is from organic matter even before that time, so how do you explain its existence.
probably from the various times God claims to have wiped out man for abandoning him. might be the reason we also have to scrape for tablets at ancient sites to try and decode their culture and figure out how the pyramids were built. they were wiped out without a trace. so God has probably been saving the faithful and wiping out the wicked for eons.
proven? What do you need to prove?nareshseep wrote:Habit7 wrote:nareshseep I believe we have been down this road before viewtopic.php?f=4&t=267363&start=12870#p6879135
I hear you but atheism was around way before theism.
Theism stands on the shoulders of atheism and not the other way around.
Believe in all or believe in none. There is no middle ground. When you choose a path you choose the middle ground.
At the end of it all we are both biased. And no side can be proven.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: pugboy and 104 guests